EPTBureaucracy Mafia! - Page 11
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
When things are less clear and more information is needed, discussion is good. Otherwise sheeping is fine and nothing is stopping is from discussing other candidates even though we lynch gonzaw today. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 25 2012 23:49 marvellosity wrote: wow Why are you so bothered about that? You sheeped us on Palmar On July 23 2012 18:38 marvellosity wrote: Until I get home and have more time later I'm going to sheep town ##Vote: Palmar On July 24 2012 05:06 marvellosity wrote: Alright. I'm gonna trust you/sandroba/syllo/whoever else. My read on him still isn't much away from null, but for someone who knows Palmar better that may be telling in itself I will have to re-evaluate my read on you because it was purely based on some of your reactions feeling genuine, but your actual actions otherwise aren't quite line in what I would expect from town. On day 1 you even claimed that BH's "case" on me was better than the one on him, which is utterly laughable. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 17 2012 01:35 Blazinghand wrote: Oh my lord, you're right. Syllo's managed to make several posts without actually comitting to anything at all. I take it all back, he's the scum here. He agrees with Sandro on me, but doesn't do anything about it. He would "like to lynch" probulous, but doesn't vote him. I've seen the light. ##unvote ##vote: syllogism die scum Was better than what we said about blazing's play, I don't know what to tell you. Well I can tell you to vote gonzaw | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 17 2012 14:50 gonzaw wrote: About laya: I don't think laya was casting doubt on the claim but rather trying to get an answer from sandro (on why he wasted his ability). I don't get why some people think killing him should be a priority over people like syllo/FOolishness or even Palmar and stuff. On July 23 2012 10:01 gonzaw wrote: layabout, do you think Palmar is town or do you just not want him lynched today? On July 23 2012 10:08 gonzaw wrote: lol layabout stealing the words from my mouth before I post  If he didn't shoot Foo and is scum I don't see why he would even fake-claim in the first place. I've never seen a game where a scum fake-claimed a vig shot from someone else, specially if it's the beginning of the game. After laya flips mafia On July 25 2012 12:01 gonzaw wrote: lol forgot layabout was in this game I'll check him tomorrow though, I'm going to sleep now. I'm sure you did | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 17 2012 04:03 gonzaw wrote: Okay woke up Holy shit I've read the voting thread and its chaotic as fuck. I'll deal with the ICBINT Mafia game and then come back to this one. Fuck I thought this would start after one of the 2 games I'm playing would end >_> On July 17 2012 06:22 gonzaw wrote: Man I thought I had time for this but now I have to go to uni all of a sudden (to check some test results). On July 18 2012 08:31 gonzaw wrote: I don't see MZ being scum after skimming his filter. Damn I don't have much time for this, this game is huge :/ After I come back from the gym I'll post more thoroughly On July 18 2012 10:59 gonzaw wrote: I can't believe I'm getting lynched just because I don't have time. Once the other UG game I'm playing in and/or Can't Believe ends (or I die in them) I'll be able to devote more time to this game, but not right now. On July 18 2012 11:18 gonzaw wrote: They could have easily been lynched if people had listened to reason and not say "we are not lynching vets today". Anyways, I'm not in the mood right now and have to do other stuff, can't even find the willpower to read a single filter. I don't know when the deadline is, but perhaps me getting lynched would be better, specially if a NL is the other alternative and I'll get the same shit on N1/D2. Fuck it, sorry Ver/Incognito :/ At least I learned my lesson here. On July 19 2012 05:43 gonzaw wrote: Okay, I'll go back to Can't Believe, do stuff there, then in my other game and come back. I'll have to go somewhere in 2 hours or so so expect from me later, like before the deadline or something. Yes, these are excuses but I can't do anything else. The alternative I have is just make incomplete posts and disappear for a long time without explaining myself, which doesn't make my actions transparent at all. If the truth makes me scummy then whatever, I won't lie to you just to appear more "townie". If I'm switching my attention between games I'll state so. On July 21 2012 11:48 gonzaw wrote: Can't Believe ended, so I'll have more time for this game (finally). My other UG game hasn't ended yet, but it will soon, so stay tuned. On July 21 2012 12:14 gonzaw wrote: Oh, just remembered. Tomorrow I'm going away for the weekend. I'll be gone for like 1 day. Thank god it's night, if not I could get modkilled or something  On July 24 2012 08:04 gonzaw wrote: I'm going to the gym now and I think I'll be back right before the deadline. On July 25 2012 07:29 gonzaw wrote: Okay, I'm back and I'll reread some filters, although I'm extremely lazy at this moment :/ He sure is self conscious about his activity in this game. Lets compare his attitude towards the lynch deadline in the other game he was playing in, in which he was town On July 14 2012 01:33 gonzaw wrote: Ehmm...is it me or does the day END IN FREAKING 5 HOURS!!!!?? Seriously people, these votes are a mess, there are 6 people with votes on them and the guy with most votes has 3 (marv will you keep your vote on solstice?). So please people consolidate the votes unless you want: 1)A NL 2)A rushed last-minute wagon on someone (to prevent NL) that will most likely end up being town. I already said I think Keirath is scum and should be today's lynch. But I wouldn't mind a Dropbear lynch either (because of reasons stated earlier). In mind with S&B's recent posting I wouldn't mind his lynch either, I don't like how he sporadically comes into the thread to shit things up and doesn't seem to care about being part of any discussion. At least I want some freaking discussion about the lynch. Meanwhile in this game, with 1h 40 minutes until deadline and his vote on a person who didn't seem likely would get lynched On July 18 2012 11:18 gonzaw wrote: They could have easily been lynched if people had listened to reason and not say "we are not lynching vets today". Anyways, I'm not in the mood right now and have to do other stuff, can't even find the willpower to read a single filter. I don't know when the deadline is, but perhaps me getting lynched would be better, specially if a NL is the other alternative and I'll get the same shit on N1/D2. Fuck it, sorry Ver/Incognito :/ At least I learned my lesson here. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 18 2012 07:40 gonzaw wrote: No. If a scum that's not CEO received his order first then sandro's message 2nd, he'd instantly figure out something is wrong, and it would be likely he'd figure out the 2nd message was bogus and not sent by his supervisor. If the scum is the CEO then he knows it's bogus. I think "Use these phrases to identify your partners" thing is not allowed in those mafia communications since it outs their mafia members so the hosts would censor it, meaning even if everything happened according to sandro's plan scum may just not believe that message would get by that censor. It's not that powerful if scum are smart and can easily figure out the bogus message; at least in this case (not if sandro had made a more "subtle" message). I don't really think his outburst here is "pushing a mafia agenda" and makes him scum alone, I'll need to read his filter first. It seems Foo' or syllo won't get lynched though. Austin and Blazinghand are the only choices? I don't really like any of them to lynch today. If I understand this post correctly, you were saying that what mafia would likely not believe a message that would tell them to identify themselves by posting something specific. But if that's the case, why did you think kurumi was mafia? It seems to me that when you were writing this, you weren't thinking about kurumi at all, because otherwise saying this doesn't make sense. This may be a bit of a stretch, but it feels weird to say something like this when you were "certain" one "mafia" had already fallen for it. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 23 2012 09:54 gonzaw wrote: lol when I saw Foo' flip CEO it made my day :D I was very surprised about BH though, I really thought he was town. About sloosh/supersoft: I don't see any reason for sloosh to fake-claim he shot Foo' as scum if he wasn't the one that actually shot him. I don't really see a reason for supersoft to fake-claim that either, unless he wanted to push a misslynch on sloosh. We need to be sure about it, supersoft has been acting shady all game and this "contradiction" here doesn't sit well with me. Really, you think Sloosh' extremely unusual and unlikely role claim and the fact he shot a person who he had previously defended isn't suspicious, but you question supersoft's play more? Why would mafia supersoft ever counterclaim there? To force a mislynch? That's laughable. The counterclaimer in this situation is actually much less suspicious. You are mafia | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Gonzaw: it has to do with your approaches. In Zealos' case you dismiss every explanation that might explain his behavior even if he is town and in Sloosh' case you dismiss every explanation why the play makes sense from mafia perspective. The claim is so suspicious, that the inconsistency and flat out refusal to lynch sloosh combined with your eagerness to lynch zealos is why I am not willing to believe you are town. Unsurprisingly sloosh voted meapak rather than gonzaw | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
##nuke sloosh No excuse for not cooperating | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 25 2012 18:52 risk.nuke wrote: Supersoft what kind of argument is that? Kill MZ because if every sensible person dies he's going to manipulate the town if he's scum. What's with the damn unwillingness to lynch actuall scum. We got people I've felt like nearly everyone agrees are scummy, like zealous or rastaban but somehow they don't die. I'm going to vote Zealous now and everyone who's interested in killing scum should join in. ##Vote Zealous Hey risk we have killed 4 mafia in a row so why would you say this? Can you ##nuke sloosh please | ||
| ||
