Bang Bang Mafia 2 - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 12 2012 22:40 rastaban wrote: The following People need to post, they are very inactive, and if they have said anything it is only a few one liners. risk.nuke Kenpachi payl gonzaw I don't see him for mafia, but I don't have a problem with making him shoot someone else if it will lessen the distracting discussion on him. So far the biggest arguments against him have been that he supported ROL and that he claimed He hadn't seen a Mafia fake a miller claim before. To me he doesn't seem scum at all, and most of the case is hinged on defending ROL, If ROL is really a miller then all the discussion seems moot. ROL Controversy, We still have no other Millers claiming, and until we get some other contenders I am very inclined to believe ROL. There should have been 2 hits last night (mafia & SK), and only 1 went down. Unless someone else claims to have been protected I see no reason to disbelieve this. I lean towards an SK 1 shot power as if it is reuseable it would be way over powered, I think we keep an eye on him and see how things progress. If the Mafia tried to shoot him, and an SK tried to remove the gun, then I think we should hold off on killing him for a bit since there must be a reason so many people tried to hit him last night. Again if more Millers come forward then I agree we should re-evaluate the claim but for now I think his play seems town and we should hold off a final judgment for him. Meapak_Ziphh, your filter looked really bad last night tons of filler and no posts contributing to discussion, but you seem to be posting more like your normal self today. Mind explaining what was going on? On June 13 2012 02:06 rastaban wrote: I say we have Gonzaw shoot payl. We find out if Gonzow has a gun and if he does, we off the single post Smurf. I have a feeling at least one if not more of the mafia are in the lurking crowd intentionally or not and it is causing confusion in the Mafia ranks. If gonzaw won't fire lets let chaoser kill him. What is exactly your stance on me? First you want me to shoot or have wbg shoot me. However then you say I'm most likely town. Yet now all of a sudden you want chaoser to shoot me? Wtf man? | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 03:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote: I don't want to have anyone shoot until RoL comes in and proves he's not lying. He can shoot Gonzaw if he likes. Also, Gonzaw, shoot again with the right formatting. I already did read the thread | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
He flip-flops on his read on me, or just head-on contradicts himself by saying I'm town but he wants someone else to shoot me. Oh yeah, he wants someone else to shoot me (first wbg, then chaoser). He never volunteers himself to shoot. Anyways, if all of you guys think claiming is better then I will, but I want to avoid VE-like scenarios this game. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 03:38 rastaban wrote: @gonzaw But the whole point is that you can't shoot. I thought you could shoot, so now that you can't and you have this many accusations on you it is time to kill you. Claim your role if you are town. I don't want my role to create more chaos. If I'm being shot (someone puts ##Kill: gonzaw in the thread), then I'll claim my role. But until then it will only serve to distract people (they'll start thinking "Oh what if his claim is real? Oh what if we let him live and bla bla bla?"). In the off-chance I survive this (not likely), then scum won't know my role either. rastaban, if it came down to it, would you shoot me? You say "so now that you can't and you have this many accusations on you it is time to kill you...." So, it is time to kill me because I have accusations against me...but not because you think I'm scum? Also, me having a gun or not had nothing to do with your "town" read on me. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 03:59 VisceraEyes wrote: gonzaw why did you act as if you had a gun N0 when chaoser first introduced the notion that you should shoot today? I know you never explicitly said one way or the other, but you never even opposed the idea of you shooting. On June 13 2012 03:15 gonzaw wrote: I didn't want to out myself as blue so soon just because 1 guy (you) was buggering me about shooting. What do you guys think of rastaban? @Wiggles: I think rastaban was talking about me and not RoL, but I'm not really sure | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 04:05 VisceraEyes wrote: But you're the guy who was pushing the idea of all guns outting N0, thereby outting all blues. You were the one saying this should be an analysis game. This is a blatant contradiction in your philosophies. When did I say that? I said that on D1 not N0 On June 13 2012 04:03 rastaban wrote: Sorry gonzaw I won't tell you if I have a gun or not, Scum is already trying to snipe our VEs as it is, you will just have to wait and see. If everybody says that when we try and force them to shoot me...then nobody would shoot me at all (that would be nice, but we wouldn't find any scum with it). You are still avoiding the issue: Why does the fact that I don't have a gun make you think I'm scum, when your town read on me never hinged on the fact that I had a gun? | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 04:08 VisceraEyes wrote: I wouldn't mind supersoft shooting gonzaw. I don't want to put it on a lurker who may or may not come back, I'd rather just shoot into those guys if we want to get a read on them. supersoft already made it apparent he wanted to shoot me. It's very likely he has a gun (whether VT or GF/SK). Same as wbg Unless you say that they are goons and this is a reverse-psychology-WIFOMy plan of theirs to appear they have a gun so we assume they do and they never shoot...they do have a gun. Any of those lurkers shooting me is alright, although I'd prefer rastaban doing it (or Zentor in any case). You guys are still fucking ignoring me: What do you think of rastaban? | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 04:14 wherebugsgo wrote: hahahaha My favorite people: marvellosity chaoser illiterate fools: Cephiro some others I can't be arsed to find again scum: gonzaw zentor kitaman some lurking asshole #1 some lurking asshole #2 If RoL shows up and contributes something decently he's probably town. His posting style has not been scummy to me, but the fact that all he did was use the misformatted post and then run away during a 24 hour day is rather suspicious. As there is no counter miller claim I find it unlikely he is scum, but it's possible we don't even have a miller. We need more time for RoL to post to actually know his alignment. For once I agree with you (replace me with rastaban from that list). I'm not that sure of marv, but he's being confident and perhaps too aggressive to be scum. Still, keep an eye on him. Keep an eye on Cephiro as well, I think he would be more active and contribute more if he was town. On June 13 2012 00:23 rastaban wrote: Regarding the plan of guns and not guns claiming, don't you think even the mafia without guns will claim they have guns (maybe 1 won't) so we just end up shooting all our blues for a few days? We don't know how many blues town has so we won't even know if mafia is the group. I don't see how that plan helps anything it isn't like the goons are going to admit they have no guns. We end up have some people claiming to have guns, who don't have guns, but how do we decide who it is? We are back to square 1 but now they know which townies have guns and who doesn't so they can shoot acordingly. We just give them even more information while we are just as confused as before. Unless I am missing something this is a very bad plan, plus we should worry less about plans and more about about posts. I agree Chaoser trying to push the shot so fast was very very bad. Chaoser, why did you want to stifle so much discussion? Just because I think this plan is good for town, I'll respond to this: If mafia without guns claim they have guns....then at some point they'll have to prove they have by shooting. If we make the process of determining who shoots random (with Palmar's site or something similar), then they won't be able to control AT ALL when they'll shoot. If they claim they have a gun, they may be chosen to shoot the next day and they'll fuck up. Not only that, but if we have like 18 gun claims and only 2 non-gun claims, we'll know something is wrong and that those 2 that claimed non-gun are most likely real blues. Of course if there's scummy people that claim they have a gun we could force them to shoot (by voting or something). It was followed on Bang Bang Mafia 1 (although town lost that game ) Like I said the problem I'd find is with the "gun-stealing" mechanic (if RoL tells the truth)...but that one is going to be around no matter what, and nobody even seemed to answer me of the implications of it (can't improve a plan if nobody is there to criticize it nor approve it). If it comes down to me (I'm sure everybody will ignore me); this should be the order of people shooting me:
As in, the 1st one from that list shoots me, if he can't the 2nd one shoots, etc. Right now I'm leaving home, but I'll be back in a couple of hours (2 at most). So if you want me to claim or something please don't shoot until then. If someone shoots until then please held them accountable for it. If I don't come back in 3 or 4 hours or sorts (if you think I'm "disappearing so I damp discussion" or some shit) then yes shoot me then but that won't happen unless I'm kidnapped or something | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 04:26 supersoft wrote: OKAY WAIT: Gonzaw I have this figured out. I want you to claim now. I have a rough idea what i want you to claim. If you fail you're guaranteed dead. Go for it. If you're town claim. If what I think you think is true, then yes I claim that (you know what I mean) I'm leaving now though (if I have to claim I'll claim when I come back). REally, I don't have time I realy have to be going :/ | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
That's what I'll say for now (Sorry dude, I'm in a real hurry and I don't want to make a mistake or something by claiming in a rush) | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
Hopefully I wasn't shot yet | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 04:38 Toadesstern wrote: you remember what you said about the shitstorm? what you're doing is way more shitstormy than any claim could ever be. Just tell us or don't but don't do such a middle thing that makes everyone wonder what it might be... Well apparently it is. *sigh* I just wanted people to ignore the "what's your role" thing from my claim, but I guess that's not possible. Okay then, I'll claim. I am a Macho Cop with Balls of Steel Macho: All protections fail on me (partly why I told medics to not protect blues) Cop: Self-explained Balls of Steel: Ace will make some sweet flavour once I die. Last night I checked supersoft, got Innocent I breadcrumbed it here: On Post #324 of this game gonzaw wrote: Great supersoft, do you have anything to say about RoL's claim? Ehm, you can also chime in with this talk about me getting shot or shooting today. Ehh I still don't get why a lot of people want me dead now (rastaban seemed to jump on the wagon as well), but unless something definitive is brought I'll just ignore it for now. Not what I'd like for D1, but it brings discussion and forces people to take stances, so it's good. My reasoning was this: I can't be Naive, therefore if I get a green check on someone that flips town, my sanity is confirmed to be Sane I thought scum would try to shoot supersoft last night, so I checked him hoping to get a green check if he died (thus confirm me as Sane if I was). I thought about checking RoL, and I thought he'd get shot by scum, but me checking him wouldn't confirm my santity like I wanted. If I checked RoL, he came back Guilty and he died and flipped Miller, I wouldn't know if I was Sane or Paranoid. If I got an Innocent check I'd be confirmed Insane though, but since it's more likely I'm Sane (all cops are more likely to be Sane in these kind of setups) I knew I'd most likely get a guilty check out of him, which is why I tried to check someone else most likely to get shot. Didn't think Coag would get shot though :/ I guess I should have seen it coming after he claimed he had a gun, but I didn't think a freaking smurf would get shot n0. Also, since it's more likely I'm Sane, it's more likely supersoft is actual town (specially considering he was so eager to shoot me...something kind of hard to fake if he was goon since he has to take a shot sometime in the future). Of course he could be SK/GF, but again it's less likely (don't take this as absolute truth though). So, apparently payl won't shoot me. It's okay though rastaban, would you kindly take a shot on me? If I die and you didn't shoot me I give permission to town to hunt your ass as soon as possible So if people agree, please let rastaban take the shot | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 07:10 supersoft wrote: don't buy it. wbg, VE what do we do? Let rastaban shoot me Seriously how is this so hard? | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
I'll make a more "compact" case in a few minutes, but just check my filter and check the reasons why I'm suspicious of him. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Why, by your estimation, was supersoft someone you "thought would get shot overnight" gonzaw? I saw him play on LV (I think?) and he seemed pretty good as town, and I think scum would have known that. He's also a "vet", making him an obvious shot N0. I was thinking to check these: -supersoft -wbg -Toad -VE -Meapak I was trouble thinking about supersoft or wbg...but after wbg started to troll and play retardedly I didn't want to risk wbg actually being scum and not getting shot at night so I choose supersoft. On June 13 2012 07:15 Toadesstern wrote: What about shooting payle instead of gonzaw? If he's truely a DT I can live with him being alive and mafia can't because they don't want him to get more checks because the moment we see his flip we know wether or not we can trust him. If he's mafia and survives n1 we shoot him tomorrow? This is the shitstorm I was talking about *cue everybody shitting on each other whether they let me live only because of my claim or not* Oh, I'm also getting RBed tonight. Anyways, case on rastaban coming up... | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 07:23 Toadesstern wrote: [/red]exactly. Noone protects him and he either dies or he doesn't, 1.If he does we get another check that may or may not be bullshit but we kill him the next day and know wether or not we can trust his checks. 2.What's the reasoning for knowing you can't be naive gonzaw? 1. I'll get RBed 2. It's in the OP and I asked Ace for confirmation. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 07:26 marvellosity wrote: Like at the end of N0, did any of you think scum might shoot supersoft? He was being retarded on purpose most likely. Considering his status I don't see why he couldn't have been shot, specially after his whole "If I was VT I'd like that....am I VT? Maybe I am maybe I'm not" thing that to me basically seemed him taunting scum to shoot him. | ||
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 13 2012 07:27 Toadesstern wrote: Actually wait about the RB. We started with n0. Did anyone claim being rb'ed ? wherebugsgo claimed RBed | ||
| ||