|
|
On November 17 2011 19:34 Forumite wrote: Palmar, Cyber_Cheese, ignoring Kenpachi, Chaoser and Lanaia for a moment, where´s your strongest Scumread? If you two could pick anyone else to lynch, and lynch now, who would it be? Prplhz is my second strongest scum read, but he manages to do that every game, so lynching right now would be Sinani.
|
On November 18 2011 00:42 chaoser wrote: So you're saying that I, as mafia, decided the best way to play this game was to scream as loudly as possible to generate discussion in the beginning of the game to gain attention from everyone so that I could cause some sort of panic (which didn't happen, who here in thread actually thinks the thread is in a panic or mess? Everybody stop, right there. Read Chaosers filter. Does it look like he's trying to 'scream loudly'? If you ask me, you tried to ninja votes and got caught, then spent most of the game defending himself.
|
On November 18 2011 02:01 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 01:58 Nisani201 wrote: I just read through Drazerk's filter. He has been jumping on bandwagons and supporting bad lynches this whole game.
Seriously, why aren't more people voting for him?
##Vote: Drazerk Probably because I am not scum and will never be lynched even if they try So, if I'm not mistaken, your claiming to be lynchproof? If you aren't, you are lying and should be lynched for it. If you are, then lynching you will confirm it. Unless I'm missing something here ##Vote: Drazerk
|
On November 18 2011 02:39 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 02:38 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 18 2011 02:01 Drazerk wrote:On November 18 2011 01:58 Nisani201 wrote: I just read through Drazerk's filter. He has been jumping on bandwagons and supporting bad lynches this whole game.
Seriously, why aren't more people voting for him?
##Vote: Drazerk Probably because I am not scum and will never be lynched even if they try So, if I'm not mistaken, your claiming to be lynchproof? If you aren't, you are lying and should be lynched for it. If you are, then lynching you will confirm it. Unless I'm missing something here ##Vote: Drazerk Your missing something but it's ok I must be, because [green]the vote didn't update in the OP
|
EBWOP
On November 18 2011 02:39 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 02:38 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 18 2011 02:01 Drazerk wrote:On November 18 2011 01:58 Nisani201 wrote: I just read through Drazerk's filter. He has been jumping on bandwagons and supporting bad lynches this whole game.
Seriously, why aren't more people voting for him?
##Vote: Drazerk Probably because I am not scum and will never be lynched even if they try So, if I'm not mistaken, your claiming to be lynchproof? If you aren't, you are lying and should be lynched for it. If you are, then lynching you will confirm it. Unless I'm missing something here ##Vote: Drazerk Your missing something but it's ok I must be, because the vote didn't update in the OP
|
Well thats enough derping around, refreshing the page and wishing someone would post something. Anyone doing the same, who isn't currently voting on Chaoser, what is your stance on him and why?
Similarly, anyone who's played with Prplhz/Sinani before and isn't voting them, what is your take on their current alignments? They both seem to do the same thing every game, and they are doing it
We have currently killed someone for lurking. Personally I don't want a Sinani lynch to happen right now, but it's better than none. I feel like Chaosers flip will provide us with more information and a much higher chance of hitting scum than Prplhz flipping, based off both reputations and actions so far in game.
Those are the three candidates I'm currently willing to consider, outside of making Drazerk prove his claim. As I've said before, more than three lynches is something I don't want to risk.
|
|
On November 18 2011 04:29 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 04:16 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Well thats enough derping around, refreshing the page and wishing someone would post something. Anyone doing the same, who isn't currently voting on Chaoser, what is your stance on him and why?
Similarly, anyone who's played with Prplhz/Sinani before and isn't voting them, what is your take on their current alignments? They both seem to do the same thing every game, and they are doing it
We have currently killed someone for lurking. Personally I don't want a Sinani lynch to happen right now, but it's better than none. I feel like Chaosers flip will provide us with more information and a much higher chance of hitting scum than Prplhz flipping, based off both reputations and actions so far in game.
Those are the three candidates I'm currently willing to consider, outside of making Drazerk prove his claim. As I've said before, more than three lynches is something I don't want to risk. At the moment I am pretty unsure about Chaoser. Although he did throw his votes around a bit earlier on, he isn't reacting to this pressure like I would imagine a scum chaoser would. So my read on him is null at best. I think Sinani is a very good lynch option today. you need not go further than his filter. He is being dissmissive, diffucult, not truly answering questions, and providing shit reasoning for voting people. However, if we are uncomfortable with a sinani lynch today, One thing Chaoser did do was bring my attention to Hiroruby. In addition to the case chaoser made against him (which he hasn't responded to) I would like to point out that at the beginning of the game he made 2 very long posts detailing policy, answering questions, ect. but when it came time to actually give opinions and contribute his posting fell quite short. I think he is at least a better lynch than prplhz, so with that: ##Unvote: prplhz ##Vote: Hiroruby If we discount the setup discussion posts, that leaves the last three, and he's just another lurker based on those. his filter is here http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=282366&user=121997
|
|
^This was a responce to \/
On November 18 2011 04:41 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 04:36 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 18 2011 04:29 GreYMisT wrote:On November 18 2011 04:16 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Well thats enough derping around, refreshing the page and wishing someone would post something. Anyone doing the same, who isn't currently voting on Chaoser, what is your stance on him and why?
Similarly, anyone who's played with Prplhz/Sinani before and isn't voting them, what is your take on their current alignments? They both seem to do the same thing every game, and they are doing it
We have currently killed someone for lurking. Personally I don't want a Sinani lynch to happen right now, but it's better than none. I feel like Chaosers flip will provide us with more information and a much higher chance of hitting scum than Prplhz flipping, based off both reputations and actions so far in game.
Those are the three candidates I'm currently willing to consider, outside of making Drazerk prove his claim. As I've said before, more than three lynches is something I don't want to risk. At the moment I am pretty unsure about Chaoser. Although he did throw his votes around a bit earlier on, he isn't reacting to this pressure like I would imagine a scum chaoser would. So my read on him is null at best. I think Sinani is a very good lynch option today. you need not go further than his filter. He is being dissmissive, diffucult, not truly answering questions, and providing shit reasoning for voting people. However, if we are uncomfortable with a sinani lynch today, One thing Chaoser did do was bring my attention to Hiroruby. In addition to the case chaoser made against him (which he hasn't responded to) I would like to point out that at the beginning of the game he made 2 very long posts detailing policy, answering questions, ect. but when it came time to actually give opinions and contribute his posting fell quite short. I think he is at least a better lynch than prplhz, so with that: ##Unvote: prplhz ##Vote: Hiroruby If we discount the setup discussion posts, that leaves the last three, and he's just another lurker based on those. his filter is here http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=282366&user=121997 What I'm saying is that making those early posts is very easy to do as mafia, and can get you some effortless town cred. then he dissapeared once we started discussing stuff. This is why he is different from the other lurkers.
|
If either of those townies had contributed, it should have been much easier to pursue people that were actual scum. If you are or are acting like a bad townie right now, this is a great chance to stop, analyse how that could have been you, and very well might be tomorrow if you don't pick your game up. Lets not have this happen again ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif)
On November 18 2011 12:00 Forumite wrote: WBG, I´d take a look at players who were on only one of the lynches, players who posted that both were scummy, but only voted on one of them, players who had allready gotten one Townie killed and didn´t want to attract too much attention by voting on two. Players who hang back and blame others for the mislynches. Those who voted for both victims look bad, but I think they look like bad Townies. That´s my opinion at least, that Scum are the ones avoiding the second lynch. If they dared to lynch sinani, then it wouldn´t have taken so long to get those final votes. I disagree, scum would have known they would be easy townie lynches that didn't give much information long before we did. There is definitely scum that voted on both wagons, especially since Sinani almost wasn't lynched.
On November 18 2011 11:15 Nisani201 wrote: DCLXVI Drazerk Zephirdd GreYMisT risk.nuke Tyrran Lemonwalrus Cyber_Cheese
These people voted for both Kenpachi and sinani206.
There is 1-2 scum on this list. Drazerk is one of them We should have lynched Drazerk to test his soft-claim. Honestly, in a balanced game, 1-2 in 8 is scum on average no matter what list you decide to make. Given the fact you claim Drazerk is one of the scum, this translates into potentially one scum out of the other seven. How exactly was this supposed to be helpful?
Neither Kibibit or Sabin010 had a vote down at the end of the day. From what I can conclude of the OP rules on voting, that means they essentially no-voted and is fine.
|
On November 17 2011 19:53 Tyrran wrote:Okay guys, I think we should try to get as much information as possible off the Kenpachi/Lanaia case. Here is my own analysis. This analysis assumes that Kenpachi will flip green/blue. If he flips red, its a whole other story. Is Lanaia scum ? While there still is a small possibilities that Lanaia used her ability to focus the votes on Kenpachi, I believe she is town and only made a mistake using her anti-vote carelessly. The main reason is that her ability does not seems to fit a scum as it appears to everyone. This was confirmed to be working as intended by Zona. Also she stated beforehand that the would rather lynch sinani over Kenpachi, so her anti-vote on Ken is understandable ( does not mean it was a good move). This leads me to believe her saying that she made a huge mistake. I'd say she is town 75%. Lets not lynch her. Yet. @Lanaia : So you did not want to claim d1, yet you used your anti-vote fully aware that he would show up?? This contradiction is the reason i still think you migth be scum. What was the stance of mafia during this ? Okay, so lets try to think as if we were mafia. A blue 'accidentaly' reveal herself, and does this in a extremely strange way. Kenpachi had not posted much, so I dont think mafia had a read on him being potentially blue yet ( his over reaction to his lynching migth have been a good tell for them). Perfect opportunity to press the town into a misslynch ! Sho who should mafia focus on ? Kenpachi ( no read on him), or Lanaia ( confirmed blue). This is a no brainer for them, pressuring the town into voting Lanaia is obviously the best move here for them. Lets see who voted early for her : * Drazerk : Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 06:03 Drazerk wrote: ##vote: Lanaia
No blue would save kenpachi First one to go for Lania, just after the post revealing her as a blue. Only has a very bad reason for this. Had already voted for Kenpachi before. Voted too hastely or scum ? * Hyshes : Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 06:21 hyshes wrote:On November 17 2011 06:01 Zephirdd wrote:Huh, I just found this on our beautiful bot-induced vote system. Kenpachi (4): bumatlarge, DCLXVI, prplhz, Drazerk, Zephirdd, Lanaia (Anti-Vote) Now, looking through his filters, Lanaia has not made an statement on voting Kenpachi, except that he prefers to vote on sinani over him. Which means that, either the system is bugged(unlikely), or Lanaia has the ability to anti-vote someone through PM. Looking through the roles, the closest I've found is "Double Voter", but I assume anti-voting is a variation of that. Which means Lanaia is not green(assuming green = vanilla town) So either Lanaia is scum or Lanaia is a blue to be killed. The question is: which one? And if he doesn't die next day, can we confirm he is scum or maybe the Mafia just want us to believe that? And why would he want Kenpachi to not die(anti-voting him)? I'd like to have these questions clarified or at least discussed, I got really confused right now. only scum would defend lurkers. ##vote: Lanaia With this in mind, the fact that he jumped extremely quickly on the Lanaia bandwagon with the only excuse "only scum would defend a lurker" is extremelly scummy. Not only that, but while this statement suggest that Kenpachi is also scum, he did not vote for him, focusing only on Lanaia. This is very suspect. Note that he later 'said' that it would be weird if Lanaia did this as scum, but did not remove his vote! *Palmar : Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 06:24 Palmar wrote: Also, Zona, if they're both scum you should probably re-roll the game, sadly.
##Vote Lanaia ##Vote Kenpachi Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:51 Palmar wrote: We're lynching Lanaia no matter what. What she did is extremely poor play on day 1. If you're gonna do something like that, why not take it up with town? You must've known the anti-vote would show up anyway, so you're basically outed as soon as yo use it.
Basically, that play is so bad for town that I see no reason to not lynch her.
As for Kenpachi, well, his sole defense i "town is bad" which is well... fair. But remember, if you are the one who doesn't manage to argue your way out of lynch, both as town and scum, you are actually the worst person of all those bads you're complaining about.
Without exception, the player who gets lynched day 1 is the worst player in the game. Okay so Palmar had already quite some influence over town with his Chaoser analysis, immediatly jumped on the Lanaia bandwagon, and later when people where only voting for Kenpachi, he insisted on the fact that Lanaia should by going down multiple time. As explained above, this is very mafia-like, he is trying to make us lynch a blue ! *LemonWalrus/GreYMisT : You guys went for her early, but backed down after explanation that lynching both of them was not a good idea, and that Kenpachi was probably the best lynch. I'm fine with that. *Zephirrd : He was the one that discovered te anti-vote, yet he waited to vote for Lanaia, and gave good reasons for his vote. I'd keep an eye on him, but no clear scum read here. *Hiroruby :Jumbed on the bandwagon without good reasons. Also, very scummy post early in the game. Not very active overall ( made a couple big post early, and fell into unactivity after that. *Sinani206 : Also jumped on the bandwagon without any good reason ( only said 1 word : "Scumbuddies" ). Now the same analysis gives us a good read on risk.nuke too : He was the first and only one to push the town into NOT VOTING for Lanaia. Why would a mafia push the town into not voting for a blue ? Does not make sens to me.I Believe he is town. Conclusion Likely scum : Drazerk, Hyshes, Palmar, Hiroruby, Sinani206 Likely Town : Lanaia, LemonWalrus, GreyMisT, Zephirrd Confirmed Town: risk.Nuke. This is based on this analysis alone, I ignored on purpose most of the post that did not relate to the Kenpachi/lanaia Case. The goal was to find potential scum, we still need to confirm them ! I think we should not lynch anyone for now. If Kenpachi does not flip red, Focus on the likely scum above. If not, we lynched a red :D, and back to the drawing board, to re use risk.nuke wording. What do you guys think ? I would love some feedback on this. I just had a thought regarding this, you are probably right, but there are parts we should not overlook. Lanaia did not roleclaim, thus there could be more to the role, nor can we be completely sure of her alignment. Lanaia could be making herself look like a bad townie because it's day 1, in which case risk.nuke who defended her is not confirmed town.
|
On November 19 2011 02:11 Lanaia wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2011 23:50 Palmar wrote: I was under the impression Lanaia has played quite a bit on globalgamers (IRC mafia) I recall something about that from PTP2. If I'm wrong, well then I'm sorry I guess.
IRC mafia is not the same as forum mafia. I am a hell of a lot better at IRC mafia than at forum mafia. Also, I'm really sorry if I don't post much within the next... 12 hours (unless the highway is shut down, I'll be working tonight). I hate this feeling I have. I want everyone who is currently active to be town (though that is highly unlikely). Right now, I feel that only one of chaoser and Palmar can be scum (leaning Palmar); however they could technically be both town, but I get the feeling scum would not try to bus day one, am I correct in thinking this? Knowing Palmar, he's already tried to bus his whole team, but Chaoser wouldn't have. If I'm not around tomorrow, keep in mind that starting all this 'people I think are town' during the night is painting targets for the mafia, and Palmar started it. I have a very busy weekend so my contributions will of a lower quality until Monday.
|
Why is he active as soon as he dies?
|
On November 19 2011 05:07 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2011 02:33 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 19 2011 02:11 Lanaia wrote:On November 18 2011 23:50 Palmar wrote: I was under the impression Lanaia has played quite a bit on globalgamers (IRC mafia) I recall something about that from PTP2. If I'm wrong, well then I'm sorry I guess.
IRC mafia is not the same as forum mafia. I am a hell of a lot better at IRC mafia than at forum mafia. Also, I'm really sorry if I don't post much within the next... 12 hours (unless the highway is shut down, I'll be working tonight). I hate this feeling I have. I want everyone who is currently active to be town (though that is highly unlikely). Right now, I feel that only one of chaoser and Palmar can be scum (leaning Palmar); however they could technically be both town, but I get the feeling scum would not try to bus day one, am I correct in thinking this? Knowing Palmar, he's already tried to bus his whole team, but Chaoser wouldn't have. If I'm not around tomorrow, keep in mind that starting all this 'people I think are town' during the night is painting targets for the mafia, and Palmar started it. I have a very busy weekend so my contributions will of a lower quality until Monday. Both chaoser and Palmar are well known for bussing their teammates. Palmar is also self-proclaimed to be terrible as scum. Chaoser is not bad at scum IMO but for me it's easy to tell when he is. His hyperaggressiveness in defending himself by continually berating Palmar is a scum defense of his he usually employs. He did it to me and Mig in PYP when I was on his back for being scummy. Finally, use your brain. If Palmar wanted to paint targets for scum he'd do it in their QT. He wouldn't out to the entire thread who he think would make good doc prots. Most of his reads are fine, too. Why would he leave it in the QT? He can distract town from scumhunting, and make sure the mafia reads match up to ones from legitimate townies. As you've noticed, it's also a great way to try and direct the doctors protects, and therefore a great way to ensure all kp hits.
|
On November 19 2011 06:56 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2011 06:49 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 19 2011 05:07 wherebugsgo wrote:On November 19 2011 02:33 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 19 2011 02:11 Lanaia wrote:On November 18 2011 23:50 Palmar wrote: I was under the impression Lanaia has played quite a bit on globalgamers (IRC mafia) I recall something about that from PTP2. If I'm wrong, well then I'm sorry I guess.
IRC mafia is not the same as forum mafia. I am a hell of a lot better at IRC mafia than at forum mafia. Also, I'm really sorry if I don't post much within the next... 12 hours (unless the highway is shut down, I'll be working tonight). I hate this feeling I have. I want everyone who is currently active to be town (though that is highly unlikely). Right now, I feel that only one of chaoser and Palmar can be scum (leaning Palmar); however they could technically be both town, but I get the feeling scum would not try to bus day one, am I correct in thinking this? Knowing Palmar, he's already tried to bus his whole team, but Chaoser wouldn't have. If I'm not around tomorrow, keep in mind that starting all this 'people I think are town' during the night is painting targets for the mafia, and Palmar started it. I have a very busy weekend so my contributions will of a lower quality until Monday. Both chaoser and Palmar are well known for bussing their teammates. Palmar is also self-proclaimed to be terrible as scum. Chaoser is not bad at scum IMO but for me it's easy to tell when he is. His hyperaggressiveness in defending himself by continually berating Palmar is a scum defense of his he usually employs. He did it to me and Mig in PYP when I was on his back for being scummy. Finally, use your brain. If Palmar wanted to paint targets for scum he'd do it in their QT. He wouldn't out to the entire thread who he think would make good doc prots. Most of his reads are fine, too. Why would he leave it in the QT? He can distract town from scumhunting, and make sure the mafia reads match up to ones from legitimate townies. As you've noticed, it's also a great way to try and direct the doctors protects, and therefore a great way to ensure all kp hits. omg... this is almost not worth responding to. At this point in the game, you are making an assumption that Palmar is mafia and then trying to fit his behavior to that assumption. Your logic is terrible. You should try doing the other way around. Sure, he COULD be trying to direct doctors so that scum can all land their hits. But then why would he direct doctors to the most active and productive townies? Do you disagree with his calls? If you disagree with his calls then perhaps there is an agenda. You want the most productive townies to survive. If they are not protected, then scum will shoot them at will. It's optimal for scum to shoot the best townies. Otherwise, they'll be shooting into the pool of players who will have little influence on the lynch tomorrow, which is actually not optimal for them. Unless they have a strong reason to suspect someone is blue, there is no reason to not shoot the townies with the best reads and thread presence. omg...
this is almost not worth responding to.
At this point in the game, you are making an assumption that Palmar is town and then trying to fit his behavior to that assumption. Your logic is terrible. You should try doing the other way around.
|
On November 19 2011 07:04 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2011 07:00 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 19 2011 06:56 wherebugsgo wrote:On November 19 2011 06:49 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 19 2011 05:07 wherebugsgo wrote:On November 19 2011 02:33 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On November 19 2011 02:11 Lanaia wrote:On November 18 2011 23:50 Palmar wrote: I was under the impression Lanaia has played quite a bit on globalgamers (IRC mafia) I recall something about that from PTP2. If I'm wrong, well then I'm sorry I guess.
IRC mafia is not the same as forum mafia. I am a hell of a lot better at IRC mafia than at forum mafia. Also, I'm really sorry if I don't post much within the next... 12 hours (unless the highway is shut down, I'll be working tonight). I hate this feeling I have. I want everyone who is currently active to be town (though that is highly unlikely). Right now, I feel that only one of chaoser and Palmar can be scum (leaning Palmar); however they could technically be both town, but I get the feeling scum would not try to bus day one, am I correct in thinking this? Knowing Palmar, he's already tried to bus his whole team, but Chaoser wouldn't have. If I'm not around tomorrow, keep in mind that starting all this 'people I think are town' during the night is painting targets for the mafia, and Palmar started it. I have a very busy weekend so my contributions will of a lower quality until Monday. Both chaoser and Palmar are well known for bussing their teammates. Palmar is also self-proclaimed to be terrible as scum. Chaoser is not bad at scum IMO but for me it's easy to tell when he is. His hyperaggressiveness in defending himself by continually berating Palmar is a scum defense of his he usually employs. He did it to me and Mig in PYP when I was on his back for being scummy. Finally, use your brain. If Palmar wanted to paint targets for scum he'd do it in their QT. He wouldn't out to the entire thread who he think would make good doc prots. Most of his reads are fine, too. Why would he leave it in the QT? He can distract town from scumhunting, and make sure the mafia reads match up to ones from legitimate townies. As you've noticed, it's also a great way to try and direct the doctors protects, and therefore a great way to ensure all kp hits. omg... this is almost not worth responding to. At this point in the game, you are making an assumption that Palmar is mafia and then trying to fit his behavior to that assumption. Your logic is terrible. You should try doing the other way around. Sure, he COULD be trying to direct doctors so that scum can all land their hits. But then why would he direct doctors to the most active and productive townies? Do you disagree with his calls? If you disagree with his calls then perhaps there is an agenda. You want the most productive townies to survive. If they are not protected, then scum will shoot them at will. It's optimal for scum to shoot the best townies. Otherwise, they'll be shooting into the pool of players who will have little influence on the lynch tomorrow, which is actually not optimal for them. Unless they have a strong reason to suspect someone is blue, there is no reason to not shoot the townies with the best reads and thread presence. omg... this is almost not worth responding to. At this point in the game, you are making an assumption that Palmar is town and then trying to fit his behavior to that assumption. Your logic is terrible. You should try doing the other way around. So you ignore the rest of my post? This is why I ignore players like you, cause you don't use your brain and you make my effort worthless. Your 'effort' was steering the conversation back towards town reads. I had two options, surrender my town reads so you could make the most of them, or ignore it. If your scum, that was commendable. If you are town, you need to back down and take a fresh approach.
|
On November 19 2011 08:12 Coagulation wrote: Everytime I come into this thread to catch up and play some mafia Im super pumped and ready to analyse. Then I get halfway through this giant clusterfuck of a pissing contest and pretty much give up trying to follow this shit.
Did I really just read fucking 20 pages of "but you said" "no you said" "no you said" "no you said" "no you" "no you" "newb" "no you" If I've been keeping track of it correctly, yes.
|
Interesting day post... That wasn't what I expected at all. First order of buisness, test Drazerks soft-claim [b]##Vote: Drazerk[b] I was planning on voting Palmar. He calls Chaoser out on being intelligent but not playing like and optimal townie, and then posts a list of trusted town reads and attempts to direct blues overnight. If he can hold Chaoser to an obligatory standard, he should at least be there himself. That said, he's claiming a hit, and I still have reason to believe Chaoser isn't town, so for now, I'm not taking a side. I'm on my phone now, but I'm going to choose out a few of the lurkers as potential lynches I approve of later on.
|
|
|
|