Will try not to fuck up so bad this time :/
Pick Their Power Mafia 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Will try not to fuck up so bad this time :/ | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
- I can safely say that my role has nothing to do with Harry Potter. - I am very much against a mass roleclaim. - I'm stunned that a plan made by sandroba was only met with derision and not outright indignation and abuse like usually happens regardless of merit. CONSPIRACY?!?!? - youngminii is extremely impatient and that kill was not necessary. The thread is actually very readable compared to last PTP game. - I don't know what to think about Jackal, it's too early to say. Bum ended up being the opposite alignment to batman last game, but he was unwillingly revealed in the day post whereas here Jackal claimed outright with no questions being asked of him. Not sure Mafia would do that. Anyway, kitaman27 is always the opposite alignment to me and he's evil anyway so he must be Mafia. Voting kitaman27. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:57 Tackster wrote: Calling the 3 Deathly Hallows examples of horcruxes is like calling Gandalf's asshole the one true ring. If we keep fucking up Harry Potter lore hear i'm going to call J.K.Rowling and then everyone will be sorry! Apart from that I was shocked to see that day kill! Days are 48 hours long - surely sandroba having a stick up his...attic... is not worth 3 roleclaims, a day shot and the beginnings of a bandwagon. Chaos13 seems to be the only one who's done any analysis as opposed to 'i just read everything so do what i say'. I myself haven't analysed much but seeing as I can't sleep i'll go back and try and generate a proper timeline of events... Everyone take a chill pill and wash it done with some methodone... I'm alone got no home need a bone at least I'm not on methadone | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 25 2011 14:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Any reason why you chose to rhyme in your last post? Prob a random accidental click of tlpd Tackster mentioned methadone, which is the title of one of my favourite songs so I sang a few lines. It's just spam So quick to defend your fellow vet! CONSPIRACY?!?!? I am being retarded at reading, can you point out where Jackal lied? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 25 2011 14:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote: bolded part is the lie. ON was town, not disguised as it. Also ON had a clause in his role requiring him to kill HP. It seems very well, odd to have 2 townies fighting over the same items to get a power role and then have 1 having to kill the other while the other just wants the items? Why would town be required to kill town. Ehhhhh I'm not convinced, that could easily be flavour text. Until Jackal's claim, Harry Potter was hidden amongst the town as well. I seem to remember reading in an insane game that one of the townies had the win condition of getting another specific townie in BrownBear lynched so it's not inconceivable, although that was an insane game I'm listening but you haven't sold me. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
ZerO idea why he's doing it but his Actions aren't helping keep me Calm, maybe I should go watch a Movie | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:39 Foolishness wrote: players like kitaman get a free ride On July 25 2011 13:43 Foolishness wrote: In the First game, On July 25 2011 14:56 Foolishness wrote: lynching based off of day 1 clues is a great idea? On July 25 2011 15:14 Foolishness wrote: I decided to Start counting Am I the only person who has noticed this or..... | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Supersoft is Tim Roth. He only gets one kill. His kill causes his alignment and role abilities to be PMd to everyone of the opposite alignment to him. I didn't get that PM so supersoft is now 100% confirmed to be town. His other ability is an alignment check, which activates if you get into a 3 each quote convo with him i.e. you post, he quotes, you quote the quote until there is 3 each. I would suggest forcing people to quote him. Not everyone at once though as it would shit up the thread something shocking. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 00:44 sandroba wrote: K wait. So he can do that indefinitely dropbear? Assuming deconduo didnt change anything, he can use it night or day, once per day/night cycle. So technically he could do it right now. I suggest forcing Jackal to repeat quote him asap. If he refuses or avoids it we lynch him. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Either supersoft or Jackal58 need to post The other quotes them The first person quotes the quote The second quotes that The first quotes that The second quotes that. That's three posts each then supersoft can use his check. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 01:03 sandroba wrote: hmmm. Jackal has convinently dissapeared. The thing is we need supersoft present as well. Jackal posted 15 mins ago supersoft can just quote that to get it up to 2/6. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 01:21 supersoft wrote: btw, i am Tim but i didn't shoot YM. um wat? It said you did in YM's death post Jackal if you are around, you need to quote supersoft's quote of you asap, plus once more after he requotes that. If you avoid doing it we are going to kill you | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 01:26 supersoft wrote: no. but I think we could end this game right now... If I am confirmed, I want everybody now to quote me, and so on so I know all your roles. = epicwin for town. everyone who doesn't do it gets lynched. Am I right? Unless deconduo changed it, you can only use it once per day. So no not just yet. You are confirmed but you can't win the game in one day. According to the role description I sent in, you MUST have killed YM. So either you are mistaken, lying or deconduo made a boo-boo. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
It's bedtime for me, nighty night. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 04:38 BloodyC0bbler wrote: ...... Are you dense? I as red have killed my own members before. It builds credibility. So yes we know he killed a mafia, after someone said "i made his role and its this" not before. The person who did this made the claim to put FoS on SS. So if they were both red, DB wouldn't have said a thing. If SS is red and called out, he has to respond or get lynched. Using information caused from a forced from a situation where you live or die does not confirm the player. It may confirm the role, but not the player. Role does not equal alignment. Had SS killed trackster before being called out I would more likely buy he is town, had DB not thought he instantly had to out SS there are enough variables that you want to not risk activating powers of players you cannot confirm at this point. ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL On Day 1? Hey Palmar, this argument sound familiar? I haven't caught up on the thread yet but I'm switching to BC. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
There is a difference between what I sent in regarding supersoft's abilities being PMd and what supersoft says. I didn't get a PM from either Tackster's kill or supersoft's kill. I said it gets PMd to everyone of the opposite alignment. supersoft says it gets PMd to the Mafia. I'm going to assume deconduo changed it to what it says in supersoft's PM. It would make sense anyway. Tackster's kill would have had him send his details to the Mafia, who already knew his role because he was also Mafia. supersoft's kill would also have meant his details were sent to the Mafia, who already knew his role because Tackster copied it and they now know his alignment. Any suggestion from anyone at this point that supersoft is Mafia is scummy as hell. He isn't as confirmed town as I thought he was, he could be a third party, but there is zero chance he is Mafia. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote: My bad I am confused on the role flip, confirms alignment and outright tells if they are lying. Still doesn't change the point. Town is more likely to want to be confirmed town than sk / mafia. Certain roles almost always wish to be confirmed first before others. Giving mafia / sk better ideas of who to snipe. As SS only claimed after he was forced to his personal alignment is suspect. We know based off his claim that his role / alignment is given to mafia, if he is red, who cares? If he is sk, this sucks, if he is town this sucks. If he is red regardless of his check the result will always be town. If it is sk he will reveal them in thread. If he is town all checks will be real. Nothing he says can be taken in truth? As such why put faith in the ability of someone you cannot confirm. His role use does not mean he is town. He was called out and forced to use his power. Again blatantly incorrect. He was called out. I called him out thinking that he had shot youngminii. He could have ridden that all the way to the bank saying "yeah sorry guys I'm just shit." Instead, he said he didn't shoot youngminii and used his actual power to take out Tackster. He was not forced to do this in any way. The only people who knew that supersoft didn't shoot youngminii were the Mafia so precisely no-one would have doubted that he did unless he claimed that he didn't, as happened. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 05:25 BloodyC0bbler wrote: if he is red, all checks reveal town maybe sks reveal third party. He just wouldn't out his team. So your idea of reversing all his checks is dumb, its not even guarenteed a red is ever checked by his alignment as they would have no need to participate. Also, lynching a player based on not participating in a plan that cannot be confirmed without other players using powers / the user of said original power dying is dumb. Kita asked questions, perhaps that is a posting restriction. Foolishness is using a ton of TLPD in his posts, perhaps that is his posting restriction. We also have players who were using day vig powers. We have players who on day 1 were calling for people to use day vig powers. We have enough scummy, suspect play on day 1 already. How about we sit back and play normally instead of hoping our trust is rewarded. Luck should not be a factor in how we proceed if its not backed by solid analysis or very very very solidly made plan that has a near 0% chance of failure. On July 18 2011 20:26 deconduo wrote: Other Rules No VI type roles. No post restrictions. These might seem amausing but are just irritating to deal with. Role that rely on randomness or coin tosses should be avoided if possible, but aren't banned. No post restrictions. Also it's nice that you point out Foolishness's activity. On July 25 2011 14:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Any reason why you chose to rhyme in your last post? Prob a random accidental click of tlpd Not that long ago you made this strangely hostile post telling me to ignore it. Now you're using it to say that possibly kita has a posting restriction, possibly you just want to mess up the thread. On the last point, it's just a DT check. It's not a huge strategy which will make us or kill us. It's one check. All these huge risks you've been speaking of are not really there. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
I still like the BC lynch very very much. I don't like the kita lynch. On July 26 2011 13:57 Amber[LighT] wrote: YET Jackal [Harry Fucking Potter] gets to go without posting since the idea of having Dropbear claim. Once that happens Jackals posting completely stops. Weird huh? This is actually very interesting. Jackal has pretty much disappeared. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
You didn't answer my question about Wiggles. Why are you so sure he is SK? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 21:20 Foolishness wrote: Why not? I randomly picked a person who's relatively inactive and someone who's half trolling and has barely posted anything longer than 3 lines. That's just like you right? You randomly picked between flavor text lynch, policy lynch, and anger lynch right? I mean your reasoning for your vote made a nice bloodstain on my wall. Perhaps you can refresh my memory on why BC needs to die? I'm going to vote for the troll now, redFF. Should be obvious when you click the filter button what I mean. I have said before that jackal, the flavour text lynch is a bad idea. It is interesting that he is disappeared but it isn't enough of a reason to lynch him. I don't know who you mean by the policy lynch and the anger lynch but I'm assuming BC is one of them. I would like to kill BC for a few reasons. - Firstly for trying to stop supersoft using a DT check. There is no reason to do this. - Second, because he is shitting up the thread, arguing wildly about something that isn't really that important. When he was my scumcoach for XVIII he advocated this as an underused and highly effective scum strategy. - Third, because he is strongly suggesting that supersoft could be Mafia which I now know is impossible. We used this argument of "he killed his scumbuddy to buy town cred" to get Palmar lynched over bumatlarge in PTP1. And it's a ridiculous argument. If supersoft is also Mafia, then he had no need to kill Tackster. I was saying that supersoft killed him, he could have just gone "yeah sorry guys I suck and I used my ability and now Mafia knows who I am " - Fourth because of his bizarre chainsaw defence of you early on which immediately set off alarm bells for me. Additionally, if you want me to vote with you at any point in this game, why not show me some reasoning rather than casting insults? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 22:10 Foolishness wrote: 1) When the result of the check shows up red and we lynch the person and they flip Green what are you going to do? Kill supersoft? 1a) He flips green. Great, we wasted 2 days minimum and did no scumhunting 1b) He flips red. This is fine since 1 for 1 trade. When his results turn up green, are you going to kill that person to confirm? No cause that's just silly. So are you going to leave said person alone the rest of the game? If this was a normal game that'd be dandy but this is PTP. There could be framers, roleblockers, heck the mafia may have already converted supersoft to their team by now. I am for the check but his reasons for not wanting to use it aren't an issue. Let me be clear: BC is worried about the town misusing the information (as am I, that's why I want a check on a random person instead), which is an all too common theme in mafia. His solution to the problem of "the town is going to misuse this information" is preventing the town from getting the information in the first place. Given the track record of the town so far I don't blame him. One mafia is already dead through stupidity why take the chance with a DT check in a game where people have bizarre roles when we can just analyze and let DT's do work later in the game. And speaking of analyze, redFF is acting just like in BC's game where he flipped red. Make a lot of one liner troll posts, then a 2 paragraph post to try to blend in and/or justify his post, rinse and repeat. That's what he's doing this game too. BC can be held accountable in the near future if he disappears. If he survives this lynch then goes afk we auto lynch him easy. He knows that so no matter what his role is he'll be around. (On the same note, if Jackal continues being afk we should lynch him tomorrow as well.) 2) It's very important whether the check gets used and who it gets used on. I'm banking that one of the people arguing with BC is mafia for the exact reasons you stated. 3) fine, I wouldn't rule it out as impossible since this is PTP mafia, but Occam's Razor says he's town and that's good enough for me. 4) link or it didn't happen. Wait I know this didn't happen so don't bother. 1. I am not going to kill supersoft. I am going to fight anyone who tries to get him killed. This whole paragraph you wrote there was kind of pointless. If a supersoft check turns up green, why would you shoot them to confirm? I trust supersoft. I would leave them alone for the time being at least and revisit them later in the game. Reasons for not wanting a check are a huge issue. Reasons for doing anything are important. Why deny the information? Not only this, one Mafia is already dead through stupidity? The town's track record is really bad so early in the game? This almost sounds as though you are disappointed that Tackster is dead. 2. To echo Mig, is it important enough to have a 10 page argument about? He isn't actually following his big argument that we should be scumhunting. You admit that the mass argument about it is indeed a good Mafia strategy, yet refuse to entertain the possibility that BC is the Mafia among them. It must be one of the others and not him, right? 3. I'm glad we are in agreement on supersoft being town. BC isn't a noob, if you and I can make this connection he should be able to very easily do so as well. Yet he perpetuates the argument that it is a possibility, when it isn't. 4. This is what I'm talking about. It's a strange response to a question that wasn't in any way accusatory. Here's the link. On July 25 2011 14:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Any reason why you chose to rhyme in your last post? Prob a random accidental click of tlpd Your hostility regarding this seemingly minor issue is a little strange Master Foolishness. As was his hostility in the original post. I do wonder about you now. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
every wednsday night i always end up at fucken bar1 its such a hole and i keep goin back its so narby and close though can run home fuxken brother is pusst always goes home early 2 of these millllarr dickheads are dead now dt chek will be good in future yes? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
I say we look at kitaman. He always ruins my plan s, dam kitaman! Hes def the bad guy Im not saying wat my penalty is somene asked. its not that bad tho whoever wrote it is nice | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
so tim roth is probs right now with his chekcs? i have to go do my uni calndar its due in the morning. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
will try analuse probs wont be good everyone giveing lanaia shit i think shes a good guy vote before tim roth chekc hard to make colour On July 27 2011 04:46 deconduo wrote: Vote Count: BloodyC0bbler - 8 DropBear redFF Nisani201 Mig supersoft Jackal58 kitaman27 Palmar Jackal58 - 8 BloodyC0bbler Amber[LighT] heist Mr. Wiggles Drazerk Curu syllogism Lanaia Kurumi - 2 chaos13 sandroba Lanaia - 1 Kurumi redFF - 1 Foolishness was close vote jackl cobblerface i say at lesat one more bad guy in coblerface list nisani206? evil kitaman? eidur gudjonsen? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
no way he last ti late game if town, mafia will kick him with their fist til hes dead | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
First atack sandrobas plan. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=245008¤tpage=9#176 every game i plau with sandroba he makes plan day 1 everyone sez stfu not many people tell him stfu this time just like 2 i think http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=245008¤tpage=22#437tries to kill jackal also says dayvigi kill him. duno if mafia would do hat argument with jizzinmypants a lot about killing jackl, really want to kill jackal http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=245008¤tpage=28#547 argue with sandroba when sandroba say guy who shot miniman was mafia. argue with sandreoba a lot on and off for no real reason mayb they just dont like each other http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=245008¤tpage=38#741 one of peopl who yell at cobblerface loudest start about here. i had same reason as him so im cool with that http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=245008¤tpage=49#963 i agree entirely http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=245008¤tpage=66#1305 reveal who shot jackal http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=245008¤tpage=72#1436 big jizzinmypants analysis. a lot of this make sense, enough sense for amber to shoot him at least. I THINK HE IS A GOOD GUY. everyhting he has done has made sense to me | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 26 2011 10:13 Nisani201 wrote: BC is suspicious, but not just for trying to avoid an alignment check. This post I found particularly scummy: The above post was extremely uninformed and looked like it was trying to start a bandwagon. That, in addition to the reasons I stated earlier in this post, I think that BC is the best lynch. ##Vote: Bloodyc0bbler this post is suss now what other reasons derp. uninformed? what you talking bout boyyyy http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=245008¤tpage=81#1616 big omgus when sandy wasnt even talking to him. conscionce must be hurtin no post bout jackal at all at any point. never even mention his name. so much one liners quoting others not saying nothing I don't like this guy | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
hes probably evil though he always ruins my plans | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
im actaully drunk lol | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 29 2011 21:14 chaos13 wrote: Sorry about all the posts, but I keep thinking of things that I didn't say in the last one. I'm guessing there is probably 5 scum. I would say the remaining scum team is Palmar, Nisani, and Foolishness. One of the more active vocal players is probably third party. Sandroba or DropBear maybe. DB might even be faking his penalty here, it could be something completely different and he's just doing that to distract from the content in his posts. My posts the last few days were not posting restrictions. It's the last week before I go back to uni so I've got to make it count I don't think Foolishness is a good lynch today. I am a little concerned by him but I don't think he's a good lynch. - The Foolishness is godfather theory isn't a good one. Deconduo has said that it was assigned randomly. Sure it's possible but nowhere near as likely as Curu has made out. - Going on the Mafia quiz and the XXXVII analysis, he tends to be less active in the first few days and then ramps it up later on. - If we just completely ignore him for now it benefits us in a few ways. If he's town, Mafia will take him out sooner rather than later. He's too much of a risk. The longer he lives, the more he can help us if he's town, if he's Mafia it will become increasingly obvious if he doesn't lift his game. I would prefer that we lynch today based on the voting pattern from Day 1. I may have been drunk when I wrote this but the point still stands. There is almost guaranteed that the vote list for BC just before supersoft's check has more than just the one Mafia on it. I'd like to see the lynch between Nisani and kitaman. Vote staying on Nisani for now. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
First 10 or so posts are vague questions. This confused me. The explanation confused me too. It just seemed unnecessary. His point about giving away the stick so quickly was a good one though. This is a good defence. Not only that but he willingly submitted to supersoft's check. Posts a couple of times saying he'll give his opinions later then delivers with this. All of these made sense. The following is his reasoning for voting BC: On July 27 2011 01:37 kitaman27 wrote: Voting for BC because 1) I enjoy watching him die 2) He refuses to submit to an alignment check Others should be forced to quote SS. There are a surprisingly few people who are willing to submit to it. His vote made it 9-6 in BC's favour so it wasn't lynch changing. He doesn't however, like nisani, mention Jackal at all, which I think is slightly suss. Someone who was debated so much wasn't even mentioned. Since here he's been quiet but it was his birthday so I'm willing to cut him some slack. CONCLUSION Unsure. I feel better about him than Nisani and worse about him than Palmar. Now that I've done the three of them, I would like to see Nisani dead first, failing that kita, failing that Palmar. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
And again, the drunk posting was me being drunk and isn't a penalty. I've already claimed my penalty. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
- I roleblocked Foolishness Night 1. - Not only this, my role has a kicker. heist was not the only one who had Foolishness by the balls. - I was the first one to call out his bizarre TLPDising. Read my posts. - My reasoning for wanting to keep him around was partly because I had him by the balls (and so did heist) but because the longer he lasted the more obvious it would be if he was mafia and the more he could help if he was town - My actions directly contributed to Tackster's death Day 1. If I had kept my mouth shut about supersoft's role supersoft may not have killed him. - I attacked BC because he used the same argument about supersoft that the PTP1 Mafia team, which I was part of, used to kill Palmar. My voting has been bad but my actions hopefully convince everyone that I am indeed town. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
there's noone here besiiiiiiiiiiide meeeeeeeee It's been over 12 hours since the last post. CONSPIRACY? For all you ravers who are up at 430 like me, here's some music :D | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
I think we have our next lynch | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:40 Palmar wrote: didn't dropbear say he roleblocked chaos13? i did. and i did this thing you speak of | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Let's kill chaos, then I have unfinished business with evil kitaman. The other person who has kind of irked me is Varpulis. He's much quieter than usual. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
I'm cool with you too then Kurumi Can I start hyper-aggressive tunneling on kitaman now? Regardless of evidence? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On July 31 2011 08:07 Lanaia wrote: Lynching either of them is logical here. I'm glad there are a lot of people who I'm feeling are town still around and active. I'm torn between who to action today, though. I'd say Drazerk or bumatlarge, simply because they haven't really gotten involved. Tis up to you though! | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
I thought we weren't allowed to post PMs from host? You are the Banshee. You are able to wail people. Wailing someone is a block plus it takes half the person's life, so if you target someone twice, you kill them. I already claimed my penalty so here it is again. I cannot use my ability on the same person twice in a row. My actions have been: Night 1 scream at Foolishness Night 2 scream at chaos13 If I scream at chaos again he dies, but I can't do it until Day 4 | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Can we start analysing please? There seems consensus that there is at least 1 Mafia between chaos13, kita and Palmar. Lets analyse them. I have done kita and Palmar already, I concluded that kita was dodgier than Palmar. Please people, build a case instead of just relying on the roles. Looking at chaos now. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On August 01 2011 03:21 Varpulis wrote: There's a contradiction between Palmar and chaos13's reports of last night's actions, so one of them must be mafia. If by some wild circumstance neither of them is red/we have another mafia left, kitaman would be a valid target. I would like to echo this statement. 3 more times. On August 01 2011 03:21 Varpulis wrote: There's a contradiction between Palmar and chaos13's reports of last night's actions, so one of them must be mafia. If by some wild circumstance neither of them is red/we have another mafia left, kitaman would be a valid target. On August 01 2011 03:21 Varpulis wrote: There's a contradiction between Palmar and chaos13's reports of last night's actions, so one of them must be mafia. If by some wild circumstance neither of them is red/we have another mafia left, kitaman would be a valid target. On August 01 2011 03:21 Varpulis wrote: There's a contradiction between Palmar and chaos13's reports of last night's actions, so one of them must be mafia. If by some wild circumstance neither of them is red/we have another mafia left, kitaman would be a valid target. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Waiting for chaos to die So had my first day back at uni today. Celebrated by not going. Only 1 hour lecture and its recorded on teh internet. I win :D I haven't updated my spreadsheet since the start of the game, should probably write down everyone's roles. Has anyone not claimed yet? Or not activated their penalty? Also decon, shotgun a place in Swedish House Mafia | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Pretty much nothing will make me change my vote and I know who I'm blocking tonight | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Lol its funny seeing you attempt to swear. Put some heart into it! I think Lanaia is town btw. She just plays this way. She just isn't as aggressive as the rest of us hooting cavemen. LEAVE HER ALONE | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On August 02 2011 22:49 Kurumi wrote: I LIKE TURTLES WUDADADADADADADAD MAUHAUAUHAHA CONFIRMED TOWN KILL TO ACHIEVE VICTORY WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I WON YES YADDA YADDA KILL PALMAR LYNCH EVERYONE BUT ME I WIN WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Quiet you or I'll take your family | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On August 02 2011 08:59 Palmar wrote: I would just like to add that Kurumi is not only intelligent, but also handsome. So you are Snape then? You are kind of a tragic character | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
In the event that I am considered cool enough to be murdered, I rbd kitaman27 | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
I should be back to normal activity in a couple of days, shouldn't need a replacement. I haven't read the thread much but I don't trust bum. Even if Palmar claimed third party, I'd rather third party than Mafia. Palmar has been pretty useful so far, e.g. in helping take out chaos. Bum has been useless and doesn't play like this as townie. Uninformed vote going on bumatlarge. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Why do I get the feeling that everyone is getting played? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Yes I roleblocked Drazerk. heist still died so he's clear as far as I'm concerned. Can we please get an updated list of who is alive and the important posts? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
WHAT KEEPS ME AWAKE AT NIGHT PART 1 Varpulis gives us three possibilities for Night 2. On July 31 2011 07:46 Varpulis wrote: to hell with it. I am the Ghost whisperer. I hear voices in the morning giving clues that could lead to the killer of those who died. day two the only voice i heard said that a caped crusader visited Jackal. That pointed to palmar. day two i went under penalty, which means that i hear more voices but most of them are lies. last night, I heard: A -kitaman27 killed amber B -sandroba inducted amber into a cult C -amber visited chaos13 The third isn't true, palmar confirmed it a couple of posts above. I don't think that amber visited sandroba, which is the only way to get inducted into his cult, so that only leaves kita killing amber. Kita, do you have something to tell us? On July 31 2011 07:44 sandroba wrote: I have no way to know, this is the first time that someone is inducted to my pm circle and the only pm I got is from chaos joining it. It was at the day post. If you have info on amber's killer pls share. Amber's role reveal. This was night 2 so the choice was between a Vig hit or Frame. Both would fuck up whoever they visit. At no point in the thread does Amber attack sandroba, in fact the only 2 posts I can find where he mentions him at all he is agreeing with him. sandroba only inducts people into his cult if they action him, there is no way Amber would have used either of these actions on sandroba. POSSIBILITY B IS NOT WHAT HAPPENED On July 31 2011 05:56 Palmar wrote: I tracked Chaos13, he visited Sandroba. I also know Dropbear visited Chaos13 Palmar's role reveal What Palmar says is consistent with his role, however, this is assuming he is telling the truth. His motivations as mafia traitor are difficult to determine for me. IF PALMAR WAS TELLING THE TRUTH, POSSIBILITY C IS NOT WHAT HAPPENED So basically, do we trust that Palmar was telling the truth? He did help get chaos13 killed with this same post. If we think Palmar was telling the truth, kitaman27 needs to die asap. If we think Palmar was omitting information, then iduno lol | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
WHAT KEEPS ME AWAKE AT NIGHT PART 2 Day 3 On July 31 2011 06:43 Lanaia wrote: As I've said before, I action during the day, but the ability happens at night. I was roleblocked. However, it didn't matter as I'd forgotten to action yesterday nor was I sure who to action. Player list as at Day 3. Who of these had roleblocking abilities? Alive: Palmar nope kitaman27 nope Kurumi nope Amber[LighT] nope Drazerk ROLEBLOCKER only if you visit him heist nope bumatlarge ROLEBLOCKER Sandroba nope DropBear ROLEBLOCKER used on chaos13 chaos13 nope Varpulis nope Curu nope Lanaia ROLEBLOCKER So I was going to say Lanaia was lying but then I found the post by bum claiming the block on her lol. So Lanaia we're pals again. Day 4 On August 03 2011 06:36 bumatlarge wrote: I was roleblocked On August 03 2011 06:39 bumatlarge wrote: Well obviously voting palmar. Kita was roleblocked as well? I'm very interested in whats going to happen. I know mafia has a RB on their team, and letting palmar live doesn't really make anything different for him. ##Vote Palmar How do you know this? Is there something you need to share with the class? POSSIBLE ROLEBLOCKS Drazerk : only if you visit him. Claimed it was impossible to block bumatlarge bumatlarge: can't roleblock himself, da? DropBear: used on kitaman27 Lanaia: claimed to use a medic protect instead. On August 03 2011 06:56 Lanaia wrote: I did. There has to have been two hits on Sandroba OR one hit that can count as two. I wasn't roleblocked or anything so I am so confused as to why Sandroba died. I am confused as to why Palmar isn't dead. I can as well! (but I didn't) If you guys want, I can shoot bum or palmar today. I'm allowed to do that again now. IF LANAIA IS TELLING THE TRUTH, BUMATLARGE IS LYING ABOUT HIS ROLEBLOCK AND NEEDS TO DIE Once again, we have Palmar rearing his head attacking bumatlarge. While this was when he was the alternative lynch candidate, he provided some pretty damning evidence against bum. On August 03 2011 06:45 Palmar wrote: yo guys I tracked sandroba bumatlarge visited sandroba ##vote bumatlarge What do people feel about Palmar's actions? His alignment again makes things strange. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
DO YOU TRUST THIS MAN??? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Do you know what Nemesis means? A righteous infliction of retribution, manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by a horrible C***. Me. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Well Varpulis? Explanation plz? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On August 07 2011 08:45 Curu wrote: I'm lazy to make a full case on how I came to the conclusion Drazerk is most definitely Mafia but if anyone needs convincing beyond just letting me shoot him I'll do it. Eventually. At this stage in the game, if you have a case, make it! Sorry about kita everyone. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Curu I am not convinced by your case on Drazerk. At all. In fact it has eased my suspicions of him lol. Is there any reason that Varpulis is completely ignored in the discussion as to who is dodgy? I killed kitaman based on what he said. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On August 08 2011 02:27 Curu wrote: Sigh. You stink. Just block Drazerk and if he's not it you kill me tomorrow. I'll put my vote on myself too. Kurumi will put his vote on me. You will most definitely put your vote on me. There's no way I'm worming out of it. Varpulis completely forgot about this game and announced in Kurumi's game that it was his first time as scum. Some intense metagame play maybe, but not likely. I also explained to you the correct voice was Amber putting medic on sandroba but you didn't listen to me that time either. That sir is in fact 100% incorrect. On July 31 2011 05:50 deconduo wrote: Day 3 Amber[LighT] the Gambler has rolled his last dice. You are the Gambler Every night host rolls the dice. Depending on the number you roll you will have two choices: 1 - Medic or Rolecheck 2 - Vig hit or Frame 3 - Vet life or Track 4 - Roleblock or become unlynchable the next day 5 - Mason someone or Day Vig hit tomorrow. 6 - DT check or your vote counts as 3 votes tomorrow. Once per game You can reroll." Night 2 is Vig hit or frame. There aint no medic protect in there mate. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
I misunderstood lol. I thought he could get either vig hit or frame on night 2 fuck lol | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
You are correct, I can't use my roleblock tonight because I used it on kita. | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
Huge apologies to kita for killing him based on misreading Amber's role lol. I did manage 3 out of 5 roleblocks on Mafia members though so at least I wasn't completely useless. Big up to Mig as well on Night 1 for topping Jackal. Thanks deconduo and Eiii. This was a fun game! | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
On August 08 2011 03:06 Lanaia wrote: Sorry I gave you a terrible role, DropBear. Also thanks Dec and Eiii :D Are you serious? I loved it! Roleblocker is awesome and with a half-kill as well! Your penalty was so kind too. The one I gave out was much more brutal! You were the person I was most confident was town by the end as well. Gj! | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
How did the roleblocking on Mafia kp work? | ||
DropBear
Australia4191 Posts
| ||
| ||