EPTThemed Game Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
Also a lot of your posts can be considered spammy/troll On February 13 2013 09:17 Blazinghand wrote: I could kiss you for that Easy way to find out ##vote: Mr. Cheesecake or On February 13 2013 09:21 Blazinghand wrote: maybe voting for the instant majority lynch should be instant majority While not necessarily trollish in itself you were feeding/playing along with the trolls All in all however, I thank you for generating discussion. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
Oats. While I defended his original response to BH about his thoughts on mayor, he started to really clutter the thread asking pointless questions and getting really defensive/agitated. Sorta what some others have pointed out. Gonzow. He called me scum. Seriously though, his play has been lacking focus. He has self admitted that he mainly cared for the role creation part. That might be true, or a mafia excuse to lurk. There's also his reasoning "too neutral" what does that even mean? Is he referring to the part that marv also mentioned where I praise BH after spending a really long post calling him wrong? That's just being polite. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On February 14 2013 10:14 Dandel Ion wrote: Who would you kwamboozle right now if you could? (note: kwamboozle is a sekrit codeword for doing what your role does) Don't tell me why, just who. EBOP for above is what I'm responding to for future filter diving. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
Posts relatively long, but not too specific post agaisnt BH. Too neutral. Posts concise reads on two players that stood out to him. Too neutral. I don't like your reasoning at all. Either you are honestly think I'm scum, which would make you wrong, or you are purposely trying to interpret me in a negative light which only mafia would do. So that said ##vote gonzaw. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote: I never said I was 100% sure you were scum. Those were the things that caught up from your posts, and out of everybody On February 14 2013 04:57 gonzaw wrote: Kay im back I would like to kill randombum today. Stuff he posted seemed too "neutral" and shit, specially that "wall of text" about BH. Other than that maybe kill BH, he's being his usual trolly scum self, specially with that bad case on Oats. On February 14 2013 08:31 gonzaw wrote: I still kind of want to kill randombum, but not many people have done enough stuff for me to get a good scum read on someone. Stuff like this and this seem too neutral and trying to blend in. So basically. I don't think your scum, but I want to kill you? On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote: Tell me, why exactly are you voting me for? Do you agree with what BH said? I didn't see you mention anything about it. I posted it not three posts before, are you even reading my filter? On February 14 2013 10:09 randombum wrote: Just got back. I'm currently dis-liking oats and gonzow. Marv too. [snip] Gonzow. He called me scum. Seriously though, his play has been lacking focus. He has self admitted that he mainly cared for the role creation part. That might be true, or a mafia excuse to lurk. There's also his reasoning "too neutral" what does that even mean? Is he referring to the part that marv also mentioned where I praise BH after spending a really long post calling him wrong? That's just being polite. Or in the quote you are responding to. Are you purposely reading my posts the wrong way or are you just bad at this game? Either way its not a very good reason to keep you around. On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote: You are OMGUSing, and hell you are even posting how I could be town yet conclude I'm scum with no other additional reason Notice I never called you scum, I just think you are not contributing which can be bad town or scum. That's better than the null reads I have on almost anybody else. On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote: Also by "neutral" I mean "agreeable" basically. 1-Post that Instant lynch is good 2-Say that BH is acting weird and his case is bad Now you go against me, which is what's "cool" at the moment apparently. Right, the fact that my first 2 posts playing the game isn't argumentative or coming to conclusions on who is scum on day 1 is alignment-indicative. It's like you are trying to read me the wrong way. Also how is it "cool" to go against you at the moment. The only other person really making a case on you is BH who I disagreed on oats with. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On February 13 2013 23:36 Stutters695 wrote: Marv just lurked through MtG mini as town (compared to his crazy posting in LIX). I think Oats meant it as in its a null tell rather than a blatant scumtell. Not sure I agree with that but I had the same thought when reading your discussions on Marv. Gonna catch up really quick. Your next post was: On February 14 2013 14:38 Stutters695 wrote: Sorry for the absence guys, first day of work at the New job. Catching up now It has been about 2.5 hours since that last one. Are you ever going to post on what you think or just "catch up" forever. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
But, On February 15 2013 04:23 gonzaw wrote: You sheep other people's opinions on stuff (on Oats, on me, etc), you OMGUS me with no reasoning at all, and your intentions are contradictory. You attack me like you think I'm scum, but then instantly backpedal into saying I'm just "not contributing so I don't want to keep you around", which is hypocritical with that "suspicion" you posted about me before. You attacking me makes no sense, and it seems you are just content on sheeping BH and parking your vote on me. needs to be addressed. How am I sheeping on other opinions when I'm the only one that attacked you in the way I did? Because other people have attacked you for other reasons? I'll admit I looked harder at you and oats because you two stuck out. I don't see any backpedaling at all. In the same post where I voted you my reasoning was "Either you are honestly think I'm scum, which would make you wrong, or you are purposely trying to interpret me in a negative light which only mafia would do." then the post after it's " I just think you are not contributing which can be bad town or scum." Its consistent, perhaps bad, but consistent. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
Marv seems to be taking the easy way out and calling out a lurker. Do "vets" normally stay this quiet during day 1 so they don't stand too much for N1, or is he just coasting? The rest of the lurkers are pretty annoying too. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On February 15 2013 04:55 austinmcc wrote: randombum, could you please give me your thoughts on iamperfection, as well as who would win the duckfight from earlier on the page? Actually, now that you mention it he looks shady to me too. For similar reasoning I had on oats. He's definitely going on my to watch list. Duck 2 clearly wins. Gangster vs cripple? easy fight. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:06 marvellosity wrote: Hello, potential friend. I have a question - do you think all lurkers are likely to be town? No, I'm pretty sure out of all the lurkers there's bound to be at least mafia. Since have the people in the game are lurking. Would you like to re-word that question. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
Outside of your silly non-nessecary writing style your only contribution to the game was calling out a lurker. Something that anybody could do. For a supposedly great player you have not said anything about anybody else all game. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:12 gonzaw wrote: ?? When BH made the "case" against me, you OMGUS me out of nowhere, that seemed sheeping to me. Your previous opinion on me wasn't "original" either, since Dandel and BH had basically posted what you said earlier. His case was some sort of meta read and how you are responding. My case was you are purposely mis-interpreting me. Those are different reasons. On February 15 2013 06:12 gonzaw wrote: So would you still lynch me or not? More importantly, do you think I'm scum or not? I don't care if you want to "kill me just because" or something. I don't know if your scum or not, I'm not sure on anybody. However, you are obviously playing the game and I can't find anything that makes me convinced your scum so at the moment I'd be prepared to go after the lurkers. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
##vote hassybaby. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
oats it is. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:50 Keirathi wrote: Can someone just say "We're lynching X" and lets do it? I would prefer Oats, but Hassy is acceptable since he obviously isn't playing at all. 12 minutes left. I'm honestly willing to throw my vote anywhere right now to avoid a no-lynch. This man speaks the truth. | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
| ||
