Themed Game Mafia

On February 12 2013 04:30 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Sigh...

/in

No idea how pick your power shit works, but I guess I need to find out eventually

On February 13 2013 09:09 Blazinghand wrote:
I guess it depends of mayor is "decides the D2 lynch" or mayor is "decides the D2 lynch, and gets some additional powers and 1-2 bodyguards"-- I assume it's the former, in which case there's not a huge advantage to going mayor over instant majority, which increases the pressure on scum.

On February 13 2013 11:12 Oatsmaster wrote:


why would you want to do that?

On February 13 2013 12:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
Also, BH is town, because as scum, there is no point to put yourself under the spotlight this early when you can use that post later in a larger analysis.

On February 13 2013 14:24 Oatsmaster wrote:
Keirathi, why are you so confrontational this game? Are you scum?

On February 13 2013 21:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
yeah but Scum Marv tries to win, like he would try to look really townie and probably succeed. Lurky marv probably has IRL issues.
But yeah, I dont really think he is scum at this point.
I will rethink this read at lylo probably.

On February 14 2013 08:48 Dandel Ion wrote:
But that's not a random vote, then.

On February 13 2013 09:51 Stutters695 wrote:
Seriously though with all of these game-types lurking is going to be a huge problem, I wouldn't be adverse to popping a lurker before we hit crazy mechanics unless someone is screaming scum.

On February 13 2013 10:14 Sylencia wrote:


Guys I swear I don't know the man, if he's calling me scummy, he must be scum!

##Vote: kitaman27

On February 14 2013 15:01 Sylencia wrote:
Kurumi, since you're voting for me right now, can I ask you to let me perhaps share with you the fact I'm innocent tonight?

On February 14 2013 09:48 Sylencia wrote:


Mainly because I don't understand what is even happening in this game O_O

On February 15 2013 03:03 Dandel Ion wrote:
@Kita: If your read is "newbie lurker", but you want to lynch him for that,does that mean you have no scumreads at all?

On February 15 2013 08:39 Sylencia wrote:
Kita: I am going to change my vote, there's no point keeping it on you - seeing as how the vote wasn't even a serious one in the first place, I'm just reading through the last 3 pages again to understand where the main frontrunners are getting their votes from.

On February 15 2013 08:40 austinmcc wrote:
kita, why leave the sylencia/kurumi stuff out of your read?

On February 15 2013 08:49 austinmcc wrote:

I find it odd that you seem focused on sylencia as a scumread, but didn't mention or draw anything from what has been the only sylencia-centric exchange in the thread, imo.

Especially given that, if we can trust kurumi, there's some way in which they can check each other, meaning that sylencia may be a bad lynch at this time because we'll be certain/certainish about his alignment later.

On February 15 2013 09:03 Dandel Ion wrote:

It's actually statistically more likely town has the vote-altering roles, I say.

On February 15 2013 09:09 Crossfire99 wrote:

Brilliant point. His role creator has a lot to explain why he didn't stop this. Well I really gtg so bye.

On February 15 2013 07:03 Kurumi wrote:
I'm keeping my vote on Sylencia - he is thinking I will risk my life to confirm him as "town", never answered why he felt overwhelemed, actively lurked and still refuses to play. Also, he is the creator of my role and tried to convince me into a situation where I could die >_>

On February 16 2013 09:20 iamperfection wrote:

Unless he thought krumi was going to kill him.....

On February 16 2013 12:12 Sylencia wrote:
Kill kita, Kurumi's first post clearly states he wasn't going to kill. (I was the one who created Kurumi's role, hence why I wanted him to check me)

On February 13 2013 09:55 Kurumi wrote:
I would like to welcome everyone to this great game. I hope we shall have fun together and be able to talk about this game in the future while sipping some good beer. As for obvious obviousnessess, it seems the poison is only for Day 1... Secret ballot is not something I'd root for. We should think if the Poison penalty will haunt this game or not. If it indeed does, my dear colleagues I think we could go for either of the remaining two. Both give us a list which we can analyse - isn't that great?
On the topic of lists, I am going to make one just now:
Tit for tat Friendship Love
100 1000 10000
I shall not kill, because that is not my job. I hope you, my dear friends will refrain from doing so. I love my tea. Not drinking it would be horrible. Someone up for some tea? I think we'd have great time together, every one of you is such a great company!
Also, I dislike loud people. Dandel Ion, could you turn your volume down, pretty please? Merci.

On February 16 2013 12:36 Dandel Ion wrote:

All my wat.

Why the fuck you even arguing that you would want to know his alignment if you were scum?
Cuz you'd generally ALREADY KNOW IT.

like
what the actual fuck

On February 16 2013 13:57 Sylencia wrote:
You were given information about your choices, and the consequences of each one. Given the nature of the game - it's likely that Kurumi would've breadcrumbed something during Day 1 and yet you somehow didn't read the clear line that says "I shall not kill"? That's not even a cryptic clue - it's as clear as day.

On February 15 2013 08:39 Sylencia wrote:
Kita: I am going to change my vote, there's no point keeping it on you - seeing as how the vote wasn't even a serious one in the first place

On February 15 2013 08:56 jcarlsoniv wrote:
So...oats? Ok

On February 17 2013 00:21 Dandel Ion wrote:

This one also does apply to kitaman btw.

On February 17 2013 03:17 Dandel Ion wrote:

Moving where?

On February 17 2013 03:17 Dandel Ion wrote:
I see you tunneling sylencia for days, and not doing much else of anything.

On February 17 2013 03:19 marvellosity wrote:
The gentleman made a 'mistake' by 'accidentally' killing gentleman Kurumi, who wished to eject the same gentleman.

Naturally the same gentleman, who was perhaps a tenth as bothered with the discourse as I, gives me points of evil for not being bothered. Gentleman Austin was right about this one.

On February 17 2013 03:20 Dandel Ion wrote:
So, you down for lynching gonzaw?

On February 17 2013 03:27 kitaman27 wrote:


So do you have a town read on sylencia? I'm having trouble coming up with a scenario where he's not scum, unless we were hit with a game where half the scum team is afk.

On February 17 2013 04:21 Stutters695 wrote:
It's my Girlfriend's birthday today so I'll be pretty inactive until tomorrow unless work is slow. Kita why is Gonz in your top six? I'm assuming since you said six specifically he's either tied for the bottom of that list or he is sixth. If that's the case why would you be ok with your sixth best choice if syl doesn't get lynched rather than push for someone in between? I need to check Syls filter, so other than him who would you.choose as your number two lynch?

On February 17 2013 03:34 iamperfection wrote:
I could get behind a sylencia lynch

On February 17 2013 06:14 Dandel Ion wrote:

Hi.

On February 17 2013 10:10 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Lol Iamp mad. Sup guys I'm town. What should I do besides read like 40 pages of stuff?+

On December 11 2012 18:34 Sylencia wrote:
At work, decided to check in on what Oats had said before he got lynched, and now this is where I find yamato to be rather suspicious.

A lot of posts made by Oats always ask about people's opinion on yamato. Why is he so intent on getting that information?






(Why does he feel the need to explain what yamato does when he is clearly capable of doing it himself)



The following posts after that are the ones where people begin to wonder - why did he say yamato was suspicious, then complete 180 and say he was town?

Naturally, Oats also did mention Kickstart a lot, but that's because he was pushing for a mislynch to happen so that is only natural that the majority of the time Kick was being talked about by him.

So here I wonder, was the plan on day 1 something like this, or did it eventually lead to this:

- Everyone starts the game, and off the bat people are suspicious of yamato.
- To help draw attention away, yamato stops posting and oats gets to work on a case against Kickstart instead, while also defending people suspecting yamato.
- During all this, opinions on yamato are given when asked as this obviously helps the scum work out who they should take out first.
- Oats continues his case against Kickstart, but at this point does the 180, and it really seems like he's now subtly putting it out there that yamato is innocent.
- Case goes against oats now and he is lynched.

In each of the days including the first, yamato has never changed his vote. A smart move, if he was scum because on the first day, going with the crowd would leave him with explaining to do, day 2 ended up with a no lynch, meaning there was a free kill for the scum in any case, and then finally we have day 3 - where him, Arn and I are the most suspicious ones of the group. Within the first few hours of the day he decides to target Arn, and we're left where we are.

The majority of this case is based behind the actions of Oats, and I think that he has left enough clues to find the other member of the mafia team. This is the way I decided to look at it this time, and it is the way I am going to vote today.

##vote Yamato

On December 21 2012 22:39 Sylencia wrote:
Alright, I've caught up to an extent, and I am pretty surprised to see so many people change their votes to Spag in the final 12 hours of the first day. At the present moment, I'm simply going through the possible ways in which we can use the vote count in our favour for finding the scum, since it's extremely unlikely that the mafia could cruise control to a free mislynch, there had to be some sort of bandwagoning happening.

Also note that this doesn't mean I'm implicating Corazon as scum, as what Omni says does make sense, but I'm not going as far as to say he is 100% town.

For the previous day, we have ourselves 7/13 (or 12 if you exclude Spag himself) people voting for Spag. Along the way, what we can take away from this is that there are scum scattered around this vote. The exact number is of course unknown, but to get the ball rolling it wouldn't be unreasonable to say there was at least 2 members voting for Spag here.

Spaghetticus (7): Aquanim, OmniEulogy, Mocsta, cakepie, Kickstart, Chromatically, shz

I've split the votes into 3 groups, the first 3, the next 2 and the final 2.

To start with the final 2 votes:

These final 2 votes were essentially making the lynch guaranteed, they could have stayed with their original vote, but decided to move over for their own reasons.

shz: Very willingly bandwagoned both his votes on cora and Spag, very little analysis behind the reasoning other than not liking spag's defense, a little shady in my eyes, since Cora has quite a high chance of being town, and Spag being confirmed town.

Chrom: Listed out his suspicions, but then also bandwagons onto Spag, only saying that the points were already raised by others, though there is a small explanation after. Still keeping my eye out, but isn't so bad.

From the middle 2, the fact this area is where the balance of the votes changes, it's likely that at least one of the three could be scum.

Kickstart: Hard to say, since it's a complete opposite to last game where he posted a lot and was very active, he did make a case, but it didn't really cover too much new information it was the same as what Aqua already said, just reflavoured.

Cake: Reasonable points raised, only concern is the really weird part in the middle:


Being the fourth vote, having Chrom move to Spag would pretty much call for a death sentence, since I was not around and Spag won't vote for himself meaning it would be a 5/11 vote count. Other than that, looks quite constructive and open with information.

From the two in the middle, I would definitely say that Kick is on my watchlist, and while I'm not entirely sure on cake, I am inclined to say he is more likely to be town.

First 3 - set the ball in action:

Aqua - While I don't agree that posting rationally is scum, I think most of the points found were legitimate, and could've easily convinced me. In addition, Aqua is putting his neck on the line changing his vote from Cora to Spag. Only reasons to do this are:
a) Legitimately believed he found the right tells
b) Plan on voting Cora (implying he is also scum) but hoping the votes didn't roll in backfired - only considered because the vote was dropped so so early on.
Plan b would be a really radical move to do, and I would believe in option A more, and so I'm more inclined to believe he has a higher chance of being town.

Omni: So confused. If you were adamant about Cora being scum why would you go and change your vote? In my mind it makes little sense because the way you voted for Spag made it seem like you disregarded your strong thoughts on Cora and just moved straight onto Spag because he didn't rebound from Aqua's claims too well. Just stick to your reads because the reasons behind your vote on Spag were way too speculative compared to what you thought about Cora.

Mocsta: Well thought out arguments, and during the day was bringing up a lot of discussion points, I like to think of Moc as more of a townie than scum at the moment.

Now - naturally this list might not actually say too much but I am going to say that it is VERY unlikely for there to be (7+Spag)/9-10 townies vote for an innocent player. There had to be some manipulation going on in, it is just a matter of finding out who.

If I had to list my two suspicions from the list - I would say I am suspecting Kickstart and Omni. There is something extra about Omni which doesn't feel right, I'm not completely sure what it is but I feel like there's something there.

I'll post about the non-voters next, but this one took me a lot longer since I got distracted by 2 games of dota..

On December 20 2012 14:05 Sylencia wrote:
Ok, I read the last few pages and at first I was liking shz's idea with the posting of the 'conclusions' that could be made if X player was lynched but as I was typing up some of the reasoning behind my thoughts I realised that it doesn't really make sense to do that - which is what Chrom said...

Corazon: Remember that while most of us are newbies, there are players who have obs'd a few games before this, and seen the inner workings on how scum players play, what newbies do and general scum reads. Putting it into practice is of course a lot harder though. But don't be intimidated by all that, just play your best game and hope for the best.

Now, for who I am going to vote for - at the moment my thoughts are actually quite split multiple ways. First, I said I wanted to vote threesr, but I feel like the behaviour displayed shouldn't be considered TOO deeply (but still considered of course) because while it annoys a lot of people, the statements made were mostly just noise. However, the unvoting and voting of different targets makes me feel uneasy, as everyone who he has voted for has been in the firing line at some point during the day, and I can't tell if it's a way to try pressure others into following suit by way of numbers or not.

In the case of voting for Corazon - this is the easy path for me, I can simply sheep and jump onto the corazon train but I don't know if that's the right way either. He was targeted early, but this was due to the lack of reads at the time and I think that scum have jumped onto the opportunity to get someone out easy, and honestly to me the thing with Corazon is that while he is defensive, he is still clear with what he is saying and is direct in replying to things which are targetted at him.
Downside is he did make a slip, and it most definitely could've been subconciously done and I don't know if I should overlook that or not - since I learned from last game you should go with the most obvious pick from the most obvious reads. I chose to ignore it last time and I paid the price by losing us the game essentially.

Fatchunk I still have no idea about, I read his filter but I didn't get much from it.

I really hate this, but for now I am leaning towards Corazon, since I don't want to be ignoring 'obvious' tells like I did last game.

##Vote cDgCorazon

I can still change my vote for the next couple of hours before I leave but at the moment this is where I stand

On December 05 2012 19:03 Sylencia wrote:
So pretty much at the moment, while catching up with all this drama that has happened in the past 5 or so hours, I've really become a lot more confused and a lot less sure who is actually scum and who is not.

Axle: Originally, I thought his acts of 'treat me nicely, I'm new' were actually quite suspicious, followed by really confusing posts which initially I believed were just posts to clog up the conversation and keep things disjointed. However, seems like as time goes on I understand what Axle is talking about less and less and now I don't even read the posts because it actually hurts my brain to try and understand the concepts he is talking about. Based off the responses you guys make to what he says, seems to be hard on you too. Basically, if I had no better read, I'd be picking Axle simply because I don't want to have to deal with working with an incomprehensible teammate.

Jidolboy: From what I have seen, all that has happened from him are a few answers and then a sudden vote. If I was to guess the way this game was going to go down, it would have the one person who is more active do the swaying, while the other lurks a bit more. As far as I can tell, Jidol has been the biggest lurker in the game so far, and then makes no effort in justifying what he has said. However, does that mean he's piggybacking onto CC, making him scum (assuming that Jidol is too)? Possibly, but probably not, if they were both scum, they wouldn't be picking out Oats I think, and instead piggyback onto the Kick vote.

Kick: This afternoon, I said that Kick is a townie because of his obnoxious behaviour. Rad and Oats continue the attack, and bring up rather relevant points, most of which I didn't consider (and also some points due to a past game which I didn't observe). However, at this point in time, I still believe that Kick is a townie, and so at this point in time I will not be voting for him.

yamato: More active than jidol, but still seems like lurking, and goes with the easy way out by voting Axle. Also noticed the disappearance after heat being applied on him but whether or not that's due to time zone, I'm not sure.

Now, between Rad and Oats, I feel like one is supporting the other, but at the same time, I also feel like one of them is doing so with the intention of swaying the other into believing they are on the same team. This round, I feel like I have to be voting for one or the other here. (Also, while I think that one or the other is scum, I do not think that both would be scum. They stand out far too much and have already essentially said "We are together in this fight", and that'd be some sick psychological tactics or some really newbie play if they were to be double scum)

In this case, I will be voting for Oats for two reasons: No lynch doesn't help us get any information. Worst case scenario means if we pick all townies to be lynched, we lose at the same rate as if we didn't lynch Day 1.

Between the two, Oats feels a lot more scummy to me. The main point in the end is the suspicion on yamato, followed by the 'scum read' on yamato, followed by a complete drop of the case against him, and then a complete dodge on answering why yamato was even suspected by him in the first place. Also, to me it seems like the case made when explaining why there was a vote for kickstart in the first place could also be applied to him.
1. At the time, yamato was still a suspect, so claims possible read
2. Notices no support for yamato's suspicion, backs out, and goes straight for Kickstart.

Naturally, I could be completely off track here, but I feel like the person who I should vote is for Oats.

##Vote Oatsmaster

On February 17 2013 23:38 Vivax wrote:
I think Kurumi's death deserves a kita lynch. We know for sure Kita wanted to kill Kurumi there. I don't think there's much more to add. He could have opted for guessing his alignment instead.

Take this with a grain of salt since I've still lots to read, but Kita lynch doesn't look disputable to me.

On February 15 2013 04:38 gonzaw wrote:
I wouldn't mind lynching Hassy/Sylencia/Cheesecake

On February 15 2013 07:17 marvellosity wrote:
And Sylencia is a gentleman of interest - the gentleman kitaman raised good points about the man.

On February 15 2013 08:15 marvellosity wrote:
The man known as Sylencia I also believe may well have evil intentions. He continuously makes little chitter-chatter with other gentlemen, but only ever about his own person, and never unprompted. This is why looking at such gentlemen is not merely "policy".

On February 17 2013 11:47 Stutters695 wrote:
Syls filter is worrying but I need to check his meta.

On February 17 2013 10:37 Crossfire99 wrote:
I would also be willing to lynch sylencia today.

On February 16 2013 02:31 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Yeah I could see sylencia being scum.

On February 17 2013 12:25 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Syl's filter is really bad, and I would not be opposed to a lynch on him today.

On February 18 2013 00:05 Vivax wrote:
You could have picked pass, since Kurumi seemed to have picked share information, he would have known your alignment.

On February 18 2013 00:14 Dandel Ion wrote:
Here's what I say happened: Scum kita saw he was confronted with the choice. Kurumi said he wasn't going to kill. Scum kita assumed kurumi would pick "pass" to learn his alignment. He didn't think it through and got announced the killer because kurumi made the correct choice for a townie to make, which is share, instead of pass.

On February 18 2013 00:19 Dandel Ion wrote:

Hell no.

Killing a townie "without any risk"? Sure you do that.

On February 18 2013 00:18 Dandel Ion wrote:
But you were too afraid of dying. Too afraid for a townie to be. u scum son.

On February 18 2013 00:18 Dandel Ion wrote:
But you were too afraid of dying. Too afraid for a townie to be. u scum son.

On February 18 2013 00:30 Dandel Ion wrote:

As I said, you hoped/assumed he would Pass.

On February 18 2013 00:27 Dandel Ion wrote:
Town thought process:
Pass: I might learn his alignment, might get shot without an announcement. Okay, but undesireable.

Share: He might learn my alignment, he might be unveiled as my killer. Both desireable outcomes.

Kill: I can't get killed. I might kill him with a good chance of getting revealed. I have nothing more than a passing suspicion of some random post he did. Clearly the inferior option. I can't killed that night, but I've thrown away my protection for free (not going to roleclaim how my role works). I throw away a kp for a player I have a mafia read on

Scum thought process:
Pass: I already know alignment, might get killed. Nope. Nope, I can't get killed. Best choice since its free

Share: He might learn my alignment. If he shoots me he gets confirmed town since he's announced killer. NOPENOPENOPE. Agreed. a scum player isn't choosing this option

Kill: Kills him. good chance of doing so without outing me, if he passes to learn my alignment. Best option for scum. Nope, you're confusing things again. Share outs me as the killer, not pass. A single kp isn't work a scum lynch

On February 18 2013 00:29 Dandel Ion wrote:
Kita tell me why you didn't claim (or at least hint at it or breadcrumb) the shot on kurumi before the daypost?

Because that's a sign of you hoping you wouldn't be exposed you know.

On February 18 2013 00:47 Dandel Ion wrote:
Your arguments:
1) I have a role that magically explains everything but I won't claim it.

On February 18 2013 00:47 Dandel Ion wrote:
2) I can't read. (as per: "Nope, you're confusing things again. Share outs me as the killer, not pass. A single kp isn't work a scum lynch")

On February 18 2013 00:47 Dandel Ion wrote:
3) I couldn't post, but I could send in my nightactions.

On February 18 2013 00:24 kitaman27 wrote:


In fact, that was the exact argument I used earlier for shooting kurumi. He refused to check syl because he was TOO AFRAID OF DYING. How come you're ignoring this?

On February 18 2013 00:49 Dandel Ion wrote:

I will have to blindly assume syl is town for as long as I think you are scum. Doesn't look like a bus imo.

I'm still firmly null on him.

On February 18 2013 01:00 Dandel Ion wrote:

You said that tho. Don't blame me for the nonsense you say.

On February 18 2013 01:00 Dandel Ion wrote:


Read this again and tell me the incorrect part in detail: "good chance of doing so without outing me, if he passes to learn my alignment"

On February 18 2013 01:00 Dandel Ion wrote:

Sure he did. quite early, too.
He didn't have to say more, since he wasn't planning on, you know, killing shit.

On February 18 2013 01:00 Dandel Ion wrote:

No. You choose to reduce it to such to make it sound trivial, but that doesn't make it true.

On February 18 2013 01:17 kitaman27 wrote:
What happened to gonzaw? At lylo I suddenly become your number one scum read now that my lynch has gained traction? Does all of the reasons gonzaw was scum no longer apply?

On February 18 2013 01:31 Dandel Ion wrote:
ah crap screwd up one of the quotes

here:

If you had wanted to make an educated choice, you should have looked. Especially since you claim he was a scumread of yours. Not only did you never do anything about that, but it also suggests you did not go through his filter at all.
Which is no good sign.

On February 18 2013 01:52 Dandel Ion wrote:
So kita, waddaya say to lynching gonzo instead?

I sense my own weakness crawling into me.
tenacity, was not a virtue to the wished degree.

On February 18 2013 02:18 Dandel Ion wrote:
I am not saying iamp is a bad target, he is currently my guess for scum#4. But you basically ask us to lynch somebody else than you, and close our eyes to pray and hope you hit red.
I do not feel willing to do that.

On February 18 2013 02:24 Dandel Ion wrote:

Shortcuts are available but nobody listens.

On February 18 2013 02:25 jcarlsoniv wrote:


Well, regardless of whether we lynch gonzaw or not, iamperfection is poisoned. Gonzaw would have to give the antidote. Iamperfection is set to die from poison at the lynch (something I don't really oppose), so his life is in gonzaw's hands before the lynch, whether or not gonzaw dies at the same time.

On February 18 2013 01:55 kitaman27 wrote:
Quick question for you soniv if you're around: if iamp was the best candidate in your eyes on day one and you weren't able to convince town about him being scum, why didn't you try to manipulate the lynch by asking town to unvote and revote so that both iamp and oats would be killed?

Sutters, have you come to any conclusions about the difference between syl in this game and hist past games as town? You said you would be commenting on it.

Does anyone else find it strange that the person that gonzaw claims to have poisoned hasn't claimed yet? Either the person that was poisoned doesn't want town to know about it or gonzaw hasn't actually used his ability and is lying to us.

Cheese, you said a couple times that you were 40 pages behind in the thread. Why is that? Could you do me a favor and comment on every player left in the game? k thx.

On February 18 2013 02:30 Dandel Ion wrote:

You have mentioned Syl doing "more" as town, but you have overlooked his actions as scum too.

"more" is something he did as either alignment.

Meta was unconvincing.

I am unsure how you can be so sure of Syl.

This may as well be a big play by you and gonzaw as both scum. To lynch Syl and kill iamp (both town IN THAT CASE), is a win.
Trust is the issue.

On February 18 2013 05:34 Vivax wrote:
Sylencia doesn't look like a good lynch to me.

On February 18 2013 08:27 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Ok, you know what? Out of the people I trust in this game right now, kitaman is not one of them. I trust dandelion slightly more. If gonzaw flips town, it's on your head dandelion.

##sheep Dandelion
##unvote
##Lynch gonzaw

On February 18 2013 08:37 Dandel Ion wrote:
Nah, same goes for gonzaw.

On February 18 2013 08:38 kitaman27 wrote:


So you don't deny my logic essentially proved syl is mafia?

On February 18 2013 08:38 Dandel Ion wrote:
I absolutely deny it.

It's shitty wifom.

On February 18 2013 08:40 Dandel Ion wrote:

Right now.


Hey, remember when you said you're down for lynching gonzaw? I do. Now put your money where your mouth is.

On February 18 2013 08:41 Dandel Ion wrote:

Maybe all 4 mafia already were on Syl. Who knows!

On February 18 2013 08:46 Vivax wrote:
But couldn't they hammer gonzaw right now as well?

On February 18 2013 08:48 jcarlsoniv wrote:


Don't really care how it sounds to you.



I don't really dispute your logic, but the same argument can be made for gonzaw, and you're fighting awfully hard for him not to be lynched.

On February 18 2013 08:49 Vivax wrote:
Your argument sounds right, I just feel really clueless about this game atm, so it's the only thing I can hold on to.

On February 18 2013 08:51 Vivax wrote:
I just don't get why you killed Kurumi.

On February 18 2013 08:53 Dandel Ion wrote:

By how far I have to fight for this lynch, I'm pretty happy about it's results.

The same shit you cite as your "logic" also applies to the gonzaw lynch.

It's laughable how hard and obvious you defend him.

On February 18 2013 08:54 Dandel Ion wrote:

I have the benefit of not being scum.

On February 18 2013 09:02 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Someone shoot kitaman tonight?

kthx

On February 19 2013 08:08 Vivax wrote:
I already know what to create if I become inventor.

On February 19 2013 09:18 Dandel Ion wrote:

Uhm, I kind of can't claim.

On February 19 2013 09:22 Dandel Ion wrote:
I'll prolly go for a shitty one since I'm last in draft order I guess.

On February 19 2013 09:23 Vivax wrote:
Wtf kita, that's a terrible idea.

On February 19 2013 09:32 Dandel Ion wrote:

sick scumhunting.

On February 19 2013 09:49 jcarlsoniv wrote:
You don't want me lynched dandelion. My role is FINALLY useful (whoever made my role, I fucking hate you)

You know deep in your heart that I'm not scum.

On February 20 2013 03:28 jcarlsoniv wrote:


Then it needed to be worded differently. I asked grey, morning of D1 I only had 25 energy. Believe me, if I had a vig shot N2 it would've gone I kita's skull.

On February 26 2013 12:29 Hopeless1der wrote:
aside from all the townies killing themselves off without mafia interference