Newbie Mini Mafia XXXVIII

On March 06 2013 07:43 TheRavensName wrote:


Your most likely going to die horribly now, you realise this right?

On March 06 2013 08:59 WaveofShadow wrote:

Scumslip.
LYNCH DIS FEKKER

On March 07 2013 07:55 TheRavensName wrote:
I thought we were lynching Kafia?

On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:

If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?

On March 07 2013 16:14 TheRavensName wrote:
Oh okay... well as long as we are going to have to start doing joke votes sense were all nubs and bad at this game with nothing to do, I'm going to stick with the policy elected before lurkers stop lurking and we get something to do. Also its cause of the Britishness.
##Vote: Krafia

On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:


Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark?

On March 07 2013 23:09 OmniEulogy wrote:
damn you guys got active after I went to sleep I missed out on the only period of time where I could have messed around that being said I like the activity from some of you. ^_^ Weak read on Krafla already but so little has happened that it can change quickly.

Why even bother mentioning it then? I'm going to try playing this game out as honest as possible and try to let you guys know my thought process as often as possible. As the game progresses and hopefully as my actions will prove me to be town to the rest of you, you will be able to trust that what I say does indeed come from the mouth of a townie. I don't expect anybody to believe me at this stage in the game but as I said hopefully as we progress my actions will make it more and more clear to you all.

@Krafla our of curiosity (and as I believe you are actually here) how do you feel about having a no-lynch if we run into a dead-end at the end of D1?

On March 08 2013 02:06 OmniEulogy wrote:
Alright.. not much to work with and if anybody has any counter-questions for me please ask. Even if you think it's a dumb question, it's best to get them out of the way. I'd like to try and get some discussion going so..

@MLuneth Could you expand on why you chose Arctic to vote on when there were others (bduddy, ChewOnStu) without any content as well. Other than it just being a coin flip.

@Krafla[spoiler]karla[/spoiler] Although you believe we may be giving some lurkers too easy of a time how do you feel about Luneth's vote on Arctic vs the other lurkers? Do you think it was too early to cast a serious vote on someone who has not been present or was it a justified action in your eyes?

@ChewOnStu Welcome to the game On the subject of lurkers, how do you feel we should deal with them if not for voting on them/lynching them when they become a problem? Every vote is meant to lynch so without that pressure how do we force bad town/scum to participate? I do agree that it is too early to assume anybody is lurking and not just busy but it is important to be able to react quickly, especially on D1.

@WoS you mentioned strategies town should implement, or rather asked about them. I was hoping you could expand on your own thoughts on the matter. Do you have anything to say about my opening post or anything to add to it?

@Matriarch How do you feel about the Lynch All Liars policy. Should town attempt to coax out scum by lying and possibly confusing the rest of us / hurting town in the process?

@Raven same question as above, how do you feel about Lynching all Liars. As Scum has to lie to survive do you think this would add pressure and eventually lead to a correct lynch if we caught somebody?

@Rainbows You mention Luneth being scummy, what do you think about his vote on Arctic? As Arctic has yet to show up, do you think it is more town oriented (trying to get a lurker to post) or scummy (attacking the easiest player early on in hopes that Arctic doesn't defend himself).

@Frorgon You mention suspicious behavior being one of the key things you will be looking for, is there anything you could note so far that you would consider suspicious?

@NobodyWonder You say you don't want to lynch anybody D1 if it is unjustified, could you expand and does that mean if we have no concrete proof of scum you will vote to no-lynch or would you get rid of the scummiest lurker?

@Arctic Can give us your thoughts on what has happened so far and answer most of the questions I have asked to the others.

@Taco Could you give your thoughts on Luneth voting for Arctic, which alignment do you believe it favors?

If I missed anybody sorry =/

On March 08 2013 07:36 WaveofShadow wrote:
That's mafia for you.

On March 08 2013 08:53 nobodywonder wrote:
...i'd say the most suspicious active is Krafla

he hasn't really contributed. all he says is to reserve judgment and not vote, but his gut says a no-lynch would be a bad thing.
i'd say that's a contradiction and that he should really be actively pursuing leads...

On March 10 2013 05:03 WaveofShadow wrote:
Oops that whole thing should've been in spoilers. Oh well.

Krafla I hope you see how scummy you look to the rest of us right now; I'm not sure I care if you get targeted N1. Explain your vote process for D1 and any new reads you have please.

On March 10 2013 09:36 OmniEulogy wrote:


it's only what.. 2:30am there?

it's unfortunate if you are telling the truth and got RB'd knowing Luneth's alignment on top of no NK would have been really nice.

On March 10 2013 09:47 OmniEulogy wrote:
@Krafla did you leave any bread crumbs to prove that you are 1 shot cop or that you were targetting Luneth tonight?

On March 12 2013 01:31 Frorgon wrote:
Krafla, I don't know how you expect the mafia to have suspected you for targeting Luneth unless you post saying "I checked Luneth" didn't actually go through after the deadline. I was always a little scared when you posted that because there had been no official call to the end of N1. Otherwise, yes, the chances were slim that they would have guessed and landed on you, but it could've happened. I don't see any other way for them to have known.

On March 10 2013 08:24 Mocsta wrote:

Responding as it may not be fully clear.

Action submission deadline is in 36min as per OP.

Cycle deadline is typically in 1hr36min.

---

For Night 1 *only*; cycle deadline will occur roughly in 1hours time (with a 15min give-or-take).

The Day 2 cycle will be extended to compensate (i.e. 48hrs + the extra ~30min (give or take))

On March 10 2013 09:57 TheRavensName wrote:
Well Krafia did state a couple of times he had cases and had no intention of revealing them till after day 2 started. I suppose you could use this as semi eviddence or slight bread crumbing. Mafia could have easily picked up on this and blocked him.

On March 12 2013 02:15 marvellosity wrote:
Vote Count

OmniEulogy (1): geript, geript
MLuneth (4): WaveofShadow, Rainbows, Frorgon, Krafla
MeatlessTaco (4): OmniEulogy, TheRavensName, bduddy, nobodywonder, geript
Rainbows (1): MLuneth

No vote: MeatlessTaco, Matriarch

MeatlessTaco is currently set to be lynched. 7h 45mins until the deadline. Voting is mandatory. Please remember to bold your votes, and to unvote if you've previously voted for someone else.

If there's a mistake, let me know!

On March 12 2013 02:09 TheRavensName wrote:


To me this is the biggest evidence against meatless. If mafia wanted to save arctic they could have jumped oon meatless, which would put him in the lynch and saved arctic by keeping omni and frogon on meatless and off arctic and then they could have blamed omni,s case and might have gotten away with it or built time to make new myslynch cases together afterwards. Mluneth still just seems like a guess to me by most people.

On March 12 2013 03:39 Rainbows wrote:
That feel when stagnated discussion.

On March 12 2013 07:31 marvellosity wrote:
Vote Count

OmniEulogy (0): geript, geript
MLuneth (2): WaveofShadow, Rainbows, Frorgon, MeatlessTaco
MeatlessTaco (8): OmniEulogy, TheRavensName, bduddy, nobodywonder, geript, Krafla, geript, WaveofShadow, Frorgon
Rainbows (1): MLuneth

No vote: Matriarch

MeatlessTaco is currently set to be lynched. 2 and a half hours until the deadline. Voting is mandatory. Please remember to bold your votes, and to unvote if you've previously voted for someone else.

If there's a mistake, let me know!

On March 12 2013 23:05 WaveofShadow wrote:
But did you really ruin it?
Thinking about it , is it worth checking your filter again Geript knowing what I know now? I'm thinking so.

On March 10 2013 12:03 WaveofShadow wrote:

Yeah, this isn't enough. I'm doing all your work for you right now, and if you expect me to believe that you actually want OE lynched you'd better come up with something or I'm dropping it.

On March 10 2013 15:31 WaveofShadow wrote:
...In my opinion OE's continued effort and Geript's decided lack of such actually makes Geript look kinda scummy. Still awaiting that promised case.

On March 13 2013 03:47 WaveofShadow wrote:
For the record, I don't think geript is scum, and I think matriarch should be ignored. If she isn't participating, despite not being modkilled she isn't a threat and we can figure her out once we dispose of someone else.
I'll post some reads after night is over and we see some action.

On March 13 2013 20:49 TheRavensName wrote:


If someone was willing to claim as a cop its a huge liability for mafia to let them actually get their investi off. I think its better this way IMO. I think the only reason Krafia would have gotten blocked AGAIN is because it was mentioned they would have to ask him for how it works... and he went out of his way to pretend that line of questioning never existed.

That being said, this makes me start to grow wary of Omni again. Omni was pushing after the perfect night of life livingness that our blue roles should reveal themselves so we can know what to think of the night, which would give him a nice pretty list of easy targets. Hes also the one that wanted to know the most how the one shot cop would work.

I also can't help but feel he kind of manipulated our jail keeper. I was RBed last night, which I'm willing to take as me being saved over WoS.... and Omni basically told WoS that jailkeeper was an idiot for choosing WoS over me, so last night the Jailkeeper followed that logic and WoS got run over.

On March 13 2013 21:19 TheRavensName wrote:

Well considering plenty of people are still skeptical of you, or were before this, I dunno.

On March 14 2013 00:48 Rainbows wrote:


You NEVER claim unless you have to. You were roleblocked. Had you not claimed blue, you wouldn't be being roleblocked every night from now on.