EPTTL Mafia LXI - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 24 2013 04:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote: I am aroundish till 9ish tonight, gone from then till sometime mid thursday afternoon, gone friday morning, gone sat morning and likely all saturday if plans stay as they are, gone sunday morning possibly afternoon/evening. I am busy. Nor should I have to be around to tell people how to make obvious choices. Yamato has done sweet fuck all. He trolled, spewed anti town shite, and only "contributed" when he was close to death. He calls oats scum then blindly comes out of no where and says he doesn't want to off him, says he wants to off ve for voting oats (which was thread sentiment) then attacks me blindly as well. He has done nothing productive. He has done basically nothing useful. The lynch on him vanished for no reason than oats was brought up as a lynch on shitty reasons. Towns need to realize how to step back and think about situations. I've made cases on 3 dudes, 2 of which are very likely mafia. What have you done again? Call me mafia for ONE POST? Lol, no. You're the mafia here, bro. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 24 2013 04:53 Clarity_nl wrote: I didn't not want to lynch him either. It didn't feel right but as hopeless pointed out in the face of dying he was just still being trolly.... you don't do that as town.. Yamato why were you so certain that oats was town, I think you were the only one. It wasn't that you were explaining how he was a bad lynch, you were saying HE IS TOWN OMG IDIOTS. What made you so sure? I posted what made me sure. The lynch was all kinds of wrong, and there was a strong feeling of town Oats coming from his posts. He didn't seem scared to die, he seemed genuine. People got so mad that he was acting silly when they were foaming at the mouth over him when, in reality, that's exactly how Oats plays in any game. But no, let's ignore me, my perfectly good analysis on BC, and let him try to tell people how to play this game from his pulpit of laziness. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
Seriously look at this game. The only argument there USED TO BE against me is that I "wasn't contributing" or whatever, when now, I've contributed more meaningful analysis than almost anyone in the game. Look at BC's filter for yourselves and be amazed at the complete lack of "give-a-shit" you see in his scumhunting. Realize that I'm his ONLY scum read OF THE ENTIRE GAME. Stop listening to him. If Ace is going to be blind to BC, then he might well be mafia, too, for all I know, but don't let them bully you into voting me when the obvious proof is in front of you. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 24 2013 05:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You do realize I've done this exact same thing the last few games I was town? You know, called people out for being mafia via 1 post or general post sentiment. Guess what? ive been shot for it every time and been right for it. Now obviously I could end up being wrong about you. However you have done nothing to sway me in any way that I am wrong in my read. You are not playing in any way I can see that a townie would play in. I will give you credit though, Ace is likely not town. However he is also not likely mafia. And only scum read? Ive listed others. Good try though. You are the only one im pushing You took my post out of context and used it to justify a bullshit push of me as a lynch candidate. That is not good scumhunting, and I will not allow it in my town. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
NEWSFLASH There's a reason I didn't get lynched. It's because town realized that I'm town. LOLOL. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
Your only other scum read is OO, and that's solely based off of his policy stance. ROFL, YEAH, YOU SCUMHUNT GOOD | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 24 2013 05:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: Based on what if i may ask? The fact that he refused to take a real stance on me/Oats and made an "original" case on Sharrant. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 24 2013 05:39 raynpelikoneet wrote: Assuming you are town you know you are town. Oats was town. Those were the two wagons there were at the time. Why would in your opinion mafia!Clarity make a case on Sharrant and not agree with BC/Vivax on the cases (like many other people did)? How is it more beneficial to him, because he know he will be questioned about it? Why not just take an easy way out and vote for one of the townie candidates? Because perhaps he felt it would look "scummy" if he came in and just plopped his vote down on me/Oats, knowing we are both town, when he's been un-involved the whole game. He potentially looks better by "scumhunting" with his case, which has been picked apart endlessly since it was posted. I feel that a town player would more likely than not take a stance on me/Oats, even if it was to say that we were likely town/likely mafia, and then case someone else. Clarity just sort of ignored the both of us, and didn't do a whole lot else. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
The timing and context of it is. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
If anyone is "lynchbait", it's that dude. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
Just for kicks, I'll give you my own subjective analysis of the filter of Sharrant and see what conclusions I can reach about his alignment. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
You seem to be convinced that he's mafia, yet your treatment of Clarity for his case and the way you ask questions about him is very odd. All in all, I'm more likely to think you're mafia out of this than Sharrant. I'm pretty sure Sharrant is town. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 06:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: About Sharrant. Sharrant accuses TRN of things. The case in itself is not scummy and i could see someone seeing TRN's posts in that light, i just don't get the same feeling from TRN's posts. Having played with him on NMXXXIX, i can tell that he has no idea how to act in the start of the game. Here he seems to be trying to figure out things and share his thoughts about stuff he is asked about. Fine, why is Sharrant scummy? - He's discussing the "policy lynch BM" matter but does not reach any kind of a conclusion that points towards this particular situation. - Asks TRN about his last games. It's not TRN's job to find those games to him. It's Sharrant's job to find out TRN's affiliation and TRN wasting time on telling him about his last games is a waste of time that does not help TRN find mafia. Seems like Sharrant is lazy and does not want to find out things on his own. Townies should not do that. This section is particularly telling to me. Your entire play up until this point had been about "policy lynching BM" because you THOUGHT he claimed miller, which was a dumb enough idea anyway. Then, you come up with this read, and that's how this whole thing started. NOW I understand, the read of Sharrant is complete fabrication. Yeah, you're mafia. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
His read on geript seems genuine. Despite the claim, he finds geript scummy, but can't lynch him because of the sentiment that he's town for the host interaction. I like his read on you and how he handled it. I like how he interacted with BM, it seemed honest and a real product of frustration. He also has a scumread on Hopeless. I haven't personally looked at Hopeless, but that's another point in his favor. In the time he has been here, I like Sharrant's contributions, even if he may be wrong about some things. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 24 2013 17:27 raynpelikoneet wrote: Also can you tell me what's irrelevant in this: All of that is petty arguing and has nothing to do with anyone's alignment but yours. | ||
| ||
