|
On November 30 2012 02:04 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2012 02:01 risk.nuke wrote:On November 30 2012 01:48 syllogism wrote:On November 30 2012 01:42 risk.nuke wrote:
Syllogism's thought process. This role isn't a mafia role. And if this was a mafia role this is a very suboptimal way to play. But there is a crystal ball in the tent flavor so this is probably a huge ploy where mafia scum buddies goodkarma and risknuke are trying to sell themselves of as town.
And I didn't know if inviting someone counted as a roleblockable action. But hey thanks for outing my name... there probably will be no consequences. It's an incredibly suboptimal way regardless of alignment and some of the things that were said by you were just mindboggling. It doesn't help that, of course, that I was suspicious of your play even before that so I'm interpreting everything through that prism. What kind of consequences do you expect there to be for outing a name of a minor character? You didn't even think it was important to keep it secret as you voluntarily divulged the name before anyone even had posted in the QT. We've had two major characters claim their names and neither of them has even been roleblocked yet. I don't know this is a heavily themed greymist game. For all we know there is third party out there who's objective is to kill me or someone else and now knows it's not me. Then there is the general always a downside to nameclaiming to prevent people from trying to mass-claim. For all we know at any point in the game the mafia can wipe out everyone who's name they know. So now it's your turn. Please, tell me the benefits of nameclaim? You ignored half of the post but that's okay, I will answer anyway. The name was required because it is suspicious when combined with the flavor provided in the QT. It could be completely meaningless, but it's still potentially evidence.
I asked grey about it. It was ONLY flavor.
As for the other reason. I revealed MY name in the qt because unless mafia have some sort of spy ability I would have full control of who could see it. YOU outed MY name to the THREAD without even asking my opinion about it.
You've did nothing constructive when you joined the qt. You could had tried to interrogate me about reads if you believed I was mafia but you were to bloody lazy and got pissed when I called you a little girl bitch so you decided to out everything for no gain.
|
On November 30 2012 02:02 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2012 02:00 Promethelax wrote:On November 30 2012 01:58 GreYMisT wrote:
It was brought to my attention that once again I am forgetful
Today You also have the pleasure of voting for tomorrows party leader. There will be a special event tomorrow with 2 stages of in thread voting, thus the party leader and his party must be selected today! this is the voting we're already doing. Right? Mementoss mentioned about 2 pages back. I am just clarifying further.
You are voting for both a lynch as well as a party leader for tomorrow's event.
What happens if the elected party leader is killed before the event?
Seems to me we probably need a backup. I suggest Keirathi as first choice (with preferred group the D1 party) and Clarity as second. Best to even include a 3rd (Syllo or Oats?) just to ensure Toad's single vote does not cause havoc.
Also, I won't be switching to GK until I've read his filter (or probably after); I have started a couple of times, but it is long and makes heavy use of run-on sentences like this one, which means that it is really not easy to read.
In any case, I think I prefer a risk.nuke lynch. He is being extremely uncooperative. Combine that with something that sounds like a bogus roleclaim and a really dodgy policy for his masonQT selection. A tent with a crystal ball makes me think of the prophet. Not sure he has a tent, but he is a fortune teller.
|
On November 30 2012 02:14 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2012 02:04 syllogism wrote:On November 30 2012 02:01 risk.nuke wrote:On November 30 2012 01:48 syllogism wrote:On November 30 2012 01:42 risk.nuke wrote:
Syllogism's thought process. This role isn't a mafia role. And if this was a mafia role this is a very suboptimal way to play. But there is a crystal ball in the tent flavor so this is probably a huge ploy where mafia scum buddies goodkarma and risknuke are trying to sell themselves of as town.
And I didn't know if inviting someone counted as a roleblockable action. But hey thanks for outing my name... there probably will be no consequences. It's an incredibly suboptimal way regardless of alignment and some of the things that were said by you were just mindboggling. It doesn't help that, of course, that I was suspicious of your play even before that so I'm interpreting everything through that prism. What kind of consequences do you expect there to be for outing a name of a minor character? You didn't even think it was important to keep it secret as you voluntarily divulged the name before anyone even had posted in the QT. We've had two major characters claim their names and neither of them has even been roleblocked yet. I don't know this is a heavily themed greymist game. For all we know there is third party out there who's objective is to kill me or someone else and now knows it's not me. Then there is the general always a downside to nameclaiming to prevent people from trying to mass-claim. For all we know at any point in the game the mafia can wipe out everyone who's name they know. So now it's your turn. Please, tell me the benefits of nameclaim? You ignored half of the post but that's okay, I will answer anyway. The name was required because it is suspicious when combined with the flavor provided in the QT. It could be completely meaningless, but it's still potentially evidence. I asked grey about it. It was ONLY flavor. As for the other reason. I revealed MY name in the qt because unless mafia have some sort of spy ability I would have full control of who could see it. YOU outed MY name to the THREAD without even asking my opinion about it. You've did nothing constructive when you joined the qt. You could had tried to interrogate me about reads if you believed I was mafia but you were to bloody lazy and got pissed when I called you a little girl bitch so you decided to out everything for no gain.
If this is you being a contributing, constructive town member, you're doing it wrong.
|
I would argue I am currently in a better position that Keir to be party leader, mainly due to the fact that there's no way I will die this cycle.
|
Acro wants to kill me over confirmed scum. I see, you claimed to be pro-town third party right?
|
Hi I'm back! Finally a fucking lynch X)
##Lynch: Toadesstern
##Leader: syllogism
Prom I read your case. It's pretty bad, but mostly because the majority of it is you paraphrasing GK's posts into something scummy when that's not necessarily the way they were intended or meant. That being said, with the mission failure it seems fairly likely that someone on the party is scum, even if Acro's 3rd party claim is to be believed. Among those remaining, I concur that the most likely to be scum is GK. I went back and read a few filters and I'm working on a post right now with what I found.
Bear with me guys.
|
On November 30 2012 02:15 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2012 02:02 GreYMisT wrote:On November 30 2012 02:00 Promethelax wrote:On November 30 2012 01:58 GreYMisT wrote:
It was brought to my attention that once again I am forgetful
Today You also have the pleasure of voting for tomorrows party leader. There will be a special event tomorrow with 2 stages of in thread voting, thus the party leader and his party must be selected today! this is the voting we're already doing. Right? Mementoss mentioned about 2 pages back. I am just clarifying further.
You are voting for both a lynch as well as a party leader for tomorrow's event. What happens if the elected party leader is killed before the event?Seems to me we probably need a backup. I suggest Keirathi as first choice (with preferred group the D1 party) and Clarity as second. Best to even include a 3rd (Syllo or Oats?) just to ensure Toad's single vote does not cause havoc. Also, I won't be switching to GK until I've read his filter (or probably after); I have started a couple of times, but it is long and makes heavy use of run-on sentences like this one, which means that it is really not easy to read. In any case, I think I prefer a risk.nuke lynch. He is being extremely uncooperative. Combine that with something that sounds like a bogus roleclaim and a really dodgy policy for his masonQT selection. A tent with a crystal ball makes me think of the prophet. Not sure he has a tent, but he is a fortune teller.
If the party leader is dead before next cycles event he will be dead and unable to participate.
|
On November 30 2012 02:18 risk.nuke wrote:
Acro wants to kill me over confirmed scum. I see, you claimed to be pro-town third party right?
No, he wants you as a secondary lynch in case toad gets pardoned. Read the thread.
|
On November 30 2012 02:18 risk.nuke wrote:
Acro wants to kill me over confirmed scum. I see, you claimed to be pro-town third party right?
Dafuq? I want to lynch toad. In the case toad is pardoned, I prefer you get killed over GK at the moment. I prefer EITHER of you over Syllo, who would currently be set for lynching if Toad is pardoned and the pardoner works the way people seem to think it does. Learn2read. For the umpteenbillionth time.
|
On November 30 2012 02:18 risk.nuke wrote:
Acro wants to kill me over confirmed scum. I see, you claimed to be pro-town third party right?
Since when is GK confirmed scum?
|
|
|
I got ninjaed so hard 
|
Switching to keirathi and Gk for safety reasons
##Unvote
##Lynch: Goodkarma
##Party leader: Keirathi
|
Syllo may I ask why you are not trying to run for the election? I think I know but I'd like to hear your reasons.
|
On November 30 2012 02:19 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2012 02:18 risk.nuke wrote:
Acro wants to kill me over confirmed scum. I see, you claimed to be pro-town third party right? Dafuq? I want to lynch toad. In the case toad is pardoned, I prefer you get killed over GK at the moment. I prefer EITHER of you over Syllo, who would currently be set for lynching if Toad is pardoned and the pardoner works the way people seem to think it does. Learn2read. For the umpteenbillionth time.
pardoner doesn't work that way. If someone gets pardoned there will be a no-lynch.
Sincerly, your friendly neighbourhoud-Toad
|
On November 30 2012 02:20 risk.nuke wrote:
Learn to write properly.
![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3b/Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.jpg/800px-Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.jpg)
|
Looking up the crystal ball I didn't really find anything (except for Inuyasha/Chrono Trigger fanfic). There are Crystal ball sprites in Enhasa and Kajar but niether seem to hold much importance.
Since the thing 'appeared to be' a crystal ball I also looked for spherical objects in the wiki. Moon/Sun stone seem most likely. Although Dreamstone and Chrono Trigger are both possibilities.
Glad to see VE and Risk both here. Its like a miracle.
VE: I'm sad you don't like my giant case. The paraphrasing is an attempt at not just dryly stating the scum motivation in those posts but ah well. I look forward to see what you have to add.
|
Depends on the setup Toad. You're thinking of games where a total majority is required to lynch.
|
On November 30 2012 02:26 phagga wrote:
Switching to keirathi and Gk for safety reasons
##Unvote
##Lynch: Goodkarma
##Party leader: Keirathi
What about having oats keir syllo dieno clarity perform our split votes (And only those 5)? At least can we set a fixed number for number of votes to switch in case of hidden vote shenanigans?
|
On November 30 2012 02:28 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2012 02:19 Acrofales wrote:On November 30 2012 02:18 risk.nuke wrote:
Acro wants to kill me over confirmed scum. I see, you claimed to be pro-town third party right? Dafuq? I want to lynch toad. In the case toad is pardoned, I prefer you get killed over GK at the moment. I prefer EITHER of you over Syllo, who would currently be set for lynching if Toad is pardoned and the pardoner works the way people seem to think it does. Learn2read. For the umpteenbillionth time. pardoner doesn't work that way. If someone gets pardoned there will be a no-lynch. Sincerly, your friendly neighbourhoud-Toad
You're right of course. We should take the confirmed scum's word for it. How could we be so stupid to think that it might work otherwise and take some small precautions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
