C9++ Mini Mafia - Page 9
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Why am I "confirmed town" for my vote on Jackal? Why was I not scummy for defending Jackal (as sandroba seems to think) after Jackal flipped scum? Your attention was on me for the majority of the day, surely it didn't just escape your notice that I called him 'confirmed town' and was defending him for a fair portion of the day... Re: responding to slOosh's case - if you're town and think that slOosh is scum, you'd be interested in clearing your name with townies, not scum. Even in your response you say "you seem to be taking it seriously"...if it was about me, why didn't you respond to MY post on the matter, your townread, rather than slOosh's, your scumread? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:53 Probulous wrote: Well there are a lot of posts to get through. I was working through them but realised answering everyone is not working. It doesn't matter to me where the case comes from. Your post mirrored his anyway. You are not scummy because you chose to vote for Jackal when you didn't have to. His lynch was basically everyone sheeping sandroba and you had made it clear you thought Jackal was town. Of all the people in this thread you had a reasonable explanation for not voting for Jackal. But you chose to nail him to the wall. I just don't see why you would buss a potentially strong scum buddy on day 1. The only one who was really pushing you was me. Sure sandroba was a little skeptical of you but you were in no danger of being lynched. The upside was minimal compared to losing a scum buddy. There is nothing wrong with defending someone who is scum. Everyone does that at some time in the game because we don't know who scum are. Your actions, namely your vote, clears you in my mind. I'll find your post and respond to it now. You really can't think of an upside? Really? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:53 Probulous wrote: Well there are a lot of posts to get through. I was working through them but realised answering everyone is not working. It doesn't matter to me where the case comes from. Your post mirrored his anyway. You are not scummy because you chose to vote for Jackal when you didn't have to. His lynch was basically everyone sheeping sandroba and you had made it clear you thought Jackal was town. Of all the people in this thread you had a reasonable explanation for not voting for Jackal. But you chose to nail him to the wall. I just don't see why you would buss a potentially strong scum buddy on day 1. The only one who was really pushing you was me. Sure sandroba was a little skeptical of you but you were in no danger of being lynched. The upside was minimal compared to losing a scum buddy. There is nothing wrong with defending someone who is scum. Everyone does that at some time in the game because we don't know who scum are. Your actions, namely your vote, clears you in my mind. I'll find your post and respond to it now. Really really? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Fucks sake. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 22 2012 08:19 Probulous wrote: VE I don't understand your case. I am scum because I didn't think you were mafia after you voted for Jackal? What is wrong with my reasoning because it still makes sense to me? Votes > words in my opinion. Explain this to me because I am completely at a loss as to why this makes me scum. I am town and have followed the same logic I use every game so if there is something fundamentally wrong in my thinking, point it out. Otherwise I am going to get mis-lynched again. Does everyone else understand what VE is saying? I'm taking a step back. Maybe reread your filter. If you still look like scum, I'll try and explain it to you again. In the meantime, I'll just point out that the italicized statement in the quote above indicates inherent self-guilt. If you'll notice, there's a fair amount of resistance to switching off slOosh...but I'm sure it doesn't feel that way to you. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 20 2012 07:27 sandroba wrote: Yes, but cop should only claim on a red check or to save an innocent from lynch. DT check on VE would put my mind at ease. I guess sandroba is scum since only scum do this. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I defended Jackal for a fair amount of D1. How is that any different? What makes TIPD scum rather than me? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 21 2012 16:16 VisceraEyes wrote: As I said, TIPD was one of the first to actually agree that Jackal is at least moderately suspicious this game. The only thing I'm put off by is how little actual effort appears to be coming from the hydra - like, a bunch of their posts imply that they've been in communication and have reached a conclusion, but there's never any reasoning behind it...just the conclusion. Ultimately null. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
And I read it as "I have a hard time reading Jackal, but we think he looks scummy"...obviously your mileage may vary. Although I will say this: TIPD was going to go through meta on Jackal to make an educated guess, but we never found out if they actually did do that and what they found. This was the only clue one way or the other. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Sandrobaaaaaaaaa!!! | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
But I see what you're saying. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
:OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GHOST | ||
| ||