Movie Star Mini Mafia! - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
No I think you're scum, which is why I'm voting you. *smooches* | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Unvote to show you I'm supersrs | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 22 2012 08:25 Probulous wrote: Guys, guys, guys.... I'm sorry but I am town this game. Snarfs, that's mean and I thought we were friends ![]() @VE, your vote makes little sense what happened to Marv? Actually, where is Marv, he owes me my alimony? Votes = Tools Not going over this again this game. Also <3 | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
*grumblegrumble* | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Vote: marvellosity Hubris does NOT become you sir. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Probulous, what did you see when you went back and read Magic? When I went back, all I saw was a completely different opening strategy. I mean, he could just be doing a fast-expand or something, but it's looking kinda cheesy to me. :/ | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Anyways look what I found guys! On May 30 2012 06:16 marvellosity wrote: Much like Magic you are reading my responses as defensive when they were not. I'm just baffled you are asking questions I have already stated clear opinions on or at least alluded to. This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again! Marv, your response? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Now, Marv, my accusation was that you were being defensive when I wasn't attacking you. That's the accusation. I accused you of being overly defensive. What part about that is 'misrepresenting' what happened in that game? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 22 2012 09:23 marvellosity wrote: I'm supposed to talk about someone else in my defence? And in the nested quote it states quite clearly there weren't any accusations... that's twice this game now you've misrepresented something, wilfully or not. i'm watching you Bolded is a strawman argument that was designed to discredit my accusations. Italicized shows MARV blatantly misrepresenting the situation, as the nested quote WAS the accusation. He's trying to use the fact that the context is not there to fool everyone, but don't worry guys...VE is here. Underlined is an empty accusation with no evidence and an empty threat. Keep on watchin Marv, I'm sure you'll see something you like. ![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 22 2012 09:38 slOosh wrote: It's absolutely imperative that we resolve this miller claim issue. If we aren't all on the same page then scum can use the miller business to screw us over later. It has to be clear. Late-claiming millers will be policy lynched on the basis of it is purely anti-town. Scum can also "look VT and pro-town", so that is just foolish Zephirdd. I think this about covers it. Now stop please and comment on Marv, who I've fingered as our first lynch candidate. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Now, my argument isn't about you defending yourself for the same reason. My argument is that you're defending yourself in the same fashion...using meta. You're encouraging everyone to leave the thread and go read other games. Why? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 22 2012 09:42 marvellosity wrote: This is the second misrepresentation. Trying to compare a 'defence' in a game where I wasn't accused to my defence this game where I am in fact accused First misrepresentation: I clearly said what I was referring to in Magic and yet you try to pretend that you went and looked and didn't find anything. Despite the fact I said exactly what I was referring to. I "pretend" that I went and didn't find anything? I went and looked and I said EXACTLY what I found. I don't care about you wanting to shoot NT, nothing similar has happened this game to compare it to. When I went back, I found what I was looking for - you acting like a townie. You haven't done that this game. When I went and looked at your scum game, I found something there too - you defending yourself needlessly with meta. You HAVE done that this game. These aren't misrepresentations, they're observations I'm making. If you don't like it, STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO GO READ YOUR PREVIOUS GAMES. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On June 22 2012 09:52 marvellosity wrote: Don't be an idiot. Why would I let myself in for this (fairly predictable, even if how long and hard it has continued was not) when I didn't have to? Use your noggin. See, the funny part is that you could ask yourself the same question. Why would you put yourself in this situation as town? It doesn't make any fucking sense. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() | ||
| ||