• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:46
CEST 10:46
KST 17:46
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202538Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up4LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced55
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up How to leave Master league - bug fix? Serral wins EWC 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Interview with Chris "ChanmanV" Chan
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
How do the new Battle.net ranks translate? Nobody gona talk about this year crazy qualifiers? [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread 9/11 Anniversary Possible Al Qaeda Attack on 9/11 Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 582 users

Boardwalk Empire Mafia: Pick Your Power

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
March 31 2013 07:53 GMT
#71
/in
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 04 2013 03:44 GMT
#144
Pick what you want when you want. By making a list and saying "no townie pick these", all you do is allow mafia to pick up extremely strong roles at the end of the draft. Trying to deny roles by directly assigning specific numbered spots is even worse due to the sheer number of roles that can steal, copy, or redirect. This isn't even considering the fact that there are too many strong mafia roles to deny all of them.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 04 2013 03:53 GMT
#146
Yes.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 04 2013 04:19 GMT
#162
On April 04 2013 13:05 yamato77 wrote:
I kind of like the idea of town "assigning" certain roles to people. I think most of town should be able to agree on 1-2 decent townreads to deny mafia roles with. It's also very hard for mafia to BE a top townread of an entire thread, so there's that.

It does depend somewhat on picking order, and people's compliance with this plan, however. We don't know ho effective it could be, our townreads might be at the bottom of the list where it is too late to make a REAL difference, and the top of the list is all lurkers/null reads.


Lettuce ask a very simple question here. How does one assign a role to a player who could conceivably pick at any spot?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 04 2013 04:23 GMT
#166
On April 04 2013 13:05 Sharrant wrote:
There are 3 roles that can copy or misdirect powers, one is thief and it's already in my list of powers we need to deny. Another is role swapper, and that's not nearly as powerful, and it is entirely possible that it would just act as an extended role block if we can determine who the role swapper is right away. Framer is concerning because it can direct actions, but at worst it means that they get one of the denied roles for as long as the framer can stay alive and untouched by town actions.

The "sheer number" of roles that can steal copy or redirect is exactly 3. 1 of which I say we should deny, another very weak, only one is a credible threat to town in my plan supposing they pick it.



There are several other roles that can cause problems for people who roleclaim, and you would do very well to think about that. You also have not noticed one of the most dangerous combinations in this game that prevents plans like the one you have.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 04 2013 04:42 GMT
#170
On April 04 2013 13:33 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 04 2013 13:23 Shelvocke wrote:
On April 04 2013 13:05 Sharrant wrote:
There are 3 roles that can copy or misdirect powers, one is thief and it's already in my list of powers we need to deny. Another is role swapper, and that's not nearly as powerful, and it is entirely possible that it would just act as an extended role block if we can determine who the role swapper is right away. Framer is concerning because it can direct actions, but at worst it means that they get one of the denied roles for as long as the framer can stay alive and untouched by town actions.

The "sheer number" of roles that can steal copy or redirect is exactly 3. 1 of which I say we should deny, another very weak, only one is a credible threat to town in my plan supposing they pick it.



There are several other roles that can cause problems for people who roleclaim, and you would do very well to think about that. You also have not noticed one of the most dangerous combinations in this game that prevents plans like the one you have.


I'm interested to hear this combination. I can see many ways that scum would be able to kill a player knowing their role.

Yes, having an extractor AND BloodyCobbler would net them 1 kill per cycle extra. But that's for 2 roles, as opposed to having an assassin and saying "green" every single time and getting 1 kill per cycle extra for only a single role.

Now, there are combinations I haven't mentioned because I didn't want to give anyone ideas, if you're thinking of anything involving the politician, there's a good chance I've thought of that as well, there are ways to stop that. But if you think there's something that is specifically of horrendous consequence for this plan, please do elaborate. If this plan is bad I would like you to change my mind, otherwise I would like to change yours.

I'm going to bed now, if I get bored I might wander back and read more, but that's doubtful.

Good night, everyone. I hope you're all as excited for the draft as I am.


As far as I know, that's not how assassin works. It requires the person to either say "Red" or their role name.

I'd rather not share what the combination is, as it's a bit unusual and I doubt if anyone on mafia will be easily able to figure it out. But the fact that I was able to think of it definitely means that someone else might also recognize it.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 04 2013 19:09 GMT
#468
The reason why this plan is awful goes beyond how well you can identify 5 town reads 16 hours in when setup is the only thing to talk about (which is simply pitifully if you arent aware). There is simply no way to force people to pick specific numbers. I wont be following it.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 05 2013 02:17 GMT
#555
[8][2]

How the hell am I below mocsta.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 05 2013 02:18 GMT
#557
oh wait I did [8][1].
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 05 2013 02:32 GMT
#573
Gonzaw, are you still here? I want to speak with you.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 05 2013 02:48 GMT
#582
On April 05 2013 11:37 gonzaw wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 11:32 Shelvocke wrote:
Gonzaw, are you still here? I want to speak with you.


Depends
I have some other shit to do now, on top of figuring out what other role to get that's not boring as fuck or turns me into VT


Want to talk to me about your "hidden gut scumread"?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 05 2013 03:01 GMT
#595
On April 05 2013 11:51 gonzaw wrote:
Patience my little birds, patience.

There was little content this drafting phase, I have to wait a little bit to see how this person picks his game up when it starts to matter and how he does it.
It's also a gut feeling in some way, so I have to develop it a little bit better.

Also, chose my role
S&B you can get the inventor I guess goddamit > : (


Is it strongandbig?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 05 2013 20:10 GMT
#841
On April 06 2013 00:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
I just woke up and I have a fucking crazy idea.

What if everyone who picks KP roles promises not to use them? I was looking at the role list and it seems that scum KP is fixed at 1? So it seems like scum will be focusing on trying to increase their KP (in a game this size).

What if we all just don't use KP roles and lynch the fucking piss out of anyone who does? I mean obviously scum aren't going to claim if/when they do, but if we can get townies into the KP roles this would be a really good way to try and limit mafia KP.


^Mafia

He's either not reading the thread at all or he's trying to fake a contribution as the idea that he brings up is one that has been repeated by a bunch of other players and is crap anyway. Additionally, VisceraEyes is known for taking ridiculous shots himself and doing whatever he feels like as town so it's very out of character for him to suggest that these types of players should be auto-lynched.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 06 2013 20:55 GMT
#1119
If VE isn't going to play, we kill him. He hasn't done anything to suggest that he is town and is avoiding discussing anything of value.

##Vote VisceraEyes

strongandbig also looks very likely to be mafia. In particular the fact that he considered the number picking strategy to be extremely important but then failed to provide any original thoughts is very suspect. He also seemed very concerned in his pregame posts about roles but didn't provide any insight about them after the game started.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 06 2013 21:16 GMT
#1122
Not number picking, role picking my mistake. All of your posts during signups are about roles and thinking about them but you don't seem interested in sharing much insight once the game actually starts.

I've already talked about VE earlier, and he has not done anything since then to change my mind. You don't consider telling people to lynch him refusing to play?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 06 2013 21:44 GMT
#1129
On April 07 2013 06:40 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 06:36 geript wrote:
On April 07 2013 06:35 Ghor wrote:
Can everyone put the numbers he sent to the hosts into his signature so I can rebuild the list without digging for needles in the haystack? There is no need for you to keep them secret if you are town.

Stop this. The time for doing this is over. There is no reason to suspect people solely based off of the numbers they supposedly picked. Don't waste anyone's time with bull like that.


No, two scum won't pick the same numbers ever. It's valuable information. Unless you can give rational explanation you have no argument and only want to keep us in the dark.


In Pick Your Power Insane, three mafia all picked the same first number. It's not a valid argument.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 06 2013 22:03 GMT
#1134
What about the case on Restraining Order did you like?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 06 2013 22:42 GMT
#1144
On April 07 2013 07:16 Vivax wrote:
Shelvocke what do you dislike about VE's case? Can you tell me your draft pick?


A lot of the points that he came up with, especially the "lol list scum" and the part about explaining why denying isn't a good strategy have nothing to do with Order's alignment and it appears as if he threw them in solely to inflate his post and make it look as if he is doing something.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 07 2013 05:56 GMT
#1239
On April 07 2013 11:43 austinmcc wrote:
I'm actually really digging that Shelvocke read. Yes, most of the posts are worthless, but the VE vote feels weak as well.

Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 05:10 Shelvocke wrote:
On April 06 2013 00:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
I just woke up and I have a fucking crazy idea.

What if everyone who picks KP roles promises not to use them? I was looking at the role list and it seems that scum KP is fixed at 1? So it seems like scum will be focusing on trying to increase their KP (in a game this size).

What if we all just don't use KP roles and lynch the fucking piss out of anyone who does? I mean obviously scum aren't going to claim if/when they do, but if we can get townies into the KP roles this would be a really good way to try and limit mafia KP.


^Mafia

He's either not reading the thread at all or he's trying to fake a contribution as the idea that he brings up is one that has been repeated by a bunch of other players and is crap anyway. Additionally, VisceraEyes is known for taking ridiculous shots himself and doing whatever he feels like as town so it's very out of character for him to suggest that these types of players should be auto-lynched.
VE isn't reading/is faking a contribution. This can be scummy, but at this point in the game there are A LOT of players who fit that criteria. The second bit, VE being...hypocritical because he often is ridiculous and is suggesting people not be ridiculous is just dumb. I'm often an idiot. I don't suggest other people are. Some players are confusing/lurky, they don't suggest that other people be confusing/lurky. Heck, the VE personality in Personality 2 just poked at VE's claiming, which, if anything, should reinforce the idea that VE might not recommend to others that they play how he has in certain past games.

Half that two sentence read is just...badwrong. The other half is true of a number of players, with no reason given why VE is singled out.


It's not about VE not recommending how he plays to others. I would understand if he just said the "hold off on kp". It's about the fact that he takes an aspect of play that is much more associated with town players (being rash with KP) and something that he does himself so frequently and says that these players should be auto-lynched. He should be well aware that town players are the ones who fall into stuff like that after being lynched himself so much for things like that. I don't see any town motivations behind his attitude there.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 07 2013 05:59 GMT
#1243
Does anyone have a mafia game for rayn? Mocsta, I'm not whoever you think I am.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 07 2013 06:33 GMT
#1254
On April 07 2013 15:00 Keirathi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 14:59 Shelvocke wrote:
Does anyone have a mafia game for rayn? Mocsta, I'm not whoever you think I am.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=402424&user=27448&currentpage=All


I don't really think rayn is mafia. His play does look different from those town quotes you had, but it doesn't look like that mafia game either. The only part of that game where he just suddenly jumps is the part where he votes for Krefla and even then he has a reason because Krefla just came in right before the deadline. The fact that he seems a lot more impulsive in this game than he has been before is something that points to him being town. I feel he would be a lot more careful and safe as mafia. The plan switch looks kind of strange, but his overall attitude makes him more likely town.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 07 2013 06:39 GMT
#1256
What do you mean? He seems to jump around based on what's going on in the thread.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 07 2013 06:52 GMT
#1260
On April 07 2013 15:44 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 15:39 Shelvocke wrote:
What do you mean? He seems to jump around based on what's going on in the thread.

Thank you. so impulsive is then defined as: in response to others; rather than in creating new ideas.

I dont see what is townie about that. Scum can be equally impulsive in regards to thread sentiment.

However, I dont particularly care about the action itself:

do you think his motives for "jumping around" is founded upon processing new information to update the conclusion?


I get what you're saying, but I've never seen a new mafia player be so crazy. I don't really understand the reasons for some of the stuff he does but it seems to me that he sees one post and then just makes up his mind based on that. Usually new mafia are much more safe and concerned about their appearance. It's possible he's some kind of mafia gosu but frankly that's not the impression I get from him.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 07 2013 22:38 GMT
#1444
I like gonzaw's case. Artanis's stuff on geript does looks unnecessarily agressive and fake. I'm voting for him.

##Vote Artanis[Xp]
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 07 2013 22:52 GMT
#1447
Austin, what is your point? Do you actually think that me having different expectations for VE and strongandbig and people not talking about me are good reasons to think that I'm mafia? Like right now I'm resisting the urge to call you a tunneling moron so much, it's not even funny.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 07 2013 23:23 GMT
#1457
On April 08 2013 08:02 austinmcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 07:52 Shelvocke wrote:
Austin, what is your point? Do you actually think that me having different expectations for VE and strongandbig and people not talking about me are good reasons to think that I'm mafia? Like right now I'm resisting the urge to call you a tunneling moron so much, it's not even funny.
Nope. I think you're the towniest mofo here.

Wait, that's wrong. My point is that I think you're mafia.

You're following thread by mainly providing minor comments on side issues.

I dislike your reason for thinking VE is mafia, but you put it in thread, and me disagreeing with your analysis doesn't make you mafia.

But you vote him without saying anything about what he said or anyone said about him over a 24 hour period, while reading thread enough to comment on snb and to say later that VE was asking to be lynched. Your scumread, your vote, seems less important to you than he should be, because instead of commenting on him over that 24 hour period you comment on snb.

Your read on snb is fluffy. No posts. No follow-up. Poking gonzaw earlier about snb, so apparently you've been somewhat focused on snb, but two dinky little lines are all you've got about snb? Not buying.

Right now I AM tunneling you. I'll address that later.



Here, since you're around:

(1) Do you continue to to find snb scummy? Can you give me less-fluffy reasons for that read?
(2) Do you agree with Gonzaw that you were discussed/suspicified earlier in the game/moreso than Artanis was? If you don't, does that affect your Gonzaw read?
(3) How do you feel about any two of the following: mocsta, keirathi, sinani?


1. I'm leaning mafia. I have no way of knowing whether he's actually busy or not so I'm just disregarding that part. He definitely looks more concerned about what's going on right now but I get the impression when I read that larger post of his that he is kind of just going through the motions; he picks out a bunch of random posts and just drops a short remark on them. It doesn't feel natural.

2. I have no idea and I don't care about this.

3. Mocsta and Keirathi both look town to me. I don't think they're correct about rayn but they seemed to legitimately believe that he was mafia.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 08 2013 07:05 GMT
#1610
On April 08 2013 09:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 09:36 Mocsta wrote:
On April 08 2013 08:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On April 08 2013 08:23 Shelvocke wrote:

3. Mocsta and Keirathi both look town to me. I don't think they're correct about rayn but they seemed to legitimately believe that he was mafia.

Elaborate please?

Do you think I was chasing you for funsies the other day?

I dont think you scum anymore.. i just think your bad town

But conviction was there, and I think Shevlocke comment was fair (regarding me at least)

No. I want to know why Shelvocke thinks i'm town.


Read my filter: + Show Spoiler +
On April 07 2013 15:33 Shelvocke wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 15:00 Keirathi wrote:
On April 07 2013 14:59 Shelvocke wrote:
Does anyone have a mafia game for rayn? Mocsta, I'm not whoever you think I am.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=402424&user=27448&currentpage=All


I don't really think rayn is mafia. His play does look different from those town quotes you had, but it doesn't look like that mafia game either. The only part of that game where he just suddenly jumps is the part where he votes for Krefla and even then he has a reason because Krefla just came in right before the deadline. The fact that he seems a lot more impulsive in this game than he has been before is something that points to him being town. I feel he would be a lot more careful and safe as mafia. The plan switch looks kind of strange, but his overall attitude makes him more likely town.

On April 07 2013 15:52 Shelvocke wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 15:44 Mocsta wrote:
On April 07 2013 15:39 Shelvocke wrote:
What do you mean? He seems to jump around based on what's going on in the thread.

Thank you. so impulsive is then defined as: in response to others; rather than in creating new ideas.

I dont see what is townie about that. Scum can be equally impulsive in regards to thread sentiment.

However, I dont particularly care about the action itself:

do you think his motives for "jumping around" is founded upon processing new information to update the conclusion?


I get what you're saying, but I've never seen a new mafia player be so crazy. I don't really understand the reasons for some of the stuff he does but it seems to me that he sees one post and then just makes up his mind based on that. Usually new mafia are much more safe and concerned about their appearance. It's possible he's some kind of mafia gosu but frankly that's not the impression I get from him.




Something about this situation really strikes me the wrong way. There was still plenty of time left in the day and an Artanis lynch was nowhere certain. Like shooting gonzaw pretty much guarantees an Artanis lynch and I can't think of a good reason for mafia to do that if Artanis is mafia. I'm rereading the thread right now. Not entirely sure who to kill right now, but it's not Artanis.

##Unvote
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 08 2013 07:13 GMT
#1611
VE, what's your first reaction when you read these posts?

On April 08 2013 12:33 yamato77 wrote:
Now we definitely kill the Artanis.


On April 08 2013 13:13 yamato77 wrote:
It doesn't matter what killed him, it matters why.

Gonzaw was killed because he was obviously town and people were forming around him. What did he advocate? Killing artanis. Let's murder him.

Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 08 2013 07:57 GMT
#1615
I'm asking VE because I want to hear from him and because he has personal experience with this kind of thing.

Did you shoot gonzaw, yamato?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 08 2013 08:18 GMT
#1617
I think yamato shot gonzaw. I can't prove it, but it's the explanation that makes best sense to me right now going by people's reactions. I'm not entirely sure if he's the kind of person who would do that as town, but just skimming through the last normalish town game of his (Town Aint Big Mafia), I think it's entirely possible. Going to sleep on this, but that's where I'm at right now.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 08 2013 18:54 GMT
#1791
I'm good with a VE lynch. I can't really figure out the gonzaw shot but I guess it doesn't really matter. If Artanis flips town, then it was a mafia shot. If he's mafia, probably a town shot.

##Vote VisceraEyes
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 08 2013 18:58 GMT
#1792
On April 09 2013 03:53 Keirathi wrote:
With geript claiming that NRA was taken already b spot 6, VE is a valid option for having chosen it (Shelvocke too, since he's obviously a smurf of someone who is at least familiar with older games).


What?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 08 2013 19:15 GMT
#1814
Rofl. Double lynch Caller?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 09 2013 03:10 GMT
#2020
Hey Keirathi. I'm not going to ask you again - why were you trying to say I could be the NRA member?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 09 2013 03:16 GMT
#2024
On April 09 2013 12:13 yamato77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2013 12:10 Shelvocke wrote:
Hey Keirathi. I'm not going to ask you again - why were you trying to say I could be the NRA member?

Why did you say that I shot gonzaw?

Still have yet to justify that.


Because you didn't have any uncertainty after the shot, you just went straight for saying this definitely means we need to kill artanis.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 09 2013 03:19 GMT
#2026
What does that mean?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 09 2013 03:22 GMT
#2028
You know what your reaction reminded me of yamato? It reminded me of this:

On August 24 2012 02:03 VisceraEyes wrote:
What in the...was that shot not claimed AGAIN? Scum must really be getting desperate.

Was that a blue flip? It looked like it, but everything has been colored blue so I wanted to make sure...

I'm down with a Wiggles lynch guys. BC died trying to get Wiggles lynched, and I think we should oblige him.

##Vote: Wiggles


On August 28 2012 05:54 VisceraEyes wrote:
I killed BC. Would scum tell you that?

Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 09 2013 03:27 GMT
#2031
Yes well at the time, that's what it looked like to me.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 10 2013 03:26 GMT
#2281
[image loading]

I talk with my guns.

##Kill Meapak_Ziph
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 10 2013 03:29 GMT
#2285
On April 10 2013 12:25 Bill Murray wrote:
I killed Caller btw


Why?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 10 2013 03:43 GMT
#2315
I have no idea what the fuck BM is saying.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 10 2013 05:39 GMT
#2374
My shot was fake. MZ is confirmed mafia, though

He came back and didn't give any reads or say anything of value, even though he thought he was going to die.

##Vote Meapak_Ziph
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 10 2013 05:45 GMT
#2377
On April 10 2013 14:41 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2013 14:39 Shelvocke wrote:
My shot was fake. MZ is confirmed mafia, though

He came back and didn't give any reads or say anything of value, even though he thought he was going to die.

##Vote Meapak_Ziph

What?

Dude sounded like he was about to have an aneurism and had to step away. He probably can't even sleep at this point if he went to try.


No, Meapak is normally active during this time. Think about reactions. What's a town player's first reaction when they know they're going to die? They try to spill everything they can think of, all their reads, who to lynch, who they think is town.

Meapak didn't do that. Instead he was just like oh I'm going to die. He didn't want to give up any information.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 10 2013 05:53 GMT
#2379
What on earth are you talking about. A day vig shot is instant. Are you reading this thread? Did you see this post:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18251526

Did you read MZ after that? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18251819
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 11 2013 04:41 GMT
#2728
On April 10 2013 17:37 Keirathi wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

Also, as an aside:

Pretty sure Sharrant is scum.

Look at these posts:

On April 07 2013 06:43 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 04:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Whatever. Kill me then. I can't hunt scum while not a single person in the entire game is taking me seriously.

##Vote: RestrainingOrder


Hi, Viscera.
I'm pretty much null on your actions, so I want you to help me. Now, the reason I'm null on you is because I know I can't read you. Last game we played I thought I had a slam dunk case on you, and you were town.

Now I might be reaching with this, but I want you to help me talk about Keirathi. See, just a short while ago there was talk about why Keirathi was scum, I think there're some really valid points in there. And I think a few others saw it too, but then suddenly the town was dragged off of this and into a spammy little brawl focused on antogonizing you and painting you as scum. Maybe you're scum, maybe you're not, but the way the thread has turned suggests to me you're not.

This feels more to me like you're getting attacked the same way that caused Marvellosity to explode when he was town in a recent game. So I want you to talk to me about Keirathi, who after being called out has dissapeared after the cases on him, and I just want your opinion on Rayne because frankly I'm not quite sure how to read him.

Do you think this could be mafia Keirathi's team trying to drag the town away from him after he got caught by causing a spammy mess on day 1? Do you think this is more likely town getting in an argument that is not indicative of Keirathi's alignment? And then your opinion on Keirathi himself and Rayne would be great., thank you.


In the pre-game. I think he was actually trying here to do what he claimed was happening with me. I think he was trying to draw attention away from VE and give VE and out by pushing sentiment back towards me.

On April 08 2013 09:46 Sharrant wrote:
Well, I can't think of anyone who commented on my Keirathi case, but here's an update for no one.

+ Show Spoiler +

He's off my scum list after these posts. They look much more like his town games. In his scum games he's more political in his posts. In his two scum games he's had disagreements but always contested things conservatively, compared to his town games like Red where he called bullshit twenty or so times on the first day.
On April 07 2013 14:57 Keirathi wrote:
EBWOP:

Oh, what the fuck.

Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 14:48 sinani206 wrote:
StrongandBig: Actually looks like he could be scum. Playing very differently than he did in RTP and I agree with the cases made on him. He seems to be playing a typical earlygame conservative scum strategy, skirting discussion and leading people in the wrong direction. I'll slap my vote on him for now.


Explain the bolded. Because it sounds like made up bullshit.



On April 07 2013 15:28 Keirathi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 15:09 geript wrote:
Honestly Keirathi, I don't feel great about Rayn, but I don't want to put too much stock in a meta read from one game especially when I don't know much of anything about Rayn. I could see someone going for a plan that puts them early in the draft order regardless of alignment.

As for S&B I'd like to hear his response, but I like your points about how he seems to find the draft/picking phase important but doesn't actually contribute anything to them at all.

So go look at his filters from past games. Dismissing a meta read because you're too lazy to look at the meta yourself is just...wtfboggle.

And my point wasn't that he was just pushing a plan to get himself high in the draft order. Yes, a townie could do that too. What I don't think a townie would do is specifically say that one plan was undeniably the best plan for town, the immediately flip flop on it and say that its a bad plan now, just because a new plan came up that benefits himself more. He's putting himself above the town as a whole; suddenly and for not much reason. (Which I also contend is completely different from what town rayn just did last game.)

On April 08 2013 07:54 Keirathi wrote:
@rayn: good, you're back

First: ##Unvote

Now, let's talk a bit:

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1) How much time i devote to the game depends on how much time i have available. I have not ahd much time this weekend.

What are you defending here? WHY are you defensive? I didn't call you out for lurking/not contributing/whatever. Weird opening statement.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
How i play also depends on the setup. It's very different when everyone is vanilla or when everyone has roles. You are making a meta case and later on you say you are not even sure about my meta. How do you think anyone is going to believe you if you are not sure yourself?

You're right to an extent. I said that I hadn't read your scum meta. But everything about your play has been so glaringly different from the way you JUST played as town. Why? "Because the game is different" isn't an excuse for thinking and behaving completely differently.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
2) That's bullshit. I never said "abandon Geript's plan, it's dumb". I wanted to implement Geript's + Vivax's plan and use them both. Here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=403766&currentpage=19#362
I don't know why you even bring something this ridiculous up..

You didn't specifically call it dumb. I was...paraphrasing, a bit. And that post you just linked came before the post where I said you were calling geript's plan dumb, which is even weirder.

Let's look at the progression, exactly:

Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 02:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On April 05 2013 01:20 geript wrote:
New plan: Instead of having a set 'draft list' in that say people drafting from 1-4 need to choose from a list of ABCD roles. People drafting from 5-8 need to draft from a list of EFGH, etc. etc. This makes it very risky for Scum to draft both outside of their own list and inside of their own list.

This is absolytely the best plan and the only one i'm going to support. We just need to find out what the roles are that we put to 1-4, 5-8, etc.

Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 02:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I also support Vivax' idea if i get to be #1, Geript #2, and yamato, Mocsta, Sharrant #3-#5.

Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 02:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Combine Vivax' + Geript's ideas and let these guys pick [1][1], [2][1], [3][1], [4][1], [5][1] (everyone else picks [6->] [X]):

Then:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 03:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don't think the players who are going to pick first should be limited to X number of roles.


geript's plan was exactly that: the people in the first 4 slots (aka pod, in this case) would be limited to a certain pod of picks. You said that was unarguably the best plan for town. Then changed your mind and are saying it's a bad plan. That's what I was getting at, here.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
There is no reason to push any plans further when people reacted to any plans like they did. 3/4 of the people said "fuck all the plans", "i'm gonna do whatever they want so fu" or "it takes all the fun out of the game". What's the point of discussing any plans further when you already know it's not gonna happen anyways? At least i fucking provided a plan that had four town reads in it for people to discuss but no.. Everyone just hopped right over that part..

Ugh, I hate this kind of excuse. "No one else was doing anything, so I refuse to do anything too!"

YOU were the one saying that the top picks needed some kind of cooperation. Why didn't you try to get any? You just got your top pick, and buggered off.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
TLDR;
- Strange reads with no progression or reasoning - maybe you should have asked me about those reads then if you do not know where my head is at. Now you are just calling me scum because you think i have not reasoned my reads well enough yet you have had no intention to even find out why my reads are what they are.

It's not my job to find out why you spew out bullshit reads with no explanation. The onus is on you to explain yourself. But again, that isn't even my point AT ALL. My entire point was that the way you are acquiring those reads is entirely inconsistent with how you acquired reads in Red Team. In Red Team, you saw something you didn't like, and either made a case right there, or you started poking and prodding at the person, questioning them and their motives. This game you just drop a name. Why so different?

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
- uncooperative - I see myself being the most cooperative peron before we got our roles. there are a lot of people who are way more uncooperative. After the roles were out i have had basically no time to think about the game, but that's gonna change now.

Again, missed the whole point. You said that the top picks needed to be cooperative with picking powerful roles/denying scum roles. But didn't try to cooperate at all with the top picks once the draft order came out.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
- excessive posturing to attempt to get himself in the top picks - rofl, why wouldn't you want to be #1 person picking? How is this alignment indicative at all? Actually, scum would more likely try to avoid being the #1 picker because that automatically gives you a lot of attention and less chances to fakeclaim later if needed. Also the top guys are gonna get killed anyways early on as they probably have the "best" roles in the game. If they do not die it brings more attention to them.

I already addressed that.

No, trying to get yourself in a top pick isn't scummy, in itself. Rapidly changing your mind to a plan that benefits you more, personally, than town, and then refusing to back up your opinions on cooperating with the other top picks is scummy, though.

I'm looking forward to seeing what you contribute today, though. Hopefully you can change my mind.



##Unvote: Keirathi

Regarding Artanis I'm going to do some more reading tonight, but he has some posts that I find quite townie. I think they show that he is trying to contribute, as well as a clear thought process in attempting to help the town determine what is best in the draft phase.

Show nested quote +
On April 04 2013 17:45 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
So if I'm getting things right we plan on giving strong town reads effectively VT roles, correct? Though the idea of stopping strong scum roles is appealing, there are a myriad of strong roles in the game and I don't think sacrificing strong townreads that can pick early (and therefore are unlikely to be blocked by anyone) VT roles just to stop scum from picking certain roles is good.
1. They'll know exactly what X players before them picked so they can dodge roles that would otherwise make them VT.
2. Strong townreads end up with a public VT role rather than being able to help town beyond their scumhunting.
3. The townVT to scumVT balance will shift heavily in scum's favour
4. If there's scum before the last strong townread assigned to a scumrole, it could easily be sniped anyway.
I think it's best if everyone hides their picks since it'll give scum the least amount of information and prevent them from having safe picks.


Gives critical input on a plan as opposed to negative input, and has his first iteration of a plan: Everyone pick as discretely as possible.

Show nested quote +
On April 04 2013 18:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I have a better plan for the Yamato plan, if you do decide to go through with it. If we have people that look suffeciently town, are early in the list and are willing to follow the plan, they could RNG between blocking a role and taking a 'real' role themselves without revealing which one they'd want to pick. It would create a risk too great for scum to pick that role unless they're going to WIFOM about if the town player would actually do it or not, and it'd give a 50% shot for the town player to actually still get a useful role. It's less certain than the Yamato plan but I think it puts town in a better position. It could have the same net effect yet have a higher chance for town to get more blues.


Again giving critical input and creating a new plan, or at the very least a new iteration in Yamato's plan.

Show nested quote +
On April 04 2013 22:42 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On April 04 2013 18:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I have a better plan for the Yamato plan, if you do decide to go through with it. If we have people that look suffeciently town, are early in the list and are willing to follow the plan, they could RNG between blocking a role and taking a 'real' role themselves without revealing which one they'd want to pick. It would create a risk too great for scum to pick that role unless they're going to WIFOM about if the town player would actually do it or not, and it'd give a 50% shot for the town player to actually still get a useful role. It's less certain than the Yamato plan but I think it puts town in a better position. It could have the same net effect yet have a higher chance for town to get more blues.

No one's actually addressed this yet, especially Yamato which I find strange as it's an improvement upon his plan. I'd propose we use it for 2 roles at the most though. Past that, it just becomes too unreliable.

I don't like the VT claiming idea. Players that ended up with a VT role are still important to town in one way: Taking hits that would otherwise land on blues. I don't think the info gained on roles is worth this downside. There might be exceptions in certain situations (such as a player high up in the list claiming VT when he tried to pick a scummy role), but as the norm I'd be against it.


Brings up his idea again, stating he believes it's an improvement to the plan, and again is applying critical thinking about the picking strategies that others are proposing. I don't see this as "hiding in set up speculation" I see this as someone applying critical thought as to how the town can start the game off with the most advantageous, and start the mafia off with the least.

Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 08:21 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
The accountability is a good point actually, I hadn't thought about that yet. Hm. Still think it's better than doing nothing at all though since without any rules at all there's no accountability anyway.
Will sleep on it.


He takes criticism on his plan well, says he'll take time to think about it. To me it reads really townie,especially because of a later post where he brings up that the route town was going had no accountability. His posts to me show the thought process of someone trying to min/max the drafting system, and follows a plausible planning process.


As I said earlier, I'll take a further look into him, and read the cases more thoroughly, but to me he reads as at least decently townie.


I'm going to post this now, I'll be reading and writing for a (hopefully) larger post, so if anyone else is going to be on for a bit, let's chat about someone, I'll even let you pick who.


Deflecting away from Artanis.

On April 08 2013 11:21 Sharrant wrote:
@StrongandBig
Hi!

I'll try and give you a sort of stream of consciousness on this one, and hopefully that will actually help me figure out where I stand on him. I've read through his filter a few times and I always notice things that send me in opposite directions on his alignment.

+ Show Spoiler +

On April 05 2013 13:25 ObviousOne wrote:
Okay duders, raid night is over. Going for a quick re-read of the past half day after I post this since I've been tabbing out to catch what I could during down time.

First impressions:

I saw that Oats is/was under some suspicion (just going from memory, don't recall if it was talked out or not) but Oats is Oats; he's a bit all over the place but I don't see the same intent to shut things down that someone mentioned earlier. He was just as loud and all-over in RED. Null still.

RO seems to want to be more helpful than I remember him being as scum in LX, not feeling what you guys that are suspicious of him are feeling there, either.

Got my eye on Rayn at the moment. His style was spammy but usually constructive (at least in telling us what he was thinking) and I've got none of that after the first couple pages of his filter. Ten one-liners in a row or something, doesn't match up to his standard attacking pattern from RED. The attacks there were thought-out, here they mostly look like casual accusations perhaps fishing for reactions? The only points he has going for him is that he's absolutely confused about what is going on regarding the draft process:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 12:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Should we have our roles by now?

Rayn, if you are serious about RO being scum then lay if out for me in one clean concise post, and if you are not, who are you most suspicious of right now? Or are you just drunk again?



Other stuff:
Most of the chat was about planning how to set up the top spots to get roles protected, is that still a thing? I'm spot 2 somehow, and I was thinking about taking America because America, fuck yeah! Is that going to make me a Pariah or something? Girls just wanna have fun, you know? I'll use it as a second lynch like was suggested yesterday or I can just sit on it if you guys are paranoid about it.

Going back for that re-read and making some coffee. See you in a bit when I'm finished with that.

PS: Seriously guys, the spam, cut it out, I decided to avoid large games because of the sheer volume of posts so please be less liberal with one-liners, thank you!



This post felt very airy, it certainly felt to me like a post that was primarily summation. There are some good questions in there, but there's no hard stances. The closest he comes to that is that he says he's got his eye on Rayn, but then never specifically says he was scummy. Points out he doesn't give fit his previous town meta, but then he gives him an out on it anyways saying that he might be fishing for reactions.


I actually noticed something that really has me leaning towards scum on him now. He makes 2 posts specifically stating for people not to spam, and has several posts insulting BM for making small spammy posts with no content. I read this as townie when I first skimmed through his filter, but looking at it again There's something very wrong.

+ Show Spoiler +

On April 05 2013 13:25 ObviousOne wrote:.

PS: Seriously guys, the spam, cut it out, I decided to avoid large games because of the sheer volume of posts so please be less liberal with one-liners, thank you!


On April 06 2013 13:26 ObviousOne wrote:
... Bill we went over this about the spamming -- you've got ~14 posts on this page alone.

Summarize your VE meta and compare it to this game and show me how he's so definitively town. In one post.


On April 06 2013 12:16 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 12:13 Bill Murray wrote:
On April 06 2013 12:11 deconduo wrote:
On April 06 2013 12:01 Bill Murray wrote:
On April 06 2013 11:51 deconduo wrote:
On April 06 2013 11:43 Bill Murray wrote:
DECONDUO
WHAT ARE YOUR READS ON WHO ARE WHAT?

Palmar is afk, but that's normal.
FoS Deconduo


On April 05 2013 01:29 Palmar wrote:
I always suck at PYP games because I find the role discussion so boring I skip it.



PTP 1: 3 posts before Day 1
PTP 2: 8 posts before Day 1
PYP Redux: 7 posts before Day 1
PYP Boardwalk: 18 posts before Day 1

Unless you're saying he's less afk than normal, I don't know why you think I'm wrong.

well i guess he doesnt play like me anymore

You say that like it's a bad thing.



Look at his posts:

+ Show Spoiler +
On April 06 2013 10:03 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 09:59 Restraining Order wrote:
In fact, I'm just going to quote myself on this matter.
On April 05 2013 11:30 Restraining Order wrote:
Pick assassin and try to kill me with please.

That way I don't actually die to your stupidity.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'll stop reading your posts henceforth.

Wouldn't be a problem if you'd actually think I'm mafia

I'll indulge your soft town claim for a moment and simply ask you why your list contains 9 people. If you can justify all 9 in some way at least we'll know whether or not you're talking the breeze with these myriad suspicions.


On April 06 2013 10:03 ObviousOne wrote:
EBWOP: Oops, looks like I miscounted, make that 10.


On April 06 2013 10:08 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 10:06 Restraining Order wrote:
On April 06 2013 10:03 ObviousOne wrote:
EBWOP: Oops, looks like I miscounted, make that 10.

No, it's 9.

I have no idea where VE got the Caller thing from, and it's sad you just take his word.

If I've misread it please tell me how. It won't be the first time. I spent like 24 hours in Fruity misreading every little thing so just straighten me out instead of spitting in my face, thx.


On April 06 2013 10:09 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 10:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Actually I misread the quote-pyramid. He was saying he wanted to lynch Kier when I thought he was replying to Caller. My mistake.

....


On April 06 2013 11:28 ObviousOne wrote:
WTF are all these random ass reads BM? Is this what you always do?


On April 06 2013 11:38 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 11:37 Bill Murray wrote:
youre rightabout that

RIGHT ABOUT WHAT PLEASE TYPE MORE JESUS FUCK


On April 06 2013 12:16 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 12:13 Bill Murray wrote:
On April 06 2013 12:11 deconduo wrote:
On April 06 2013 12:01 Bill Murray wrote:
On April 06 2013 11:51 deconduo wrote:
On April 06 2013 11:43 Bill Murray wrote:
DECONDUO
WHAT ARE YOUR READS ON WHO ARE WHAT?

Palmar is afk, but that's normal.
FoS Deconduo


On April 05 2013 01:29 Palmar wrote:
I always suck at PYP games because I find the role discussion so boring I skip it.



PTP 1: 3 posts before Day 1
PTP 2: 8 posts before Day 1
PYP Redux: 7 posts before Day 1
PYP Boardwalk: 18 posts before Day 1

Unless you're saying he's less afk than normal, I don't know why you think I'm wrong.

well i guess he doesnt play like me anymore

You say that like it's a bad thing.


On April 06 2013 13:26 ObviousOne wrote:
... Bill we went over this about the spamming -- you've got ~14 posts on this page alone.

Summarize your VE meta and compare it to this game and show me how he's so definitively town. In one post.


On April 06 2013 13:29 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 13:26 ObviousOne wrote:
... Bill we went over this about the spamming -- you've got ~14 posts on this page alone.

Summarize your VE meta and compare it to this game and show me how he's so definitively town. In one post.

Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 13:26 Bill Murray wrote:
meta

Okay I'm laughing my ass off at this but really, three dot points or something. Substance, please.

Who do you want to lynch D1?


On April 06 2013 13:52 ObviousOne wrote:
... not sure what to make of this but way to leave yourself open to accusations of a scum slip. Wow that's really bad looking.
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 13:37 geript wrote:
I figured out why I don't like the case on RestrainingOrder at all. In The Game, I got to watch both Bugs and Kita push absolute bullshit towards town's direct. It was well crafted bullshit, but bullshit none the less. VE's case is an exact example of this type of thing for a few reasons:
1. The townread/lynch stuff + Show Spoiler +
On April 06 2013 09:42 VisceraEyes wrote:
So RO wants to lynch inside [Caller, Palmar, Decon, VE, Kierathi, Artanis, austin, OO, Vivax, sn0] before D1 starts. That's cool I guess, but some of those names sound familiar. Where have I seen those names before?
...
Oh that's right. In that OTHER post where he made a list and said "4/5 are townies", he wants to lynch 3/5 of them.

This is the exact type of thing that we as scum would jump on. Any little thing that we could catch where town fucked up, changed reads, etc. It's perfect to attack because it seems so simple and plausible. Town in general are not going to be filtering themselves constantly to see their positions, know where they stood on exact people, etc. Whereas as scum, we were quite often referencing ourselves to see what stances were plausible for us to take. I can't wholly ignore the possibility that RO may just be lazy scum, hell he lurked most of LX until his teammate shot him. However, it's stupid to think that this early on that scum would make a slip this big. It's far more likely to be bad/stupid town. This isn't particularly scummy.



On April 06 2013 13:57 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2013 13:54 Bill Murray wrote:
On April 06 2013 13:28 Mocsta wrote:
@ArtanisXp
I would like to continue discussion regarding your Geript case.

Specifically, your qualms with Geripts wishy-washiness on whether I am town as follows:

+ Show Spoiler [Artanis on Geript] +

On April 06 2013 07:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

+ Show Spoiler +
On April 05 2013 13:05 geript wrote:
I'm not saying that you haven't done anything not town Mocsta-ish. There's just a very specific heuristic that town Mocsta seems to follow that you haven't hit on yet for me. I'm leaning town on you but until you get that one aspect I have a hard time putting you there fully.

As for your posting, I really like it.

Translates to:
===============================
On April 05 2013 13:05 geript wrote:
Hi, I think you're being townie, but you're not being you-townie, yet I still think you're townie but I'm not sure if you're townie.
Oh and I think you're pretty townie.
===============================
Why on earth would a townie post this?
WHY?

Mocsta wasn't even close to being in danger, and the town motivation for calling someone town, then suspicious, then town eludes me.


What I find curious about the above, is when we start discussing Geript and you comment the below:

+ Show Spoiler [Artanis WishyWashy] +

On April 06 2013 09:13 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I had you as weak town before our exchange, and the post you made questioned that read, so I questioned you. At first I thought it made you null again, but rereading it I realized that your wishy-washy post wouldn't make sense if Geript is scum, because he created an easy way for you to defend him which you denied. Since I believe Geript to be scum that makes you fairly town.
On April 06 2013 09:16 Mocsta wrote:
Lol.. and if he is town.. what then?
On April 06 2013 09:17 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
[red]Then you'd be null again.


I find this interchange ironic, as you flip flop regarding my alignment much to the same manner Geript does.
Let me guess, the heuristic doesnt apply to your play?


Further, I shall ask the same question I asked Geript.
On April 05 2013 15:18 Mocsta wrote:
Im not sure why I need to know you have me as town though? Nor why everyone else needs to know?

Im asking because, Im still trying to figure out if that affects my perception of you.

town are more likely to flip flop than mafia

On April 06 2013 13:29 ObviousOne wrote:
On April 06 2013 13:26 ObviousOne wrote:
... Bill we went over this about the spamming -- you've got ~14 posts on this page alone.

Summarize your VE meta and compare it to this game and show me how he's so definitively town. In one post.

On April 06 2013 13:26 Bill Murray wrote:
meta

Okay I'm laughing my ass off at this but really, three dot points or something. Substance, please.

Who do you want to lynch D1?

AustinMCC at this point is betraying his blue meta as a lurker that I've seen
He had a plan that would help the mafia, too, in regards to town picking from the mafia role list
It wouldn't surprise me at all to see the mafia have taken from more "town" roles than "mafia" ones
By that token, I don't expect there is a Godfather

So do you know who is mafia or are you saying AustinMCC is a town read of yours?




ALL of those posts were one after another. They're spread out over 4 hours, but it's 11 posts that are almost entirely one liners, some without even any text. Yet he was saying don't spam, make good quality posts. Why wasn't he doing that too?


+ Show Spoiler +
On April 08 2013 08:24 ObviousOne wrote:
Also sorry to dine and dash but my cousin wants to hang out, back in a few hours if I manage to be wakeful when I get home.

Oh, gotta vote too.


On April 08 2013 09:58 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 09:54 Palmar wrote:
I think it's mafia defending me, I look too scummy for townies to defend me.

why is there no machine gun role that can kill like 8 people on day 1, I'd have liked that.

Also there really is not enough killing this game.

Bored Walk Empire Mafiyawn: Pull Your Pud

=[


On April 08 2013 10:25 ObviousOne wrote:
Undertaker 21-0
GG no RE


On April 08 2013 10:31 ObviousOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 10:30 strongandbig wrote:
On April 08 2013 09:46 Sharrant wrote:
Well, I can't think of anyone who commented on my Keirathi case, but here's an update for no one.

+ Show Spoiler +

He's off my scum list after these posts. They look much more like his town games. In his scum games he's more political in his posts. In his two scum games he's had disagreements but always contested things conservatively, compared to his town games like Red where he called bullshit twenty or so times on the first day.
On April 07 2013 14:57 Keirathi wrote:
EBWOP:

Oh, what the fuck.

Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 14:48 sinani206 wrote:
StrongandBig: Actually looks like he could be scum. Playing very differently than he did in RTP and I agree with the cases made on him. He seems to be playing a typical earlygame conservative scum strategy, skirting discussion and leading people in the wrong direction. I'll slap my vote on him for now.


Explain the bolded. Because it sounds like made up bullshit.



On April 07 2013 15:28 Keirathi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 07 2013 15:09 geript wrote:
Honestly Keirathi, I don't feel great about Rayn, but I don't want to put too much stock in a meta read from one game especially when I don't know much of anything about Rayn. I could see someone going for a plan that puts them early in the draft order regardless of alignment.

As for S&B I'd like to hear his response, but I like your points about how he seems to find the draft/picking phase important but doesn't actually contribute anything to them at all.

So go look at his filters from past games. Dismissing a meta read because you're too lazy to look at the meta yourself is just...wtfboggle.

And my point wasn't that he was just pushing a plan to get himself high in the draft order. Yes, a townie could do that too. What I don't think a townie would do is specifically say that one plan was undeniably the best plan for town, the immediately flip flop on it and say that its a bad plan now, just because a new plan came up that benefits himself more. He's putting himself above the town as a whole; suddenly and for not much reason. (Which I also contend is completely different from what town rayn just did last game.)

On April 08 2013 07:54 Keirathi wrote:
@rayn: good, you're back

First: ##Unvote

Now, let's talk a bit:

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1) How much time i devote to the game depends on how much time i have available. I have not ahd much time this weekend.

What are you defending here? WHY are you defensive? I didn't call you out for lurking/not contributing/whatever. Weird opening statement.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
How i play also depends on the setup. It's very different when everyone is vanilla or when everyone has roles. You are making a meta case and later on you say you are not even sure about my meta. How do you think anyone is going to believe you if you are not sure yourself?

You're right to an extent. I said that I hadn't read your scum meta. But everything about your play has been so glaringly different from the way you JUST played as town. Why? "Because the game is different" isn't an excuse for thinking and behaving completely differently.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
2) That's bullshit. I never said "abandon Geript's plan, it's dumb". I wanted to implement Geript's + Vivax's plan and use them both. Here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=403766&currentpage=19#362
I don't know why you even bring something this ridiculous up..

You didn't specifically call it dumb. I was...paraphrasing, a bit. And that post you just linked came before the post where I said you were calling geript's plan dumb, which is even weirder.

Let's look at the progression, exactly:

Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 02:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On April 05 2013 01:20 geript wrote:
New plan: Instead of having a set 'draft list' in that say people drafting from 1-4 need to choose from a list of ABCD roles. People drafting from 5-8 need to draft from a list of EFGH, etc. etc. This makes it very risky for Scum to draft both outside of their own list and inside of their own list.

This is absolytely the best plan and the only one i'm going to support. We just need to find out what the roles are that we put to 1-4, 5-8, etc.

Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 02:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I also support Vivax' idea if i get to be #1, Geript #2, and yamato, Mocsta, Sharrant #3-#5.

Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 02:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Combine Vivax' + Geript's ideas and let these guys pick [1][1], [2][1], [3][1], [4][1], [5][1] (everyone else picks [6->] [X]):

Then:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2013 03:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don't think the players who are going to pick first should be limited to X number of roles.


geript's plan was exactly that: the people in the first 4 slots (aka pod, in this case) would be limited to a certain pod of picks. You said that was unarguably the best plan for town. Then changed your mind and are saying it's a bad plan. That's what I was getting at, here.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
There is no reason to push any plans further when people reacted to any plans like they did. 3/4 of the people said "fuck all the plans", "i'm gonna do whatever they want so fu" or "it takes all the fun out of the game". What's the point of discussing any plans further when you already know it's not gonna happen anyways? At least i fucking provided a plan that had four town reads in it for people to discuss but no.. Everyone just hopped right over that part..

Ugh, I hate this kind of excuse. "No one else was doing anything, so I refuse to do anything too!"

YOU were the one saying that the top picks needed some kind of cooperation. Why didn't you try to get any? You just got your top pick, and buggered off.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
TLDR;
- Strange reads with no progression or reasoning - maybe you should have asked me about those reads then if you do not know where my head is at. Now you are just calling me scum because you think i have not reasoned my reads well enough yet you have had no intention to even find out why my reads are what they are.

It's not my job to find out why you spew out bullshit reads with no explanation. The onus is on you to explain yourself. But again, that isn't even my point AT ALL. My entire point was that the way you are acquiring those reads is entirely inconsistent with how you acquired reads in Red Team. In Red Team, you saw something you didn't like, and either made a case right there, or you started poking and prodding at the person, questioning them and their motives. This game you just drop a name. Why so different?

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
- uncooperative - I see myself being the most cooperative peron before we got our roles. there are a lot of people who are way more uncooperative. After the roles were out i have had basically no time to think about the game, but that's gonna change now.

Again, missed the whole point. You said that the top picks needed to be cooperative with picking powerful roles/denying scum roles. But didn't try to cooperate at all with the top picks once the draft order came out.

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 06:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
- excessive posturing to attempt to get himself in the top picks - rofl, why wouldn't you want to be #1 person picking? How is this alignment indicative at all? Actually, scum would more likely try to avoid being the #1 picker because that automatically gives you a lot of attention and less chances to fakeclaim later if needed. Also the top guys are gonna get killed anyways early on as they probably have the "best" roles in the game. If they do not die it brings more attention to them.

I already addressed that.

No, trying to get yourself in a top pick isn't scummy, in itself. Rapidly changing your mind to a plan that benefits you more, personally, than town, and then refusing to back up your opinions on cooperating with the other top picks is scummy, though.

I'm looking forward to seeing what you contribute today, though. Hopefully you can change my mind.



##Unvote: Keirathi

Regarding Artanis I'm going to do some more reading tonight, but he has some posts that I find quite townie. I think they show that he is trying to contribute, as well as a clear thought process in attempting to help the town determine what is best in the draft phase.

On April 04 2013 17:45 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
So if I'm getting things right we plan on giving strong town reads effectively VT roles, correct? Though the idea of stopping strong scum roles is appealing, there are a myriad of strong roles in the game and I don't think sacrificing strong townreads that can pick early (and therefore are unlikely to be blocked by anyone) VT roles just to stop scum from picking certain roles is good.
1. They'll know exactly what X players before them picked so they can dodge roles that would otherwise make them VT.
2. Strong townreads end up with a public VT role rather than being able to help town beyond their scumhunting.
3. The townVT to scumVT balance will shift heavily in scum's favour
4. If there's scum before the last strong townread assigned to a scumrole, it could easily be sniped anyway.
I think it's best if everyone hides their picks since it'll give scum the least amount of information and prevent them from having safe picks.


Gives critical input on a plan as opposed to negative input, and has his first iteration of a plan: Everyone pick as discretely as possible.

On April 04 2013 18:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I have a better plan for the Yamato plan, if you do decide to go through with it. If we have people that look suffeciently town, are early in the list and are willing to follow the plan, they could RNG between blocking a role and taking a 'real' role themselves without revealing which one they'd want to pick. It would create a risk too great for scum to pick that role unless they're going to WIFOM about if the town player would actually do it or not, and it'd give a 50% shot for the town player to actually still get a useful role. It's less certain than the Yamato plan but I think it puts town in a better position. It could have the same net effect yet have a higher chance for town to get more blues.


Again giving critical input and creating a new plan, or at the very least a new iteration in Yamato's plan.

On April 04 2013 22:42 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On April 04 2013 18:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I have a better plan for the Yamato plan, if you do decide to go through with it. If we have people that look suffeciently town, are early in the list and are willing to follow the plan, they could RNG between blocking a role and taking a 'real' role themselves without revealing which one they'd want to pick. It would create a risk too great for scum to pick that role unless they're going to WIFOM about if the town player would actually do it or not, and it'd give a 50% shot for the town player to actually still get a useful role. It's less certain than the Yamato plan but I think it puts town in a better position. It could have the same net effect yet have a higher chance for town to get more blues.

No one's actually addressed this yet, especially Yamato which I find strange as it's an improvement upon his plan. I'd propose we use it for 2 roles at the most though. Past that, it just becomes too unreliable.

I don't like the VT claiming idea. Players that ended up with a VT role are still important to town in one way: Taking hits that would otherwise land on blues. I don't think the info gained on roles is worth this downside. There might be exceptions in certain situations (such as a player high up in the list claiming VT when he tried to pick a scummy role), but as the norm I'd be against it.


Brings up his idea again, stating he believes it's an improvement to the plan, and again is applying critical thinking about the picking strategies that others are proposing. I don't see this as "hiding in set up speculation" I see this as someone applying critical thought as to how the town can start the game off with the most advantageous, and start the mafia off with the least.

On April 05 2013 08:21 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
The accountability is a good point actually, I hadn't thought about that yet. Hm. Still think it's better than doing nothing at all though since without any rules at all there's no accountability anyway.
Will sleep on it.


He takes criticism on his plan well, says he'll take time to think about it. To me it reads really townie,especially because of a later post where he brings up that the route town was going had no accountability. His posts to me show the thought process of someone trying to min/max the drafting system, and follows a plausible planning process.


As I said earlier, I'll take a further look into him, and read the cases more thoroughly, but to me he reads as at least decently townie.


I'm going to post this now, I'll be reading and writing for a (hopefully) larger post, so if anyone else is going to be on for a bit, let's chat about someone, I'll even let you pick who.


hi sharrant
i don't think you are right in interpreting those posts as townie, those are things scum could do as well - both because setup discussion is always fertile ground for scum to grow the rare towncred-flower, and because it was (or at least, it seemed to me) clear that this town was too fractious for a real plan to come together.
that said i like that you are taking this seriously and giving real thought to what you're saying

it seems like you haven't been commenting much on stuff since the end of the setup phase but that may be because you play more like i did when i was a new player, with a lot of full sentences and capitalization and well-thought-out posts

so how about lets talk about a player? I randomly chose obviousone. i wrote up a few sentences about his post about artanis, how about you do the same and then we can both post ours after i finish my next dota game?

Commercial break. Come at me bro.


On April 08 2013 10:46 ObviousOne wrote:
Mocsta. I love you dearly. Please make paragraphs.

Or

I'll

Do

This

Just

To

Explain

Why

It's

Annoying

And

Difficult

To

Read.


On April 08 2013 10:52 ObviousOne wrote:
@Mocsta

<3 never change



Look at all the spam there. And the kicker,

Show nested quote +
On April 08 2013 10:28 ObviousOne wrote:
On April 08 2013 10:24 Mocsta wrote:
Gonzaw
Unrelated question.

Do you think I spamming up the thread?

I am asking because my last couple posts have all been big text walls; and not sure if Im getting my message across succinctly at the moment.


Who cares at this point. Give the lurkers a shit load of posts to read when they get back. Let them cry. Let them complain. They will sheep anyway. Your question wouldn't even be relevant if everyone was participating. Be the Mocsta we know and love. Fuck the haters.


Straight up saying to spam. Call it a joke, or whatever, but that kind of conflicting mindset isn't townie.


##vote: ObviousOne

You can't stay in line with your own thinking at all, I think that's because you're scum.


Chainsaw Artanis.

But I think this is the kicker:

On April 08 2013 12:45 Sharrant wrote:
I'm pretty much 100% sure that that was an assassin kill. Gonzaw pretty much gave away his role earlier when he was figuring that he could withhold his shot today and have any possibility of surviving until the next day and being able to shoot. This makes Sinani look worse for fishing for his role now that it is fairly likely that scum have an assassin.

It is possible that he was day vigi'd, but that is much much less likely in my opinion.


This was almost immediately after the gonzaw shot. At the time, Mocsta and I (and maybe a few others), were floundering a bit about what role killed gonzaw. In strolls Sharrant being 100% sure it was an assassin kill (and remember, he's been hard defending the actual assassin).

Keep reading a bit after that and see how the rest of the conversation went down. He tried to flip it to make Mocsta scummy, and he seemed to have put an extraordinary amount of thought into gonzaw being Jack before he flipped for a "townie".

So yea, Sharrant is scum.

And with that, I sleeps. G'nite!


I agree with most of this post. I'm voting for Sharrant. It's worth noting that Sharrant seemed very interested early on in with making plans but has become much less involved as the game has gone, which is typical for mafia and especially in this kind of situation, where multiple mafia have died really quickly.

Also if you aren't voting for Meapak, you really need to reconsider. Meapak was convinced I had shot him, came back, and chose to say nothing. As town, you want to be open right before you die. As mafia, you try not to leak any information or give out who might be your teammate. It really doesn't get much easier than this.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 11 2013 04:50 GMT
#2730
Why not?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 11 2013 16:24 GMT
#2833
I'm a VT, I tried to pick Showtime.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 11 2013 16:26 GMT
#2834
No we're not doing bottom up for the cops. strongandbig, claim your name right now. Keirathi afterwards. Austin will claim last.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 11 2013 20:48 GMT
#2980
On April 12 2013 05:24 strongandbig wrote:
Shelvocke, can you explain why you decided to pick Showtime!


It's the only role I get a bonus for that's actually not bad. Kind of nice to know if it's there or not in the game also. And I had a pretty low slot so I didn't think I could get anything good.

Trying to decide between ObviousOne and Vivax right now. If there's a green check on MZ, I guess that clears him.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 14 2013 04:43 GMT
#3540
Can someone post the mason logs?
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 15 2013 01:24 GMT
#3590
I'd rather kill Vivax than strongandbig. Voting for him.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 15 2013 03:05 GMT
#3645
You guys are idiots. Kill Vivax.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 15 2013 03:05 GMT
#3646
Bye.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 15 2013 06:11 GMT
#3741
I'm still alive? Fuck the haters.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 15 2013 06:17 GMT
#3743
The mason qt is pointless to read as MZ is the only one who posted anything of value in there. Not going to bother posting it.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 16 2013 04:04 GMT
#3814
##Vote Vivax
##Vote Oatsmaster


Oatsmaster: I don't think he's trying to find mafia. I'm too lazy to copy posts from the qt, but it's pretty much just MZ (and RO to a lesser extent) giving reasons and making points and asking Oats "town or scum" and oats will reply with a meaningless one-liner. He doesn't make any effort to say anything productive of his own. It's not what I expect from a town player who took a mason role.


Also nobody should be voting for yamato today. The fact that keirathi was killed last night is a strong indication that the last mafia member has to fear a cop check. As someone with a green check already on him, yamato doesn't have any reason to fear a cop.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 16 2013 04:22 GMT
#3819
On April 16 2013 13:13 Mocsta wrote:
The guy with no check is cancel if I recall.

We really need vivax to share his check.

Shevlocke, any reason you didn't share this first opinion yesterday?

I also don't like your conclusion with kei being shot for being DT.
He was also a town contributor. So this jump to high DT value whilst interesting is too black/white for my liking.



Because it was night. I told you the important part. It shouldn't be too hard for you to draw conclusions from that.

As for the Keirathi shot, it's just simple logic. Is it the only possible explanation? No, but it's the one that makes best sense to me. Keirathi spent the latter part of the day saying that he wished he was dead and defending himself. That's not someone you expect mafia to shoot.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 16 2013 04:56 GMT
#3824
On April 16 2013 13:33 Mocsta wrote:
Cool. That I understand.

So why shoot kei over vivax then? Both are alignment cops.

Your second para indicates vivax is top read.

The first para indicates oats?

In case their is a traitor, I think it would be ideal to only vote 1 person


Vivax is very likely mafia lol. And if he's not, he's like the number one mislynch. No mafia player would shoot him.

You can't no-lynch in this setup. Look at the OP - it's a plurality lynching system.

On April 16 2013 13:39 Mocsta wrote:
BTW. Cancel = dandel

Damn auto correct.

I meant, restraining order has no check.. So he is the one that fears kei?


Restraining is pretty much guaranteed as not mafia based on VE's case. VE is a prolific busser, but this is not the way he does it.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 17 2013 04:40 GMT
#4023
My activity has nothing to do with my alignment. But hey, I guess if you don't know how to read or analyze, that's one way to pick a lynch candidate. I've heard that Ouija boards are pretty effective - you guys should try those too!

I'm still voting for Vivax and Oatsmaster. Do whatever the hell you want.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
April 17 2013 05:28 GMT
#4026
Bravo geript! Bravo! Being inactive=Having no interest in lynching mafia. Where do you come up with such pearls of wisdom? Tell me please. I'm excited to learn from you.

You can see that I have my votes on two players? Lynch them. That's all you need to do.
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Shelvocke
Profile Joined March 2013
Grenada70 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-18 03:46:04
April 18 2013 03:42 GMT
#4062
On April 18 2013 12:28 gonzaw wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2013 12:19 Mocsta wrote:
Awesome

This was embarrassing, but at least we got there.

Fuck face should have conceded. Game took forever


Why would he concede when you had pinned yamato and sinani as mafia because BM put them apart in similar intervals in his post or stuff like that?

If he wasn't SO LAZY he would have won to be honest. Like....if he had tried to appear active and contribute and call people out and post stupid speculation he could have gotten to LYLO


It wasn't about laziness. I was just incredibly busy during most of this game. I don't remember what my skype password is, so Artanis can share the skype logs if he has them.

mafia qt: http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/BZgPPac7S43T7
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 14m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech64
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 2822
ggaemo 1571
Barracks 576
actioN 472
Leta 210
Nal_rA 202
EffOrt 191
Killer 174
Aegong 126
Pusan 104
[ Show more ]
Noble 60
Backho 48
Sharp 36
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma274
Fuzer 202
XcaliburYe186
ODPixel129
League of Legends
JimRising 526
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1709
Stewie2K1041
shoxiejesuss654
Other Games
summit1g7322
ceh9783
WinterStarcraft549
XaKoH 455
Pyrionflax145
SortOf103
JuggernautJason43
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH231
• davetesta27
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
2h 14m
OSC
15h 14m
Stormgate Nexus
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
HCC Europe
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.