Liquid City Mafia - Page 3

On October 03 2012 08:10 marvellosity wrote:


Had a quick peek at the playerlist out of curiosity. Seeing syllogism lynched day 2 was a bit of a shock to my system, heh

On October 03 2012 23:21 austinmcc wrote:

Because I got a pm that said so.

On October 04 2012 00:59 Coagulation wrote:


lol butt hurt townie detected.

You will be ok big boy walk it off.

On October 04 2012 01:07 Coagulation wrote:
Is the bandwagon because of risen dropping a massive wifom bomb before he died?

Like... really?

When im scum I always shoot the stupid fucker saying "IF I DIE KILL THIS TOWNIE" cause of idiot bandwagons like this.

throw all that out the window cause marv starts playing scummy as fuck in response to the pressure so whatever.

On October 03 2012 22:24 marvellosity wrote:


Risen protected me and his role is that if he protects mafia he dies

On October 04 2012 01:12 Coagulation wrote:


RUKIDDING?
you all bent out of shape and huffing and puffing over me like your holding a most fucking unbearable indignation and personal vandeta against me for calling you scum earlier. LOL

I see this shit every game.

On October 04 2012 01:14 austinmcc wrote:

Because I'm town? Because they think I'm town? Because I put a bunch of work into this game N1? Because they agreed with my reads? Because their role is austinmcc-protector? Because they loved the play I wrote?

I dunno, ask them.

On October 04 2012 05:02 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


Given that no one has claimed any of the shots on the dead players, (ie no one is claiming vig)

We know we have two dead vanilla's, shots on me and austin, and risen raped himself while giving us marv.

We know we have mafia, and 1 third party based on setup, so 4 kp appearing isn't that unlikely I think.

On October 04 2012 06:06 kushm4sta wrote:
austin has made some good posts IMO look at his filter.

On October 04 2012 11:32 ToutEstChaos wrote:


Extremely cool, because it means you're scum.

ShiaoPi is an analytical player whose ability to post cases isn't great, but he thinks a lot about the game and reads the thread extensively. Even for a normal player, though, the kind of slip-up ShiaoPi made is unusual-- it means that at the time he made this post, he hadn't extensively read the thread since the day-post, or hadn't thought about it clearly. This is not useful to town and not what ShiaoPi or anyone does.

His statement:

isn't unusually stupid or anything-- but it doesn't follow a pattern of logic a townie would use. When he speculates about the night kills (showing a night-oriented mindset), he thinks mafia has 3 KP. Even if this is reasonable, it's set-up speculation on D2, and it's not pushing us in the right direction.

I didn't get totally on him because I wanted to see what he'd do after the FoS, and that was this:



Although I give ShiaoPi credit for writing something, overall this is bad. Assuming, for example, that because mkfuba07 and marvellosity posted similar things at similar times they are scum together, is like super bad. Sure, maybe they were talking about it in their scum QT together and happened to post at the same time, but that sort of interaction in scum QTs (in my experience) typically delineates explicitly who will say what. Townies (or a townie and a scum) often say shit at the same time that means the same thing. Think about it: how many times have you been "ninjaed" in a mafia game by someone and one of you was town?

The next it of ShiaoPi's case rests on the fact that mkfuba changed his mind a few times without making a huge amount of sense. He said this is "confusing town", but really, anyone who's played with mkfuba (and similarly incompetent players) know that this is in fact "confused townie".

One part of ShiaoPi's case does in fact point out scummy stuff that mkfuba does: his node read is inconsistent later on, and he pushes it half-heartedly. This is fair point, and also the right point to end a case on if the other points are weak, made up crap that scum use to fluff out their post count. Granted, it's also chronologically the last point so it makes sense to go there, but the fact of the matter is, it is what it is.

This line in particular jumps out at me as poor reasoning:
>fuba was more or less following marv during day 1 play,

This is not what scum does to other scum. Come on, you've all played scum. This wasn't a scum fuba following scum marv. Look at Marv's previous scumgames. He wouldn't let shit like that happen. This is a scared town fuba in a big game deciding to attach his lips to the ass of the strongest, biggest, most familiar vet he could find: Marv.

ShiaoPi, you continue to fail to impress,
and since I've called you out you've posted even less.
Unless you want to be vigied at best
you should respond properly to this ##FoS

On October 04 2012 11:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


Er? Its scummy thing to recheck / review? I don't do that ever unless I am town making some epic post by post analysis.

I think he could easily be mafia given his interactions with people, his odd post that he just made



This may just be the living up in a household with a mother who is an english major, but using the word "so" as he did seems weird to me.

However throwing ones thoughts into the thread mean near jackshit when you look at the last three pages of his filter have been basically none useful. I don't see solid reasoning for reads, I see summarizing of other peoples shit, spam, and the same.

I honestly believe if someone is active like he has been this game there should be real content in his filter, and honestly I am not seeing it.

On October 04 2012 12:09 DarthPunk wrote:
Up to Page 48. I am pretty bummed marv decided to Troll/WIFOM/Shit up the thread so badly. It makes this much more arduous a task.

On October 01 2012 06:15 slOosh wrote:
This is the most upsetting start to a game I've played. So I'm gonna lay some ground rules because people are playing in a way that they shirk responsibilities with their actions / words.

Biggest thing is stop saying "I wanna lynch player X what do you think?". There is no back up analysis, and it allows people to toss out names at random. You think someone is scum, back it up. Don't say "seems scummy maybe". It lets people sow seeds of suspicion and it makes mislynches more untraceable.

---

Shady's vote makes no sense as VE pointed out. In fact the whole thing doesn't make sense, including how he has already started making connective tells on Kush based on Z-Boson. But it seems just as explainable by a combination of poor play / leftover emotions from TL-LVII. I'd wait to see what he can produce (case wise or whatnot) since arguing whether acting like a troll to incite a mod warning isn't conclusive to determining alignment.

VE I don't see your issue with annul - or are you doing one of those reaction things because its leaning on the destructive side right now.

On October 02 2012 12:33 slOosh wrote:
Guh didn't realize how much time I actually take to read. Between Node and Shady Sands I'm leaning Shady.

With a total lack of follow through after his troll antics, he has disrupted early day discussion and dropped off. Not lynching him today on the basis of a potential modkill is stupid - he could easily trade his life for hurting day 2 discussion as well and he might not even be lynched.

The nature of the Node lynch is really strange. Reason enough to lean the former.

##Vote: Shady Sands

On October 02 2012 12:49 slOosh wrote:

Node is scummy. I think what you found about his post was valid. However we can only lynch 1 at a time and I find Shady a better target for the reasons I stated. The strangeness of Node's lynch was that there was a disconnect between the push and the votes - you tossed out a bunch of names and his was just picked up. It's enough to sway me to Shady.