Village Idiot roles - mainly ones where the mod has to make sure the VI says or does something each day. With 25 people in this game, it'd make life pretty hard for the mods.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 08 2013 13:20 GMT

#22

At least, that's what I came to understand them to be from my friends <.<

Also, /in.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 13 2013 01:14 GMT

#233

On February 13 2013 09:29 kitaman27 wrote:
If we all just agree on the instant majority option early, we can ensure people aren't able to comment freely on the mostly irreverent theme.

We can also use our knowledge of the roles that we picked for another player to our advantage. If we find someone using their role in a sub optimal anti-town way, we can just claim who we picked for and make them pay.

Also, look how scummy that Sylencia guy is! Lets vote for him.

Guys I swear I don't know the man, if he's calling me scummy, he must be scum!

##Vote: kitaman27

Also, hurts us least probably
##Select: Instant Majority Vote

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 00:48 GMT

#511

On February 14 2013 08:46 kitaman27 wrote:
There have been a lot of one line posts and conversational posts. Can we at least try to put a little effort into keeping the thread and the filters manageable?

Generally with my random votes, I just pick the newest player or player I don't recognize to see how they respond and have them start posting. 90% of the time they respond along the lines of "why are you voting for me." and I eventually move on when I find someone else. In this case, I really would like to see a couple more votes on Sylencia. By voting for me in response to my random vote, it shows that he is reading the thread, but only responding to an issue that affects him. He has yet to comment on a relevant issue or shows that he cares about coming up with a plan to benefit town. It may be a lurker vote, but I think we should at least give him some motivation to post and move off tomorrow if we're satisfied and find a better target.

Kurumi, in response to your question about marv, I said that he shouldn't get special treatment for being absent just because he is a vet. There isn't anything in particular about his posting that I've picked up on yet since his return to the thread.

Oats, what kind of response were you hoping to get from Kierathi that would lead you to a town or scum conclusion, based on your earlier post?

Mainly because I don't understand what is even happening in this game O_O

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 01:07 GMT

#525

On February 14 2013 09:49 kitaman27 wrote:
lol again you show up only when I reference you -_-

What exactly don't you understand? Is there anyone that you are suspicious of yet?

Honestly no, I still need to catch up on what happened while I was sleeping but I'm not going to have time until I get home tonight.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 06:01 GMT

#579

Kurumi, since you're voting for me right now, can I ask you to let me perhaps share with you the fact I'm innocent tonight?

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 12:51 GMT

#586

On February 14 2013 20:54 Kurumi wrote:

Show nested quote +

Um, well, I never wanted to share this fact but I am actually Barrack Obama.
Hi USA citizens! Sorry for all the trouble!

I don't even understand.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 15:00 GMT

#594

On February 14 2013 21:53 Kurumi wrote:

Show nested quote +

I have NO reason to believe you're town. You said that you are "innocent". That's nothing.
You are actively lurking, your defence is crap. I don't understand what's overwhelming with this game and I asked you that and you went straight onto defensive >_>

But you realise you have nothing to lose by passing through the night. If I wanted to kill you, it'd be out there in the open wouldn't it?

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 15:01 GMT

#595

well actually, I take that back I'd do it the more traditional way but still, it's a gamble I think you should take.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 23:03 GMT

#825

austin: you asked if I was here about 6 hours ago, I am now - what did you want to ask?

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 23:39 GMT

#885

Kita: I am going to change my vote, there's no point keeping it on you - seeing as how the vote wasn't even a serious one in the first place, I'm just reading through the last 3 pages again to understand where the main frontrunners are getting their votes from.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 23:40 GMT

#890

In any case, Blazinghand's case on Oatsmaster is more compelling to me that a lot of others, so I'll be sheeping with him on this one.

##unvote
##vote: Oatsmaster

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 14 2013 23:55 GMT

#929

On February 15 2013 08:44 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

I appreciate the support, but for your own sake you should give your thought process and reads out now, before the flip. It's important to other people forming reads on you

Short version for now since the boss keeps walking past - his filter reminds me of his scum play in NMM32, a lot of questions asked to others, yet not a lot of his own opinions.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 15 2013 00:02 GMT

#958

Kurumi you didn't pick a poison :|

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 15 2013 00:13 GMT

#976

Well considering iamp's reaction to it...

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 16 2013 03:12 GMT

#1179

Kill kita, Kurumi's first post clearly states he wasn't going to kill. (I was the one who created Kurumi's role, hence why I wanted him to check me)

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 16 2013 04:57 GMT

#1184

You were given information about your choices, and the consequences of each one. Given the nature of the game - it's likely that Kurumi would've breadcrumbed something during Day 1 and yet you somehow didn't read the clear line that says "I shall not kill"? That's not even a cryptic clue - it's as clear as day.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 16 2013 04:58 GMT

#1185

Also : Lynch: kitaman27

I don't even understand what the election is for.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 17 2013 03:21 GMT

#1261

Pretty sure kita is still prime lynch here, with his deflection onto me I can only assume I'm seeing something which everyone else is missing.

Kurumi died last night due to the wager.

If Kurumi was scum, he would've chosen me and killed me knowing I'd pick share. Reason? I told him to so that I could tell him which side I was on. That would mean that Kurumi would get a free kill during the night with little risk of being revealed.

If Kurumi was town, he still could have picked me there and if he passes there, and I was scum, I would pick either Kill or Pass. If I pick pass, Kurumi would pick up that something was off since I said I'd share. If I picked kill, the same thing that happened to Kita would happen. I would be exposed as the one who killed Kurumi.

What actually happened during the night was that he decided to pick Kita as his target and he passed.

If Kita is scum - he knows that Kurumi isn't scum and so he could get a free kill, best case where Kurumi wishes to share which side he is on. That gives him high motivation to kill.

If Kita is town - he doesn't know if Kuru is town or scum. In this case, the best option would be to pass on both suspicions. As I said above, if Kurumi was scum, he wouldn't have done the whole 'I don't trust you' speech to me, and selected me because he knew I was going to share. This makes it a lot less likely he was scum. Thus given that there was a high chance he was town, town doesn't pick someone to select Kill on unless he had a read on them. This was also unlikely as he never made any mention of it whatsoever in any of the posts. If he had suspected Kita of being scum, why was he voting fo rthe same person as the suspect? It doesn't add up.

Thus, if Kita was town, the correct move would've been to pass or share, with pass being the safer option in the case Kuru WAS scum because he'd be exposed as scum pretty much instantly.

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 17 2013 03:55 GMT

#1271

On February 17 2013 12:28 Dandel Ion wrote:
Sylencia, I don't quite follow.

I'm pretty sure share is the correct option to pick as town, as opposed to pass. Pass doesn't announce the killer.

C'mon even I remember that. And I didn't even make the role.

Hm, yes seems like I've mixed myself up =\

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 17 2013 03:57 GMT

#1272

Urgh, I thought I had it worked out as well - now the majority of what I just said doesn't even make any sense ==;;

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 17 2013 04:38 GMT

#1274

Yeah, given I mixed them up, having townie needing to share makes it more compelling that it was not a town oriented move to kill. The original case I said that pass was the move because I was considering the open reveal as a fallback plan, but since I apparently don't even know my own role I made, sharing has no downside for a townie :\

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 17 2013 23:56 GMT

#1511

Eh, I don't even have much to defend myself with - but if I die it makes kitaman's kill so much more worth it, a two for one :\

Sylencia

Australia1057 Posts

February 18 2013 00:03 GMT

#1530

gg guys

Normal

Please or register to reply.