You should probably retire from mafia if you really believe he could be a townie doing it for fun at this point. You don't even need his claim to see he isn't playing like a townie would

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 15:51 GMT

#1085

He already took a hit and didn't die

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 16:01 GMT

#1089

I could tell you and you would believe me, but it wouldn't make the issue of igrok any clearer and could only help mafia. The only reason to reveal any information about my role would be if I'm in danger of being lynched or vigied, which I'm not.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 16:06 GMT

#1090

On September 22 2011 01:00 Cyber_Cheese wrote:

Show nested quote +

Also I'm still looking for an answer from back when I asked your opinion on Palmar.

It still looks more like his recent apathetic town play than his scum play, but at the same time if this is how he plays town these days, I'll be highly disappointed. Just stop joining games if you don't care or don't have time. If I don't take meta into account, he is obviously isn't looking townish at all.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 16:14 GMT

#1095

I agree, but then again we had kitaman claiming Pacifist Ocean and Wiggles Time Traveller as scum in WaW2. Sure, it was a less serious game but mistakes happen. I would be more inclined to let igrok live if he actually was a SK who is willing to kill at our command, but he seems reluctant to even do that.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:30 GMT

#1142

Why would you protect igrok? Even for you that would be unbelievably stupid

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:31 GMT

#1143

Also why are you role claiming medic to save a third party? Huh?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:33 GMT

#1150

right, drazerk the scum hunter extraordinaire was going to be mafia target

Are you really this awful?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:35 GMT

#1153

Now explain why you protected igrok

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:36 GMT

#1156

Oh okay, another "I'm just really awful" justification

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:37 GMT

#1158

On September 22 2011 03:36 Cyber_Cheese wrote:

Show nested quote +

Says the person who chose to day vig him the day he revealed.
You should have waited for the next day at least, such that any medics could change target

If there was a medic on iGrok, this raises more questions on the other two that 'survived hits'

You've already repeatedly established that you are really daft, so I'm not even going to bother explaining the obvious to you

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:40 GMT

#1163

Drazerk and now please slowly explain what you protecting igrok says about his alignment

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:43 GMT

#1166

On September 22 2011 03:42 Cyber_Cheese wrote:

Show nested quote +

I can't speak for him, but iIt's not about his alignment, it's about the alignment of the people pushing his lynch that I care about.

I somewhat agree, but the thing is he has been beyond saving for quite a while now and bussing is the norm in TL mafia

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 18:52 GMT

#1177

Yes jcarlsoniv, you haven't had any opinions whole game long really

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 21 2011 19:05 GMT

#1188

He is still claiming to be Balrog the Neutral Survivor who had to kill a townie (wait woops he doesn't even have to personally kill him despite having abilities specifically designed for it!) before he wins and then he can win with either alignment! And our win con is to purge all Evil so if Balrog isn't evil, well Curu really messed up

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 22 2011 04:36 GMT

#1301

Radfield you are really awful or scum, either way yawn

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

September 22 2011 04:48 GMT

#1302

"benign neutral" balrog, yep