| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Dropbear what is your penalty? Regardless, I think chaos13,redff,palmar,lanaia are good information role targets tonight. The lurking newer players are fine as well, but they all look the same to me so far. Tempted to say Foolishness can't be town aligned due to balance reasons after seeing the flips so far, but I guess it's possible the alignments were truly RNGed and it's such a lame argument to make | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 27 2011 21:35 Curu wrote: Huh syllo you know Foolishness's role? Balance as in a few veterans have already flipped town and I've town reads on a few more. This obviously doesn't mean anything if alignments are completely RNGed | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
This obviously isn't just flavour | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 28 2011 06:39 redFF wrote: why can't i be a mafia hit? Not 1337 enough? Regardless gg all, my role would have been difficult to play but i was going to do something very clever until i died. GL town! Well a few people suspected you and your role wasn't that amazing, so if whoever wrote is mafia, he would have argued against it | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 28 2011 06:40 Palmar wrote: When you stop posting obvious shit syllo, can you answer me? Balance reasons, he has been lurking so far and didn't bother committing into any of the lynches day 1. After the jackal incident I'm having a tough time giving people credit for actually being too busy to play. He also didn't die n1 which is always suspicious for a great player like him. Of course if he shows up today and actually starts playing, I'll re-evaluate that position. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 28 2011 09:15 Palmar wrote: yes, I read it very well, and I read it again, and again. Wasn't it nice, going from telling us BC was not town-aligned (I love how you always remember to not say 3rd party or scum, just simple not-town) to telling us we're idiots for lynching him? You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Good | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 28 2011 09:34 Palmar wrote: or he was hoping the check would not get used on him. he was red, not voting on a red report day 1 makes no sense. You agreed with me on that in RTM, but not now. This isn't RTM; the setup likely has way more millers to balance out the arbitrary number of DTs/information roles. In RTM there were no red results by real DTs and I don't think I was even around when VE made his fake claim. I would have voted for Drazerk though as his play was scummy, unlike BCs. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Replay Cast
OSC
LAN Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
LAN Event
IPSL
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
BSL 21
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs Sterling
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
