Insane Mafia 2 - Page 10
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 04:01 iGrok wrote: I can use him as an excuse. He's posting in the thread. If he weren't allowed to post in thread he'd be added to the ban list, right? Get off the topic please. Dead players technically shouldn't post in thread but it's not a strict rule, sometimes players like to make comments that have nothing to do with the game or just go "lol" like ace does. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 04:18 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: You do realize we are basically in mylo right? If we miss the lynch in the IG the mafia can perform a wipe on the remaining players. Yeah, assuming no medics/other types of blues to help, we're at LYLO. Though tnkt can just bus one of them with someone else and then mafia can't kill that guy. This is assuming tnkt is town | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
So, now we're back to the IG. It isn't LYLO, because now we have a bus driver, in addition to medics! Black has no reason to shoot into the IG anymore. Red has 2 KP. So... tnkted busses one of the IG participants (probably Coag, seems most likely town), and we have another day. In fact... let's assume we lynch Tack, he flips town. tnkted busses a townie in the IG tonight, mafia hits both non-red players. One guy dies, the guy tnkted busses lives, we have confirmed town, lynch last mafia in item game, GG. So at this point, assuming we play it right, we have the item game in the bag. Thank you, what I've been saying all of today -_-. We got the tools needed to make sure we have a very good chance of winning the game, whether Tack is green or not (at this point I still think he's red). Mafia can get into a little role and KP dance with us if they want but if they don't do it right they lose big. There's a vest in there not to mention tnkt as a bus driver and surely we got a few medics. We can win the IG. Mafia's fighting an uphill battle. Which is why I only really care for bum's circle response to all of this. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 07:04 Pandain wrote: ![]() Actually no I haven't read this at all, just the last couple pages :p Get out of here you! You're a Panda! Panda's don't even know how to type! | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 08:07 Pandain wrote: If I was mayor I wouldn't let this place become spam-fest. But since I left this place, I can now contribute to the spam without shame. You know whats funny? Confirmed town. Yet no one noticed. NSFW + Show Spoiler + That's not really a confirm though, LSB was talking about stealing, using, protecting, PMing fellow game members. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 09:21 deconduo wrote: Theres a very strong case for the mafia to be either Lemon or Jackal. I think its Lemon. Would you at least not be as blind/stubborn as Jackal and think about it? The facts are there. I don't know why the two of you are so narrow minded but it really isn't helping the slightest. You have no case against Tack whatsoever and you refuse to admit it. When Tack flips town it will be too late, and chances are you'll have cost us the entire game. Stop with your hyperbola and fear mongering. Cost us the whole game? Unlikely. Losing us the IG, more likely but we still have the advantage. It seems mafia has a role block and a mind control. They can't cover medics/bus driver/vest all at once. To even get past the many combination of things we can do requires a shit load of luck from them. And even if they do get through, they'll kill 1 person max. Next day we can lynch the mafia and win IG. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 09:32 Mr. Wiggles wrote: But then why does it say that Annul got hit twice? Was that a joke? Right now, if annul got hit twice, you're proposing there was 5 KP last night, or else the Day post was misguiding. The KP are explained as 2 on annul - 1 from red, 1 from a redirected hit from Coag who wanted to hit Tack 1 on Kav - black/red 1 on GM - black/red That's 4 | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 09:37 Jackal58 wrote: Bullshit. I have my fucking dick stretched across half the globe to win the IG and ultimately the entire game for town and that's the best you can do??? Bullshit. And explain the Tack is 100% scum to 85 - 100% scum to now you're looking scummier than LW. Ok you need to calm down...pretty sure bum isn't scum by this point. The fact that you're suggesting it shows that you need to chill the fuck out. Blues not claiming at this point would be pretty fail and we would deserve to lose. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 09:38 bumatlarge wrote: Because of his vest item. Accuse me all you want, I can't clarify any more then that. Wait, LW had the vest, not annul | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 09:40 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Bum just claimed Coag's KP was used on Tackster and that annul was hit once. He explained it as: 1 on annul, from red 1 on Kav, black/red 1 on Gmarshal, black/red 1 on Tack, Coag And I asked him why he didn't put annul as being hit twice, when that looks like a definite clue in the day post. 2 on annul - 1 from red, 1 from a redirected hit from Coag who wanted to hit Tack 1 on Kav - black/red 1 on GM - black/red Coag aimed at Tack. But his shot went to annul. Someone messed with the shot. It's care by looking at the day post. Coag was "confused" | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Specificially (bum being hit notwithstanding, apparently that never happened), Tack can not be guilty because he thought Jackal had the gun. If Tack was mafia he would have mind controlled Jackal to kill annul and not Coagulation, who really had it. Actually this is wrong. Mafia covered all bases. They stole had Tack steal from Jackal and they mind controlled Coag. That makes it so that no shot could land on Tack. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 10:39 chaoser wrote: Actually this is wrong. Mafia covered all bases. They had Tack steal from Jackal and they mind controlled Coag. That makes it so that no shot could land on Tack. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 09:55 orgolove wrote: I just read over most of the thread and the voting thread. Nothing in the thread 100% proves Tackster is red, as bum claims. In fact, the past ~30 or pages have only cast increasing doubt on coagulation's insistence... Tackster can't be a red. the only advantage of Reds and Blacks are information. But he did not know that coag was actually the one with the gun. All discussions about how his play of stealing rather than using the mood ring aside, I cannot understand why so many votes are still on Tackster. Just going to quote this since it's basically him 1) defending Tack and 2) Yes, he didn't know. Either Jackal or Coag could have been using a gun. So Tack stole from Jackal and then mafia mind controlled Coag. That way Tack would be safe from hits. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 10:56 tnkted wrote: Coag, are you saying that they used their mind control ability on you JUST IN CASE you and jackal had built up a hugely elaborate plan spanning 80+ pages, then shot annul with their own KP, JUST IN CASE you were running a sting operation? That is hugely unlikely that they would spend so much of their force on a hunch like that. On March 29 2011 11:01 tnkted wrote: I just wrote up a huge long post saying precicely what I've said 6 fucking times and then deleted it because the way I am trying to explain this is clearly not working. Lets try it a new way: 1. Coag, why do you think you were mind controlled last night? 2. How did they know to mind control you? 3. Why didn't mafia just steal the gun from you? They didn't need to know who had the gun. Their plan was simple. 1) Make sure Tack wasn't killed 2) Make sure annul was dead So they did this 1) Steal from Jackal 2) Mind control Coag 3) Shoot annul This covers their entire plan. They kill the "confirmed green" of annul. They stop Tack from being killed. If Jackal had the gun, they just stole it. If Coag had the gun, they just shot annul. Just to cover all their bases they shot annul. See? Simple. Do I get batman lovin' yet??? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 11:58 orgolove wrote: LSB, does the "no abstain" rule only apply for the mayoral election, or does it apply forall votes? Can I please see where coagulation specifically mentioned the stun gun issue? I don't remember reading Tackster talking about a stun gun at all. On March 27 2011 15:44 Coagulation wrote: ok guys i will let you know my item I have a stun gun if i choose to use it at night anyone that tries to hit me at night will be stunned and the hit will be prevented. additionally i can go through the stunned players belongings and get the alignment of that player theres 1 more detail im leaving out cause it will only help scum knowing it. However if i use the stun gun i will be open to theft So im 50/50 about using it or not. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 11:59 iGrok wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote Tackster Anyone else see this in vote thread? he unvoted LW, voted Tack and didn't think to hit us up in thread. Sneaky Sneaky. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 12:17 iGrok wrote: chaoser, I don't feel the need to say "Oh wait, everything you guys are saying makes sense". Sue me. Jeez, why so defensive? Could have just been like, yeah, sorry, I didn't think it was needed. But instead we get some snark. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 29 2011 16:52 Kavdragon wrote: Mafia likely hit Annul, so why would they also redirect coag's bullet into him? Ugh....GGQ explains it. Mafia thought Coag had stun gun which would have disabled annul's bomb, making it safe to hit him. So they mind control Coag to "disable" bomb. What really happened was that Coag had a real gun and shot annul instead. Mafia didn't expect this. | ||
| ||