EPTI thought you were done with me! Go sleep, scum!
Liquid City Mafia - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
I thought you were done with me! Go sleep, scum! | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
I propose this: we lynch some1 else today, and tomorrow, VE. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 13 2012 15:58 VisceraEyes wrote: Coroner dead. If we're assuming scum had the ability to change flips around, then we're assuming they did so for Kush and that they did so with Kush because no night-kills. Why? How do we know it's not a next-day deal? Someone else please answer this. He's done with me, unfortunately. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
I'm never gonna play the same way as scum ever again. See that I'm town by the fact that I am actually giving a shit, mr. Coach. Let me know if you wake up feeling like you'd talk to me. I'd really love to chat with you again. I can be mean at times but boy do I have a big heart. Kei, regarding that theory, it's possible but we shouldn't base ourselves on it. VE has indeed been acting hella scummy, but man he sure is insistent. I'd rather kill someone else today. Since there are two people willing to lynch kreb, with some valid arguments by sloosh, I will go over kreb's filter more carefully. If I still get a town feel on kreb, I'll likely end up voting on DP or mattchew. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
No rb has claimed, so no nk's are missing from that point. This also means that scum had to forgo a roleblock (or chose not to use it.. ?) So even if they shot BC again, which I doubt, there are still one or more kps missing. I highly doubt that they only have 1kp at this stage of the game. So there's no way the missing shots can be accounted for any reason, am I right? This must mean that this is in fact some weird mechanic. I also can't wrap my brain around the fact that BC waited until I was going after VE full force to give us his "scumslip" argument (which actually does make sense, though). Why didn't he say it earlier? Feels weird. VE's "lynch me" behavior certainly feels weird as well. It's not like someone like him can't handle pressure. I don't know what to make of all this... He sure seemed like he wanted people to lynch him there for a while, so I'm also tempted to think that it was on purpose. Whatever the situation, let's lynch someone else, be it Mattchew, DP or kreb (yes I'm including kreb's name now because my town read came from my general reading and a quick skim of his filter. I still haven't read it carefully enough.,, his lack of voice today also increased my suspicions.) | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 13 2012 19:09 Kreb wrote: Lack of Voice? I went to sleep at about 4am when there was a small break in posting (right after VEs self vote and BC asking why that makes sense). Go check the timestamps if you like. And then I got up at about 11am and its now 12am. Is sleep the equal of hiding nowadays? lol, from my post it's quite clear I meant the lack of voice from kreb  | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Can't find kreb to be scummier than him ##Vote Mattchew | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
I also don't have his meta down hardcore, so I'm voting the person who makes most sense and also has a decent chance of being scum. He was also quite inactive during the night btw. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 14 2012 02:37 Keirathi wrote: I know you're not this...dumb, for lack of a softer word...all of the time. My point exactly, thank you! | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Even if they did, once Node was lynched they would obviously be all like "wow he sure fooled me", which is not the tone he took. The only thing that really says it for me is the difference from his townie filter, which I've read and it sure seems a bit different. However, he's actually trying to defend himself, unlike Mattchew, who simply disappeared. Like nuke said, mattchew is a liability for the late game, we can't rely on him. Added to that, he actually has a decent chance of popping scum. He is also in agreement with your "awol" theory, if you check his filter, his only two posts are nowhere near dawn. Remember he also didn't vote in day 1? Honestly, he's a much better choice. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Ok, let me double check the times then. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 11 2012 00:36 Mattchew wrote: Thanks BC for that I'll write a case before the end of the night On October 11 2012 02:26 Mattchew wrote: Also kush was being pushed hard and sloosh pushed for the BC 3rd party (regardless if he's right or not) lynch... Someone else should say this but I will cause I thought of it Inb4 you called out BC too.. I haven't been reading as much as sloosh Then your next post on october 12th you had one: On October 12 2012 01:22 Mattchew wrote: forgot i had work today, i am done in ~6 hours Each of them are more than 11 hours apart from the night 4 post. This is also just a side note, not the main things you've got going on against you. You also choose someone who has not even one vote. There are like 6 lynch candidates today, we need to consolidate, seriously. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 14 2012 03:52 Mattchew wrote: i am reading the thread, and you have not quoted or answered risk once. Your case on me was demolished by me and VE. I would like to know your actual reasons for voting me and what actions i have taken that you deem scummy, especially if any of them pertain to anything other than "he's not active" It was not demolished. The fact that I find VE scum and you being the only person he tried to defend ever makes me think poorly of you. I've made my case, I've also made a post making a summary of my case. Here it is again: 1) Your post telling people not to vote shady for shit reasons 2) Your only two major posts stating your views on people, only never to be revisited ever again. Gives off the impression that you are just wanting to look like you are scumhunting, but you are not. VE also said that this might be true, when he ridiculed my case | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 14 2012 03:52 Mattchew wrote: i am reading the thread, and you have not quoted or answered risk once. Your case on me was demolished by me and VE. I would like to know your actual reasons for voting me and what actions i have taken that you deem scummy, especially if any of them pertain to anything other than "he's not active" Dude click on risk's filter and see his last two posts... seriously | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
hi nice to see you again! That's because matt invoked your name as well, before me see. @Matt lol I'm glad you don't like you as a candidate Godamnit, why can't you just die quietly. This game confuses me. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 14 2012 04:06 Mattchew wrote: what is this in reference to? These are risks last posts on me z-boson references The recently ended Aperture game had almost every player in the game call me inactive and apathetic and I was town. Therefore his meta read could be easily countered by just reading the game that i was playing in alongside this game. I am attempting to become more active although in about 45 minutes I will be offline for around 20-ish hours. I will not be around at deadline. Ok, so couple of more things. You being inactive is a null tell if you are scum./town from what I'm gathering. However, it IS anti-town, as you will become a liability later on. Also, I get your reasoning for finding iamp scummy. What I don't get is why you bring this up now. Lynch time is getting closer and we need to consolidate the votes on someone, and there are like 6-7 different lynch choices. What of DP? What of Kreb? What of Shiaopi? Why are you voting iamp over any of them? I seriously think you did not read any of their filters, and just selected somebody easily pegged as scum and went for him. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
The reasoning for this is that mattchew has actually bothered show his face in here and make some townie-looking posts. Also, BC's voting of him makes me very suspicious, as his reasoning for voting mattchew is not convincing and could very well be applied to ShiaoPi, in terms of usefulness. ##Unvote ##Vote ShiaoPi | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
| ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Yea that's making me uneasy on who to vote. The biggest tagline of my voting on ShiaoPi is being useless with a fair possibility of being scum. The biggest tagline of me wanting to vote DP is that I actually find him scum. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 14 2012 08:47 DarthPunk wrote: Yep. So were others. ZB's entire case against me relied on Kush being town. Even though he later stated kush was 75% red. He used the possibility of kush being town to try and lynch me. I wanted to not lynch someone I thought was town in the end. This is all not scummy. In fact it is pro town. Bullshit, btw. | ||
| ||
