Experiment Mafia I - Page 7
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
sleepy1
37 Posts
| ||
happy1
83 Posts
On April 17 2011 08:26 sleepy1 wrote: when does day end? Uncomfortably soon considering the lack of activity. Most people arn't even voting. Aggrivating. Specifically, something like 1~2 hours. | ||
caligula1
39 Posts
IGMEOY augustus | ||
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
On April 17 2011 08:26 sleepy1 wrote: when does day end? 9am EST. 13 hours from now. | ||
happy1
83 Posts
| ||
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
| ||
doc1
30 Posts
On April 17 2011 08:41 caligula1 wrote: Switching to claudius, its better that we get rid of the lurkers. Especially considering how short the day/night cycle is. IGMEOY augustus *cough* *cough* | ||
doc1
30 Posts
Oh wait sorry i read caligula as claudius >_> my bad my bad! | ||
caligula1
39 Posts
On April 17 2011 09:30 doc1 wrote: Oh wait sorry i read caligula as claudius >_> my bad my bad! You thought I was voting for myself?? :O | ||
doc1
30 Posts
IM NOT THAT DRUNK ...yet. | ||
augustus1
20 Posts
##Vote Claudius. Lurkers and inactives are no good for town in any game. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
sleepy1
37 Posts
[b]##vote augustus1/b] I doubt mafia are going to be inactive/post only once in a game of 11 people. Mafia would want to blend in and try to look like they're contributing but not really, not stay quiet and not do anything. augustus1 has been saying either things that are common sense or questions: On April 16 2011 21:46 augustus1 wrote: So are you advocating a mass claiming? On April 16 2011 22:59 augustus1 wrote: How does a medic "happen"? If you read the OP you will see that the medic is not informed if they do a successful protect. Nor is the person they protected. Actually I'm thinking right now the scum team just outed itself. Happy and Caligula. On April 16 2011 23:02 augustus1 wrote: Claiming at lynch is fine and all but it doesn't really mean anything. Claiming before that is suicide. On April 17 2011 00:28 augustus1 wrote: I understand how the roles work I understand how KP works. I also understand how scum like to create pointless arguments on day 1 to fill a game full of bs. Role claiming in this setup at this time makes no sense. Role claiming before being lynched is fine. But it is basically useless information. Medic gets lynched. Medic claims before nightpost. Scum hit vet. Does that verify the medics claim??? Apply that to vig, medic, vet. Any number of scenarios can arise in night actions to make it appear they were telling the truth. It's all WIFOM. If you are a vig and claim your shot before the day post you would be confirmed if there are 2 kills and 1 was your claimed target. If you are cop and post your targeted person before the day post and the day post shows that player you are confirmed. You are also likely dead. For all we know if we had a medic they died 2 days ago. Now throw in a role blocker. Night actions and results can in no way shape or form be used to determine if somebody has truthfully made a role claim. You're scum. ##Vote: Caligula1 On April 17 2011 00:45 augustus1 wrote: OMGUS. Nice one too. I'm aggressive? Before I was dense. Or a troll. I'm not spamming anything. I'm stating my opinion on role claiming. You are the one pushing an argument. Quickly defensive and really just all around being aggressive without a real reason (not like it's focused aggression to draw a response in my opinion) | ||
doc1
30 Posts
| ||
claudius1
28 Posts
This game, people are voting me because I haven't been here much today (sorry that I had to work today). With only hmmm.... 11 hours to go, I'm probably going to die since I have to go again in 1 hour. On April 17 2011 07:18 happy1 wrote: Which oneliner are you speaking of? How is Sneezy 'worse' than Claudius when he's actually had a post taking a stance on one person (albit you) while Claudius has only spam to his name, and last posted here when there was plenty to talk about, while Sneezy has actually been absent while a lot of stuff was going on. And now that he's back, he's contributing. What did we have to talk about back then? Please tell me? That ON posted with his real account? Or what, that two players were having a pissing contest kind of like Annul vs LSB in Mafia XXXV, or like Jackal vs Tackster in Insane Mafia 2? One was mafia vs town, the other was town vs town... indistinguishable, just like this. Nothing to post about. | ||
happy1
83 Posts
On April 17 2011 11:04 claudius1 wrote: Wow :/ really... every single mafia game we play in this forum, voting the inactives is frowned upon and looked like a scum move. Interesting. Mostly because from my beliefs, lurkers are inherently anti-town, and if there is no real clear scum to kill, getting rid of a lurker is just as good. This game, people are voting me because I haven't been here much today (sorry that I had to work today). With only hmmm.... 11 hours to go, I'm probably going to die since I have to go again in 1 hour. Good thing you're doing something to give reason that you should live... or wait, from what I read, its just a lot of bitching that people are voting you because you weren't around, as well as crying "well what was there to talk about?" What did we have to talk about back then? Please tell me? That ON posted with his real account? Or what, that two players were having a pissing contest kind of like Annul vs LSB in Mafia XXXV, or like Jackal vs Tackster in Insane Mafia 2? One was mafia vs town, the other was town vs town... indistinguishable, just like this. Nothing to post about. I've yet to see you attempt to give any reason to your value to keep you around. No inqueries, not stances, not even a top 3 or analysis given. What to talk about? Here's a couple off the top of my head: 1) Stance regarding Role Claims 2) Tiberus1 putting himself in as a check target This game will not move if you do not contribute to get it moving. 90% of the reason I jumped on Grumpy for a very mild point; get things rolling one way or another. As well as the huge info dump I'd put together. If this game had any flavour at all, I woulda advocated a soft claim as well. | ||
happy1
83 Posts
By the way, since you didnt say anything else, you havn't seen anything at all to comment on since your last post either? | ||
claudius1
28 Posts
This is why lynching inactives is a poor choice early on, because town needs information and lynching an inactive gives none. Even without flips, we can still get relationships from the way people have posted concerning the lynch-ee. As of now, there would be no relationships towards an inactive, and as such little to no gain for the town at this moment. @ second point, what reasons should I give? I'm town... we're 6 pages into the thread. What kind of immense amount of value can I give my self this early in the game? This is a stupid request... all I can say is "I'm town" there has been nothing to look at and analyze, so there is little to nothing for me to add to this town at the moment. Hell, no one has value at the moment. Most people are just randomly spamming to look active, but very few people have actually posted anything of value. Simply attacking each other over nothing. @Role Claims, its stupid to do so unless your about to be lynched. A town will tell the truth, a mafia will lie. It helps when we use the reveal. A mass role claim does nothing but give mafia targets, terrible idea. @Tiberus1 putting himself up as a check target... then he is either GF or Town. But its not a huge tell, in Insane Mafia a few people asked to be DT checked and were town, so what... This game isn't moving so there is little that I can say, the only person I can analyze so far is you with 20 of the threads posts (a HUGE amount). Most of which being spam, or FoS of like 3 to 4 different people already... Its day 1, there is very little information we can get from players, especially with this activity level, and yes that is hypocritical, but really, I don't care. | ||
claudius1
28 Posts
On April 17 2011 11:20 happy1 wrote: EBWODPP: By the way, since you didnt say anything else, you havn't seen anything at all to comment on since your last post either? You do realize that the last 2.5 pages are nothing but one sentance posts right... so what am I supposed to be looking for? This? or this? or this? On April 17 2011 06:19 doc1 wrote: My proofreading sucks veing = being why wanted = why you wanted Seriously read the posts... no one is posting anything of use... its just a tonne of spam. Its really hard to analyze spam. | ||
claudius1
28 Posts
Looks exactly like the Pokemafia analysis that let the mafia hide behind the fact that no one reads that kind of analysis, and then totally destroyed the town. So far, the game is just like every other day1, people trying to look busy so they don't die, whooopeeee | ||
| ||