|
On August 05 2011 10:07 Curu wrote: Curu also stared at redFF, the paranoid used cars salesman, very suspiciously. Perhaps even more suspiciously than Coagulation. Some business about "role PM" and knowing that they changed. Curu's own had not changed. stop
|
On August 05 2011 11:10 Curu wrote: Curu drew back surprised at the sudden vehemence from the prissy coward Frenchman Varpulis. NO
|
|
|
K. regarding the intentions thing. In n0 i got a role pm as townie saying i had good intentions, I was asking the intentions of others in the hope i could easily confirm some people. I've actually come to think that we all recieved the same role pm n0, and that our real roles/alignments were given out at the start of day1.
You sense that something may have changed about the party members who slowly begin to return to the main dining chamber. You are not sure what it is yet.
|
|
|
|
On August 06 2011 05:53 Varpulis wrote: Red what was your reward? why do you want to know?
|
##Vote Varpulis
For role fishing
also this
I am not a good scum player, so please leave my soul pure, thanks very much.
best read i have atm
|
On August 06 2011 06:34 Varpulis wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2011 06:21 redFF wrote:##Vote Varpulis For role fishing also this I am not a good scum player, so please leave my soul pure, thanks very much. best read i have atm Syllogism shared his reward, it was just an extra inventory slot. I was curious if the rewards would have more variety. From your response, it seems they do. If you don't want to share, fine by me. How did you solve it though? Knowing the methodology and line of thinking that leads to correct answers will be helpful. not gonna tell u cuz i think ur mafia.
|
On August 06 2011 09:05 Curu wrote: Why don't you vote the evil Coagulation instead? explain
|
On August 06 2011 12:44 Trotske wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2011 12:08 Mig wrote:On August 06 2011 11:21 Coagulation wrote:
if you say so.
I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also.
So why didn't you post that reason at the time of your vote? And trotske has done plenty of suspicious things since then. Last page he said red was the scummiest person yet voted curu. Every time someone asks troske his opinion he lists a different person he is suspicious of. But instead of bringing any of these points up you lurk not posting then only show up once someone votes for you. If you actually thought trotske was still the scummiest you could have made a case to actual push him for a lynch but you chose not to. yes I did say I thought the scummiest person was red based off of a one game meta..... and then you immediately voted someone else. What gives?
|
K my thoughts. Amber is actually making posts and fos'ing people and doing analysis, which is more then i've seen him do as scum. Trotske just isn't very good.
On August 06 2011 18:10 bumatlarge wrote: Yeah the votes are really spread out. Perhaps we should narrow down candidates, so that we can actually have something to go on for later. In a recruiting set-up, it is generally accepted that vets get picked up nearly 90% of the time. The recruiter forces town to lose a valuable asset, while bolstering his team more effectively then normal. Aside from that, we don't have any evidence supporting that this so it shouldn't have any impact on who we lynch.
Mig, Curu, or redff are all viable picks, and we should probably keep it between these three unless someone feels otherwise. I don't like the last part of his post. He's basically saying "let's lynch into these 3 people because I said so. Honestly all it loos like is mafia Trying to control town/divert lynches. Bum, why not keep it between coag, amber and Palmar instead?
|
On August 07 2011 01:10 syllogism wrote: The votes are so spread out that I'll rather vote to lynch someone who isn't going to be useful or make his alignment apparent than risk lynching someone more active when scum can potentially just redirect the lynch. I'll be around for the lynch though so I'll re-evaluate if necessary.
##vote Coagulation who says coag isnt goingto be useful?
|
|
varpulis why did u calim ur item in the first place.
|
|
Mig do you have any reads?
|
In what way was Coags day 1 play scummy?
|
|
|
|