EPTSteamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 08 2011 03:16 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Generally yes, some hosts might not allow it, but that would usually be in the OP. I would advise against it, even if you have the time, one game ends up taking priority, and the other suffers for it. I learnt that the hard way. I mean I'm currently in a game, but by the time this starts its likely to be over. I meant is it actually against the rules to sign up for one when your current game is still in progress. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
##Signup | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
##Signup | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
GLHF Everyone!:D | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 15 2011 16:28 Cyber_Cheese wrote: People should post opinions on 1) Tunneling people, 2) Use of the multilynch system and 3) The use of the multilynch system in regards to lurkers. 1) I'm assuming this means focusing solely on getting 1 person lynched? If it does, we obviously want to avoid that and keep an open mind. 2) I think the multi-lynch system looks really interesting, and could be a great help if we use it properly. If we have a couple of people who are posting suspiciously then we don't have to decide which one is scummier, because we're not limited to one lynch, we can judge them seperately and lynch them both (if it comes to that). 3) We shouldn't go overboard with the use of this on lurkers, maybe lynch 1 lurker a day with it, in addition to the people we think are scum. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 15 2011 16:59 LSB wrote: What are your views about this? Should we do this? If so why? Well, obviously we want to be careful how we use it. I'm happy lynching a lurker day 1 as long as we focus on finding scum first. On November 15 2011 16:45 GreYMisT wrote: usally the problem with the day1 lurker lynch is town doesnt scum-hunt when they are determined just to kill a lurker. however with this settup we can "tack on" another target to the lynch. As for why, inactive players really don't help town at all. The only people who benefit from inactivity is scum. If we prioritize our first votes on someone scummy, and then lynch a lurker in addition to that, it's essentially free information is it not? | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
I think we've discussed the LaL and lurkers stuff enough. What topics of conversation are usually used day 1 to hunt scum with? | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 16 2011 21:29 Palmar wrote: hey guys, I'm in a good mood today, so here's a great offer to you: I will write an alignment analysis on the first three players people ask me to do. Each player can only select one person for me to analyse, and I will provide a post for each subject on what I currently think of their alignment. Go! What do you think about prplhz? | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 16 2011 21:42 Forumite wrote: Just found this little gem. Looks like a typical newbie scumpost. His filter suggest the same. FoS: xsksc Sorry, what? I posted this before the game even got going, I was breaking the ice and being friendly, what is scummy about it? It IS my first real mafia game, I'm excited about it. Several others have said it's their first game too. Can you enlighten me, why do you think it's a newbie scumpost? | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 16 2011 22:48 Forumite wrote: No, the game had allready started. You confirmed getting your role first of all players, then when people got going with discussing policy, you dropped the above post. During 2 hours people had been talking about policy, and even dropped a few weird posts that have since been called out, so the game had definetly started. And about which part is scummy about it? Everything! You excuse yourself as a new player, thereby lowering our expectations on your contribution in the game, making way for future lurking. It´s an empty icebreaker, full of forced enthusiasm. The message of the post is "I´m trying to help but will probably fail". Is that the kind of player we are going to rely on in this game, or someone who will be left until the end because noone will bother to shoot him? That's a pretty silly assumption, my post said nothing of the sort. Why does "This is my first big game" become "I'm trying to help but will probably fail"? What makes you think that because I'm new to this sort of thing, I'm just gonna be a hindrance? Sure, I don't have the same experience as some of the veterans here, but I can still be just as useful. I'm not using being new as an excuse to "lurk", I've actually posted a decent ammount already. You really seem to be over-analyzing a simple hello post, I don't know what else to say. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
The kenpachi/lanaia incident looks like the biggest talking point. Kenpachi is already dead and I'm not gonna vote lanaia yet, I think we should see which way kenpachi flips first. I find it hard to believe lanaia would make such a massive mistake if she is scum, assuming she did know that her name would appear alongside the anti-vote. Right now I'm getting a pretty strong scum read on Drazerk. The majority of his posts are one-liners, to which he'll add votes without giving a reason. On November 17 2011 01:35 Drazerk wrote: ##Vote: chaoser That is all He attempts to defend himself from pressure by going on about how bad he is as a townie On November 17 2011 01:54 Drazerk wrote: Erm wait a second... XL - Only reason I didn't get lynched was because I spammed the thread with martyr posts SNMM4 - Read above but a lot worse WaW2 - LOL AA - Bad tunnel at wiggles proceeding by telling the SK that I am the medic proceeded to acting retarded Ressurection - Lurk day 1 - shot day 1 - resed by scum and everyone realizes it because I was looking so scummy XL3 - Active lurked into acting scummy to get the whole scum team in a single post LOTR - Saved the scum from a vigilante, proceeded to defend his third party claim, ROLE CLAIMED MEDIC TO SAVE SCUM, and proceeding to get role blocked / shot while spreading confusion through out the day. Hell If scum had kept me alive I would of protected Kita and let them win. Not sure what Drazerk your talking about to be honest because it's not me  And when kenpachi puts Drazerk on his scum-team list all he replies with is On November 17 2011 09:11 Drazerk wrote: Unlike you I will never be lynched though In almost ALL his posts, he looks like he's posting just for the sake of posting, he doesn't add anything to discussions, and something like 3/4 of his posts have less than 10 words and no actual content. I'm not convinced that he's just a bad townie. I think he's scum. ##Vote Drazerk | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
 I can't help it man, when I'm on nothing happens. I posted my analysis a couple of hours ago and not much has happened since then. What are your current reads forumite? Still think think I'm newbie scum based on my hello post? Cause honestly, that was a pretty silly case. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
While I agree that Chaos would be a decent lynch, I see Drazerk as way more suspicious at the moment and I'd rather lynch him. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
I think the Kenpachi/Sinani lynches were silly. The only real scum read I have right now is on Drazerk. I'm not sure about Chaoser, I don't know his meta so it's harder for me to form an opinion on his town play. There are a couple of others I'm undecided on. People I think are town : wherebugsgo palmar risk.nuke harbingerofdoom lanaia forumite People I think are scum/I'm suspicious of : prphlz chaoser drazerk lemonwalrus That's my current opinions, I have nothing solid to go on with chaoser/prphlz/lemon though. Also, I'm really surprised I made it onto your vig list. I actually made a case on someone and stuck with it, I didn't join those ridiculous bandwagons that got two of our blues killed day 1. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 19 2011 00:24 Palmar wrote: well, to be fair, maybe it's just best if vigis hold their shots. I can relate to your list though I don't agree with all the reads (pending re-reading I'd say harbringer could be scum, and prplhz could be town). The reason HoD is on my town list is because he voted drazerk before most people. I'm reasonably confident that drazerk is scum, which would make HoD almost confirmed townie to me. And yeah the prphlz thing is really just a feeling at the moment, I don't have anything solid on him. | ||
| ||
