|
Sniped. Hmm.
It's weird though, if you are looking for other scum candidates and trying to pull wagons on them, that means that you aren't satisfied with a Tunkeg lynch. If you aren't satisfied, why don't you explain this?
|
On December 12 2012 04:06 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 04:01 Clarity_nl wrote:
He has a couple of one liners that aren't alignment indicative at all.
Exactly. And that's the majority of his filter. Clarity here's the link to his filter, I don't think you've read it http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=384953&user=235418There is only one big post in there. And he makes comments about three people Where are you getting this nonsense from?
Read my goddamn case and stop burying it in your disjointed thoughts spread out over 5 posts.
I say his filter shows he cares about his appearance too much.
You say he clearly doesn't because he has one liners.
I say his one liners aren't alignment indicative.
You say his filter is only made up of one liners.
BUT ITS FUCKING NOT, READ MY CASE
|
|
|
On December 12 2012 04:07 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 04:06 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:03 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote:
The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else.
At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later.
The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active.
Clarity, if you think your case on jay is so good, why in the fuck are you not rallying people to jay?????? Because a lot of people showed they disagreed and there is no momentum. I also don't have anything to add about jay since making that case, and repeating myself a lot seems pointless. I can easily revisit it tomorrow, today I want BL lynched. Lol. This is not a townie mindset at all You believe so strongly you are right? We have what, 6 hours til lynch? And you aren't pushing your lynch???????????????????????????????????????????????? The fuck>?
I am pushing my lynch, my lynch changed. How is this hard to understand?
|
On December 12 2012 04:09 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 04:06 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:01 Clarity_nl wrote:
He has a couple of one liners that aren't alignment indicative at all.
Exactly. And that's the majority of his filter. Clarity here's the link to his filter, I don't think you've read it http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=384953&user=235418There is only one big post in there. And he makes comments about three people Where are you getting this nonsense from? Read my goddamn case and stop burying it in your disjointed thoughts spread out over 5 posts. I say his filter shows he cares about his appearance too much. You say he clearly doesn't because he has one liners. I say his one liners aren't alignment indicative. You say his filter is only made up of one liners. BUT ITS FUCKING NOT, READ MY CASE
yes it is
On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote:So the very first thing BL does is post a massive "rapid fire scum reads and suspicions" that no one asked for. + Show Spoiler [giant post] +On December 10 2012 21:37 Bluelightz wrote:Alright, from reading the thread here's some rapid fire scum reads and suspicions - as well as answers after I play some games after posting this.
Firstly, thrawn. What I find suspicious about him is that first, he only answers questions when pressured, this is an example of trying not to give information to town and because he has a bunch of one-liners in his filter. Also, shall we take a look at his vote? Oh, it's on WBG, why is it on WBG??? He says that WBG has rubbed him the scummiest out of all the responses, but I think his vote is justified, and thrawn's point is not. Because WBG says because his vote (at the time on thrawn) is because of LALiars, which is possibly true because we don't know thrawn's alignment and his intentions in doing that (although thrawn has explained why he claimed Miller, but in his explanation "It first was mostly a joke but it was also intended to jumpstart discussion", wait what? He's trying to shed a good light to his mostly bad action)
Second, jaybrundage:Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 10:32 jaybrundage wrote:On December 10 2012 10:29 thrawn2112 wrote:All the people in the past, present, and future who ask why I lied about being miller..... can go and read this post. If they don't like it then they can just continue reading it because that's all I've got to say about it. You tried to brush off bears vote. And then when the whole thread is asking you to explain you dont give an answer. Ok heres my thought of process. IF you dont wanna get lynched today your gonna have to try harder then that. If your a town player then your gonna have to put some effort in your defense because as it is I could totally see my self lynching you. I dont wanna start an early easy bandwagon. But your making a pretty good case for your self why your scum. It has been said by clarity already but how I think it is, it's a attempt to avoid pressure, also the sentence after: Does he give a bloody explanation on why thrawn is making a good case why he's scum? nope (so where's the info we can discuss bro?). Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 10:37 jaybrundage wrote:On December 10 2012 10:33 thrawn2112 wrote:On December 10 2012 10:28 Adam4167 wrote:On December 10 2012 10:24 thrawn2112 wrote:On December 10 2012 10:19 Adam4167 wrote:On December 10 2012 09:57 thrawn2112 wrote:
any answer I could possibly give would just betray the actual purpose behind that post, making whatever I hoped to accomplish with that post no longer possible I think you better try to explain what you were hoping to accomplish here. On November 01 2012 08:25 thrawn2112 wrote:
If a miller claims D1 I don't even know what my thought process would be for deciding if I believe them or not, so I'm hesitatingly saying that I disagree with the idea I find this post sits in a stark contrast to your current play, and this is from one of your recent town games (ACME). What's the stark contrast? I don't see how these things are even related. Are you trying to suggest I'm scum? because you went about it pretty subtly. Town you from ACME says that you disagree with the idea of millers claiming, and that you don't even know what your thought process would be for deciding if its real or not. Why are you trying to put everyone else in a similar position of confusion? If I wanted to call you scum, I would have. What I want to know is why you are doing what you are doing. That's not even the issue. How am I putting anyone in a compromising decision about whether or not to believe the claim when millers aren't even self aware? I don't understand what accusation you're trying to make, it makes no sense in the context of what the OP has to say about millers. Dude... Its not whether we believe you. Your lying simple. Not a single persons believes your claim its about why are you lying. For no damn reason. And what purpose would town have to do that. It only makes sense from a mafia perspective Piggybacking other people's opinion and not giving one's own: Not giving information to the discussion. Also, lastly, I don't understand why he keeps pressuring thrawn for a response, is thrawn's response so pivotal to him? This along with clarity's case, I will vote jaybrundage. ##vote: jaybrundage
So on my simple one post suspicions: Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 12:47 wherebugsgo wrote:
alrighty.
I've concluded from the current events that there's an 80% preliminary chance that Palmar is scum.
Therefore I'm voting him, at least until he comes back and proves me otherwise.
##unvote
##vote Palmar Why, everyone knows that chances suck balls in mafia correct? This is as same as lying to be frank (does he know more than we do? Does he know more shit so he can base his 80% chance that Palmar is scum? Is this just an attempt to get a good town player d34d through the lynch?) Show nested quote +On December 10 2012 14:11 debears wrote:
Clarity in particular I like this part
That's not even the issue. How am I putting anyone in a compromising decision about whether or not to believe the claim when millers aren't even self aware? I don't understand what accusation you're trying to make, it makes no sense in the context of what the OP has to say about millers.
Dude... Its not whether we believe you. Your lying simple. Not a single persons believes your claim its about why are you lying. For no damn reason. And what purpose would town have to do that. It only makes sense from a mafia perspective He says: 1) There's no town mindset in saying it 2) There's a lot of scum mindset Yet, he keeps warning thrawn he'll get lynch if he keeps it up. And the wishy-washiness despite having said the above "Hey he found it but I'll explain this thing he found!" Doesn't bother to read jaybrundage's filter, but simply describes what jay said in his post.
Okay game time. Gonna drop my vote off in the voting thread The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else. At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later. The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active. Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 01:43 Bluelightz wrote:
Aight. From the thread, I'm gonna vote
##Vote: Adam4167
Because of Palmar's case and my own reasons. I believe this is the most helpful vote I can put in before I sleep as I have school so can't be here @ the deadline. Here is his voteswitch. First off, he doesn't mention why he switched away from Jay. When prompted he answered: Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 01:45 Bluelightz wrote:On December 12 2012 01:42 marvellosity wrote:
BL, do you still think jay is the scummiest? Losing confidence in his lynch, so I switched to Adam because it will probably be the lynch (barring any new cases while I sleep) and because of the reasons I have listed. Notice the phrasing. He's "losing confidence in his lynch." Because of him "losing confidence" he switches to Adam. He explains why: " Because he will probably be the lynch and because Palmar and my reasons" Since I didn't know his reasons, I asked him what they were. He responded by quoting one of his older posts: Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 21:58 Bluelightz wrote:On Adam, On December 10 2012 13:07 Adam4167 wrote:In fact, why are you not voting me dabears? On December 10 2012 11:43 debears wrote:
@Djo
The person that I don't like so far is adam. I would arguably say he has been just as, if not more, aggressive with you on thrawn. Yet, he hasn't voted him. He implied heavily that thrawn was scum, yet doesn't think he's scummy when asked directly. Furthermore, he keeps hard questioning thrawn on a response that thrawn basically said he wouldn't say (even though it seems to me that he was joking) even though he said he doesn't think thrawn is scum.
His reaction is feeling very forced You say you don't like me (I assume this means you think i'm scum?), you find my lack of vote strange and that my reactions feel forced. Why make a case like this if you aren't going to follow it with a vote? ##Vote: dabears This caught my eye in Adam's filter, someone says "Oh Adam might be scum" he went into insta defensive mode, then he didn't address the accusation but only followed up with a counter vote. Seems strange? But in this post he is not calling Adam scummy. He is calling what he said "strange". Completely non-committal like anything else he's done. This is the second time he sheeped someone but tried to appear as if he wasn't sheeping.Scum cares about their appearance a hell of a lot more than town, and BL has made it quite clear how worried he is. He makes a giant post before leaving for 24 hours to appear active, he then sheeps people but tries to appear as if he's not sheeping. Bluelightz is scum. ##Vote Bluelightz
Oh wait i'm sorry
There's one big post (which I already mentioned. The post mentions 3 people)
I SEE THREE TWO LINERS IN YOUR CASE. WOWOWOWO MY BAD 2 LINERS MAKE ALL THE WORLD OF A DIFFERENCE
|
On December 12 2012 04:11 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 04:07 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:06 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:03 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote:
The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else.
At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later.
The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active.
Clarity, if you think your case on jay is so good, why in the fuck are you not rallying people to jay?????? Because a lot of people showed they disagreed and there is no momentum. I also don't have anything to add about jay since making that case, and repeating myself a lot seems pointless. I can easily revisit it tomorrow, today I want BL lynched. Lol. This is not a townie mindset at all You believe so strongly you are right? We have what, 6 hours til lynch? And you aren't pushing your lynch???????????????????????????????????????????????? The fuck>? I am pushing my lynch, my lynch changed. How is this hard to understand?
Lol. You are making no sense right now. Jay has been the second leading candidate behind adam for most of the time. Now, you suddenly want to lynch bluelights when you believe your jay case is so good?
Which case do you think is better?
|
Derpbears, push your case against Adam and stop diluting this thread with your mental diarrhea.
You're most likely getting your Adam lynch done, why the fuck are you so concerned with two votes on BL?
|
On December 12 2012 04:14 Vivax wrote:
Derpbears, push your case against Adam and stop diluting this thread with your mental diarrhea.
You're most likely getting your Adam lynch done, why the fuck are you so concerned with two votes on BL?
Because I want Adam lynched.
And this kind of shit wagon is something that I don't want ruining an Adam lynch
|
On December 12 2012 04:12 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 04:11 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:07 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:06 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:03 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote:
The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else.
At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later.
The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active.
Clarity, if you think your case on jay is so good, why in the fuck are you not rallying people to jay?????? Because a lot of people showed they disagreed and there is no momentum. I also don't have anything to add about jay since making that case, and repeating myself a lot seems pointless. I can easily revisit it tomorrow, today I want BL lynched. Lol. This is not a townie mindset at all You believe so strongly you are right? We have what, 6 hours til lynch? And you aren't pushing your lynch???????????????????????????????????????????????? The fuck>? I am pushing my lynch, my lynch changed. How is this hard to understand? Lol. You are making no sense right now. Jay has been the second leading candidate behind adam for most of the time. Now, you suddenly want to lynch bluelights when you believe your jay case is so good? Which case do you think is better?
Jay has been the person with the 2nd most votes. Doesn't make him a likely lynch. There was no momentum on him.
My BL case is better or I wouldn't have my vote on him.
|
If it comforts you, me and Clarity probably too won't allow a no-lynch to happen. Also cause noone wants to be responsible of a no lynch, so it's not really alignment indicative.
If we rally enough people for BL though, then you'Ll have to wait for Adam.
|
On December 12 2012 04:16 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 04:12 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:11 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:07 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:06 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:03 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote:
The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else.
At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later.
The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active.
Clarity, if you think your case on jay is so good, why in the fuck are you not rallying people to jay?????? Because a lot of people showed they disagreed and there is no momentum. I also don't have anything to add about jay since making that case, and repeating myself a lot seems pointless. I can easily revisit it tomorrow, today I want BL lynched. Lol. This is not a townie mindset at all You believe so strongly you are right? We have what, 6 hours til lynch? And you aren't pushing your lynch???????????????????????????????????????????????? The fuck>? I am pushing my lynch, my lynch changed. How is this hard to understand? Lol. You are making no sense right now. Jay has been the second leading candidate behind adam for most of the time. Now, you suddenly want to lynch bluelights when you believe your jay case is so good? Which case do you think is better? Jay has been the person with the 2nd most votes. Doesn't make him a likely lynch. There was no momentum on him. My BL case is better or I wouldn't have my vote on him.
Lol. Wow.
I don't understand how you can see posting one liners as caring too much about your appearance. That doesn't make sense. BL is doing exactly what would get him attention, something which scum usually don't want. He's posting one (and two  ) liners and then sheeping like crazy with shitty reasoning. In other words, he obviously doesn't give a shit how the town views him.
If you want to lynch BL for doing nothing for town, that's better reasoning. The problem with that is munk-e, tunkeg, jay, and VE all have been afk as fuck d1.
|
On December 12 2012 04:17 Vivax wrote:
If it comforts you, me and Clarity probably too won't allow a no-lynch to happen. Also cause noone wants to be responsible of a no lynch, so it's not really alignment indicative.
If we rally enough people for BL though, then you'Ll have to wait for Adam.
Jesus Christ dude get away from me.
|
On December 12 2012 04:19 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 04:16 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:12 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:11 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:07 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:06 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:03 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote:
The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else.
At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later.
The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active.
Clarity, if you think your case on jay is so good, why in the fuck are you not rallying people to jay?????? Because a lot of people showed they disagreed and there is no momentum. I also don't have anything to add about jay since making that case, and repeating myself a lot seems pointless. I can easily revisit it tomorrow, today I want BL lynched. Lol. This is not a townie mindset at all You believe so strongly you are right? We have what, 6 hours til lynch? And you aren't pushing your lynch???????????????????????????????????????????????? The fuck>? I am pushing my lynch, my lynch changed. How is this hard to understand? Lol. You are making no sense right now. Jay has been the second leading candidate behind adam for most of the time. Now, you suddenly want to lynch bluelights when you believe your jay case is so good? Which case do you think is better? Jay has been the person with the 2nd most votes. Doesn't make him a likely lynch. There was no momentum on him. My BL case is better or I wouldn't have my vote on him. Lol. Wow. I don't understand how you can see posting one liners as caring too much about your appearance. That doesn't make sense. BL is doing exactly what would get him attention, something which scum usually don't want. He's posting one (and two ) liners and then sheeping like crazy with shitty reasoning. In other words, he obviously doesn't give a shit how the town views him. If you want to lynch BL for doing nothing for town, that's better reasoning. The problem with that is munk-e, tunkeg, jay, and VE all have been afk as fuck d1.
Stop twisting my words and stop repeating yourself. Read my case. If you had you would know why I think he cares too much about his appearance.
|
On December 12 2012 04:20 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2012 04:19 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:16 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:12 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:11 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:07 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 04:06 Clarity_nl wrote:On December 12 2012 04:03 debears wrote:On December 12 2012 03:09 Clarity_nl wrote:
The post itself contains not much of value, mostly BL calling things "suspicious" or "weird", never committing any kind of read, just pointing out things. Please note that he sheeps my case, but he adds reasoning of his own. His own reasoning however, is very weak and non-committal. At first I thought he was just sheeping because my case is good (because it is) but this is the first of two times that he's done this, and both times he added terrible reasons while full on sheeping someone else.
At this point, after some small post for a couple of minutes, he leaves and doesn't come back until 24 hours later.
The fact that he makes a really big post right before he disappears seems scummy to me, it means he anticipated to be gone for a while but he wanted to look active.
Clarity, if you think your case on jay is so good, why in the fuck are you not rallying people to jay?????? Because a lot of people showed they disagreed and there is no momentum. I also don't have anything to add about jay since making that case, and repeating myself a lot seems pointless. I can easily revisit it tomorrow, today I want BL lynched. Lol. This is not a townie mindset at all You believe so strongly you are right? We have what, 6 hours til lynch? And you aren't pushing your lynch???????????????????????????????????????????????? The fuck>? I am pushing my lynch, my lynch changed. How is this hard to understand? Lol. You are making no sense right now. Jay has been the second leading candidate behind adam for most of the time. Now, you suddenly want to lynch bluelights when you believe your jay case is so good? Which case do you think is better? Jay has been the person with the 2nd most votes. Doesn't make him a likely lynch. There was no momentum on him. My BL case is better or I wouldn't have my vote on him. Lol. Wow. I don't understand how you can see posting one liners as caring too much about your appearance. That doesn't make sense. BL is doing exactly what would get him attention, something which scum usually don't want. He's posting one (and two ) liners and then sheeping like crazy with shitty reasoning. In other words, he obviously doesn't give a shit how the town views him. If you want to lynch BL for doing nothing for town, that's better reasoning. The problem with that is munk-e, tunkeg, jay, and VE all have been afk as fuck d1. Stop twisting my words and stop repeating yourself. Read my case. If you had you would know why I think he cares too much about his appearance.
I'm not twisting your words. I'm telling you exactly how it is.
but w/e let the vets knock some sense into you
|
Don't be shy mate 
|
My problem with jay is that he spent SO much time and energy focusing on thrawn only to recant based on one response. The fact that he was SO pissed about it and made such a big deal about thrawn not responding makes it seem fake and made up.
|
MARV, do you have any other reason to vote Adam aside from sheeping Debears?
You mostly talk about everyone else but have your vote on Adam. What do you think of Tunkegs presumed last post?
|
Tunkeg's town, he's probably not ballsy enough as scum to confirm me town like that, so it's most likely a read.
|
VE, Palmar, some thoughts on BL and my case?
|
I will probably back off tunkeg especially if he comes back. His martyr post made me think he's just a town who didn't put any effort into the game and is now pissed that everyone is calling him out for it. But he knows he didn't play well so he's pulling the martyr car and calling everyone dumb to make himself feel better.
writing some other stuff about bl
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
