Bastard Mafia 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
I'm not interested in joining House Chezinu, at least until we have some more information about the potential "benefits" of doing so, but I would be interested to know why Drazerk is so intent on mass murdering anyone to do with it. Do you know something that we don't? Or do you just have a bad feeling about it? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 17 2012 05:53 KharadBanar wrote: I still have a will on my own, thank you very much. If someone is acting really scummy but HiroPro is protecting him to the point where it seems unreasonable, I am not going to be convinced by him that I should drop my case. (Sorry HiroPro) What, why would you apologise to HiroPro for that? If you strongly believe that a person is anti-town, and your wincon is to remove said anti-town, HiroPro and his "House" should not even factor into your decision. If HiroPro disagrees with that, this alliance of yours is clearly detrimental to your wincon. The fact that you feel you had to apologise for saying you'd want someone "really scummy" dead, worries me. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 17 2012 06:28 HiroPro wrote: I am the Director of Recruitment/Funding. I must recruit; it is not a choice. On June 17 2012 03:01 HiroPro wrote: Update: All supporters or members of House Chezinu, 5th Party along with submitting applications should make donations to the Treasury Fund of House Chezinu, 5th Party, specifically indicating that said monetary funds should be sent to the Director of Recruitment/Funding, HiroPro. On June 17 2012 03:15 HiroPro wrote: If your role/skills/wealth are great enough, you may even be able to join the board. Is this just flavour for your recruiting, or is there actually some form of currency involved with the House? Can you elaborate? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 17 2012 09:52 Drazerk wrote: Also I love how now one else mentioned my murder spree ♥ On June 17 2012 05:03 xsksc wrote: but I would be interested to know why Drazerk is so intent on mass murdering anyone to do with it. Do you know something that we don't? Or do you just have a bad feeling about it? I said this 5 hours ago but you neglected to respond, unless I missed it. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 17 2012 10:05 Drazerk wrote: I should read the thread but that is too much effort ... I remember trying to lynch you in Steamship for this kind of posting. People just said, nah that's just how Drazerk plays. There's no need to be lazy though. -_- Is anyone else around atm? The thread's gone pretty quiet, let's try and get some constructive discussion going. I would like to hear some more opinnions on Nisanis and Kharadbanars haste in allying with an unknown faction, especially this early in the game. Personally, I don't like their decision at all. We have very little information about the House, because honestly, most of HiroPro's posts about it have been flavour and nonsense. It may turn out that HiroPro and his House turn out to be a good resource for town. Until I know more about it, however, I'm staying well clear. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
HiroPro's "House" bullshit just proves that you shouldn't be too quick to make friends with people you have zero information about. An anti-town player could just as easily have typed all that flavour out, and an anti-town player with influence over you, however slight it may be, is never a good thing. Anyway, I just finished re-reading the thread, and KharadBanar strikes me pretty heavily as anti-town. 1. Proclaims House Chezinu to be fish, and that he's "not convinced." 2. Sees Nisani's alliance proposal as a good idea, does a u-turn and offers the same, also talks about "future deals"..whatever that means. 3. On June 17 2012 04:48 KharadBanar wrote: This in turn leads me to the opinion that Drazerk is very much right in ignoring The HOUSE for now. I will do so from now on (I'll not play against HiroPro or his faction since we are allies, but I'm not going to mention them too much in my posting) and I believe it is wise for you to do the same. This post is very interesting, he has literally no way of telling Hiro's alignment this early in the game, and yet he doesn't want to discuss Hiro and his House, nor does he want to play against it since they are allies. I have a hard time believing someone with a town agenda would just consent to live and let live, without asking questions. This leads me to believe he is some sort of 3rd Party survivor/anti-town. ##vote: KharadBanar | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
In response to Nisanis vote - On June 18 2012 09:20 Nisani201 wrote: First of all I'd like to call out BioSC for hardcore lurking throughout all of N0. However I'd prefer not to lynch a lurker today because I think there are better targets. xsksc is who I'd like to lynch today. Read his filter, and you'll see that he is sort of unwilling to contribute but is trying to make posts in the thread. In other words, all of his posts are easy to make. His most recent post, commenting on me and KB wanting to ally with the House Chezinu, is once again very diplomatic and is siding towards the general popular opinion on the thread. Putting my vote on him for now. ##Vote: xsksc Maybe it's the popular opinion because allying with a completely unknown faction is a pretty bad idea for town? As for my posts being "easy to make", I'm sorry you feel that way, but I disagree. I've voiced my opinnion and encouraged discussion when the thread was dead. I suggest you have a quick read of your own filter, and maybe that will stop you from accusing others of shit contribution. On June 17 2012 07:21 Nisani201 wrote: Drazerk, I feel like you are trying to make it look like you are contributing and being outspoken by latching onto any bullshit you can find. On June 18 2012 06:26 Nisani201 wrote: I'm on my phone so i can't do much right now, but i don't believe talis's claim. Makes it look like he's contributing when really he's just "forcing" everyone else to contribute for him. On June 18 2012 09:20 Nisani201 wrote: Read his filter, and you'll see that he is sort of unwilling to contribute but is trying to make posts in the thread. Copy and paste attacks, that's pretty much it. Your easy-to-make argument is completely nonsensical, not to mention hypocritical. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 18 2012 09:57 DropBear wrote: Can you shoot KB talismania? I'm not sure if it's worth wasting the shot. Who would you lynch if KB was out of the equation? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 18 2012 10:00 talismania wrote: It's something I can consider. The upside is the information of who has pushed him and who hasn't etc which then informs the lynch. The downside is the loss of information by shooting early and losing the information that I would get from forcing others to post cases/impressions/info. It's not clear to me exactly what the right tradeoff is. I'm also not convinced kharadbanar is anti-town. I lean third party on him. You think that third party =/= anti-town? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 18 2012 10:14 Nisani201 wrote: Yes indeed, contributing without contributing seems to be a common theme this game. Not my fault. I don't think you quite got my point there.. You have contributed fuck all, and you are in no position to point that particular flaw out in everyone elses play. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
Point 3 in a nutshell is his "live and let live" attitude, considering he knows nothing about their alignment, looks very 3rd party-esque. Being diplomatic is one thing, deciding to not play against or even discuss them on n0 is another matter. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 18 2012 19:25 Acrofales wrote: as I am leaning increasingly towards some third party role for KB, which may or may not be anti-town, but is probably not (pure) scum. In this sort of game, I want to kill 3rd party even more, given that to win we have to remove all anti-town elements, which 3rd party/SK definitely falls under. For all we know, there might not even be "pure" scum in this game. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 19 2012 08:00 deconduo wrote: KharadBanar -Scummy play with the House Chezinu stuff -Scummy play in the aftermath of the House Chezinu stuff -Puts a case against BioSC and proposes him as a lynch candidate, then votes for mazu -Then asks for Dropbear to be day vigged. He's the safest shot, least likely to hit a townie anyway. If he's not scum then he's 3rd party. We could hang him and try shooting someone else, but seeing as you have to shoot soon it's probably best to just play it safe. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
There's way more Europeans in the last page than there is Americans. ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 19 2012 13:39 DropBear wrote: NISANI201 IS A SCUMBAG Defends Maju with no reasoning. THIS IS DODGY AS ALL HELL. Tries to ally himself with Hiro at the beginning of the game purely for the sake of safety, clearly has something to hide. The case on xsksc is terrible. Extremely defensive. Generally is only popping up to defend himself. NISANI201 IS RED AND NEEDS TO DIE I gave Nisani the benefit of the doubt earlier, I thought he was just being bad lol. Maju's flip is pretty condemning for him, he looks a lot more likely to be the scum partner than KB does. That's not to say I think KB is town, though. I don't think he's AS likely to bleed "pure scum", as it were. TLDR I agree, Nisani would be a good lynch. On June 19 2012 13:51 DropBear wrote: I also am unsure what to think of deconduo. This early post from deconduo caught my eye immediately and to me was a huge blueslip, highlighted here: This immediately made me think decon was a blue of some kind. Was this deliberate? He has soft defended Maju a few times but. It's not relevant anymore, but if you think you've found a blueslip, why would you draw attention to it? o.O | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
I'm gonna leave my vote on Nisani - I might not be back on before the deadline and he seems like the best choice. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 20 2012 07:52 talismania wrote: xsksc is awake! Why don't you tell us who you think Maju's partner is and why? Nisani. His posts are pretty retarded, I quoted this copy and paste "contribution" nonsense earlier. On June 17 2012 07:21 Nisani201 wrote: Drazerk, I feel like you are trying to make it look like you are contributing and being outspoken by latching onto any bullshit you can find. On June 18 2012 06:26 Nisani201 wrote: I'm on my phone so i can't do much right now, but i don't believe talis's claim. Makes it look like he's contributing when really he's just "forcing" everyone else to contribute for him. On June 18 2012 09:20 Nisani201 wrote: Read his filter, and you'll see that he is sort of unwilling to contribute but is trying to make posts in the thread. There's more bullshit if you feel like reading his filter. This in itself doesn't make him the partner, he could just be another 3rd party like KB. However, this post that DB pointed out does give him a possible link to Maju. On June 18 2012 06:43 Nisani201 wrote: I also don't like the case on Maju He just dismisses the case without any explanation, defends him without actually doing any defense, if that makes sense. So yeah, Nisani is my best guess for the scum partner atm. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 20 2012 08:25 talismania wrote: So how do you account for this: (especially now given that we have a role pm that shows there are extra wincons as well) ? If you take nisani as 3rd party, then who would maju's partner be? Do you have any other reads? Maybe I misread it but I thought Nisani denied that claim, if not, my bad I'll go re-read. Also, I'm curious about this point you made earlier. Classic scum posts like "Anyway I'm going away now blahblahblah if anyone has questions" (I hate it when townies do this btw). The only post in my filter that is anything close to that would be this On June 18 2012 10:42 xsksc wrote: I have to go for a while, might be able to check the thread before I sleep. If I don't, I'll respond to any additional queries you might have, tomorow. If you had actually read the context, Nisani was questioning my KB case, and I had to go AFK after I replied. I wouldn't be around again for a while, so I said I'd respond to anything else he asked in the morning, that was not a "if anyone has questions". How on earth is that a "classic scum post"? Why do you hate it when townies do it? Is it more towny to just vanish for 12 hours? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 20 2012 09:00 talismania wrote: I just don't understand why people need to update the rest of us with their whereabouts unless it's deadline-related or something. Scum get nervous about seeming absent and make those posts, but townies do it too so eh. ___________ What are your other reads? I've heard you talk about kharadbanar and nisani and that's about it. Anything else? I think it's polite to say you are leaving, if you're in a discussion. I didn't update you with my whereabouts, I just said I had to go, simple. Call it a classic scum post all you want, in my opinnion it's a courtesy. As for Nisani and KB, they were my anti-town reads which I actually had a case for. I need to do a full re-read when I'm done playing LoL, but as it stands, I have a bad feeling about EchelonTree but I don't see anything solid enough for a case, it's just a feeling. Drazerk is being drazerk, but his play should pick up. DropBear and acrofales look town. Hyaach and bio, null null. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
I'm convinced HiroPro is not anti-town - I like his posts, they're constructive and pro-town. He also started the case on Maju, and I don't see why he would bus that early. I don't believe FourFace/DropBear's claim's. It looks to me that if we have a role, we have a name. Decon claimed "I am Phoenix Wright, the Objectivist" This fits in with my own role, and I believe someone (acro?) also said they have a name. DropBear and FourFace provide us with no names, DB even claims he is called vengeful townie. Given that we can't even lynch, (which he didn't know at the time) I really doubt DB's claim. FourFace's bulletproof DT looks really overpowered. He also tells us who he plans to investigate, which is insanely careless and gives off the impression that he doesn't give a fuck. I don't believe him. I still think Acrofales looks good. EchelonTree doesn't look as bad after a re-read/look through his filter. Am I reading too much into the no name thing? Do you guys also have names? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 20 2012 13:26 talismania wrote: I have a name, deconduo has a name. Neither maju nor kb had names. So it's unclear at this point. Neither of them are town/blue role. I am town and have a role, and a name. Deconduo - town, has a role, and a name. You - town, a role, and a name. Acro implied he has a name. See where I'm going with this? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 20 2012 13:43 EchelonTee wrote: I have a name, but revealing it would reveal my role pretty obviously. Sort of how saying "I'm Phoenix Wright" should point to Deconduo's role for whoever followed Aperture. Yeah, obviously don't say your name. I just think it's odd that we who have roles have names, yet DB insists he was called vengeful townie. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 05:41 Acrofales wrote: Fuck it. Mass claiming might be a pretty good idea at this point. There's 2 people who blueclaimed and both are a bit scummy and will probably be lynched. At least this way scum has to shoot them. They may do that anyway. SitRep as far as roles go: HiroPro --- ? Tali --- used dayvig Acro --- used vig Drazerk --- VT Ghost --- ? deconduo --- used objectivist DropBear --- vengeful townie Hyaach --- ? SnB --- ? xsksc --- unspecified blueclaim Nisani --- unspecified blueclaim ET --- dead medic BSC --- dead cop KB --- dead SK Maju --- dead scum Alright, I'll fullclaim in 30mins or so if nobody objects. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 11:43 HiroPro wrote: Anyone there? Just because we're lynching Nisani doesn't mean we stop talking... I'm here! What do you want to talk about? ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 12:10 HiroPro wrote: Yay! I'm still rereading people's filters but I'd like to get your opinion on DropBear. The way I see it, the cases that people have made on him being scum are based on the fact that he wanted to kill and backed off KB with weak reasoning, claimed vengeful townie, and never really mentioned MajuGarzett. Thing is I don't really agree with the first point at all as he seemed to provide good reasoning when Acrofales asked him (and I thought his original posting on KB even before was fairly clear in that he thought KB was scum for posting lots of contentless posts). I don't see anything crazy about his claim. And the third point is pretty weak in my opinion. And I thought his reaction to Acrofales's pressure was genuinely townie. I'd just like to hear what you personally think about this. And if you have any strong scum reads other than Nisani? Points 1 and 3 both apply to me as well, so no, I don't think they make him scum. Leaning town on DB, however I had some doubts about his claim (which I went over not too long ago and it's possible I was just overthinking things). Other strong scum reads - no, although I wouldn't mind Drazerk dying. On June 21 2012 12:11 Nisani201 wrote: Can everyone please put their vote on me? A unanimous vote would be so cool, I wonder if it has ever happened in tl history. This makes me nervous... | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 12:33 HiroPro wrote: Ok. I noticed you said earlier that you had a town read on DropBear. But like four hours later, you started to doubt his claim. Thing is, he had claimed before you said you had a town read and he hadn't posted at all in between, so can you explain this a little more? And why Drazerk? My first reads that I gave to tali were just before I did a full re-read of the thread. Having done that, I noticed the whole name/lack of thing, that's what changed my opinnion on his claim. Nothing I would lynch him for I just thought it was fishy. As for Drazerk, it's not a scum read, I just don't like his play. ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 18 2012 09:20 Nisani201 wrote: Read his filter, and you'll see that he is sort of unwilling to contribute but is trying to make posts in the thread. In other words, all of his posts are easy to make. "Is that a crow I hear, calling the raven black?" | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() I never said 3rd party are more important than scum, I said I want to lynch them more than usual. You want me to claim? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
Every night I can investigate a player, and I'll get told if they're anti-town or non anti-town. I was told I could be sane or insane. I've determined that I am most definitely sane, as I checked KB n0 and he returned anti-town. I checked BioSC n1 and he returned non anti-town. The reason I checked BioSC was that I knew someone was framed, and he had managed to stay fairly low profile. Bit of a waste in hindsight, but I had no idea he was about to be vig shot. At least it confirms my sanity. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 14:19 HiroPro wrote: I am not going to argue with this about you. But no, it is not about being annoyed. Townies get annoyed too; it is about deliberately trying to make a person look bad when they are coming after you. The case was just bad, even you said it, lol. I don't like being told my posts are easy to make, by nisani of all people, it's simple as that. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 14:29 HiroPro wrote: lol, 2 cops in a 15-man setup. We have a liar, ladies and gentleman. Read his filter, read my case, and then laugh at his claim. We're lynching him tomorrow. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=326599 | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 14:35 HiroPro wrote: That game had 6 survivors and 2 serial killers. Town was a minority of 7 people. It is not comparable. And your behavior has already shown that you are scum. Your claim is just icing on the cake. You argue that I'm scum because of how I reacted to Nisani's case. You yourself even said the case was bad, why would I risk exposing myself by reacting in such a way, to such a bad case that would never get me lynched? It was a bit over the top admittadly, but I was fucking annoyed by what he said. You said you don't want to argue this issue with me, but it's the core of your case on me... | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 14:51 HiroPro wrote: Your reaction is not townie. If you were town and the case was bad, then you would say "oh bad case", maybe get annoyed a little, and move on. But instead your response is not only defending yourself, but also painting doubt and suspicion on your accuser without directly calling them mafia. That is a scum tactic. Additionally your response is drastically different from the way that you described it as later "giving Nisani the benefit of the doubt". Giving him the benefit of the doubt was @ not pushing his lynch because I thought he may have just been playing the same way he did in steamship, go read that to see what I mean. I'm not calling my RESPONSE to his case the benefit of the doubt, lol. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
Since when is pointing out hypocrisies in a case is a scum tactic? It's clear we have a different opinnion on the issue. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 15:06 Nisani201 wrote: How the hell is my play this game anything like steamship? Early on, not all game. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
Am I the only one that sees my claim as retarded as hell for scum?o.o | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 15:14 HiroPro wrote: I have to go work tomorrow and I am going to go to sleep. This is the last thing I am responding to. Your response was not townie. I am not the only person who believes this. This is a direct quote from one of the vets who was in the Wheel of Fortune QT (I don't remember what this person's forum id is, someone who played in Wheel of Fortune probably remembers). "However, when Ace responds, he acts exasperated, and says he doesn't give out all his reads on Day 1, which is obviously not what Bluelightz was asking for, and then asks what scumhunting Bluelightz himself has done. This moves suspicion off of Ace, and onto Bluelightz, while avoiding addressing Bluelightz's concerns, and can intimidate Bluelightz into not pursuing Ace further. I don't see that as a particularly townie way of replying." Everyone please read my case and xsksc's filter. Do not waste discussion just because we are lynching Nisani today. Except I was replying to a case which you summed up as "just bad". If I'm scum why would I even feel the need to attack nisani there? I could probably just ignore it and be fine. That case was never going to get me lynched, but i felt ANNOYED by it, so I pointed out the very obvious hypocrisy in his case. There's nothing more I can say about it. You say it's "not townie", I say it's not not townie. ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 21 2012 15:16 DropBear wrote: I have said repeatedly that you are making more sense to me than anyone and you are the last person I would have lynched, even before your claim. ♥ | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
Is it? On June 20 2012 13:10 xsksc wrote: I don't believe FourFace/DropBear's claim's. One thing I have learned this game is that there are 50 ways to spell xsksc, although I do wonder how you arrived at xaard and xberk.. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 22 2012 07:32 talismania wrote: Proposal: Nisani wants to be lynched, we want to lynch scum. We all vote dropbear, and nisani does what KB did and unvote votes to make sure he's the last one voting. If the game ends because dropbear is the last scum, great. If the game doesn't end, but dropbear is still scum, then we lynch nisani for possibly having an anti-town wincon (or one of the other 3p players). If the game doesn't end because dropbear is town and telling the truth, then we've still gotten rid of nisani (and nisani has gotten rid of himself). ___________ All that said I still have a sneaking suspicion the last scum xsksc =/ I have a proposal. You guys give me a list of people you want investigated. I'll investigate into that list each night until I'm shot, and if it does come to lynching me, my flip will confirm their alignments. (I'm 100% sure that I'm sane.) This either forces scum to use a KP on me, saving you a lynch day, or you lynch me in a few days and you get the alignments of everyone I checked, too. Either way I'm going to die, it seems, so I might as well be useful while I'm alive. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
Yes it is, I haven't slept all night. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 22 2012 18:29 Acrofales wrote: It depends a lot on who dies and what they flip what I think of the proposal. If town wins, then your proposal doesn't matter. If Nisani dies then I'm not sure it isn't just safer to roleblock you (if Hyaach is mafia he'll roleblock you anyway and if you're a mafia goon then roleblocking you prevents a NK and catches us a scum). But lets talk about your roleclaim. I don't automatically agree with Tali that you're scummy for not jumping on 4F (BioSC didn't either), you did say this, after all: And it was night and revealing a blue role at night is not something you want to do (by day ghost had already said the claim was bullshit). So I don't really think this is a reason to nail you to the cross. However, BioSC flipped DT and giving town two DTs in a 15player game seems like a very strange setup. Do you have any insight into why we should believe your roleclaim? I'm not sure what to say about it really, it does seem strange for a 15 player game, and I can see why everyone doubts it. It worries me that they might have some kind of mechanic or power to balance it out, which we haven't picked up on yet. I still don't understand what could possess a scum player to make this claim though, can't you see it's pretty much a death sentence for me? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 23 2012 16:52 Acrofales wrote: Doubt I can make it at the deadline. In case I die, I think xksksksc is scummier than Hyaach. I think it is in their own best interest to follow the plan if they're town: it can show ghost is scum. If the plan isn't followed, regular scumhunting will prevail! So i'm checking Hyaach then? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 24 2012 17:54 deconduo wrote: I think he was just being an idiot and didn't think through about what result he should give. Oh. So I'm an idiot as well as scum now, that's good to hear. I really wish I had put the same ammount of thought into using my ability as you did, lol. Seriously though, how can you think I'm scum when it'd just be playing against my wincon to claim DT and return an anti-town result on a townie AND not shoot. That reduces my chance of winning to 0, because I would die right after Hyaach flips. What the fuck would possibly motivate me to do all that? I don't get towncred unless he actually flips anti-town, and I miss a night's KP for absolutely zero gain. By faking the anti-town result, I sign a death sentence, and for what? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 24 2012 19:03 deconduo wrote: If you are so confident that hyaach is the last scum, then whats your problem with being lynched first? I don't have one? He dies regardless. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 24 2012 12:13 xsksc wrote: Sure, but after I flip DT, you'll kill Hyaach. So it doesn't really matter which of us dies first. ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
I'm just baffled that you think this is all some clever gambit to buy an extra day so I can use my mysterious power and win. It's a watertight theory. One thing though...I was free to shoot last night. Why didn't I? It doesn't implicate Ghost because I've just claimed Hyaach is anti-town, and it doesn't buy me town-cred. Explain to me why you think scum xsk holds his shot there (without calling me an idiot this time, pretty please) and I'll die a happy man. ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
I've never played this badly before, in fact I've never even been close to hanging. I think it was partly due to a mixture of lack of sleep and a hectic schedule, but it's still completely inexcusable - I apologise. Apologies to Nisani as well, for the major OMGUS I gave him. I understand that I need to die today. Acro's case, and my play this game makes me look incredibly scummy. I'll warm the noose for you, Hyaach. ![]() PS Maybe it's pointless now, but if you were looking for XLVIII etc, here's the rest of my games : Newbie Mini Mafia - Scum Steamship TLMafia 46 - Town Medic Student Mafia - VT TLMafia XLVIII - VT Election Mafia - Tracker C9++ Mini - VT | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
You realise when I die and flip DT, my red check obv dies too? 1 for 1 is a sick trade for town, lol. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 25 2012 02:47 Acrofales wrote: I like the way ghost thinks. In fact, I may have been biased by having just read xkscd's filter before Hyaach's. If xksscd is really town and Hyaach is actually scum, then xskscasdf is in a unique position to put up a killer of a case on Hyaach, because he already knows he's scum. I want to see that case! Why? Any case I made would have been crap compared to the one on me. Nobody believed my DT claim, nobody believed the check, nobody even believed it would be insanity for me to do what I did last night, as scum. (withhold KP for literally 0 gain, i still don't understand this... and fake an anti-town claim) You've already made your minds up, and my flip will ensure his death. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
Rofl no, find out when the cycle ended. Context bro. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 25 2012 03:34 Nisani201 wrote: ecks ess kay-ess-see xsksc You guys could learn a lot from this guy. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
All my role tells me is blurb about how a sane/insane DT works, some filler about Sherlock, and I win when all anti-town elements are destroyed. Doesn't say anything else. Not that you'll believe me, of course. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
##vote strongandbig | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 25 2012 22:38 Acrofales wrote: I agree with the scum! Kill (uncover) the other scumteam! ![]() I resent this obnoxious defamation. You dare call Robert Downey Jr. scum? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
Weird? Several others have mentioned the possibility of a framer still being around, it's not my own suggestion lol | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
I'm talking about the possibility of a mafia framer, not the n0 ability they had. I was told to check Hyaach, in the thread. Hyaach returns red. Now this means he's either Scum Miller Framed I've said it's a very unlikely chance, but in my opinnion it should be taken into account. I have actually read that shit, so you can stop fucking implying that I haven't. I know how their n0 ability works, I know how DT works. That line in the OP would be referring to the n0 scum ability, if not a miller. I am talking about the minuscale possibility of a mafia framer role. It's a bastard game with 2 DTs lol, why couldn't there be 1 permanent and 1 temporary framing ability? Fine, I was actually trying to help, but whatever, I'll just shut the fuck up and check whoever I'm told to like a good dog, and then I'll roll over and die quietly. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 00:12 strongandbig wrote: Also why are you discounting the possibility that Hyaach is a miller? There doesn't have to be a framer still in the game for your check to be wrong. Herp a derp it's right above you On June 25 2012 23:27 xsksc wrote: Hyaach returns red. Now this means he's either Scum Miller Framed | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 00:45 Acrofales wrote: I think SnB was mainly aiming at my analysis, where I assumed that if xsksc and Hyaach are both town, then there is a framer. I agree that in the initial post I forgot about the existence of millers. In the follow-up, however, you had already mentioned that possibility and I fail to see why the difference between being framed and being a miller is so important to you. The key point of the scenario is that there is a scum on the loose. From a purely coherence of role name point of view, Tyrion the MILLER roleblocker makes a hell-of-a-lot of sense. In fact, I believe I mentioned it in the ScumQT of GoT mafia that Tyrion could just roleclaim his own name and say he's a miller :D He said "your" check, so i assumed he was directing it at me. I just mentioned that there's a possibility, dunno why it's being blown out of proportion... The difference would be giving me a check in the thread with a framer alive basically wastes the check, whereas a miller is not gonna change. That's all. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 01:03 HiroPro wrote: "Some player may check out wrong on alignment checks, but if so, they will be read the same during the whole game." Hmmmmmm Read what else I wrote, I've already said I believe this is talking about either a miller or the permanent ability. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 02:22 Zephirdd wrote: I just want to reiterate that roleblocking may or may not possibly have some minute possible interaction with passive abilities such as roleblocking, being bored or playing card games. hahahaha | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 02:22 talismania wrote: I'm with you for the most part. I found xsksc very scummy initially. I even voted for him day one perhaps because of a misguided connection to maju. hyaach has the plus of having said the shit that deconduo pointed out, but his role and everything else doesn't make much sense. xsksc has been townie since then but who knows. at this point I'm kinda with deconduo. I wouldn't mind ghost dead but at some point we have to stop worrying about millers and this that and the other and just figure out who the last scum is. Like, if we lose because hyaach is a miller roleblocker... ok? I mean I've never even heard of that so I won't feel bad about myself. If we lose because snb and hiro are kp-less scum (making 5 scum in a 15 player game) then fuck it, I won't feel too bad about that either. But if we lose because we didn't lynch xsksc and hyaach when it was sitting on our plates the whole time.... I dunno. Ok then, kill me today then hyaach tomorow, i'll still win if I'm dead so it's no big deal to me. Just gotta pray he's not miller/framed ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 02:29 talismania wrote: damn you for looking so innocent xsksc! + Show Spoiler + | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 03:08 Acrofales wrote: Also, totally LOL at the fake rolename, truthful roleclaim deal. I can see what inspired that, though :D So. xsksc claimed a rolename that wasn't in a previous game on this forum. I think we're back to lynching him tomorrow ![]() All I can say is fuck the mods. On June 26 2012 03:05 Acrofales wrote: Okay. So now we know that the remaining scum withheld his KP. I will spend a while contemplating for any good reason for scum to do that. I don't think there's a framer, because then the OP is lying to us (once again), so we can tell xsksc who to check. My preference is for Drazerk or one of Hiro/SnB. Alternatively we can just have Hyaach roleblock xsksc, because who really cares about DT checks anyway? It might prevent KP again! If he RBs me he has to hold his KP too, so that's actually a good idea! | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 03:45 talismania wrote: ok disregard that post, lynch xsksc tomorrow? Yes, I hate that guy. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 03:52 HiroPro wrote: lololol, I thought you hated xskddc ![]() I hate all of them. xberk was the worst imo. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 03:42 talismania wrote: also, fuck me for changing my vote. Worst play of the game probably. xsksc says he's going out to get food but I knew he would be back right after the deadline =/ He's lurked all the deadlines so far. Leave it to a scottish guy to come up with "sherlock holmes" for his fake DT name. Leave it to an American to think it's all about foooooooooooood! jkjk Can't wait to die tomorow - it'll confirm Hyaach as scum AND it'll prove that you fuckers are wrong about my name. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 04:00 strongandbig wrote: What dt check on you? And a dt check on either of us would come back as "not anti-town." You could even rng which one of us to check so if we have a magical modconfirmed-not-in-the-game framer they wouldn't know who to check! That's a pretty magical framer indeed, if he can "check" people. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 16:03 Acrofales wrote: Lets just agree to disagree. I don't think you're right and I think it is a really fucked up reason to think someone's scummy. It's speculation about the mindset of the mod when he made the game. There's plenty of other reasons to suspect xsksc. I don't like Hyaach's absense at all either. xsksc: other than the red check, what makes Hyaach scum? Hyaach: what makes xsksc scum? Gogogo! A mod told me he's red, and he's a Lannister. Other than that - On June 24 2012 19:02 Hyaach wrote: I RBed ghost last night I'm not scum. A scum xsksc wouldn't kill ghost either. Scum win-con is when scum outnumbers town. Third parties doesn't count. Why kill ghost then? He could get a mislynch on me today, kill someone tonight and try to get a plurality lynch tomorrow. But all these would have been been even faster accomplished had he killed someone last night. I don't know. This has been his only post since I claimed the anti-town result on him, I believe. That in itself is suspicious. He either doesn't give a shit, or he's given up. He doesn't seem to have thought it through - if I mislynched him there and he flipped town, I am instantly dead the next day, so if I wanted to win the game, why would I claim the anti-town result? I have locked myself into Hyaachs fate by doing that, at the best I'll get a 1 for 1 exchange, which totally sucks for scum, especially considering there was no night kill. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 05:09 HiroPro wrote: I think iGrok claimed that he was a Neutral Surviving Balrog in either IRC or LoTR mafia. Professor Badass was the hydra name that Curu and Erandorr used in Election Mafia. It was LoTR, I loved reading this game. + Show Spoiler + On September 21 2011 11:28 iGrok wrote: I've been thinking about this. And I think it is, in fact, time for me to claim. So, as my meta, this is my incredibly huge post. Ok, I've come under a lot of fire lately for lurking. And it's true, I have been. But trying to use meta arguments (other than lack of a monster post, which is never on D1 anyways) on me is stupid - I dare you to find two games in which I've played similar styles as similar roles. And in this game, I'm a role I've never been before. I am the Balrog. I am a Survivor. I have a number of powers, but I'll start with my wincon: I win when any faction wins and Gandalf is dead. So, the second part of my wincon has been conveniently fulfilled. Gandalf probably wasn't supposed to die this early - I've got a few powers that would have aided me in my quest for Gandalf.
But that only helps me kill Gandalf. I still need to survive. Fortunately, I have a passive power:
I'll take a quick breather to let you all think about everything I've just said. When you're ready, scroll down. It's time for my favorite! Setup Analysis time! In a closed setup, its difficult - but as a 3rd party role, and with all the recent flips, I think I can figure a few things out. I'll start with my role, as it is the most complicated. Survivors suck. You have to somehow survive to endgame, against a mafia team who doesn't know not to kill you. So you have to be as non-threatening as possible, while avoiding lynch. This leads you to lurk hardcore. This is no fun. But my role is a little different. I have a goal, and tools at my disposal. And I think I've figured out how Curu intended for Balrog to be played - Investigate people, when you find a Maia, use the thread to figure out what kind. Then get them lynched. Use the oneshot to get the ring once it pops up somewhere, and then go into heavy pro-town action to win the game. With the death of Gandalf though, I can change things up a bit. After all, it's in my best interest to survive. And for me, the choice seems clear: Get the ring. With this in mind, I have a proposal for the town. 2 Maia have died (Gandalf and Sauron). One, maybe two are left. Saruman definitely, lets be honest he's going to be in here. He's kind of a big deal in LotR. Radagast on the other hand...+ Show Spoiler + If he's in the game, he's probably a miller or traitor with some sort of bonus power. He was a good guy who aided Saruman in Lotr lore. He's pretty obscure though, so idk if he's in the game. Anyways, my proposal - give me the ring, and I'll trade you an unblockable KP, Saruman checks, and I'll actually contribute useful analysis. Who decides on the KP? Well, if you're a DT I'll give it to you - when you check me you'll get my role PM, If you want to use my power, post the first word in the name of my Checking ability in one of your posts. I'll use it on the next name that appears in your post. Also, I'll check whoever got the second-most votes each night to see if they are Saruman or Radagast. Why should you trust me? Because this forces me to act pro-town. I'm basically saying, I'm 3rd party but with your help I can be a Bullet-proof Vigilante. Think about that. If I get the ring, I can still be lynched - so if I don't hold up my end, you can lynch me. So thats the deal. I want to win. Give me the ring, and I hunt the other White Wizard, while scumhunting the best I can. As a sign of good faith, I'll include an analysis later on, and I'll tell you that Radfield is neither Saruman nor Radagast (I thought he might be Gandalf). On to the rest of the analysis, what little I can do. Take it or leave it, but I've been known to perfectly guess setups before. I won't attempt to do so, but lets see... First, look at Gandalf's Powers. He's called a Jack of all Trades, but he's not actually that strong. He has 4 powers, but he can't even combine them. Gandalf is supposed to be the strongest damn being in the lotr universe. But he's a purely information role. In contrast, Sauron's Role: He, too, has investigative powers. He also has an unblockable kill, AND is godfather. Sauron just seems like a more powerful role than Gandalf. But what can we take from this? Mafia seem to be pretty heavily loaded. Supporting this are the existence of a Jailkeeper and Messenger - Messengers are awesome for confirming players, and Jailkeepers are excellent on offense or defense against mafia. So, with heavily loaded mafia AND at least one 3rd party, Town has to have some serious firepower and/or protection. I expect Aragorn to have KP (Curu if you make him and Legolas Trackers I will not forgive you - and if GIMLI doesn't have kp... They're the fucking heroes!) I don't forsee there being more than two medics (Eowyn and Galadriel are my guesses), but combined with a Jailkeeper and a vet or two we're starting to talk about some high-power games. My final note about setup: Pippin (Peregrin Took). The existence of pm-oriented roles is cool, and I highly doubt there's just one. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if Merry was a clone of Pippin's role. So now its time for some sample analysis. And my focus today is Palmar. This was his first post. Nothing scummy here, but it sets the mood for everything else he posts. Now, here's a list of his opinions since then. Radfield, WBG, Errandor prplhz DrH Radfield, himself, Sandroba, Pyo Pause. Next post. Here, minimal interaction with DrH is played off as enough to auto-confirm him. This post sets off alarm bells in my head. Palmar contributed 4 posts before DrH died, 2 of which were "Herp I'm not reading the thread" (He was obviously reading the thread). Its his fourth post that interests me: "DrH is giving me really bad vibes." At the time, it looked like just another throwaway post. But post DrH's death, this post looks more like DrH new he was going to be modkilled and Palmar jumped out early to get a townie point. For the rest of the game, two things are going on. He puts faith in Radfield, and he continues to stress Sandroba town. (yes theres other shit but those're the important parts) Palmar already feels scummy. So lets continue on that assumption, and introduce possibilities. 1)Radfield and Sandroba are both town. If this is true, then Palmar is trying to gain town cred when they flip. With sandroba acting scummy and a possible lynch, and Radfield a good mafia target, thats two points for him. Fits with calling DrH scum. 2)Radfield is town, Sandroba is scum. This is using Radfield's town cred to make Sandroba look better. Even those who don't trust Palmar will subliminally put them on closer levels. If sandroba didn't look so damn scummy, it might work. 3)Radfield is scum, Sandroba is town. I just... don't see this as possible. 4)Both are scum. I don't know what this would mean actually Alright guys, well you've heard me out. Give me the ring, and I'll start working a hell of a lot harder this game, hunt down Saruman, and give a DT an unblockable shot. Otherwise, I'll basically keep doing what I've done so far. Your move. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 17:34 Drazerk wrote: I prefer not talking about LoTR mafia TBH ![]() Why not? It was MAGICal! ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 18:49 Acrofales wrote: I had a great plan involving creating information asymmetry between xsksc and Hyaach by having them flip coins on their actions and encrypting the results of the coinflip, but I realized it was a lot of work for no gain whatsoever. We should just have Hyaach roleblock xsksc and be done with it. Pros: if Hyaach is scum and wants to keep incriminating xsksc, he will hold his shot. Cons: if xsksc is town we miss out on a DT check. I think the pros outweigh the cons in this situation. I support this. What do you have to say about it Hyaach? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 18:58 Hyaach wrote: I actually thought the game was done when i cast my vote on xsksc. (have not caught up on thread) If you didnt get my point. xsksc was a bigger suspect than ghost. Him getting a mislynch on town yesterday would result in an 3v1v3 situation after tonight Which would place all his winning chance on convincing 3rd party to vote with him. But somehow the lynch got shifted and got a 3rd party lynched instead. But bear in mind he was okay with any 3rd party but at the same time trying to get me lynched to get into his favorable situation. That didn't happen so this means we win tomorrow when we lynch him or by some mechanics he have 2 KP tonight. Do you not realise that if you flipped town I would be 100% dead? If i got you lynched, what the fuck kind of favourable position is that if I'm scum? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
INDEED! Hyaach, why is putting my life in the hands of 3rd party a "favourable" position for scum? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 19:12 Hyaach wrote: Can you get to any other more favorable position give the situation you've dug for yourself? No. You've lost when I flip so I don't even know why I'm bothering to communicate with you. If i wanted to get to this.....favourable situation... why didn't I shoot? | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 19:25 Hyaach wrote: I love how you quote my posts and forget what i write in them very soon after. That's what I can't explain. Using your own logic against you. If I am scum as you claim. why didn't i shoot yesterday night? Buy an extra day with hold KP/RB+lynch ghost, and cause mass WIFOM. Better than no explanation at all. ![]() I actually thought the game was done when i cast my vote on xsksc. (have not caught up on thread) Holy shit dude... you left the thread for 48 hours because you thought it was over? Really? Bullshit. There was plenty of discussion and stuff to talk about... If the voting had started to go on you, I have no doubt you woulda popped up asap, like you did just now when your name was mentioned. Last post 2days ago was at 19:02 On June 24 2012 19:02 Hyaach wrote: + Show Spoiler + I RBed ghost last night I'm not scum. A scum xsksc wouldn't kill ghost either. Scum win-con is when scum outnumbers town. Third parties doesn't count. Why kill ghost then? He could get a mislynch on me today, kill someone tonight and try to get a plurality lynch tomorrow. But all these would have been been even faster accomplished had he killed someone last night. I don't know. Acro and myself both mention you between 18:49 and 18:52, 2 days later. On June 26 2012 18:49 Acrofales wrote: + Show Spoiler + I had a great plan involving creating information asymmetry between xsksc and Hyaach by having them flip coins on their actions and encrypting the results of the coinflip, but I realized it was a lot of work for no gain whatsoever. We should just have Hyaach roleblock xsksc and be done with it. Pros: if Hyaach is scum and wants to keep incriminating xsksc, he will hold his shot. Cons: if xsksc is town we miss out on a DT check. I think the pros outweigh the cons in this situation. You re-surface 9 minutes after you are mentioned, after 48 hours of saying absolutely nothing. On June 26 2012 18:58 Hyaach wrote: + Show Spoiler + I actually thought the game was done when i cast my vote on xsksc. (have not caught up on thread) If you didnt get my point. xsksc was a bigger suspect than ghost. Him getting a mislynch on town yesterday would result in an 3v1v3 situation after tonight Which would place all his winning chance on convincing 3rd party to vote with him. But somehow the lynch got shifted and got a 3rd party lynched instead. But bear in mind he was okay with any 3rd party but at the same time trying to get me lynched to get into his favorable situation. That didn't happen so this means we win tomorrow when we lynch him or by some mechanics he have 2 KP tonight. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
He's RBing me tonight so he has to hold his KP again if he wants me to hang, so asuming you guys lynch me tomorow, we should be left with Hyaach - confirmed scum by my flip. HiroPro strongandbig talismania Acrofales Drazerk deconduo We'll lose one townie the night after, leaving it at a 3v1v2. I see no reason for the 3rd parties to side with Hyaach there, it would just prolong their win, but seeing as this is the case : 5. In the event of a tie the person with the most votes first wins (or loses). you guys should get votes on Hyaach as quickly as possible, to be safe. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
![]() 3rd party are not going to side with you the next day, because they win faster with town. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 23:02 talismania wrote: I don't understand why xsksc is so certain that using the RB power necessitates withholding kp. If there's a shot and he's claimed RB on me, is it not pretty obvious that he's the scum? That's why I think he would withhold it. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 23:25 talismania wrote: oh duh sorry, am i missing something obvious? I'm not really sure what you mean ![]() | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
##vote Hyaach deconduo, don't be an asshole. Vote me if you think I'm more likely to flip scum, don't do it to be fucking awkward. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 27 2012 16:13 deconduo wrote: Its both. If you flip scum and the game ends its great. If you flip scum and the game doesn't end then we lynch acro. If you flip town we lynch hyaach. Lynching hyaach first is the most dangerous thing to do because there's a chance acro is a traitor, given how he saved you from being lynched yesterday and tried to divert the lynch again today. And now he's pushing for hyaach to be lynched first which is ridiculous as well. There now, that wasn't too hard. Doesn't it sound a whole lot better than this? On June 27 2012 08:38 deconduo wrote: I'm gonna vote xsksc just to be awkward. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 27 2012 16:28 Acrofales wrote: Okay, I missed the reasoning in this last night. How does this even work. It is easier to look townie as scum than as town? I don't get how it's possible that you guys think Hyaach is looking townier atm. I claim a redcheck on him-> he goes afk for 48 hours and magically appears 9 minutes after you bring him up in a discussion saying with the excuse - lol im back, oh i thought we won. He managed to dodge a whole 2 days of discussion and nobody seems to care. Whatever. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 26 2012 06:00 Zephirdd wrote: If you want the following day cycles to last only 24 hours, PM me. A majority(5+) will make it 24 hours. Zephirdd, is this happening? I don't see any reason to prolong the day if you guys are certain about lynching Hyaach. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 28 2012 01:34 Zephirdd wrote: Yes, deadline is in 1:27hr. It was confirmed on the day post. Oh, I missed that bit, my bad! | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
gg :D | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 28 2012 03:01 Zephirdd wrote: obs QT: http://quicktopic.com/47/H/bLMSGkf8invnG Scum had no QT Fun fact: I never intended the roles to be ALL part of the TL Mafia Lore. You could say that it was a stupid coincidence. Sorry xsksc! :D Oh, you will be. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On June 28 2012 03:06 Drazerk wrote: I still say we should of killed S+B and Hiro If i was the last scum I would have shot them both no doubt about it. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
After this game I'm never going to be able to play again on this forum without everyone intentionally misspelling my name, lol. On June 28 2012 03:14 Zephirdd wrote: Also another fun fact: "Restraining Doctor" was a role claimed by me on Steamship Liquida last year, my first game(and only game as scum with normal communication). I was a roleblocker/medic/framer mix, and claimed a role that was essentially a Jailer without even knowing that "Jailer" was a possible role. Haha I remember that well, you guys went on to rape us though. | ||
| ||