If you don't have time, you don't join games. If something comes up during the game, you sub out. This is the first time in 9 days you post something that actually matters. Do you think that is acceptable? You've had several 24 hour periods of inactivity, even after being warned about it (for some reason you didn't get force replaced).

Some parts of your case against blazing are laughable. His bullying makes people less likely to challenge him or sheep him? It certainly makes people more likely to ignore him, but other than that it's nonsense. This would be his first game as scum and second game overall. Is this the kind of play you would expect from his first play as scum? Did you look at his Student mafia filter?

He certainly is open and aggressive about his reads, even if they are all poorly supported; unfortunately I would need to know if I can expect him to make sense for that to be anything more than a null. Some aspects of his play do look suspicious, but especially with 5 scum still left he is a very bad lynch.

What do you think about Jackal? Tyrran? Grackaroni? HoD? What do you think AoD did on night 1?

I'm not sure how much effort I'll bother putting into the game today. Some (at least mostly) townies have been basically actively sabotaging the game. Not to say I've played well as my posts have lacked in content, been spammy and I've been wrong several times. However at least I've made it clear that I care about game, care about who is being lynched and established my innocence quite early to anyone with a pair of eyes.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 12:27 GMT

#1542

Though I've to say that based on Blazing's student mafia filter, he seemed a lot less stupid and more rational

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 15:18 GMT

#1548

Jackal RoL made promises too and didn't keep them. Are you not up to lynching him? What about dirkzor, your previous random vote you never bothered to push or justify? If you've to choose between Tyrran and RoL today, which one will you be voting?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 15:22 GMT

#1550

I'm not answering your questions. Feel free to, however, tell me your own personal preferences. It's very much appreciated.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 15:52 GMT

#1561

Even if we assume your assertion about aggressive dismissive posting to be correct, do you think it's something mafia is more likely to do? Being aggressive is certainly generally towny. How likely do you think it is for a person who has not played mafia elsewhere and playing only his second game here (according to his TL mafia census post) to play like that if he happened to roll scum? Do you seriously think he is the best lynch with 5 mafia left?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 15:57 GMT

#1562

And regarding promises kept

On January 11 2012 16:37 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
As a side note, I read a few of the tyrran analysis and I found them well reasoned, I will try to give my own thoughts on it tomorrow.

On January 12 2012 17:34 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
just got home, F5'd and saw the lynch. I will get out my analysis before the day post tomorrow, hopefully I can get some done before work tomorrow, but if not after 6pm EST I will be home trying to get some shit done.

On an unrelated note, if anyone likes medieval art and lives around NYC, fort tryson has a pretty cool renaissance collection that I checked out today. It's called The Cloisters and going to it gives you admittance to MET as well during the same day.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 16:05 GMT

#1565

That's not a mistake. I did not say you necessarily need experience, I was talking about probabilities.

WBG posts a lot like him as town and is a bit more subdued as scum.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 16:23 GMT

#1569

On January 14 2012 01:21 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:

Show nested quote +

This isn't a game of the coin flipping heads, people are different and how they play will be different. WBG is actually a good example of exactly what I was talking about.

Yes it is unless you can show that the kind of behaviour you you describe is much more likely to make someone mafia rather than an aggressive townie and even then you have to adjust based on what you would expect on newer mafia players in general.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 22:33 GMT

#1608

Alright, Harbingerofdoom's only scum read in the last few days has been Tyrran and now he isn't so sure any more. He doesn't think blazing is scum. Probably not Grackaroni. RoL? Nope. Cwave? Err, no HoD didn't really say that either, though apparently he was one of the people he would have lynched over risk. Spaackle? He dislikes "the look of spaackle", asks him a question and doesn't follow up. No scum anywhere apparently

##vote harbingerofdoom

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 13 2012 23:02 GMT

#1619

Lych HoD, the angel of death and send rebirthofthelegend to purgatory. Neither of them is actually interested in finding scum, at all.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 00:24 GMT

#1626

I do not particularly care what spaackle is right now. Zephirdd if you think him defending palmar was weird (it wasn't really, few of you actually know what palmar's town and scum play look like), you probably think he is a demon. We do not want to lynch a demon. Vote for HoD.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 00:49 GMT

#1634

Zephirdd where did you disappear? Are you willing to vote for HoD? I'll rather have this conversation now than right before deadline tomorrow.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 00:54 GMT

#1636

Oh so only basing lynch on the fact he has done no scum hunting, been only defending himself, made a bunch of really strange posts from town perspective (like the one about palmar thinking that he was blue) and there was no kill on the night he was jailed. He never really suspected me despite knowing his own alignment, because he didn't want the focus to be on the fact that one of the jailed players is AoD.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 10:01 GMT

#1688

I think it's likely that Wiggles was the sage

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 10:03 GMT

#1689

But I'm likely fine with lynching RoL instead

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 10:07 GMT

#1690

There are only two roles angels can really fake claim in this setup: Sage and seer. Breadcrumbing means absolutely nothing, especially if RoL is on his team to give him the idea.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 10:18 GMT

#1693

On January 14 2012 13:37 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
And layabout, I like how you managed to find a replacement for doing any actual analysis or scum-hunting, it's cute.

You have done zero scum hunting. Now you pop-in, claim sage and don't even say who you want to lynch.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 10:23 GMT

#1694

Wiggles warned about trusting breadcrumbing and posted this on n2

Because I want him (RoL) shot tonight by the DH. He probably won't flip, though, as I get the feeling he's an angel more than a demon, so the seer can potentially check him as well. It also solves the problem of having to convince people to lynch him if he flips demon, as most people seem very reluctant to push anyone who they see as a "vet".

I think he investigated RoL on n1 and got not-demon