Experiment Mafia I - Page 8

On April 17 2011 11:26 claudius1 wrote:

You do realize that the last 2.5 pages are nothing but one sentance posts right... so what am I supposed to be looking for? This?



or this?



or this?



Seriously read the posts... no one is posting anything of use... its just a tonne of spam.

Its really hard to analyze spam.

On April 17 2011 01:48 tiberius1 wrote:
except, sleepy, that townie doesn't flip. this is a no flip mafia. We wouldn't know if he was mafia or not until we use the reveal.

I'm getting awfully suspicious of caligula and augustus here... they've basically created an argument out of nothing. Perhaps trying to make themselves seem more pro-town? Both seem far more interested in scumhunting day fucking 1 than in creating a good town atmosphere.

(not saying scum hunting is bad, just that building a good atmosphere is far more important on day 1. lynch is usually useless and nobody has any analytical material yet).

Could cal and aug be mafia buddies? IDK, but both of them are on my shitlist right now.

On April 17 2011 01:53 tiberius1 wrote:
..actually, thinking this through, I'm absolutely wrong. There is no reason for BOTH mafia to come out into the light of day DAY 1. That's just asking for one of them to be lynched, and since theres no reveal theres no reason to do that for cred. Its a free scum lynch for us.

Therefore, we can probably assume that there will be no bussing from scum until we decide on a night to reveal mafia count.

However, if we were to assume that no mafia has put themselves forward yet this game as a major power player, we'd be idiots. So I think that one of the two of cal/aug (include me to make 3 if you're REALLY unsure) is probably mafia.

I guess we got some targets for checks tonight. me/cal/aug

On April 17 2011 11:28 claudius1 wrote:
EBWOP: Oh ya, sorry I could also look at the day1 "analysis" people have done so far, that consists of quoting every single post a player has made to the moment, calling it spam, then FoS'ing them... so useful.

Looks exactly like the Pokemafia analysis that let the mafia hide behind the fact that no one reads that kind of analysis, and then totally destroyed the town.

So far, the game is just like every other day1, people trying to look busy so they don't die, whooopeeee

On April 17 2011 12:43 doc1 wrote:
Well in no particuler order:

Sneezy: Lurking useless etc.

Tiberious seems town as my only real problem was a really weak technicality in one post.

On April 17 2011 12:57 happy1 wrote:

Doesn't make me feel any better about you.

Does the fence have a reserved spot for you to sit on?

On April 17 2011 14:07 doc1 wrote:


What do you want from me? Im just saying what I think, I could be like claudius and just lurk more but im just giving opinions and you pressure me for it? Is indecision a scum trait? because I honestly have nothing to hide, if you want something just ask.

On April 17 2011 14:16 happy1 wrote:

Here is how I read your bit on Tiberus:

"He seems town, but you know what, I still kinda think he's scum."

On April 17 2011 11:40 happy1 wrote:
Ah yes, glad you can participate when prodded hard enough
##Unvote


My counterpoint:

+

These posts are pretty interesting to look at and are not spam. I can pick and choose too.


You wound me.

Not my fault people are lazy, but then again, I'm fine with wall o' texts when they're not just quoting every single bit just to dismiss it with a sentence.

This is why I like the day vig role. Makes things fun.

but then again, I'm fine with wall o' texts when they're not just quoting every single bit just to dismiss it with a sentence.

On April 17 2011 14:39 grumpy1 wrote:
Doc, could your vote possibly be more OMGUS in nature? I highly doubt either of you are scum -- your argument is silly. There are much better places to put votes right now.

On April 17 2011 14:35 doc1 wrote:

Ok heres how I see you then, guy who posts on how we should use our revealer role and pressures everybody while not really saying anything:

case in point:



You basically pick some longish points call them not spam then make an off handed comment about day-vigs. the part that really piqued my interest was this

This sir is whats called a contradiction. Scum alwats have contradictions its what makes them scummy. A contradiction is when you say something and an action you take completely goes against it.

I hope the rest of town doesnt fall for your bullshit

##Vote Happy1

oh and btw im quite sure in myself right now.

On April 17 2011 14:39 grumpy1 wrote:
Doc, could your vote possibly be more OMGUS in nature? I highly doubt either of you are scum -- your argument is silly. There are much better places to put votes right now.

On April 17 2011 15:04 happy1 wrote:

Then who do you believe IS scum? Saying there are better places means you have to have SOMEONE in mind, eh?
With quotes/reasoning as well plox.

On April 17 2011 12:17 grumpy1 wrote:
As far as suspicious inactive-ish people go, I'm far more wary of sneezy than I am of claudius, now that claudius has posted some.

However, I also want to bring up bashful as a possible lynch target. He made a few posts on the claiming subject that weren't particularly strong and then stopped talking entirely. I'd like to hear more from him.

On April 16 2011 22:52 bashful1 wrote:

No, he was recommending that you claim before you hang. Or at least that's what I think.

I haven't thought through the idea of a mass claim. Early mass claim will lead to everyone claiming townie because, well, mafia won't want to gamble, and blues will want to stay hidden. I would say we should definitely mass claim at LYLO though.

##Vote Grumpy1

Agreed with the post critic, have some pressure.

On April 17 2011 15:43 grumpy1 wrote:


Sneezy made a single shit post when a vote went on him and then disappeared. He's currently the most inactive player. At best he's a dead weight townie, at worst he's scum. I don't have a problem with lynching him.