|
Oh S & B throwing dirt in from the sidelines while not voting me.
Why am I not your scumread then but the guy about to get nuked is?
There's many looking scummy currently but if I look at S & B I notice the huge cases he wrote at the start and how he lost steam quickly to become only less more than a commentator feeling rather apathetic about who gets lynched.
|
On March 14 2013 02:31 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 02:27 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 14 2013 01:55 marvellosity wrote: The rule of thumb for Vivax is: if he plays blatantly anti-town, he's town.
IT's tragic but it's usually true. I will consciously not acknowledge this. Dandel babe, why did you out your protective role of me instead of keeping it secret? teeheehee
I have my reasons.
|
On March 14 2013 02:53 Vivax wrote: Oh S & B throwing dirt in from the sidelines while not voting me.
Why am I not your scumread then but the guy about to get nuked is?
There's many looking scummy currently but if I look at S & B I notice the huge cases he wrote at the start and how he lost steam quickly to become only less more than a commentator feeling rather apathetic about who gets lynched.
um well it's mostly because
On December 25 2012 14:00 kitaman27 wrote:
Town Lynched Percentage (Minimum 10 games) kitaman27 0/25 = 0.00% Fishball 0/18 = 0.00% Foolishness 0/18 = 0.00% Keirathi 0/13 = 0.00% Node 0/13 = 0.00% supersoft 0/13 = 0.00% chaos13 0/11 = 0.00% barundar 0/10 = 0.00% iamperfection 0/10 = 0.00% DoctorHelvetica 0/10 = 0.00% Eiii 0/10 = 0.00% GMarshal 0/10 = 0.00% Mementoss 0/10 = 0.00%
like, you're terrible but we should just kill foolishness
also - what happens when the lynch target is dead when we lynch them? Does the next-most-voted-for person get lynched? Just in case some or all of the nukes are real.
|
SnB what do you expect me to play like? HUGE CASE HUGE CASE HUGE CASE?
Also among the chaos, a few people have gone unnoticed. stutters sloosh Iamp Yamato.
Seriously, Iamp I have no idea what you are thinking, what your reads are, or even if you intend to play this game. If you are town of course
|
/facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today?
|
Facepalm was at Vivax thinking VE's fake list was real.
|
On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote: /facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today?
KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today
|
also holy fuck marv how did you get five new pages of filter like overnight
i thought you were ve not gonzaw
|
On March 14 2013 03:00 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote: /facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today? KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today So we waste a day by all sheeping onto Foolishness with no discussion. Lets have the discussion instead and we might net a second scum. There are 4 scum in addition to Foolishness. Don't be lazy.
What do you think of Cora? Do you still think Oats is scum?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 14 2013 03:04 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:00 strongandbig wrote:On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote: /facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today? KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today So we waste a day by all sheeping onto Foolishness with no discussion. Lets have the discussion instead and we might net a second scum. There are 4 scum in addition to Foolishness. Don't be lazy. What do you think of Cora? Do you still think Oats is scum?
you checked Foolish's meta? the things I posted? still think he's like "nullish"??
|
On March 14 2013 03:05 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:00 strongandbig wrote:On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote: /facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today? KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today So we waste a day by all sheeping onto Foolishness with no discussion. Lets have the discussion instead and we might net a second scum. There are 4 scum in addition to Foolishness. Don't be lazy. What do you think of Cora? Do you still think Oats is scum? you checked Foolish's meta? the things I posted? still think he's like "nullish"?? Did the post you quoted sound like I still think he's null? You convinced me. You just didn't convince me we should lynch him when there's a nuke flying at his face.
|
Nukes are overrated.
And prolly fake.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 14 2013 03:06 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:05 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:00 strongandbig wrote:On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote: /facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today? KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today So we waste a day by all sheeping onto Foolishness with no discussion. Lets have the discussion instead and we might net a second scum. There are 4 scum in addition to Foolishness. Don't be lazy. What do you think of Cora? Do you still think Oats is scum? you checked Foolish's meta? the things I posted? still think he's like "nullish"?? Did the post you quoted sound like I still think he's null? You convinced me. You just didn't convince me we should lynch him when there's a nuke flying at his face.
When there's a potential nuke flying at his face, with a message from a very likely scummer telling us the nukes are real.
Hiro was right, handing out 3 day KPs as an invention or whatever sounds ridiculously OP.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Dandel, you need to vote with me.
|
On March 14 2013 03:07 marvellosity wrote: Dandel, you need to vote with me. do i look like a sheep to you?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 14 2013 03:09 Dandel Ion wrote:do i look like a sheep to you?
yes
|
On March 14 2013 03:09 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:09 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 14 2013 03:07 marvellosity wrote: Dandel, you need to vote with me. do i look like a sheep to you? yes you got me
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
On March 14 2013 03:07 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 03:06 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:05 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 03:04 Acrofales wrote:On March 14 2013 03:00 strongandbig wrote:On March 14 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote: /facepalm
Anyway, I don't know why we are speculating about the nuke being real. If it is, we kill Foolishness. If it isn't, we kill Foolishness tomorrow. In the meantime, we should kill someone else.
SS: for a confirmed townie who is hanging around to give us guidance, you are not guiding much. Do you agree with me that Cora is scum? If not, who should we kill today? KP reduction - seems like it makes sense to kill a for-sure scum today So we waste a day by all sheeping onto Foolishness with no discussion. Lets have the discussion instead and we might net a second scum. There are 4 scum in addition to Foolishness. Don't be lazy. What do you think of Cora? Do you still think Oats is scum? you checked Foolish's meta? the things I posted? still think he's like "nullish"?? Did the post you quoted sound like I still think he's null? You convinced me. You just didn't convince me we should lynch him when there's a nuke flying at his face. When there's a potential nuke flying at his face, with a message from a very likely scummer telling us the nukes are real. Hiro was right, handing out 3 day KPs as an invention or whatever sounds ridiculously OP.
Yeah, but I think three duds would also be stupid. So one of them is probably real. It's worth waiting and seeing which.
|
If, at the end of the day we aren't any further reaching a consensus (hint: lynch Cora), we can always pile onto Foolishness.
|
|
|
|