|
On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something.
I still think there is a wealth of information in how people respond to my claim. But I think you are smart enough to figure out how they might work.
|
On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose?
This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target?
|
Uhh ... also bold the "I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something"
If you are concerned about consolidating votes. I can move it earlier if you think we can't do it in 24hrs.
|
On March 14 2013 03:42 slOosh wrote:
Ah mah gash so much information.
Crossfire, explain clearly what you thought when you received your NUKE and the thought process leading up to deciding how to use it.
I figured you were planning on killing me today with your post earlier, so I knew I had to use the nuke before you did something to me. Foolish was my top scum read, plus I saw that he nuked yamato who I believe is town. I also saw that people seemed to be just voting foolish because everyone knew he had to die, so I figured I would help everyone out by nuking scum. This will allow us to lynch another scum and have better discussion.
|
On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose?
I think you are town. I also think you should stop fishing for role information. If DI is a medic and protecting you in some non-normal way, he shouldn't be spelling out what's up. Don't ask him.
slOosh is either mafia, in which case this is all nonsense and he's not going to tell you the truth, or he's town, and hopefully can be trusted to have done something that makes sense (despite being Caller).
slOosh, if you want to go ahead and play the game, I'd like to know what you think about strongandbig.
As to everything else, I'm trying to stay back and not shit up the thread and no go setup-austinmcc here.
If the person who is controlling prplhz's vote is town and can say so without giving away a ton of information, then that person should state that they're responsible for the vote. Vote controlling not the most townie looking action, and this is information that would be important in figuring some things out.
|
Sloosh, what have you learned, other than that the thread went nuts?
|
On March 14 2013 03:44 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. I still think there is a wealth of information in how people respond to my claim. But I think you are smart enough to figure out how they might work.
Stop teasing us and give up the goods.
Put up or shut up.
Its a total mess but no use crying over spilt milk.
Now.
We should lynch scum.
Vivax isnt scum I dont think. Which makes me sad but whatever.
I need to think about this :/
|
On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target?
lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan.
Also,
On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense?
|
On March 14 2013 03:47 austinmcc wrote:
slOosh, if you want to go ahead and play the game, I'd like to know what you think about strongandbig.
If the person who is controlling prplhz's vote is town and can say so without giving away a ton of information, then that person should state that they're responsible for the vote. Vote controlling not the most townie looking action, and this is information that would be important in figuring some things out.
Politician is in no way a town move unless you intentionally take a scum's vote to decide a close lynch. Clearly the way that it was used today was not that.
I'll give you a blurb on my thoughts on SnB soon but I'd rather focus on the NUKErs the NUKEees and surrounding conversation.
|
On March 14 2013 03:48 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense?
Sloosh if the nukes are real, why give them to scummy people like me, vivax, and foolish. Most likely it will be a waste, e.g. vivax and foolish nukes. Why not give them to top town reads and use them to kill scum? You obviously aren't afraid of bad decisions because you have countermeasures, so why not try to kill 3 scum by giving them to good townreads?
|
On March 14 2013 03:48 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense?
If yamato is scum, then why would foolish have nuked him? It would be a monumentously stupid thing to do as scum. So if yamato is scum, foolishness isn't. It really is that simple.
|
On March 14 2013 03:52 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:48 slOosh wrote:On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense? If yamato is scum, then why would foolish have nuked him? It would be a monumentously stupid thing to do as scum. So if yamato is scum, foolishness isn't. It really is that simple.
Pretty much, especially if they could have forced a mislynch today because they'd still have 3 kp tonight.
|
And I still think the way this power was used did nothing except create chaos. But I don't see why a scum would come out and claim both its use and the countermeasures.
RAAAAGE.
|
On March 14 2013 03:52 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:48 slOosh wrote:On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense? If yamato is scum, then why would foolish have nuked him? It would be a monumentously stupid thing to do as scum. So if yamato is scum, foolishness isn't. It really is that simple.
Why wouldn't you lynch Foolishness today?
|
On March 14 2013 03:55 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:52 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:48 slOosh wrote:On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense? If yamato is scum, then why would foolish have nuked him? It would be a monumentously stupid thing to do as scum. So if yamato is scum, foolishness isn't. It really is that simple. Why wouldn't you lynch Foolishness today?
BECAUSE HE'S GETTING NUKED
|
On March 14 2013 03:55 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:52 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:48 slOosh wrote:On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:41 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote:
If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information.
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures.
Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further.
Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. So to clarify again, all the nukes are real but you can cancel whichever you choose? This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
How does this make sense? If yamato is scum, then why would foolish have nuked him? It would be a monumentously stupid thing to do as scum. So if yamato is scum, foolishness isn't. It really is that simple. Why wouldn't you lynch Foolishness today?
Because there's a nuke aimed at his head?
|
On March 14 2013 03:51 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:47 austinmcc wrote:
slOosh, if you want to go ahead and play the game, I'd like to know what you think about strongandbig.
If the person who is controlling prplhz's vote is town and can say so without giving away a ton of information, then that person should state that they're responsible for the vote. Vote controlling not the most townie looking action, and this is information that would be important in figuring some things out. Politician is in no way a town move unless you intentionally take a scum's vote to decide a close lynch. Clearly the way that it was used today was not that. I'll give you a blurb on my thoughts on SnB soon but I'd rather focus on the NUKErs the NUKEees and surrounding conversation.
Right, I'm trying to rule out the possibility that it was town, or compulsive, or whatever stupid non-scum explanations there are. If nobody comes out of the woodwork, it's most likely a scum politician, and it means vivax is more likely to be town. I hate that conclusion (and the thought of Vivax being alive and in thread for longer), and the whole bit where SOMEONE'S VOTE WAS STOLEN got lost in all the other stuff.
|
Oh, my post was from before Xfire's nuke. Yeah. That's also in my filter. Just fucking read. Zzzzzz.
|
On March 14 2013 03:57 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:51 slOosh wrote:On March 14 2013 03:47 austinmcc wrote:
slOosh, if you want to go ahead and play the game, I'd like to know what you think about strongandbig.
If the person who is controlling prplhz's vote is town and can say so without giving away a ton of information, then that person should state that they're responsible for the vote. Vote controlling not the most townie looking action, and this is information that would be important in figuring some things out. Politician is in no way a town move unless you intentionally take a scum's vote to decide a close lynch. Clearly the way that it was used today was not that. I'll give you a blurb on my thoughts on SnB soon but I'd rather focus on the NUKErs the NUKEees and surrounding conversation. Right, I'm trying to rule out the possibility that it was town, or compulsive, or whatever stupid non-scum explanations there are. If nobody comes out of the woodwork, it's most likely a scum politician, and it means vivax is more likely to be town. I hate that conclusion (and the thought of Vivax being alive and in thread for longer), and the whole bit where SOMEONE'S VOTE WAS STOLEN got lost in all the other stuff.
Not necessarily true. WIFOM is always a possibility.
|
On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote:
So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town.
On March 13 2013 23:46 Crossfire99 wrote:
##NUKE: Foolishness
I'm glad I can read the thread.
People - is this a scumslip or people who can't read?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
