• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:50
CEST 21:50
KST 04:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed18Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Crumbl Cookie Spoilers – August 2025 The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey Muta Micro Map? BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier CSL Xiamen International Invitational Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 735 users

TL Mafia: Boot Camp - Page 6

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
November 23 2010 04:07 GMT
#101
QATOL DO I QUALIFY?!?!?

I WIN GAMES
+ Show Spoiler +
Generally for the other team, but still!
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
November 23 2010 04:48 GMT
#102
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
November 23 2010 05:26 GMT
#103
On November 23 2010 11:54 kingjames01 wrote:
Alright, that's a fair and nice way to tell me that you don't think I'm good enough yet... =)

Also, I plan to be hosting a game just after the new year... I won't reveal any details or who has been helping me just yet, but I'll eventually need to pass it through the Mafia council to have a judgement about balance.

Yah yah just send it to us for balance.

On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.

I don't think I've singlehandedly won a game though?
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
November 23 2010 05:55 GMT
#104
Well, weren't you the Village Idiot in XXXI? =)
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
November 23 2010 05:56 GMT
#105
Oh wait true forgot about that haha.
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
Incognito
Profile Joined November 2008
United States2071 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-23 05:59:16
November 23 2010 05:56 GMT
#106
These are the topics/focuses of each analyst as far as I know.

Flamewheel - Looking through a townie's eyes: How townies should use thread information
Ver - Attention worthy points: What good players focus on and what they ignore
Incognito - Important points and players: A look at who, how, and why people did or did not impact the game.
The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
November 23 2010 06:24 GMT
#107
On November 23 2010 13:07 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
QATOL DO I QUALIFY?!?!?

I WIN GAMES
+ Show Spoiler +
Generally for the other team, but still!

Your performance in Mafia 5 will live on forever.
Uff Da
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
November 23 2010 06:37 GMT
#108
On November 23 2010 14:26 flamewheel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 11:54 kingjames01 wrote:
Alright, that's a fair and nice way to tell me that you don't think I'm good enough yet... =)

Also, I plan to be hosting a game just after the new year... I won't reveal any details or who has been helping me just yet, but I'll eventually need to pass it through the Mafia council to have a judgement about balance.

Yah yah just send it to us for balance.

Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.

I don't think I've singlehandedly won a game though?

The VI game and from what I understand, you had a pretty major impact on a scum win from a pretty heavily town-favored setup in XXVIII.
Uff Da
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
November 23 2010 19:10 GMT
#109
That game was awesome. Caller as ROFLing so hard.

Anyway I suppose its time that I write the day post

SIGHH!!!!
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
November 24 2010 05:22 GMT
#110
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.
Liquipedia
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
November 24 2010 07:12 GMT
#111
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
November 24 2010 08:15 GMT
#112
On November 24 2010 16:12 kingjames01 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?


There is the normal game thread, and then there will be the bootcamp analysis thread posted after the game. It's a separate thread with a specific purpose because the normal end of game talk is usually just whining and ego boosting; useful posts get lost fast in that.

So in the bootcamp thread the OP will have the "analysis" and then everyone, players and observers, can discuss the analysis/events of the game.
Liquipedia
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
November 24 2010 08:53 GMT
#113
But yeah, no posting game-relevant information while it's still going!
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
Amber[LighT]
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States5078 Posts
November 24 2010 13:40 GMT
#114
On November 24 2010 17:15 Ver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2010 16:12 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?


There is the normal game thread, and then there will be the bootcamp analysis thread posted after the game. It's a separate thread with a specific purpose because the normal end of game talk is usually just whining and ego boosting; useful posts get lost fast in that.

So in the bootcamp thread the OP will have the "analysis" and then everyone, players and observers, can discuss the analysis/events of the game.


If we still want to sit on the sidelines and analyze the game without being noted as an analyst can we do that? I don't think my analysis would really benefit the players or you all anyway, but like I said previously I want to almost play the game without actually playing, if that makes sense.
"We have unfinished business, I and he."
DarthThienAn
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States2734 Posts
November 24 2010 16:44 GMT
#115
On November 24 2010 22:40 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2010 17:15 Ver wrote:
On November 24 2010 16:12 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?


There is the normal game thread, and then there will be the bootcamp analysis thread posted after the game. It's a separate thread with a specific purpose because the normal end of game talk is usually just whining and ego boosting; useful posts get lost fast in that.

So in the bootcamp thread the OP will have the "analysis" and then everyone, players and observers, can discuss the analysis/events of the game.


If we still want to sit on the sidelines and analyze the game without being noted as an analyst can we do that? I don't think my analysis would really benefit the players or you all anyway, but like I said previously I want to almost play the game without actually playing, if that makes sense.

Nobody's stopping you from doing that ^^. If you want to share your analysis after the game ends, no one's going to say "you're not allowed" to share your thoughts or anything. lol.
www.cstarleague.com | Love is like playing the piano. First you must learn to play by the rules, then you must forget the rules and play from your heart.
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
November 24 2010 17:31 GMT
#116
On November 24 2010 22:40 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2010 17:15 Ver wrote:
On November 24 2010 16:12 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?


There is the normal game thread, and then there will be the bootcamp analysis thread posted after the game. It's a separate thread with a specific purpose because the normal end of game talk is usually just whining and ego boosting; useful posts get lost fast in that.

So in the bootcamp thread the OP will have the "analysis" and then everyone, players and observers, can discuss the analysis/events of the game.


If we still want to sit on the sidelines and analyze the game without being noted as an analyst can we do that? I don't think my analysis would really benefit the players or you all anyway, but like I said previously I want to almost play the game without actually playing, if that makes sense.


Yeah that's half the point. There isn't good postgame discussion normally so the goal is that everyone will join in and there can be group emphasis on learning from games. Just post your thoughts anyways once its over even if you don't think it'll help anyone. It might stimulate some discussion or give people ideas.
Liquipedia
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
November 24 2010 17:35 GMT
#117
Ah that makes sense. =)
Okay, I look forward to the end of the game and learning what I can.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
November 25 2010 02:00 GMT
#118
Yeah, what ver said. Anyone can post analysis or constructive criticism. Just send it to us and we will add it into the OP in the next thread. I am probably going to do an analysis as well just because I am going to be reading the game anyway o_O. Depends how much time I have.
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
SiNiquity
Profile Joined April 2010
United States734 Posts
November 25 2010 03:06 GMT
#119
On November 13 2010 09:03 SiNiquity wrote:
Tentatively in ~ depends on when this thing actually starts (Thanksgiving & Christmas I won't be near any internet devices).

QQ
'i' before 'e' except after 'c' ~ it's scientifically proven.
DoctorHelvetica
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States15034 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-01 08:54:44
December 01 2010 08:52 GMT
#120
I'd be interested in analysing any games I'm not participating in. I'd prefer to host the next boot camp game rather than participate and while I'm not as good of a player as most of the vets, I think I have something to contribute.

I don't think I quite have the clout to be listed as an official analyst or anything, but I'll chime in with my thoughts. I need to work on my scumhunting for sure and my tendency to go for high risk/high reward plays runs pretty flagrantly against what a lot of people consider "good".

RIP Aaliyah
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
17:00
$100 Stream Ruble
RotterdaM804
Liquipedia
CSO Contender
17:00
#43
Liquipedia
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
15:55
FSL Team League: PTB vs RR
Liquipedia
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Playoffs Stage
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 804
BRAT_OK 92
JuggernautJason74
CosmosSc2 31
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 1041
Larva 599
firebathero 200
ZZZero.O 161
TY 115
Aegong 59
yabsab 17
GoRush 14
Stormgate
TKL 115
Dota 2
qojqva4228
monkeys_forever360
canceldota12
League of Legends
Grubby4635
Counter-Strike
fl0m2426
Stewie2K1142
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu387
Other Games
summit1g1960
Beastyqt743
ToD198
Skadoodle179
Trikslyr149
Hui .127
ArmadaUGS111
Sick40
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2181
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• printf 77
• tFFMrPink 18
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21682
Other Games
• imaqtpie1636
• WagamamaTV168
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
14h 10m
Online Event
20h 10m
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.