Well I suppose it sort of makes sense as DH+sage would be a waste. Further, there's nothing particularly wrong with lynching RoL and sending HoD to purgatory

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 11:45 GMT

#1699

On January 14 2012 20:33 Refallen wrote:
I don't think we should lynch anyone who roleclaimed unless there's no other targets.

This is awful, but in this situation I might be fine with lynching RoL as we can still jail HoD. Frankly it looks like they've both given up. It's extremely unlikely for the real sage to do what HoD did; that is to say basically stop playing, show up to claim sage and then not do anything else. I'm very confident that HoD is the angel of death and quite confident RoL is some other angel.

Wiggles' post makes most sense, by far, from the perspective of Sage who knew he was likely going to die. Also, angels can't really fake claim seer either because then you have to explain why you are being left alive.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 11:53 GMT

#1701

On January 14 2012 20:48 Refallen wrote:
My statement dosen't have anything to do with how likely the claim is being true. I don't want to lynch anyone who roleclaims until the concealer dies.

It's still an awful statement in general. What if the role claimer is the last angel, there are demons left and our channeler is dead? There are other similar scenarios where lynching the role claimer is absolutely correct, especially when the claim makes no sense as at all in the context of his play and the role he claimed DOES make sense in the context of someone else whose flip was concealed. In this case the only reason I'm likely willing to lynch RoL instead is because it's actually better jail the AoD than kill it immediately.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 12:33 GMT

#1703

Bluelightz vote RebirthOfLeGenD before you disappear again

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 17:18 GMT

#1720

RoL didn't even change his vote to HoD and barely put any effort into his defense, again. Similarly HoD didn't bother commenting on the lynch, defend himself or vote for RoL. If they are both angels as appears likely, it doesn't seem like they can win, which explains the apathy. Jailing AoD rather than killing is marginally better because then angels will have, at most, access to Stalk and not Slay. When AoD is dead, acolyte can Slay, though the flip won't be concealed.

Of course if we somehow think RoL could be town and might convince us of that tomorrow, then lynching HoD is better.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 18:40 GMT

#1722

Vote for RoL then and we will jail you tonight

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 18:45 GMT

#1724

In 3-4 hours is fine. If you aren't here to vote, we will just lynch you instead.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 18:47 GMT

#1726

Also I see you still aren't either reading the thread or just cherry picking things. I explained why breadcrumbing sage is pretty much the only possibility.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 18:50 GMT

#1728

I did not and we've a reason to believe that Wiggles was the sage. Are you going to spend your time today posting analysis or are you going to be really busy again?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 19:00 GMT

#1731

Now that you are here RoL, please move your vote to HoD

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 19:24 GMT

#1735

Thanks RoL, I know we can count on you to deliver

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 19:35 GMT

#1738

No one is voting for spaackle and you better be around to change your vote to whoever we consider the best lynch in a few hours. Encouraging random people to vote for a person with 1 when we've 5 hours until lynch and a no-lynch is a possibility is very poor play or suspicious.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 19:44 GMT

#1740

Zephirdd being the third angel actually makes some sense based on a quick filter check. Thanks for the help you two.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 20:22 GMT

#1742

I should know better than to bother asking, but do you think Spaackle is an angel or demon? You said you were suspicious of him because he defended palmar the demon. After answering that, do you think HoD/RoL are demons? Because that's the only reason for demons not to "hammer" someone. They only have one corrupted vote and it might be voting for those two already anyway.

Things are fitting together quite well actually and the more you talk the more they fit.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 20:33 GMT

#1745

I see so you want to lynch a demon today and what you wrote above is nonsense as demons have no way of knowing whether someone is town or angel, and as you don't think they are demons there is nothing weird about the lack of hammer, even assuming they would like or could do such a thing.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 20:46 GMT

#1747

I already explained why it only makes sense to breadcrumb sage and also explained why there is a reason to believe wiggles was sage. I'm quite sure you've read the posts. I don't particularly care if you respond to this. Anyway, you shouldn't worry as it's more likely that we lynch RoL and jail HoD. Or perhaps that's precisely why you are worried

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 21:42 GMT

#1751

I'm around, basically just waiting until we decide to hammer. I suppose we'll wait for layabout at least

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 21:47 GMT

#1756

He said he won't post until tomorrow, so basically HoD and RoL both gave excuses for not doing anything before the lynch. Likely because they feel it's wasted effort as they don't have towns interest in mind.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 21:52 GMT

#1760

No you are not, dont counter claim