TL Mafia LX - Page 129

On March 01 2013 21:25 Wade Fell wrote:


No.

Fuck that reason.

Fuck it .


I dont' care about learning, I don't care about anything but lynching scum, and CHEZ IS SCUM.

Why would anything other than lynching scum matter

On March 01 2013 21:26 Aquanim wrote:

I'd like to lynch scum tomorrow too.

On March 01 2013 21:36 Aquanim wrote:
I said lynch scum tomorrow, not lynch chezinu tomorrow. I have no interest in parking a vote on chezinu and going AFK for 40 hours though.

On March 01 2013 21:38 Blazinghand wrote:
talking to aquanim is like wrestling an eel while covered in motor oil

On March 01 2013 21:41 Aquanim wrote:
sorry, I'm playing dota
skimread your case and it looks legit
want to compare it to chez's filter though
I'll get back to you in an hour

p50; layabout decides to support the prome lynch, and then leaves his options by throwing some town pointers on prome -> which is where the hassy reference ties in.
On February 26 2013 11:53 Promethelax wrote:
Hassy vanished. Scummy.
On February 26 2013 11:55 Promethelax wrote:
You k ow hassy at all? Would he vanish like that as town?

If anything, this makes hassy more likely to be town (unfortunately) ... i.e. prome sniffed an easy target to push as scum.

On March 01 2013 06:44 WaveofShadow wrote:

Yeah, my point is pretty clear I would think. It means I nor anyone else in the thread should be able to trust your reads. You're wrong this time as well if you're partially basing your case on my 'excited' activity.

Ugh this is as good a time as any to duck out until after daypost considering I've apparently brought no worthy discussion with my case and am going mostly ignored once again. If only I was scum I'd win singlehandedly. I'll be back later this evening.

Oh and I guess so I can contribute to the actual topic of conversation: my 'conspiracy theory' involves Toad in a way. The same way that DrH mentioned he think both Geript and I are town despite being against each other in ways is very different from how I feel towards Toad vs VE.
I don't believe it's possible for them both to be town.

On March 01 2013 09:15 WaveofShadow wrote:
Geript #1 reads NA.
Can we lynch him yet?

On March 01 2013 20:22 Toadesstern wrote:
oh and actually just a little explaining, I'm still reading but only answering if I have to because it's not really worth it. Here are my thoughts I had when talking with someone outside of the game (you're allowed to talk & post as long as the guy is not in the game, right?^^):

+ Show Spoiler +

That's pretty much the reason I was mad earlier. I've got this bullshit 3 times in a row now. I've been told I'm mafia last game because "Toad posts a lot of walls of text! He isn't doing that when he rolls town! LYNCH HIM". This time it's not being agressive enough early on while it's 2 am or because "lynch was too easy, let's lynch Toad", or because of "Toad badding his own back, must be mafia!" when everyone knows that I regulary do that as town when I'm mad to rub it into peoples faces and I don't do that as mafia. Check Mafia L for example... I told people Palmar is town d1, told people Sandro is mafia d1, people lynched Palmar and later on Sandro and EVERYONE was mad at me because "how does Toad know Palmar is town when everyone thought he's mafia and how did you know Sandro was mafia so early on?" and everyone in the game tried to lynch me for that although it isn't even a mafiatrait in the slightest.
Okay back to this game: VE basicly said I'm mafia because I'm so egocentrical and focused about myself which again, is a towntrait for me and when confronted with it answered "duh, you know about it. Meta you know about yourself isn't worth a damn". No shit sherlock, knowledge about my own meta and the assumption that I can play and confuse you with that makes it a null though if you really think so and not a mafiatrait.

So if you want me to answer something give me something that I can answer. I'm not going to explain why something that is a towntrait really is a towntrait this game as well and not some fancy mafiaploy from me because there's no possible way to do that. When you want to lynch me because "well Toad looks really good with the d1 lynch but he looks too good! Must have been a bus! LYNCH HIM" there's nothing I can do about it. That's why I told Greymist I'm going to stop being mad about people being bad and will just ignore them from now on (you probably know the timing of that one). I'm still sticking to that promise.

See you in 48hours.

On March 01 2013 21:20 Wade Fell wrote:
You know what, I get it if you disagree with my Chez case or think there's a problem with it, but could someone at least point it out? Chez is GUILTY AS SIN and there's like nothing on the table right now that even remotely countermands my case that Chez is scum and we need to lynch him-- yet people are just voting other dudes. Like, is there a _reason_ nobody wants to lynch Chez right now?

I mean yeah he claimed dayvig... but shouldn't that be even MORE reason to lynch him? It's not alignment-indicative and he threw away his shot when he could have shot someone much scummier. The Grush ##shoot thing was a red herring. Come on, guys, he's throwing mud in the water and sand in the air and we're getting all confused when we should be _focused_ on killing chez.

STOP BEING CONFUSED
EXPLAIN WHY U NO VOTE CHEZ

my case is SO GOOD. At least respond

On March 01 2013 23:27 iamperfection wrote:
fuck you flood control i got more to say

Anyone not voting for toad has to explain to me how him not caring about this lynch at all is not the scummiest thing ever committed.

On March 01 2013 23:34 jcarlsoniv wrote:


I find it more interesting that you only show up and start freaking the fuck out when just toad lays suspicion on you.