[T] MTG Mini Mafia II

On January 25 2013 03:15 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

You are quite obviously the inferior hydra.

Fear (This creature can't be blocked except by artifact creatures and/or black creatures.)

On December 25 2012 04:12 strongandbig wrote:
More people sign up for this!!! not too many slots left and it's gonna be awesome.

Also, I'll probably be hydra-ing with Marv.

On January 25 2013 07:32 strongandbig wrote:
Huh I need to make a hydra account for me and marv....

On January 29 2013 08:53 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Also, if someone even dares to play a 0/X creature with no abilities, then I'll seriously have to consider "policy lynching" you

Why 0/X creatures suck:
If you are scum, then it means that you have 1 blockable and basically indestructible monster. Thus, town have to spend more effort/time to kill you, thus you survive longer

If you are town, then it means that maybe a random scum won't attack you directly that easy....maybe?

If you are town, try to establish your innocence (preferably following the commandments above). If you do, then no townie should attack you AT ALL the whole game. If scum want to attack you, they have to FoS you first. If they do it badly the rest of town will fuck him up, so don't worry, don't be afraid and put a 0/X beast just to "defend" yourself.

If you do however, we also can't know if you are mafia or not, since 0/X creatures are good for mafia as well. So you basically confuse the hell out of town, and maybe even convince town to kill you

If you have a 0/X beast to play, please tell us first, and most importantly tell us why you are playing it, so we don't try to "policy kill" you.
I'll heavily consider killing anybody that doesn't follow this.

---

I also don't see many downsides to stating to the thread what you are playing before you do (if it's something unblockable, etc), so consider doing that.

For instance:
I'm playing BlooodStained Mire, a land card right now

Has no effect at all for now (I'm not activating it until I consult with Prom)

On January 29 2013 10:58 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Also, how about a "if marv doesn't post anything at all lynch him" policy kill this game?

You won't get away with it this game buddy

Also, just like I did in the previous game:

Read the whole thread before deciding to cast anything with mana cost

Have to be careful about scum casting stuff to avoid the plan, then saying "oops! Didn't read the thread!"
Hopefully stupid townies don't do it either.

On January 29 2013 11:19 Stutters695 wrote:

Haven't we established that using as much mana as possible isn't entirely helpful? Drawing is great but if we mill ourselves were ditching a lot of potentially powerful cards when we discard to seven since we won't have mana.

Since you haven't mentioned it, what are your thoughts on forcing the scummiest players into contributing their mana for it?

On January 29 2013 11:40 Hopeless1der wrote:

Well on that note, I think you should be able to play zombie infestation instead of contributing anything to the draws so that you can benefit sooner (because you'll be able to discard this turn, right?). I'd like to take a collective voyage next turn, as I'm running basic lands. Feel free to flame me for that all you want. In the meantime, I still need to read the first MTG, so away I go.
~Hopeless

On January 29 2013 12:04 SuckMyTopdeck wrote:


If you're reading it this way, you're reading it wrong.

On January 29 2013 11:40 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:



Do you agree with my plan?
If so, then we have to wait for you to use your mana, and preferably casting those creatures.

Also, if the plan is to get people 2/4 cards, then it won't matter if you play "as many cards", because if you play too many cards, and we draw a lot of cards for you to get 7, then lots of players will have to discard cards

/G

On January 29 2013 16:13 BinOnFire wrote:
IGrok has posted absolutely nothing of use so far, only like 3 serious posts.
Really not looking good.

This post especially

Like he is roleplaying, then goes into serious mode, then goes into roleplaying.
Lynch him.

On January 29 2013 18:02 Oatsmaster wrote:
Well, I dont think that the 'voting' system will work to well cause you cant really enforce people to 'vote'.

Ok what do you guys think about a lynch all lurker's policy, where we hit the person with the lowest post count with all that we got?

On January 29 2013 19:32 zebezt wrote:
I'm assuming you are Oats.

If you seriously can't figure out why just counting the number of posts somebody has is the best way to decide who should die...

I'm not gonna waste time explaining it.

On January 29 2013 21:07 Acrofales wrote:
@RockHydra: what flavour of storm are you running and should we be worried you can kill us all if you draw a monster hand?

On January 29 2013 21:07 Acrofales wrote:
@RockHydra: what flavour of storm are you running and should we be worried you can kill us all if you draw a monster hand?

On January 29 2013 21:27 Clockwork Hydra wrote:


Apologetic, defensive, wishy washy? Hits them all. Hi scum, welcome to the thread! You don't get to play the noobie card, and if you're scum with marv, you need to streamline your tactics so only one of you does it next game.

Coincidentally, mind telling me what you think of Marv?

On January 30 2013 00:40 zebezt wrote:


I'm kinda hoping that Artanis has filtered out such overly aggressive decks.

/zebezt

On January 30 2013 02:00 Hopeless1der wrote:
I have two phyrexian walkers I wish to play. Any objections?

On January 30 2013 02:03 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
No real objection to playing them I guess, but why do you have phyrexian walkers in a ninja deck?

~dandel

On January 30 2013 00:48 Stutters695 wrote:
I'm up, catching up now.

On January 30 2013 01:05 Clockwork Hydra wrote:


You are running really scared of what scum *might* do, instead of thinking of what they probably WILL do. If there is some deck that will combo out everybody on T2, then it is 3.5x more likely to be on town side. Meaning we have a 7:2 chance of town winning on T2, right off the bat. Maybe we should discuss deck strategies a bit more and who is playing what, in order to decide whether any potential combos will fuck us over, or win us the game. Thereby shifting the probabilities even further in our favour.

Also, you only have to fear zombies, if you're scum.
Are you scum, iGrok? Your extremely cautious play indicates to me that you are. A townie being afraid of all the potential ways he can die would try to figure out whether they can and will actually happen, rather than fear monger with it.

Also, as I said above, townies have statistics on their side and thus less reason to be scared.

/Acro

On January 30 2013 07:59 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Rock (zeb especially): I want to hear more from you. I know how excited you were for this and I happen to know you better than anyone in this game (since I was your town coach) give me something to work with here.
p

On January 30 2013 21:20 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

Not a lie. It's entirely from my point of view, but it's not a lie.

/Acro

On January 30 2013 22:22 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
Why, that's completely pointless. If you tell me that you're afraid of the dark, I'm not going to look at it from your point of view. I'm going to tell you that you shouldn't be afraid of the dark and give you a bunch of reasons for why the dark isn't scary.

You know why zombies aren't scary if you're not scum? Because they won't attack you!

On January 30 2013 23:34 Aperture Science wrote:
Here's my analysis of Bin.

On January 31 2013 03:14 BinOnFire wrote:
My other high-priority read is RockHydra, mostly due to this empty promise of his:





So what does he actually post?



Lazy sheeping, baaa. Actual contributions? Neigh!

On January 31 2013 03:10 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
So who do you think is that scum hydra?
If you are not the scum hydra, at least help us get him.


Also that's the truth marv. Or rather it's something I know WILL happen in this game (it's kind of inevitable). You can't just say "Fuck you just make a decent read on me, if you don't it's your fault", mafia doesn't work like that.

/G

On January 31 2013 05:01 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:


Well, I'd like to see that math of yours. I got that there is a 9% chance no hydra is scum, and that's if scum are chosen uniformly (I might have gotten it wrong though)
Take away uniformity to take balance and stuff into account, and that chance is even smaller.
Take into account that Nova doesn't seem to be scum, thus that the only way no hydra is scum is if both Stutters+Crossfire are scum, and that chance goes even lower and lower.

Also lol:

If I am scum, then what I'm saying is 100% true isn't it?

I want to put attention on hydras, and not let anybody fly under the radar. Again (I've said this like 10 times), so we don't repeat what happened last game.

I won't 100% oppose a Stutters+Crossfire scumteam though, if there is evidence for such. And I'd probably not oppose it after someone flips, not before most likely.

/G

On January 31 2013 05:33 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
@Rock: What do you think of Suck? You haven't mentioned them in that "thoughts" post of yours.

Also again, if you had to choose, which one of Nova/Cross/Stutters is scum and why? Or if you think all 3 are town, explain to me why you think Cross is town



What's your "updated" read on Bin?
What about the other hydras?

---

If you guys are going against Nova+Stutters/etc, remember: It's VERY unlikely 2 of them are scum.

Thus, if you find Nova suspicious, you basically find Stutters and Crossfire like confirmed town. Same with the other 2.

Thus, if you put suspicion on any of them, before spouting stuff in the thread (or rather before actively FoSing any of them), think about how that changes your read on Stutters/Crossfire, and see if it's consistent and you agree.
If you think something is wrong, then better reconsider your initial push (unless you want to pressure the guy, which is fine I guess)

I am suspicious of Crossfire, and I don't see any inconsistencies with my reads on Nova and Stutters, thus I'm slightly more confident in that read.

On January 31 2013 07:23 SuckMyTopdeck wrote:
I don't think I've ever read anything that less demonstrates how someone is mafia. For that, I congratulate you.

-marvelbabe

On January 31 2013 08:02 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Cute scum claim cross, good to see you working with town on this one.

P

On January 31 2013 10:05 Hopeless1der wrote:

Nova vs Suck
Colors are relative and not necessarily representative of strong reads

---

Aperture
That analysis post/link is awesome as far as scumhunting goes. He's set a standard for himself that needs to be upheld so I feel quite good about his overall contributions so far, and I expect similar in the future.

---

At least 1 hydra...
BinOnFire is my pick right now if I have to pick one, but I don't necessarily subscribe to the 1 (non)-hydra MUST 100% be scum. I'm rereading right now and grabbing dinner. Back soon.

~Hopeless

On January 31 2013 17:09 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:


Actually, this game is 3 days long, dear.
The "there isn't much to go on yet" part is false, at least to form opinions (if not black and white "he's scum/town" reads).

Also in a normal game you'd be crucified for saying that (considering you would have voted for a lynch by now).

Also hey, I don't have "good reads" on people either, yet I'm not being called out as scum, which reduces the possibilities for scum in many people's eyes, thus making the game easier for town. That's something isn't it? You guys should try it some time.

/G

On January 31 2013 08:19 Crossfire99 wrote:This makes no sense seriously. I'm just...lask;dfjkl;sdjlakj.f...aaaaaarrrrrrgggggggggggggg...why are you attacking me for playing according to my reads...ajdsfljdfiopjdoajfp

On January 31 2013 10:15 Stutters695 wrote:

...

Then to defend not looking at hydras when mathematically it is way more likely for a hydra is svummy as duck to me.

On January 31 2013 23:09 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
I'm interested zeb, can you make a case on our friend Xfire? I'd like to see your points laid out in one place so I can see what you are thinking.
p

On January 31 2013 23:47 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
Just as our discarding of Larry's Disk says NOTHING about our alignment and anybody trying to read shit into it is wrong (not that I am worried about you thinking I'm town because of it, it's just fucking stupid to use THAT of all things to think so).
/Acro

On January 31 2013 12:29 Hopeless1der wrote:

iGrok!

---

Are you genuinely upset that I'm lurky? Like...if someone had to pick 1 word to describe me, that's probably the one.

---

Nah, I'm right there with you.

---

So...I've reread and haven't come up with much that I can report on right now, nothing strikes me as scummy enough to pursue at this point. I'm headed to bed. See you all tomorrow.

~Hopeless

On February 01 2013 02:56 Hopeless1der wrote:

wait what? which filter have I been looking at, stutters hasn't done shit to me

On February 01 2013 03:02 Clockwork Hydra wrote:


Here you say they further your goals, which is presumably to play ninjas. However, the first thing you actually DO with them is:

AKA keep them as a blocker.

Why the inconsistency in play? I'm starting to agree with SnB here. If a creature can attack, it should be.

/Acro

On January 30 2013 14:47 Crossfire99 wrote:


I'm going to quote what I send in Parallel World Mafia because the same thing applies here.

On February 01 2013 04:30 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

Your earlier post:


You only accept people not attacking if they are legitimately doing other things. You are not. Why you contradict yourself?

On February 01 2013 04:45 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
K, Rock's filter is nice and short and full of fluff. Of the two, my earlier town read on H1 has gone to a slight scum read. However, my earlier null read on Zebezt is moving towards the town spectrum.

I want to know how they are so incredibly schizophrenic, though. It's a great strategy as scum: Xfire is town! No! Xfire is scum!

So what's your stance on Xfire?

In fact, I am missing general scum reads, the whole filter is confusing in that sense. Lot of waffle, some town reads, but no pressure and no consolidated reads. If you had a 10/10 trample thingy, who would you attack? And why? Go.

/Acro

On January 29 2013 13:55 Crossfire99 wrote:
Hi guys. Just so you know I'm a magic noob. I was supposed to hydra with Risen, but he dropped out and took all the magic knowledge with him lol. I'll try to do my best, but I'll probably still be dumb, therefore, feel free to correct me when I make mistakes because I know I will.

As for this whole Mind Glow issue. I only think a few mana total should be used on it because I don't think it is wise to discard so many cards because that's wasteful. I also don't think I would contribute mana to it because it seems like a big goal of using it is so Bin can get that Voyage card, which if I understand correctly won't help me at all. Risen seems to have had a fondness for non basic lands (all of my basic lands are already in play lol).

Oh, also can anyone that played in the first MTG Mafia summarize any hugely important things from it? Basically, I'm trying to think what is better, everyone attacking 1 person or everyone slowly whittling down everyone else, so they'll be easier to kill later. Typing that out makes me think that attacking 1 person is best because it will be as close to a normal lynch as possible, but I'm not sure with all this magic stuff, so I'm asking.

On January 30 2013 14:43 Crossfire99 wrote:
Now onto some scum hunting. Let's take a look at Clockwork shall we. Look at the contradiction at how he responds to virtually the same question: + Show Spoiler + and this + Show Spoiler +. Why is he so upset that I asked that question when before he thought it a completely relevant and important question to spend some time on a serious response? There is no reason for such a disparity in opinion.

Also, look at this post where they advise caution when powering up a single person + Show Spoiler +. Then look at how they throw caution to the wind and say everyone trust us and do what's best for us because they would benefit disproportionately from this Minds Aglow play with tons of mana put towards it + Show Spoiler +. I mean it's not even 3 hours into day 1 yet. It would be one thing to just advocate power plays, but the fact they warn against them and say to be really careful, but then instantly say to back theirs is ridiculous.

Lastly, I already showed before how their attack on me was bad and all of this definitely has me thinking Clockwork is the first scum.

On January 31 2013 08:19 Crossfire99 wrote:


Seriously, you want me to use mana for Join Forces, when I think Clockwork is the most scummy as of right now. Oh hey what's this post by you to suck:



This makes no sense seriously. I'm just...lask;dfjkl;sdjlakj.f...aaaaaarrrrrrgggggggggggggg...why are you attacking me for playing according to my reads...ajdsfljdfiopjdoajfp

On January 31 2013 08:25 Crossfire99 wrote:

I have a freaking life and it is pretty busy right now. I played at night when the started 2 days when i had time. I played at night last night when i had time. Now i am playing just when i got home. I really really really really really lrajljafl;dsfjal; klaldsfj want to attack you right now just cause of the crap you just said, but I know that is just me not thinking clearly because of what you said, so I'm not going to decide rihgt now. ughguigho

On January 31 2013 08:39 Crossfire99 wrote:

Your right Gonzaw. Sorry, for getting so angry. There's a lot of crap going on irl causing me to be stressed and i'm getting way too pissed off at people saying where's crossfire. crossfire isn't here. crossfire needs to post more becaues I know i am literally using every free moment to play this game.

I hope we can have a clean start from here and i will try not to let me emotions get the best of me. Feel free to call me out again if I get too angry again. I don't want to play like that.

On February 01 2013 04:54 Stutters695 wrote:
So you think that the two most likely scum are both single players (8% chance if random, unlikely if not random)? you would also attack him over XF who you just said you were going to make a case on?

On February 01 2013 05:06 Acrofales wrote:
RockHydra, secretly not a hydra, but:
+ Show Spoiler +

On February 01 2013 03:28 RockHydra wrote:
From Xfires WLIIA filter:+ Show Spoiler +

Anyways, I think his rage is completely over the top, but his reads match up with his actions around putting mana into minds aglow, as well as his indignant response to gonzaw when called out for it. He doesn't have to stop and think about why he's upset, he knows immediately that he didnt want to give CH zombies. I dislike that he didn't talk about anything, but then again, why would scum intentionally shroud their actions? I don't think they would. I don't want to attack crossfire, he doesn't make sense as scum to me. Here's another example:

I had a double-take upon reading this post. I say I have a townread on cross, and he posts something that basically says my reasoning is irrelevant. I don't see why scum would bother telling me to question myself when I had a townread.

On February 01 2013 05:50 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:


Derp lol I forgot about Nova lol

Put it Xfire/Nova/Rock, followed by CH/Bin/Stutters.

I am not really fond of Nova's attack of you (even if strong's case wasn't that good either).
He hasn't been around for a while, which he was last game.
I.e he was around on D1 with his "laid back" one liners, but in MTG 1 he kept the same behaviour all game long.
Now he suddenly stopped doing anything this D2..?

He could be scum.

Hmm....it's a toss between him and Xfire to be honest. I don't really see Rock as scum, zbest saying he doesn't have any read is not something scum do.

/G

On February 01 2013 05:52 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Rock, how about instead of talking about Nova you talk about Aperture?

/G

On January 31 2013 23:55 Aperture Science wrote:

I already said I'm going to do Xfire and Nova. But it will have to wait until I get home from work.

Also, unrelated, GreY is almost back from Italy

On February 01 2013 06:20 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Also, maybe we should figure out how much damage town can deal tomorrow

CH can deal 11
I can deal 9
That's 20 damage, we would need 19 more damage to, for instance, kill both Xfire and Aperture?

Is this possible?

Also, if CH's zombies attacks go through today (which I thought it couldn't), then we need less town KP

/G

On February 01 2013 06:25 Nova_Terra wrote:
Im here till main phase, if anyone needs me to answer something, shoot

On February 01 2013 06:26 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Nova, I think posting your thoughts on the 2 giant cases that were posted is a good start

/G

On February 01 2013 07:10 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Yeah Nova

Like, everybody's job right now is stating if they agree with the cases or not, because tomorrow we are 100% attacking those 2 guys and hopefully killing one of them.

Stutters and Nova haven't posted their thoughts on them yet.....Rock hasn't either for some reason (I don't know why Apperture posting his "analysis" will make my case invalid or something)

/G

On February 01 2013 07:57 Stutters695 wrote:

Not quite (unless this is changed and I don't remember it from the rules for the mafia gain. 2/2 attacks 0/3

0/3 turns to 0/1 until turn end and the zombie stays at 2/2

On February 01 2013 08:24 Crossfire99 wrote:

I know right...seriously

On February 01 2013 08:31 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
Rock, can you use the walker you just played (the one that can't attack) to get rid of xfire's soul warden?

No need to give him more HP than necessary.

~dandel

On February 01 2013 08:41 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Anyways, no matter what happens we are still in a better position than town was in the previous game lol

Rock, will you use your other "useless permanents" for something?
We can use it to destroy that Goblin card of his so he can't block with it

/G

On February 01 2013 08:49 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

You can't. You can either tap him for damage, or tap him to attack.

Also, Rock, can you please get rid of that Soul Warden before his scumbuddy plays creatures?

On February 01 2013 08:56 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
I propose this:

Aperture: Destroy your Braid of Fire with The Abyss and destroy Xfire's Goblin

If you do not, then you'll claim scum along Xfire

Does this seem like a good idea to enforce?

On February 01 2013 09:50 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
where does Rock's two come from? His shuriken isn't equipped to the best of my knowledge. False?

On February 01 2013 09:28 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Anyways, we can go hunting for the remaining scum

Who here thinks Aperture isn't the remaining scum?

Also, who thinks that CH/me/Rock/Bin could possibly be scum in any way possible (regarding what's happening with Xfire and previous interactions)? Please raise your hand.

/G

On February 01 2013 11:37 BinOnFire wrote:
There is probably a better thing to do than tunneling me with the limited time you have.
Oats' shit just feels bad, and MG isn't playing like I know he can in a mason circle (which is what a Hydra is).
This is really weird, wont Scum Oats+MG make sure I dont do idiotic things? Like the thing you just called me scum for is what scum WOULDNT do.

On February 01 2013 16:06 Nova_Terra wrote:
So i could tap my treetop village to make it a 3/3 ape, but then its tapped. Wonderful.

On February 01 2013 22:13 Aperture Science wrote:


You would indeed, but in order to use it I need someone else to cast a instant or sorcery that does damage.
-GreY

On February 01 2013 22:20 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

You could have had us in your deck.
just sayin

~dandel

On February 02 2013 00:12 zebezt wrote:
If we can't kill xfire this turn, maybe we can use SuckMyTopdeck's Words of War... if it's allowed to activate that "during upkeep". Then at least xfire would die during drawphase, before any sorcery can be cast.
Not sure if this games setup allows abilities during upkeep though

On February 02 2013 00:54 Stutters695 wrote:


I have a instant that's +1/+1 trample infect for all creatures I control, nothing that just blanket affects the board though.

On February 02 2013 04:52 SuckMyTopdeck wrote:
wait the plan wont work
he can sac a land to kill nova's creature

On February 02 2013 04:57 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
Rock, what's your opinion of AS?

On February 02 2013 06:59 zebezt wrote:
we could have killed him in the next drawphase though.. no more lifesucking sorceries
but oh well

also:
maybe the ninja's don't seem so awesome to some.. but that's cause they lurk in the shadows n such... we might have a couple on the board that just have detected all notice. Also they don't listen to our commands :/

/zebezt

Well crossfire is my number one read but he's been discussed to death. I'll have a post explaining my next best read when I get a few minutes of downtime at work. In the meantime I'll contribute to discussions however I can. I will say I feel a bit better about AS now that he's a bit more into it. Right now I don't think Nova is scum so if X turns out to be town I'd bet on a double hydra team.

On February 02 2013 23:39 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

I am totally okay with you doing something too. Who is Xfire's partner in crime and why?

/Acro

On February 03 2013 06:26 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
Crossfire prolly outed himself because we made a bulletproof case on him and he's BY FAR not good enough a (scum) player to wiggle out of it.

Any assumption further than that is crazy tinfoil-hat talk.

~dandel

On February 03 2013 06:32 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
I'm sure you see what I see.

On February 03 2013 19:39 zebezt wrote:
Good morning all.
I don't have much time now, but I have a question, can the onslaught fetchlands be used to fetch a dual land?

/zebezt

On February 04 2013 05:22 Nova_Terra wrote:

well im not actively playing against my wincon, and im still town. Trying to deal with RL issues and all, probably my last TL mafia game cause shit hit the fan. so is life, apparently.

On February 04 2013 16:07 zebezt wrote:
Good morning all
Havent read much yet, just wanted to point out that this makes sense to me.



You and stutters cant both be scum, coz xfire already is. So there is no reason not to trust your word on Stutters.
I dont have the time to read all of stutters old games to figure out his meta


/zebezt

On February 04 2013 17:52 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Do you think that is worth the trade off that comes from drawing attention to himself and diverging drastically from his past meta? Why or why not? What would you do if you rolled scum?

p

On February 04 2013 19:17 Nova_Terra wrote:

Ok
Thing is i do assume that hes scum, i just aknowledge the slight chance that he isnt (which is still growing smaller)

On February 03 2013 18:45 Nova_Terra wrote:
..

If Crossfire indeed flips scum, we need to take a look at these interactions:
..

On February 04 2013 21:59 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
Yup. I also regularly claim vig as scum and shoot my scumbuddy in the face. Oh wait. Nobody does that because it doesn't work.

The only reason I felt it needed to be brought to your attention is because idiots keep bringing it up as if they might be seriously entertaining the idea. Like... if you want to call me scum, go through my filter and make a case. Otherwise, go bugger a goat.

/Acro

On February 04 2013 23:53 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

General mtg advice:
@Rock: you can attack anybody you like with your Phyrexian thingy, so attack us: we won't block it. Then ninja in your giant beasty to do 5 damage to the target you actually want to kill.

On February 04 2013 21:19 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

Second, I agree that Aperture needs to die. ...
Why not advising Xfire doesn't make him town: if I were scum I would advise Xfire to blow shit up at the end of the attack phase (before damage resolution of course). This has 2 advantages: the first is that town might spend extra resources in killing you and the second is that you know exactly how much damage you need to prevent. The disadvantage is that town might blow up your creatures before you can blow shit up, meaning you might need to sac more lands.

/Acro

On February 05 2013 06:29 Aperture Science wrote:

His point is that GreY and I are good at MtG, therefore we would have told Xfire to wait.

At least I think thats it

On February 05 2013 07:11 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Hopeless has been kind of absent lately as well (I think). I'd like his thoughts on this whole thing

On February 06 2013 03:08 Nova_Terra wrote:
I'm not even going to try to defend this cause if you want to see it that way go ahead, im not gonna stop you. However I think that I can use a Marv defense here and say that my scum play is much better than what you give credit it for

On January 30 2013 00:50 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
Not to say that if you have a shitty chump blocker that you played for its useful side effect (mogg fanatic or so), that you can't use it to chump block if someone decides to attack you. The no-blocker policy is unenforceable anyway. In general townies should always favour attacking over blocking, but I can definitely agree with a townie defending against some giant beast with some chump, rather than doing 1 measly damage themselves (unless that 1 damage is enough to kill scum).

/Acro

On February 06 2013 07:09 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:


Yeah, but I'm the kind of townie that wants to figure the game out, and get the whole scumteam as soon as possible and then watch and laugh as they fall.

Trying to do that here is not going as planned lol

Just "killing everybody" seems kind of a "loss" to me in that sense, even if we win.
Just like in OMGUS, I had a game where we were like 7v1 hunting for a SK. We misslynched like twice or something, but because of setup shit and numbers alone the SK was caught and died, and we won, but I still was angry as fuck.

Yeah something like that is happening here. It's frustrating as fuck.

/G

On February 06 2013 09:26 SuckMyTopdeck wrote:
Hi Hopeless (not zeb, hopeless). Do you think I'm mafia, if so, why? Make it a proper answer if you do, pretty plz

On February 05 2013 11:07 SuckMyTopdeck wrote:
I'll say this only once again: if me/aperture flip town, make sure you are actually able to flip CH next.

Anyway, this game isn't fun anymore so I won't be posting anymore.

On February 06 2013 15:22 Nova_Terra wrote:
Alright guys i now have another question:
Since when is stutters as townie as Poster?
I dont like it one bit