/in
Bureaucracy Mafia!
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
/in | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 10 2012 09:53 kitaman27 wrote: That picture of VE and BH looks suspiciously close to the mafia communication structure! /in My Archon buddy! | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
People are being shy violets right now but I like what probulous has posted thus far. Looking back at PYP insane, Chez tried to look as scummy as possible and people passed it off as "just chez being chez." Looking at his opening post I almost feel like a similar theme is in the offing. It'd be irresponsible to call someone scum after one post but I just want to put this out there, especially since there since foolishness and I are the only other people who were in that game so he may feel he can get away with it again. gotta get out dat FoS: Chezinu | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
What part of FoS is me calling Chez scum? Can you tell me what FoS means? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 16 2012 15:43 Blazinghand wrote: To add to my previous post, which is unreasonably short: That's awfully irresponsible of you, M_Z. Are you FoSing him without calling him scum? Way to take any air whatosever out of your FoS. You're probably worried that you'll be told by your overlords that he's scum with you and you want an excuse not to vote him later. ##unvote ##vote: Meapak_Ziphh lulz didn't scroll. So apparently I need to define FoS. Stands for Finger of Suspicion. Gives a heads up to Chez that his current play isn't working and that he needs to change or it's lynch time. When I vote for someone, I want them to die and will work for that unless significant evidence can convince me otherwise. If you just throw votes around like you (and bugs -_-) are doing, they get the air taken out of them. My post was prompted by remembering Chez's previous gambit I saw him play. Either he continues to play scummy and we kill him, or he shapes up and plays nice. Obviously he could still be scum even if he shapes up but it'll be much harder for him to cause chaos if he's playing nice and we catch him later on. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 16 2012 15:09 Q-bert-Z wrote: Walton, are you the Batman? Rest of you: Mafia have an advantage in numbers. We need to find a way to use this against them. They also have a disadvantage in communication, and we need to make sure we exploit that as much as possible. A few ideas coming to mind: Large numbers will make it slightly easier to lynch a mafia, as long as we can keep communication to a minimum with them. They can only send one message a day, so we should try to create an environment that is shifting too much for that message to be useful. Remember, they can't organize and respond to lynches effectively like a normal mafia. hmm this slipped by me. What dearest smurf here seems to be suggesting sounds like a scum heaven. In a constantly shifting environment, scum will never be forced to take a solid position on anything thus allowing them to skate by. While disrupting scum communication is a worthy goal, it's not worth sacrificing a stable town atmosphere to do so. A better method is more along the lines of what probulous suggested; jump on anyone who has sudden and rather odd changes of heart. This is coming up because of your post history so far smurfette... let's not continue down this road k thnx. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 16 2012 15:59 Q-bert-Z wrote: You must be new here. I'll be nice then. Chezinu is the definition of amazing play. You must learn to get past the cunning language that he puts forth to veil what he speaks from the unworthy. Just because you speak a different language doesn't mean he's not playing the game. Learn to play his game and you'll find a treasure trove of wisdom and knowledge. He is, after all, Walton. As far as "holding people to their day one reads", I must say I've heard worse things, though not many. Let me ask you this...what is the probubality of our day one reads being any good? Day one reads are the worse reads we're going to get... If you're just gonna troll then I'm fine pushing you off the boat first. You run the risk of being blinded by chez's veil. In your haste to hail him as a speaker of wisdom and knowledge you miss the fact that he has actually played a fairly successful scum game using this tactic. @Probe, do my posts need more fire and brimstone? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
There's nothing to explain, it's like the second post in the game and it makes a lot of sense. If someone has been going tunnel city on someone else and then next day they completely ignore it I think it's worth lynching into. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Marvellosity Blazinghand Rastaban Supersoft Scum or town, go. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:10 supersoft wrote: yes of course, but do you think it's worth mentioning? This stuff is common sense. dont you think that these thought are rather thoughts a scumplayer has, because he has to control and plan who he accuses? Could you quote stuff? I didn't realize this was directed at me. I actually do think it's worth pointing out because in a normal game, the only people who suddenly change their minds are DTs who got a red (or green) check. Someone doing an about face is often a good way of lynching scum without having to claim DT. In this game however, it'll be scum doing about faces so I think it's good to get it out there so we don't have to sift through multiple DT claims later in the game. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Actually yes. You've done this before, I want to know if you're going to go through with it. If you're not, then you were essentially just causing chaos. That's not a very promising mark on your record. So let's get rid of the asshole act and you can sit down and play nice or I'll assume that you were just trolling with the RL shit and I'll give Katina's case a second look. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:31 sandroba wrote: Why in hell are you still talking about this. Isn't there anything more productive for you to comment on? I'm continuing my conversation with supersoft, read the thread. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:42 syllogism wrote: Meapak you never replied to my post here. I don't expect much from the reply, but I do expect something In green | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 02:43 supersoft wrote: ah I corrected that list for you ;-) *stop going for palmar. All of you. That guy works best if you let him do his job. judge him based on his results not based on his playstyle. + this makes him the most hillarious player so far. We can't afford to lose him. Despite what he'll have you believe, Palmar is not allergic to contributing. Bolded part is extremely retarded, Palmar isn't good enough to justify giving special privileges to. Only player of that caliber in this game is foolishness and even so it'd be nice if he'd make an appearance soonish. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 03:13 Mattchew wrote: cause you are playing an easy to fake pro-town without actually doing anything pro-town That's bullshit and you know it lol. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 03:27 Mattchew wrote: you have said the word "chaos" or talked about town stability in almost every post you have made. Did you elect yourself town peacekeeper? Because basically every one of your posts has extremely little to do with actually finding and lynching scum Actually I'm playing smart and waiting until I have a solid case before I go after someone. In contrast, you have your idiotic crusade against katina and that's it. Discussion should be currently centered around Palmar for his inability/refusal to play. BH should be a secondary consideration for his random wild play. And of course I still haven't forgot chez and the smurf, I'm interested to see if they start playing as well. This may come as a shock but it's not always a good idea to shit up the thread with random cases. My lack of a formal "case" is way better than your little spat with Katina. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 03:33 Mattchew wrote: I don't think you are correct. I think Palmar was doing EXACTLY what he said in that other game and is pissed that you quoted him from it, thus revealing his curtain This is my point about Palmar. There's a script for what he's doing and he decided to go off of it. Look at the list of people I asked him about and reference that with the play from the other game. You'll understand why I want him in here right now answering me. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
If Palmar shows his face hold his feet in the fire until he answers my post. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
##Vote: Kurumi So let's talk about tomorrow. My assumptions are that Chez will continue trolling and that Palmar will continue to be worthless but let's broaden our horizons. Blazinghand and rastaban spring to mind, BH has been discussed a fair bit but I'll shed some light on rastaban. Some of his greatest his include posts like this: On July 16 2012 23:32 rastaban wrote: Caught up now, thoughts so far: First off the random vote is a bad idea, normally the reason it is used is to eliminate mafia influence, but guess what the mafia don't know who each other are so this lynch will be without their influence anyway. We have a golden opportunity to have a lynch today with mafia having to base their judgments on reads, and make hard choices while not able to communicate. Fellow employees do not squander this opportunity! This leads to my second point, Lynching scum doesn't put someone in the clear, especially this early in the game. They don't know who each other is so they can lynch themselves, so look for sound reasoning not just who they voted for. @ HiroPro Third yes mafia only has 1 KP see: Fourth, While I think a Policy lynch on claiming blues is bad, I do think you bring up a very valid point. As you mention 1 for 1 may not be a bad trade for them so I think we should certainly be extra wary of any claimants and possibly lynch the claimant if it seems fishy, but I think a Policy is going a bit too far. OK so thats my setup review / plans post, I am now working on locating scum so I will follow up in a bit with my thoughts on who to lynch. This: On July 17 2012 00:15 rastaban wrote: And they get only 1 shot to do so, so they will need to wait before sending it out. and it sounds like names are restricted in someway as well. Say we start to lynch a minion, then only 1 other person knows he is mafia (the high rank) at most he can probably say don't let this lynch go through. and it gets sent to the other 2 minions, but only if he hadn't said anything before that. or he won't even be able to say that. They also need to wait to hear from the leader or they can't forward on his message. This means more confusion as they have to wait later to try and save someone. This is why this lynch is so unique and a great shot for us to lynch scum. (full disclosure, I forgot they could send one message now though, which is why I said they would have no impact in my previous post) And this: On July 17 2012 05:18 rastaban wrote: I like the case on BH better than the on Mz right. I feel GGQ is right in his assessment that mafia will use the lack of ties to make them more bold in their case rather than second guessing. Look at my play as Serial Killer, I decided to try and play as pro town as possible, I ended up going overboard and tunneling risk.nuke in my effort. I feel like MZ's caution is the sign of town who wants to get things right rather than scum who wants to get the day over with. Think about it we still have more than 24 hours of discussion to go. As others have also pointed out, he is also trying too hard to find reasons for his votes, it makes them seem fake. ##vote blazinghand What traits to these posts share? They're extremely wishy-washy, there's a lot of setup speculation, and his current vote was part of a bandwagon where he was merely parroting other's opinions. I'll continue to keep my eye on my other little fishes but they've been well discussed unlike rastaban who has been skirting the radar. Thoughts? (people who read the thread only please). | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
No one has commented on my rastaban case yet :/. Also Chez edited: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349678¤tpage=30#589 | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 10:33 wherebugsgo wrote: whoa, why are you speaking FOR probulous? holy shit are you scum with Probulous? Probulous never mentioned that post, he hasn't replied to it yet. Also I already elaborated on why layabout is scum in the post before that. So, #1. You're talking for someone else #2. You're not reading the thread you really are scum! honest mistake bugs, we're all templar icons and I just glazed over it before I posted. And besides, the scenario of us being scum like that doesn't work -_- | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 17 2012 11:20 Blazinghand wrote: WBG, after some thought, I agree with you. Although syllogism strikes me as scummy, Layabout is irredeemably so. Examining his filter (link) I cannot in good conscience NOT vote him. This is a big game and he's trying to skate by. Syllogism's posting history, while unfavorably comparable with the droppings of a flock of diuretic parrots, greatly outdoes Layabout's simply on strength of its existene. Layabout is trying to skate by. We can't let that happen. ##unvote ##vote: layabout BH is really just going for whoever is currently the flavor of the hour, if you look at his posts he's simply flipped whenever thread opinion has changed. Also his reasons for voting people have been very sheepy, he's been gunning for syllo for the better part of the game but all of a sudden bugs waltzes in with a case and BH flips again. ##Unvote ##Vote: Blazinghand | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Posts like this though are a problem. The last thing we want is to give scum more information on sandro's role. On July 18 2012 00:31 austinmcc wrote: Voting sandroba until he reveals his power. Don't waste your vote like that, try and do something productive. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 03:17 rastaban wrote: MZ while you are here, mind explaining that first line? You never even asked me a question, so how was I hamstringing your efforts while I was gone? You've been very careful and useless so far this game however I don't think I could have made a convincing case on you with your 4 or so posts you had at the time I made my post. You've subsequently posted a little more however they've been just as worthless. I don't think I have enough time to get you lynched today but I'll definitely make a move tomorrow. On July 18 2012 03:17 supersoft wrote: is this poor attempt to look useful by austin a scumtell or is he just useless all the time? Tough call, if austin was a better player/I knew his town play better I'd say it's a scumtell because of just how bad it is, maybe even a signalling attempt at fellow mafia. However that seems a bit too far fetched to me so I'm going to go with useless for now. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 03:27 Mattchew wrote: he's not useless at all what do you think of MZ Well like I said, I have no idea if he's a guy who will whip out the entire scum team on day 2 or if he's just another kenpachi style practitioner. If it's the former I'd have to say he's scum but my guess is that it's the later and that he's just useless. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 03:31 marvellosity wrote: Meapak, you don't think rastaban is posting similarly to Bang Bang? I just went through his filter and I have to say I disagree. He posts a lot more in BB and they're somewhat casual as well. rastaban feels a lot more guarded this game. He certainly wasn't the most active person in BB but he averaged like double his current posts per day in that game compared to this one. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 04:14 rastaban wrote: So of all the cases made and discussed so far, you think lynching me for not being active is the best choice, an interesting opinion... I also I can't help but notice that you are also in the lynch BlazingHand camp now glad to see you are at least working to lynch scum today. I wanna lynch you for acting scummy. You have very few posts of substance to your name. And please, don't twist my words. I want to kill blazinghand today, he's a better option than you. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 04:59 HiroPro wrote: I can't tell if austin really believes this or not... austin, can you give me a scum read based on behavior and not just on setup speculation. yes this please -_- | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
If Matt's vote has been irrevocable placed on gonzaw then we need to see if we have enough people who will switch to gonzaw. Anyone who will not cooperate with the lynch I will instantly consider scum. Who's active and can change their vote right now? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Chezinu Hiropro Sandroba Meapak That's what we have to work with right now. If we all switch we can kill gonzaw. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 13:39 Chezinu wrote: so we are two votes from lynching BH and you want everyone to go the other way? To the side where people are stealing other peoples votes and using dirty tricks? uhh Unless I am mistaken there aren't two active votes we can get to kill BH. I would rather have BH die, but I also trust sandro's judgement. I'm in the process of carefully reading what I've skimmed to see if I find anything glaring that I don't like about the gonzaw case but it's imperative that we lynch. The only reason I can think of for the scum to use a power like this is if they're trying to force a no lynch so let's not let that happen. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 13:41 HiroPro wrote: Am i the only one uncomfortable with switching to a candidate who had a stolen vote on him. I am as well, however ultimately, whether scum is trying to actively save or simply mislead, it's a WIFOM question. I think a simpler answer would be that they're simply trying to force a no lynch but even that is speculation. I have yet to find anything that would make me question the gonzaw case so I'm becoming slightly more happy with the switch. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 13:45 slOosh wrote: !!! Can't let no lynch happen. ##Unvote ##Vote BH ok this is good, now we only need 1 person to switch to BH. With that in mind, if there's anyone from the gonzaw list who shows up and refuses to switch I'm all for lynching them tomorrow. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 13:49 Bill Murray wrote: 1) I haven't seen BH's posting at all - I am not caught up - it was a ploy 2) I HAVE seen Gonzaw make excuses I don't like excuses ok you can die tomorrow | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Switch please Bill. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
1 in the hand versus 2 in the bush I guess. If there's a vigi they need to hit kurumi tonight, otherwise we'll waste an entire day tomorrow. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
We all know how town foolishness should be playing, when you don't do that it's very obvious. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 18 2012 22:23 rastaban wrote: Can we calm down on the insults on RoL, he can't defend himself and regardless of if he screwed town or not it isn't helping us now. I think this is my first game with "Nukes" and it is closed so they are very confusing for me. Is it standard for people to be given duds? Even if it is does the launcher usually know it is a dud, I would think that would be something they wouldn't be privy to. Lastly BH, if you really are town can you explain your block since it has been used now, I am asking because is it possible it blocks the last Nuke fired? RoL while lazy/absent much of the game actually was major contributor to the town win in Bang Bang, I find it incredibly hard to believe the story he knew K wouldn't be hit. Foolishness is usually useless day one, and ramps up day 2 (why they try and kill him so fast) what surprises me is at least in my previous game he was open about it, this game he seems to be trying to hard to look like a contributor day 1. Of course he is amazing at outing scum when town so lets see if he has better reasoning if he survives the night. That said, Kurumi needs to die, I don't trust a shot anymore (Sorry Palmar I thought you were crazy for wanting to lynch her, I had no clue nukes were so un-sure). I still want to kill rastaban for continuing to be useless and contributing without contributing. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 19 2012 05:44 HiroPro wrote: ![]() Everyone please read the last 3/4 page with Zealos and his filter. He's scum. Completely agree. I'm glad we didn't end up lynching gonzaw. I've reread the parts I've skimmed and while I recognize that gonzaw hasn't been acting like his usual self, I do think the fact that he's playing in multiple games can account for some of it. Also his last post shows that he's paying attention and is at least trying to contribute which is more than can be said for some people. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 19 2012 06:27 wherebugsgo wrote: Okay, several things: I can confirm that there is at least one messaging power that can be used on townies. I received this after the daypost: And I confirmed with the host that this is a player-sent message. Secondly we have two near-confirmed scum in Kurumi and Zealos. If you're a vig or you have any sort of night KP it might be a good idea to kill them given that tomorrow will likely be a wash if they're alive. bugs it doesn't sound like you have a townie wincon anymore. I had you as a pretty strong town read before so this is rather annoying. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 19 2012 06:38 HiroPro wrote: You realize that's not a mod PM, meapak. It's likely a player sending a fake message... skipped what bugs said -_- bugs are you going to try that command out to see what happens? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 19 2012 06:52 wherebugsgo wrote: And no, I'm not going to use that command. In fact I'm suspicious of you for asking because it's possible scum rigged that as a keyword for a bomb placed on me. Actually I had considered that. I didn't ask you to use it, simply if you were going to. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 19 2012 06:56 VisceraEyes wrote: MZ if you had a gun right now, who would you shoot? kurumi | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
I'm going out for a bit, be back later. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Also I really don't like the idea of not killing kurumi today. The last thing we need to do is give up an easy scum kill. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 19 2012 10:23 HiroPro wrote: Let me read Bang Bang. I will come back after I have read his filter from that game. While you're rereading bang bang, have a look at rastaban as well. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 19 2012 10:26 HiroPro wrote: Explain your rastaban case to me please. I did not find your inital thing very strong. Yeah I understand people haven't been thrilled with it yet so I'm going to formally write an analysis up later tonight. On July 19 2012 10:28 Kurumi wrote: When did you learn this? Mattchew told us about it during the day. looking at the time stamps it was about 45 minutes after the day post so I think it's likely this was a day action as well, I find it odd that it would be used so soon though. On July 19 2012 12:20 Katina wrote: It doesn't matter if your vote was stolen, just vote. No actually. If I do people will claim that I was faking the whole stealing thing in the first place. I'd rather see where whoever is controlling my vote (most likely scum) puts it. When I don't get modkilled for failure to vote people will have confirmation that this is a real role. This also clears mattchew to a certain extent because we know he wasn't faking his claim. He could of course still be scum but at least he's not lying just to muddy the waters. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 16 2012 23:32 rastaban wrote: Caught up now, thoughts so far: First off the random vote is a bad idea, normally the reason it is used is to eliminate mafia influence, but guess what the mafia don't know who each other are so this lynch will be without their influence anyway. We have a golden opportunity to have a lynch today with mafia having to base their judgments on reads, and make hard choices while not able to communicate. Fellow employees do not squander this opportunity! This leads to my second point, Lynching scum doesn't put someone in the clear, especially this early in the game. They don't know who each other is so they can lynch themselves, so look for sound reasoning not just who they voted for. @ HiroPro Third yes mafia only has 1 KP see: Fourth, While I think a Policy lynch on claiming blues is bad, I do think you bring up a very valid point. As you mention 1 for 1 may not be a bad trade for them so I think we should certainly be extra wary of any claimants and possibly lynch the claimant if it seems fishy, but I think a Policy is going a bit too far. OK so thats my setup review / plans post, I am now working on locating scum so I will follow up in a bit with my thoughts on who to lynch. This post is a whole lot of fluff. The game has been going on for a while when he makes this and there’s plenty to discuss however rastaban is more comfortable discussing the setup. This is a red flag, this type of post is something you make right after the game starts, not when the game has been going on and there are actual issues that can be addressed. To continue with this theme we have posts like this: On July 17 2012 00:19 rastaban wrote: Wait I just realized it said "one" of them in those posts. I had thought they sent out a message to all their followers at once, but it means instead of the above example, at most the high up, could tell one other person to try and save him. That means only 2 scum detractors at most from any lynch today Again, it’s just talking about the setup instead of actually scumhunting. Let’s look at the next two posts together: On July 17 2012 01:37 rastaban wrote: @BH What is this??? the only way someone could vote you is if they are scum, do you really believe you are that town? Your latest post is so crazy I almost think it is a joke. On July 17 2012 03:54 rastaban wrote: VE both games I have played with you you pushed someone incredibly hard day 1, why do you want to do a random lynch, cant you find any scum this time? Both these posts serve no purpose. Does rastaban think either of these two are scummy? Who knows. He says that BH is so crazy he almost thinks it’s a joke but gives us no read. Similarly with VE, he mentions how VE’s behavior is different than what he’s observed but gives no read. After a nice little wagon has built up on BH, rastaban finally feels confident calling for someone’s death: On July 17 2012 05:18 rastaban wrote: I like the case on BH better than the on Mz right. I feel GGQ is right in his assessment that mafia will use the lack of ties to make them more bold in their case rather than second guessing. Look at my play as Serial Killer, I decided to try and play as pro town as possible, I ended up going overboard and tunneling risk.nuke in my effort. I feel like MZ's caution is the sign of town who wants to get things right rather than scum who wants to get the day over with. Think about it we still have more than 24 hours of discussion to go. As others have also pointed out, he is also trying too hard to find reasons for his votes, it makes them seem fake. ##vote blazinghand He like the case on BH better than the one on me but spends most of the post talking about something other than his reasons for voting BH. Ultimately, rastaban’s vote seems like it is available to whichever candidate is currently the flavor of the hour: On July 17 2012 13:29 rastaban wrote: Sylo also looks like a good target, and while his actions are Scummy I recommend the Ace method, when two people both look like scum start by lynching the player you have more content on. We can give Sylo till tomorrow to improve if need be, and lynch this scum BH he has so much content and it all points one way On July 18 2012 11:33 rastaban wrote: I like the BH LYnch better but I could go for lymching Austin as well mainly because the only defense for him is it's so scummy scum wouldn't do it. I have mis-lynched gonzaw before and this case on him doesn't seem that strong. That said his reaction is quite different than in bang bang so I would take over a nolynch if we can't get BH or Austin stung up. On July 18 2012 12:32 rastaban wrote: I see u are on MZ. Gonzaw and mh are our leading candidates and it looks like I agree to give gonzaw a bit more time. Will u switch to MH? On July 18 2012 12:57 rastaban wrote: Sorry guys but I have to head to bed. I think the momentum is swinging back to BH so I will leave my vote where it is. The last post really betrays rastaban’s strategy. He “agrees” with the every case that was brought up d1 however he sticks with BH because that’s where the momentum is. This just screams scum trying to fit in. He’s not going to argue hard for the BH lynch, he won’t stick his neck out by switching to another candidate but he’ll agree with the argument against that person just to be in agreement. Finally, he chooses to go with BH because it’s the one that seems the least controversial. This may not be a very elegant post but it should get the point across and I need sleep. I’ll be happy to answer any questions when I wake up. tl;dr rastaban needs to die at some point. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 20 2012 04:01 HiroPro wrote: MZ, you think Zealos is scum? I do actually. He came in, was under some pressure, and then promptly checked out once he was safe. To me that's always extremely scummy. If you were a serious lynch target you had better work your ass off to give town reason to keep you around next time. Zealos hasn't done that. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 20 2012 04:02 Blazinghand wrote: I think Zealos is scum! The literal non-thread-reading and utter garbage that tries to look town but isn't makes him like my #1 scumread. Well that's nice to know, I'd appreciate if you wrote out a case. You're lucky to not be dying today so I think you should make some serious contributions to give people reasons to rethink their position on you. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 20 2012 04:29 Blazinghand wrote: Just as an aside, it's okay if you think I'm a bit scummy, just check out Zealos-- he's clearly Captain Scummer McScummy of HMS Scummytowne. He needs to be lynched tomorrow and there's now two ways around it. I promise it won't take long, his filter is short. idk what to think about you anymore blazinghand, I had expected you to quietly slip away once the pressure was off of you but instead you've stuck around which is definitely points in your favor. You still may be scum but at this point there are a lot of people I'd rather lynch ahead of you. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Because he practically claimed scum in my eyes. Sandroba's nailed him so let's take care of that first before we move on to others. We already screwed up once so I don't want us to do it again. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 21 2012 01:14 Foolishness wrote: Don't trash one of the few people that's making sense this game. looool Your contributions to this game have been overwhelming foolishness, I have seen the light and realized that katina is indeed valuable to the town. How could I have not seen this before... riiiiiight. Anyway we need to all make sure kurumi dies today. There's no excuse if he somehow wiggles out of this again. People need to remember this, it doesn't matter what alignment sandroba is at this point, kurumi got caught hook line and sinker. It'd be actually retarded if he somehow gets away. It's great to discuss more potential lynch targets but everyone needs to make sure the kurumi lynch happens today. I've seen a couple people call him town in the last couple pages (cough rastaban cough) this is just grossly negligent failure to read the thread, don't let this sentiment somehow take hold. Again, if you think about it, it doesn't matter which side sandro is on for kurumi to be scum. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
-The Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of Marketing know 3 minions each. They can send orders to one minion every half cycle. Seems to me that as soon as sandro sends a message to 4 people he'll be confirmed, I see no reason to kill him until it becomes apparent he can't do this. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 21 2012 02:59 VisceraEyes wrote: You're pretty loose with your interpretation of the rules MZ. :/ I have no idea what you're talking about. The OP says the chairmen dudes can send PMs to their minions, they have three minions each. Once sandroba sends to more than three people we'll know he's not a chairmen. I didn't really feel it necessary to include this one: -The CEO knows the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of Marketing. He can send orders to one of them every half cycle. Since it's obvious that if he's not a chairman he can't be the CEO. Where exactly is my interpretation bad? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Anyway I'm on p114 and catching up. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
I'm happy with a Palmar lynch, no need to rehash things there. I don't think GGQ is scum. I honestly think he doesn't have enough time. Rastaban is still very much scum and I'd love if people would start paying attention to him more. In fact, I'll update my case with his latest and greatest when I get the chance. I'm leaning scum on sloosh. There's so much wrong with his claim's timing and that doesn't even take into account him not shooting kurumi. This is just what I have from my initial read through. I'll go over things more carefully, update the rastaban case, and come to a decision about sloosh as time allows. For now: ##Vote: Palmar | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
@the people calling me scum. Palmar backing off of me is not in fact indicative of my alignment. Since Palmar was not an executive, the argument that I must be an executive as well falls apart really fast. Similarly, the argument that I have been playing passive is ridiculous as well while I recognize that I haven't been as active as some games, my posts haven't been passive. A lack of 24/7 activity on my part does not equate to passivity. For our upcoming lynch I think zealos is our best bet. Between sandroba's trick and his posting I think the case on him is very solid. As for sloosh I'm going to say scum but he's not as high up on the list of people I'd like to lynch as my dear friend rastaban (surprise) is. In fact I think probulous should kill rastaban tomorrow with the power VE gave him. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Let's contrast that with this game. D1 the lynch should have been BH. If you go back and read the end of the day I was working very hard to try and ensure that we even had a lynch. D2 Kurumi was obviously the best option because of the Sandroba PM, I'm still astounded he flipped town. D3 Palmar was easily the best option because of the foolishness situation. Note a theme here, I fully agreed with the person who was getting lynched. The guys who was under the gun was acting scummy and I wanted them to die. It would have hurt the town and been very nonconstructive if I had pushed for rastaban say on the day we killed Palmar. It's just dumb to accuse me of not going hard after rastaban when I agree with the guy up to die. I've brought up rastaban because at some point we're going to run out of obvious lynches (since we have zealos that day hasn't arrived). My rastaban case has actually started to pick up some steam which I'm glad to see, as soon as there isn't a better obvious lynch I'll take my turn and get him killed. I can get someone killed when I want to VE, you of all people should know this. However the time isn't right for a rastaban lynch. It would have been completely idiotic if I had tried to get him lynched in place of any of the others who have died so far, and further more I have no incentive to do so when I agree with the guy getting lynched. All the other people to die have been in my opinion, the scummiest person in the thread. The day we try and lynch someone who I don't think isn't the scummiest will be the day I jump up and start screaming bloody murder. Until then I'll wait my turn to get rastaban killed. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 09:39 VisceraEyes wrote: Then why was BH a better lynch than Kurumi D1? And why was Palmar the "obvious" lynch D3 considering your "super-read" on rasta? Nope, not buying it MZ. I appreciate the effort of your defense though, it's more than I can say for others in your position. No, now you're being thick. I was out most of the latter part of d1 (hence my late vote) I dealt with the situation in the thread when I got there. Not only that, but my read on rastaban d1 was still in it's infancy, I didn't even post a proper case until d2. Palmar was obvious because of his interactions with foolishness like I said, also his all around shitty play didn't help at all. I don't think I ever used the phrase "super-read" lol, I do think rastaban is scum but as I said previously, our lynches have all been used on people who I would consider practically confirmed scum due to circumstances in the thread. Regarding rastaban, I've been the only one on him, while I trust my analysis skills, I'm not going to try and lynch someone on my analysis over someone who's all but claimed scum (kurumi) or was just implicated by the flipped scum CEO (palmar). | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 09:48 Probulous wrote: Yeah alright VE. I completely disagree but arguing isn't going to get us anywhere. Tomorrow, MZ dies. why none of you actually have anything against me. The case is basically an extension of Palmar repeating over and over "lynch MZ." After awhile it caught on I guess -_-. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 09:48 VisceraEyes wrote: Then I'm sure you have nothing to worry about MZ. What I am concerned about is someone pulling a lone ranger act and shooting me without warning. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 09:51 VisceraEyes wrote: You don't trust Probulous? He's great dude, look who he chose for king yesterday. ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 09:51 VisceraEyes wrote: You don't trust Probulous? He's great dude, look who he chose for king yesterday. ![]() oops EBWOP: Oh I think he's town but I don't want him to do anything hasty. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 11:23 Mattchew wrote: This is a fucking stupid dance. Lynch MZ cause you VE supersoft and syllo (and myself) all agree he is scum. This doesn't have to be some stare down between you and VE... no none of you have a case. Since we're all suggesting targets, I'd say you should lynch zealos. He's just about confirmed red because of sandroba, once he's out of the way we can actually spend the day arguing with each other over who to lynch. While yesterday was great because we killed scum, it kinda sucked in terms of discussion because it was so obvious. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 12:00 gonzaw wrote: MZ, what do you think of Katina, austin and other people discussed by now? Yes, you've said "lynch Zealos" ever since N1, we already know you think he's scum.....so? What else? You can't think you complaining about people are considered contributions. Plus if you are really town and you know you'll likely get killed by Prob/lynch you should post all your reads and try to contribute as fast as you can to make sure people know what you think once you die and are "confirmed town". Katina is... Katina. I got her lynched in liar game for play that was very similar to her play here. Her play style is definitely unique but I don't think she's scum this game. Regarding austin, I had to look back through my own filter because I completely forgot what my earlier read of him was. I had him pegged as worthless town, however given that I had to look at my own filter to remember what I had previously thought of him I went and read his filter and I wasn't impressed. His attacks on sandroba look like a chainsaw defense of kurumi, and his attacks on GGQ look like a pathetic attempt to contribute. Other than that his filter is remarkably unremarkable so I'm gonna shift my read to scum. Also for the record I want to kill sloosh as well. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 15:23 supersoft wrote: stop. we are definetely not lynching Chezinu. wtf :D Everyone hold your shit for a second. VE don't go all conspiracy theorist yet, that's austin's job iirc. I propose we lynch zealos today. It's long overdue and it'll whittle down scum numbers even more. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 15:30 supersoft wrote: we have also me. I am towndreamflower. But we also should have 2 executives, so we could have 2 messenger roles in our team. And so far we have no counterpart to sloosh. This is a good point, if the mirror theory holds true then sloosh is probably the mafia nuke. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
hmm I should make it clear that I'm not 100% sold on the mirror theory yet, just pointing out that if it's true sloosh is almost certainly scum. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 15:35 Mattchew wrote: nah sloosh/supersoft would be the mafia vig, who actually shot foolishness lol Only one of them can have actually killed foolishness. Here's my biggest problem with the mirror theory. There are 4 scum left, 2 are execs. That only leaves 2 other possible minions with roles. The mirror theory simply doesn't hold up since we know there are more than 2 townies with PRs. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 15:36 Probulous wrote: Matt, hasn't it been tested already? What exactly does another flip tell us that the previous ones haven't? It's a really bad reason to lynch someone. @Meapak Why did Zealos leave out the first line from sandroba's PM? I just don't understand how his reaction to sandroba makes him scum. Either he deliberately chose to remove that line and not respond to sandroba in thread, or he is dumb and wasn't reading. Wait a second, maybe he expected Sandroba to die that night alleviating him of the need to post the PM? But that doesn't explain why he left out the first line. I don't get it, can someone explain to me? hmm I had forgotten the whole bit where he took stuff out of the PM which is just incredibly dumb. I don't understand it either, however when I read that whole thing as it happened zealos just came across as scum who had gotten caught flat footed. Couple that with sandroba's flip and I felt really good about him being scum. The fact that he's basically disappeared hasn't helped my perception of him at all. If you're under suspicion and you're town you should be demonstrating why you're not mafia by being helpful and contributing... zealos has declined to do this. You could be right and he could simply be monumentally stupid. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
I would have thought the minions would have been warned off of shooting foolishness given how easy it would have been for someone to shoot foolishness and get away with it had he been town. I can understand the rational behind a mafia vig shooting foolishness which is exactly why I'd expect him to have warned people against it. The more I think about it though, it doesn't matter either way since sloosh is scum no matter which way you slice it according to the mirror theory. Unless you think supersoft could be scum but I doubt it. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 15:49 Probulous wrote: But where would it have been useful? Day was a no-lynch without the role and the other lynches have been almost unanimous. What is the point in revealing the role when it wouldn't make a difference to the outcome. It would be a decent play to wait until there are a few people left and bust it out then to secure a misslynch. wait probulous are you saying that you think the mirror theory is correct? | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
I am however very much in favor of lynching the first person who launches a nuke. On an unrelated note, did you know dogs can get hiccups? Mine currently has them and it's driving me nuts lol. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 16:26 supersoft wrote: ve, read the thread. really. we discussed the slooshtopic like 1474383 pages. no he did not claim the same role. I want you all role claim you exact rolename and abilitys now. i dont lynch based on a stupid mirrortheory, if i dont have all roleclaims. today's lynch will be determined the good old behaviorbased way. even though you still are welcome to roleclaim, meapak. -_- Don't ask for role claims if you're certain you're going to lynch me. That's just idiotic and gives scum more information than they need. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 16:32 supersoft wrote: damn telephone. meapak do it now. i bet you claim vt :-D I'm not going to roleclaim | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 16:36 supersoft wrote: good. if you think i am now afraid that you're medic, you're wrong :D You're not going to get me lynched. Like the rest of the long line of my accusers, you have no case, you're simply parroting what Palmar started. If you think I'm remotely concerned about dying then you're wrong. If we can all consider some serious lynch candidates for a moment, I really don't like the idea of lynching anybody to prove your theory VE. I'd much prefer if we spent some time on sloosh or zealos. Also worth looking into are austin and I haven't forgotten about rastaban. In fact, depending on how things go with sloosh and zealos, it may actually be time to lynch rastaban today. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 16:45 supersoft wrote: we have a case. If you read the thread, you will find it. lol. You're a good player supersoft but your weakness is that you sometimes get hopelessly arrogant. You don't have a case, I'm not getting lynched. Moving on how about we hear from you on who you'd realistically like to lynch today. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 16:59 supersoft wrote: btw. You're a good player, too. But i couldn't see that this game. That's one main allegation. You're not town, simply because you didn't reach your own standart. That is a hopelessly bad argument. I recognize that my activity level isn't as high as I would like it to be, however my play hasn't been "bad." My reads have been good and I haven't made any major mistakes that hurt the town. No I haven't been as active as I usually am but if you actually take a moment to look at what I've done it's consistent with my standard town play, just on a smaller scale. If you're going to base your "main allegation" off of meta, at least read some scum games and see the difference. This discussion is probably not going to get anywhere tonight so I'm going to bed. Tomorrow we'll decide whether it's a sloosh or zealos lynch. Maybe could even be rastaban's turn. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Now I really am going to bed. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 17:14 supersoft wrote: No matter how many times syllo or anybody repeats the word "passive" does not make it a fact. D1, I wanted a lynch. No lynch means scum is in complete control. Sandroba (confirmed town) made a decent case on gonzaw (who has subsequently picked his game up) in interest of at least having a lynch I was willing to follow sandroba's judgement. In terms of the "blame game" (cute turn of phrase btw syllo) sandroba and probulous were on BH at the end, I have no problems with them there. The point about me not going after the people who threw their votes away is also ridiculous. D2 we needed to lynch kurumi, there was no point in bringing that up. Then the biggest offender, foolishness, died. So no problems there. Finally, I had voted BH in the thread hours before but simply forgot to vote in the voting thread. I've done this twice now this game. As for the quotes, gj cherry picking syllo! I'm not even sure what they're trying to prove as they don't show anything. And I resent the comment about me not caring at all, as was established by protact, I went away for a few days. Naturally I'm going to have a low post count because of that period. Marv just sheeping syllo lyk a baus. He also whips out that meta like there's no tomorrow. I've already established why I'm not tunnel city on rastaban so this whole post is worthless. Sheeping marv who's sheeping syllo. if you somehow didn't catch it, meapak :-D Come up with a real case lol | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 25 2012 17:21 supersoft wrote: Second allegation: Gamebalance and math: alive: 11. Supersoft town 15. syllogism town 7. VisceraEyes killed scum very unlikely scum when Prob is scum 10. Meapak_Ziphh 8. Bill Murray townread (can't be executive) 18. Chezinu town 4. Probulous killed scum very unlikely scum when VE is scum dead 25. RebirthofLegend town 19. Kurumi town 13. Wherebugsgo town 3. Sandroba town 16. GGQ town 26. Palmar scum 6. Foolishness scum Setup speculation=bullshit Third allegation: you have no abilitys. We have 2 executives missing. Foolishness CEO flip indicates, that good players are in key positions. Setup speculation=bullshit Fourth allegation: Foolishness refused to mention you, even though you were discussed day1. Syllo attacked you day1 and got attacked by foolish and palmar. This proves what? This logic is retarded. Foolishness was a CEO and Palmar was a goon. There's literally no way for them to have planned that. Also foolishness never mentioned a lot of people lol, that's a dumb point You gotta do better than this supersoft. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 26 2012 02:45 VisceraEyes wrote: If the Traitorous Employee wins with town, then why hasn't he claimed? What makes you think he wins with town slOosh? I didn't see ANYTHING that implied that in Foolish' role description slOosh, which is the only source of information on the subject I can even imagine. Probably because he'd get instagibbed: you have the power to kill your own employees. Any time during the game, you may use your secret trap door to anonymously (and instantaneously) kill one of your employees in an attempt to kill the traitor (one use). However, the trap door only works on your own employees. If you use it on a non-employee, the kill does not go through, they are notified someone made an attempt on their life but not who, and your night action immunity goes kaput. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
Tomorrow I'll write something on him and the updated case on rastaban that I had previously mentioned. I also have a gut feeling about QbertZ which I'll try and flesh out as well. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
We still have plenty of time and it's easier to reach a majority now than it was D1. With that in mind it'd be great if people would at least listen to a my sloosh case tomorrow. There are enough active people that I'm fairly certain we'll prevent a no lynch which seems to be a major concern for you supersoft. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
fuck this, I'm an alignment cop. N1 I checked sandrob, N2 I didn't get a check because I was away, N3 I checked sloosh and he came back mafia. This is why I've dropped off on rastaban a bunch. I didn't want to claim because I thought we were going to lynch sloosh as part of the progression of scummy people I've talked about earlier but seeing as it looks like he's going to get completely away with this I'll claim. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:15 supersoft wrote: I didn't even think once about the mole at this time This almost looks like scum trying to bait the mole out. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:16 syllogism wrote: Are you kidding? He is mafia traitor and almost certainly shows up mafia on alignment checks No, sloosh is scum. Think about this claim more dynamically. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:18 syllogism wrote: Foolishness' flip confirms that there is a mafia traitor in the game. If sloosh isn't it, the real traitor would counterclaim. You should try thinking sometime, it might actually do you some good. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
oh and for supersoft ##Nuke: sloosh | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:20 syllogism wrote: Oh I see, why not just say it then? I'm a cop, I'll die tonight. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:24 HiroPro wrote: so MZ is claiming mole also? ok, then lets lynch sloosh, even if he is mole he counts as mafia anyway. I'm not claiming mole dumbass, I'm claiming cop. I can check someone tonight to confirm that if you'd like. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:25 syllogism wrote: I think he is essentially counterclaiming sloosh traitor claim, but has a posting restriction that prevents him from claiming. I can't think of any other reason. At least you've got the right idea that sloosh is scum. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:29 HiroPro wrote: -_- Are you fucking kidding me MZ. What is the point of claiming cop? What the hell does telling us that sloosh showed up as red tell us. The point of claiming cop is that I am a cop. I'll check gonzaw or zealos or whoever you guys want tonight. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:28 gonzaw wrote: If so maybe you should color your claim like this so we know that you are cc'ing mole but you don't "claim" it (just like Palmar did in that game) I just color my claim like this because my point is across. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:35 HiroPro wrote: I dont see any reason for meapak to claim as cop. why would a mole not show up as mafia -_- Useless to tell us that. So Im thinking MZ is mole with a post restriction like syllo said. you are super fucking retarded. I am a cop. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:36 HiroPro wrote: What kind of cop claims with no useful checks? That's like painting a big fat target on your back and saying kill me... well then it's a clean 1-1 trade which I'm fine with. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:36 gonzaw wrote: It all seems to indicate he's cc'ing mole then. If he was actually scum (and sloosh real mole) that' be stupid as hell, so I'd be inclined to believe him. ##Unvote: Meapak_Zipph ##Vote: sloosh Even if that's not the case (and MZ is real cop), the mole still counts for mafia's numbers, and sloosh isn't really helpful with his "confirmed town-mole" status, so it doesn't really matter I'd like confirmation from MZ that he's cc'ing mole by the above way though I'm a cop. If you need more help, read syllo. I'd appreciate if we could all drop my role now. Let's not make it a huge thing. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:37 supersoft wrote: if you really are a cop, MZ. this is the worst move in history of mafiagames. why didn't you claim something like oneshot-wincon-revealer lol now i am pretty confused because I'm the motherfucking cop. Like I've said, if you're confused filter syllo. We need to move on from this now. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:41 gonzaw wrote: So I take it all those PMs sloosh posted were fake then? In my opinion sloosh used real PMs and just called them fake Just my opinion though. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:44 syllogism wrote: I think they were mostly real, but not completely. I think the role breadcrumbing part may still be accurate and we should lynch q-bert-z after sloosh and gonzaw. I agree with this wholeheartedly. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 05:05 VisceraEyes wrote: syllo why do you believe MZ's claim? you need to carefully reread the last couple pages then drop it. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 05:07 syllogism wrote: Because it makes no sense at all for him to claim what he did unless he is the traitor trying to counterclaim? If Sloosh flips traitor, we would lynch MZ next. I also think it's more likely that the traitor can't post mafia PMs because that gives us too much information. syllo I'm the cop, the only way I have the opportunity to die tonight is if people can just let me be the cop in peace. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
well I will probably be dying tonight but I'll make a post at the day cycle with how we need to proceed. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 13:29 rastaban wrote: Nice work, how do you feel about sloosh's made up Pms, you think they are based off real ones or entirely fabricated? My gut feeling says they are based off of real ones. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 27 2012 15:49 Chezinu wrote: + Show Spoiler + FoS+ Show Spoiler + Just kidding..+ Show Spoiler + Mafia cannot be a person who puts pants on their head!+ Show Spoiler + Unless putting pants on head is some sort of secret code! The pants pic was and is still amazing... problem is it'll always remind me how bad I lost liar game lol. Anyway I think that QbertZ should be ahead of gonzaw. I'm not sold on gonzaw yet. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() Anyway I say we go Katina, Chez, QbertZ. I was wrong about katina and chez as well, damn :/ | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 28 2012 10:22 Bill Murray wrote: If Katina put her pants on her head, open hand slap to the face the first pants pic isn't katina lol. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
I forgot who I had the conversation with, but a long time ago I was on AIM with one of you and we discussed how hard a mafia traitor is to balance. The second I read my roll PM I thought "sonofabitch they did it." Anyway I'm curious of your opinions on how I played the role. It was my goal to appear on at least half the suspect lists per day because I figured that would give me leeway to go after people who I thought were scummy and have my overlord dismiss it as me just trying to get heat away from myself. I honestly did think rastaban was scum at first but then the very first PM I received told me that he was a good target for me to go after so then I had to find a way to continue to push for him without him dying. The situation that arose with supersoft is one that I had assumed would happen since I figured I couldn't play quasi scummy all game without getting called on it. However, it's remarkably easier to defend yourself when you know you're innocent so I was banking on that to get me through. The whole bit of fake claiming cop was because I was under the impression that the mafia still had the ability to use the trapdoor on me and I didn't want to give them a free KP. It became fairly obvious that I was the traitor but they waited until night to kill me so I almost thought I had gotten away with it ![]() Anyway I had a lot of fun, I felt like I was walking on a tightrope for most of the game which demanded I play very carefully. The accusations made against me early were very accurate. Thanks to protact and co. for hosting, thanks to town for being one of the better ones in recent memory. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
| ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On August 01 2012 05:31 VisceraEyes wrote: Thx pal! Sorry I didn't pick up what you were doing with the cop-claim. Luckily we had BeastModeSyllo this game too ^^ haha yeah, that claim was pretty clumsily done but it achieved the goal of getting sloosh killed without me dying on that day. Edit: I knew scum had a power to instantly kill me and after foolishness died I asked protact if it was still there. They responded that the execs held the power so I assumed that I was still in danger if I outright claimed because I didn't want to give the mafia a free KP on me (which is how I assumed that the trapdoor worked). I was banking on whoever controlled the trapdoor not paying very close attention to the thread for a page or two or just not caring enough to pick up what I was trying to do. Luckily for me, sloosh sent me a PM telling me to bus him as hard as I could so he may have interpreted that as me trying to bus him. Ultimately I really have no idea why I didn't die. There was no rule against me claiming outright, I just didn't want to give that extra KP. | ||
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6785 Posts
On July 28 2012 09:18 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: While we wait... ![]() | ||
| ||