I'm kind of wondering about Dropbear. He never gave the details of supersoft's killing ability and when supersoft claimed he hadn't shot YM, it didn't occur to him to suggest using the ability on the real killer of YM

Dropbear what is your penalty?

Regardless, I think chaos13,redff,palmar,lanaia are good information role targets tonight. The lurking newer players are fine as well, but they all look the same to me so far.

Tempted to say Foolishness can't be town aligned due to balance reasons after seeing the flips so far, but I guess it's possible the alignments were truly RNGed and it's such a lame argument to make

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 12:40 GMT

#1246

On July 27 2011 21:35 Curu wrote:
Huh

syllo you know Foolishness's role?

Balance as in a few veterans have already flipped town and I've town reads on a few more. This obviously doesn't mean anything if alignments are completely RNGed

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 13:45 GMT

#1250

I actually agree on Mig, upon reread

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 21:09 GMT

#1306

Well this puts a lot of things into new perspective

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 21:32 GMT

#1335

Chaos13 and Foolishness definitely look like the best lynches as of now.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 21:35 GMT

#1339

Kita is still a decent choice, but he did volunteer for Supersoft's check. I suppose he could be GF, but that would be rather lucky

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 21:37 GMT

#1340

I can't see redff being a mafia hit

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 21:39 GMT

#1343

"Fortunes got told, things got stolen, someone had a REALLY good night"

This obviously isn't just flavour

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 21:40 GMT

#1347

On July 28 2011 06:39 redFF wrote:
why can't i be a mafia hit? Not 1337 enough? Regardless gg all, my role would have been difficult to play but i was going to do something very clever until i died.

GL town!

Well a few people suspected you and your role wasn't that amazing, so if whoever wrote is mafia, he would have argued against it

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 21:44 GMT

#1350

On July 28 2011 06:40 Palmar wrote:
When you stop posting obvious shit syllo, can you answer me?

Balance reasons, he has been lurking so far and didn't bother committing into any of the lynches day 1. After the jackal incident I'm having a tough time giving people credit for actually being too busy to play. He also didn't die n1 which is always suspicious for a great player like him. Of course if he shows up today and actually starts playing, I'll re-evaluate that position.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 21:49 GMT

#1354

By the way, I was visited last night. Anyone want to claim the visit?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 27 2011 23:11 GMT

#1412

How do you know that

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 28 2011 00:12 GMT

#1432

Palmar aren't this stupid, so I can only conclude that you are, indeed, not town-aligned Palmar. Did you actually read the thread last night when we were pushing for people to switch from BC to Jackal?

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 28 2011 00:12 GMT

#1433

EBWOP: you aren't*

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 28 2011 00:21 GMT

#1435

On July 28 2011 09:15 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

yes, I read it very well, and I read it again, and again.

Wasn't it nice, going from telling us BC was not town-aligned (I love how you always remember to not say 3rd party or scum, just simple not-town) to telling us we're idiots for lynching him?

You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 28 2011 00:25 GMT

#1438

On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:

Show nested quote +

quote me!

Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 28 2011 00:27 GMT

#1441

On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:

Show nested quote +

no, no i'll wait the day out.

Good

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 28 2011 00:32 GMT

#1446

After the check came back red? Of course the first instinct was to believe it was accurate, but after thinking it over it didn't make sense for BC to volunteer for a check and play like that overall if he was red

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 28 2011 00:36 GMT

#1452

On July 28 2011 09:34 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

or he was hoping the check would not get used on him.

he was red, not voting on a red report day 1 makes no sense. You agreed with me on that in RTM, but not now.

This isn't RTM; the setup likely has way more millers to balance out the arbitrary number of DTs/information roles. In RTM there were no red results by real DTs and I don't think I was even around when VE made his fake claim. I would have voted for Drazerk though as his play was scummy, unlike BCs.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

July 28 2011 08:59 GMT

#1510

How incredibly stupid