|
snb I don't really like the fact that you're living 16 hours in the past
On November 22 2012 04:14 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:05 iamperfection wrote: also why do we have to have the leader select all 3 wouldn't it be best for the town to put some input on the other team members? I feel like this was already discussed to death (with thechronicler's terrible plan, among others); why bring it up again just then? Oh the irony.
Anyway I'm back and catching up =]
|
@ Cavejohnson
While I appreciate the fact that you're trying to "think of the endgame" we don't know what an endgame will look like at all in this format. We don't know how many (if any at all) lynches we'll have. For all we know there is no such thing as lylo. Yet you are suggesting we get rid of people who give off a newb town vibe because they might be a problem later? Seriously, our win con is defeating Lavos, with a secondary objective of killing scum. How will getting rid of a newb towny help town?
|
Dieno I'm really happy to see you posting the way you are now. Please keep it up.
|
On November 21 2012 22:25 sandroba wrote: I wont take clarity with me if I get elected. He smells funny. This post has been begging for a follow up for a while now. Where is it?
|
Why will this game be so chaotic that no one is allowed to make a mistake? You lost me completely. You say the only definite thing we need for Lavos (endgame, win condition) is firepower. But you think of newb townies as a liability, rather than an asset? Yes of course if they contribute more/better that will help, but do you really believe you're going about this the right way?
Lylo is lynch or lose. It MIGHT not apply to this game. You're talking about reaching a state where town cannot win, there is a difference.
|
Okay, so walk me through how failing an event will be a newbie's fault. Especially if you know they're newbies.
|
On November 22 2012 05:28 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 05:26 CaveJohnson wrote:On November 22 2012 05:23 Clarity_nl wrote: Okay, so walk me through how failing an event will be a newbie's fault. Especially if you know they're newbies. When all the "vets" are dead with only them alive do you really believe they will have the knowledge and experience to make the correct choice? No. Failure of events = newbies fault Go. Yeah, this.
Also..
On November 22 2012 05:26 CaveJohnson wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 05:23 Clarity_nl wrote: Okay, so walk me through how failing an event will be a newbie's fault. Especially if you know they're newbies. When all the "vets" are dead with only them alive do you really believe they will have the knowledge and experience to make the correct choice?
So you're not comfortable making scumreads and acting on them? You expect to win by killing/lynching the newb town players? All you'd be doing is securing a loss.
If town kills/lynches a newb town, that doesn't suddenly stop scum from killing vets. It just gives us one less chance to kill/lynch scum.
|
On November 22 2012 05:45 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 05:42 Acrofales wrote:On November 22 2012 05:38 Keirathi wrote:On November 22 2012 05:36 phagga wrote:On November 22 2012 02:40 syllogism wrote: CaveJohnson who are you? It would be helpful to know in order to determine whether you should "know better" than to say some of the things you have said. Obviously the fact that you chose to use that account suggests that you don't want us to know, but if you are town it would be in your best interest to reconsider. I don't like your posts either, although the fact you said you don't want to be picked for the mission is slightly towny, depending on your reasoning, which I expect you to later reveal. why is that townie? I would expect a townie to want to be part of every mission if possible, as it will make sure that at least that spot is not occupied by scum (from that specific townies point of view). If a townie has a low "success modifier". I could see him not wanting to be picked especially in the early game where its much more likely that a scum (or two) are picked for the team inadvertently and it could cause mission loss. How the hell do you have any idea what your HIDDEN success modifier is? What CaveJohnson's post made me think of was 3rd party. I thought syllo was referring to the fact that a 3rd party didn't want to come along on the mission was "townie", because he at least cares enough about the town to warn them off. So why do you think I said that, then?
Don't do that, just answer his question.
|
I think we should stay away from this topic before we give scum too much info. My info differs from Keir's but that doesn't make him scummy.
|
On November 22 2012 05:53 iamperfection wrote: well like clarity my info is different so different from me is usually not good
I think we can't read too much into it, nor should we try to extract more information like this.
Scum just make everyone post their role pm in the QT and they have a pretty good idea of how roles work and what town might have. Town on the other hand does not know anything, so any information that is in our pms should not be shared, as it benefits scum more than town. Does that make sense?
|
I, for one, would like Cave to get out of himself and answer my questions.
|
|
I'm not that impressed Bio. A townread on marv, syllo, sand and the fact that we shouldnt be scumhunting, but we should.
|
If you want to be fashionably late you have to be fashionable.
|
On November 19 2012 09:43 GreYMisT wrote:
Voting rules: 1. Voting is done in a separate thread. Please keep votes there, and only vote there. Do not PM me your vote. 2. Please vote in the following format: ##Vote Qatol. Votes not done in the correct fashion will not be counted. I will update vote counts whenever I get the chance. 3. No conditional voting. 4. You may vote for yourself. You may not vote for anyone dead or outside the game. 5. In the event of a tie the person with the most votes first wins (or loses). 6. Voting is mandatory. You may NOT abstain.
#4
|
On November 22 2012 06:33 BioSC wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 06:16 Clarity_nl wrote: I'm not that impressed Bio. A townread on marv, syllo, sand and the fact that we shouldnt be scumhunting, but we should. If you aren't going to read my one post, why should I be impressed with you?
I did read it. Tell me what I got wrong.
|
marv how do you feel about cave's recent interactions with me, and sudden disappearance?
|
You called an extremely bad plan bad, that gave him the townread, that's the sole reason he gave.
|
You think it's reasonable to come away from that with a towntell, as long as they're not familiar with you?
|
Do you believe that with your current posts in this game anyone should logically have a townread on you?
|
|
|
|