Normal Mini Mafia III - Page 12

On August 29 2012 12:13 Kville wrote:
Just for the sake of having some progress this day period I'll go for ldvr but if this kidflips town dj is done day 4.

##Vote ldvr

On August 29 2012 13:25 iamperfection wrote:


Tails said he wouldnt be as active this is a completetly diffrent then his actvity levels in the mad men game. I dont understand



So he apologizes for being afk so much but then does this



Why not warn us that he is going camping? I think its because he full of shit

## Vote talismania

On August 29 2012 08:18 Lvdr wrote:
I'm back. I was focusing on my other game. Still read along here, but didn't have much jump out at me. Going to do a close reading.

On August 29 2012 14:08 Lvdr wrote:
I like my previous read on talis being scum. Also, I disappeared mainly because (as you noted) I was extremely involved in the other game, esp coming down to lynch deadlines, and I was unable to deal with shady because I was mad at him (oops).

The lack of activity makes me really uncomfortable. Also, it may be a cross game gambit, but Shady's actions here seem similar to those in the other game (where he flipped scum). I keep getting a "He is either really bad town or clumsy scum" read across the two games.

I would say lets just lynch him, but I don't think thats actually good play.

Hence, ##vote:Talismania

I like my previous read on talis being scum.

Also, it may be a cross game gambit, but Shady's actions here seem similar to those in the other game (where he flipped scum).

Regarding talis, I would give him no better than a null read. 2 points that stuck out to me.
1. The activity is quite low, and not particularly filled with content. I wouldn't call it downright scummy though.
2. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359836&currentpage=25#497
This post latches on to a stretch of a case, complete agreement, no further points made, never revisited beyond his initial AHA moment.

##Vote: Talismania

Let's see what happens.

On August 29 2012 16:08 Djagulingu wrote:
EBWOP:


He's providing no content, voting uselessly on day 1 and sheeping on me on day 2, not providing reasons why he voted for these people either. His only serious attempts over starting a discussion is after I called him out along with Chezinu and iamperfection, against me.

Now consider you and me, trying to generate discussion here, trying to find scumbags and shit, trying to see reasons why people are doing some stuff or why are people avoiding to do some stuff, why we suspect the people we're voting, interrogating each other from time to time too, just to be sure about one another.

And now, consider talismania and chezinu. The people who never generate discussion, provide either no reasons or poor reasons over what they do, latch onto lynch candidates or voting uselessly, stay afk most of the time, troll for the rest.

And you say that I'm sheeping Marv with poor reasoning?

On August 29 2012 16:01 Djagulingu wrote:

Because my vote itself doesn't commence a majority lynch. Like I said before, Chezinu is my primary target because he's

a) Scumbag (minimum of 95%)
b) A townie that even scumbags will grief over his death. (5% tops)

But people for some reason aren't voting for him and it's more probable that Lvdr can result in a mislynch than talismania.

On August 29 2012 16:08 Djagulingu wrote:
EBWOP:


He's providing no content, voting uselessly on day 1 and sheeping on me on day 2, not providing reasons why he voted for these people either. His only serious attempts over starting a discussion is after I called him out along with Chezinu and iamperfection, against me.

Now consider you and me, trying to generate discussion here, trying to find scumbags and shit, trying to see reasons why people are doing some stuff or why are people avoiding to do some stuff, why we suspect the people we're voting, interrogating each other from time to time too, just to be sure about one another.

And now, consider talismania and chezinu. The people who never generate discussion, provide either no reasons or poor reasons over what they do, latch onto lynch candidates or voting uselessly, stay afk most of the time, troll for the rest.

And you say that I'm sheeping Marv with poor reasoning?

On August 29 2012 16:02 Miltonkram wrote:
Finally got home from work. Sorry I haven't been active for much of the day. I'm going to avoid going to sleep tonight until I feel I have a decent handle on the game. I'm still catching up on everything, but it shouldn't be too much longer until I'm up to speed.

On August 29 2012 16:17 Djagulingu wrote:

Try your best son.

On Lvdr though, he's my suspect #4. Being #4 on my list, he still has 70-30 odds of being a scumbag. My reasons are slightly different though, he's taking advantage from my case over Chezinu/talis/iamp trio that I used him for and using this advantage into laying low for a bit. I don't like that.

On August 29 2012 16:25 Djagulingu wrote:

He sees that he's currently out of the spotlight and thinks that we now see him as a townie (at least me) but still afraid to come into the discussion because he doesn't want back in. I don't like that. Why would a townie be afraid of the spotlight in the first place?

So Lvdr at this point has offered the town no reads at all since D1, while claiming to have scumreads on 2 people. In addition he's sheeping Marv yet again and making excuses for his lurky behavior when he clearly had a much higher activity level in the game where he was town.

On August 29 2012 16:41 Djagulingu wrote:

I don't know which one is worse. The way he's playing on day 3 or this being actually a progress. He provided zero reads (except for talismania, if you call that a read that is) until the end of day 2, now comes up with the read on talismania. There is something wrong with him but I don't know what.

On August 29 2012 16:55 Djagulingu wrote:

It was at least 70% my effort that helped Chez to stop with the trolling bullshit of him (that is if he actually stopped).

And this shit reminds me of the Reservoir Dogs more than the Good the Bad and the Ugly. Up until I called them out, nobody was doing nothing, now they felt their asses are on fire and they are all trying to find who was the leak.

On August 29 2012 17:10 Djagulingu wrote:
EBWOP: At least that's what I'm thinking now.ç

On August 29 2012 19:31 marvellosity wrote:


This is meaningless twaddle. Who gives a flying shit about the credibility of a bunch of players? The only thing that matters is who is likeliest to flip scum. The fact that you're suggesting otherwise is horrible.

On August 29 2012 22:57 Bluelightz wrote:
I don't know, talis's post's seem's townie compared to his scum game in Pick Your Poison, granted in PYP he was active, but I dunno, I'll vote talis before I sleep though to consolidate (as I won't be there for the deadline, school started).

On August 29 2012 20:44 Miltonkram wrote:
Ok, having caught up on the thread a few things have jumped out to me.

Firstly, because of general inactivity and the accusations that have been flying every which way between the active posters in the thread I think the correct play for scum has been to lay low. I'm looking at several players who have avoided putting out a lot of content, specifically Chezinu, Talismania, iamperfection, and KVille. At this moment I'd be fine with a lynch on any of them, but especially Chezinu. I realize he plays trolly, but he hasn't contributed much more than placeholder votes at the end of the days. This is bullshit. Feel free to hoist him up and I'll make sure to dance on his grave.

It seems like there is a decent amount of traction towards a talismania lynch. While my gut prefers a Chezinu lynch, I can happily get behind this lynch as well. Having played with talis in the past, I think he's been inactive/unhelpful enough to warrant a lynch.

I'm pretty tired and catching up on the thread while I probably should have been sleeping has left my brain fried. I'll hopefully get some more time when I wake up to put together more complete cases. Night everybody.