• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:25
CEST 12:25
KST 19:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !10Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results1
StarCraft 2
General
MaNa leaves Team Liquid Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! SC2 INu's Battles#16 <BO.9> Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
ASL Tickets to Live Event Finals? Pros React To: Leta vs Tulbo (ASL S21, Ro.8) Flashes ASL S21 Ro8 Review BW General Discussion [ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course
Tourneys
[ASL21] Semifinals B [ASL21] Semifinals A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] RO16 Group Stage - 02 - 10 May
Strategy
[G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread PC Games Sales Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1756 users

TL Mafia: Boot Camp - Page 6

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
November 23 2010 04:07 GMT
#101
QATOL DO I QUALIFY?!?!?

I WIN GAMES
+ Show Spoiler +
Generally for the other team, but still!
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
November 23 2010 04:48 GMT
#102
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
November 23 2010 05:26 GMT
#103
On November 23 2010 11:54 kingjames01 wrote:
Alright, that's a fair and nice way to tell me that you don't think I'm good enough yet... =)

Also, I plan to be hosting a game just after the new year... I won't reveal any details or who has been helping me just yet, but I'll eventually need to pass it through the Mafia council to have a judgement about balance.

Yah yah just send it to us for balance.

On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.

I don't think I've singlehandedly won a game though?
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
November 23 2010 05:55 GMT
#104
Well, weren't you the Village Idiot in XXXI? =)
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
November 23 2010 05:56 GMT
#105
Oh wait true forgot about that haha.
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
Incognito
Profile Joined November 2008
United States2071 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-23 05:59:16
November 23 2010 05:56 GMT
#106
These are the topics/focuses of each analyst as far as I know.

Flamewheel - Looking through a townie's eyes: How townies should use thread information
Ver - Attention worthy points: What good players focus on and what they ignore
Incognito - Important points and players: A look at who, how, and why people did or did not impact the game.
The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
November 23 2010 06:24 GMT
#107
On November 23 2010 13:07 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
QATOL DO I QUALIFY?!?!?

I WIN GAMES
+ Show Spoiler +
Generally for the other team, but still!

Your performance in Mafia 5 will live on forever.
Uff Da
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
November 23 2010 06:37 GMT
#108
On November 23 2010 14:26 flamewheel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 11:54 kingjames01 wrote:
Alright, that's a fair and nice way to tell me that you don't think I'm good enough yet... =)

Also, I plan to be hosting a game just after the new year... I won't reveal any details or who has been helping me just yet, but I'll eventually need to pass it through the Mafia council to have a judgement about balance.

Yah yah just send it to us for balance.

Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.

I don't think I've singlehandedly won a game though?

The VI game and from what I understand, you had a pretty major impact on a scum win from a pretty heavily town-favored setup in XXVIII.
Uff Da
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
November 23 2010 19:10 GMT
#109
That game was awesome. Caller as ROFLing so hard.

Anyway I suppose its time that I write the day post

SIGHH!!!!
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
November 24 2010 05:22 GMT
#110
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.
Liquipedia
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
November 24 2010 07:12 GMT
#111
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
November 24 2010 08:15 GMT
#112
On November 24 2010 16:12 kingjames01 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?


There is the normal game thread, and then there will be the bootcamp analysis thread posted after the game. It's a separate thread with a specific purpose because the normal end of game talk is usually just whining and ego boosting; useful posts get lost fast in that.

So in the bootcamp thread the OP will have the "analysis" and then everyone, players and observers, can discuss the analysis/events of the game.
Liquipedia
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
November 24 2010 08:53 GMT
#113
But yeah, no posting game-relevant information while it's still going!
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
Amber[LighT]
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States5078 Posts
November 24 2010 13:40 GMT
#114
On November 24 2010 17:15 Ver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2010 16:12 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?


There is the normal game thread, and then there will be the bootcamp analysis thread posted after the game. It's a separate thread with a specific purpose because the normal end of game talk is usually just whining and ego boosting; useful posts get lost fast in that.

So in the bootcamp thread the OP will have the "analysis" and then everyone, players and observers, can discuss the analysis/events of the game.


If we still want to sit on the sidelines and analyze the game without being noted as an analyst can we do that? I don't think my analysis would really benefit the players or you all anyway, but like I said previously I want to almost play the game without actually playing, if that makes sense.
"We have unfinished business, I and he."
DarthThienAn
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States2734 Posts
November 24 2010 16:44 GMT
#115
On November 24 2010 22:40 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2010 17:15 Ver wrote:
On November 24 2010 16:12 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?


There is the normal game thread, and then there will be the bootcamp analysis thread posted after the game. It's a separate thread with a specific purpose because the normal end of game talk is usually just whining and ego boosting; useful posts get lost fast in that.

So in the bootcamp thread the OP will have the "analysis" and then everyone, players and observers, can discuss the analysis/events of the game.


If we still want to sit on the sidelines and analyze the game without being noted as an analyst can we do that? I don't think my analysis would really benefit the players or you all anyway, but like I said previously I want to almost play the game without actually playing, if that makes sense.

Nobody's stopping you from doing that ^^. If you want to share your analysis after the game ends, no one's going to say "you're not allowed" to share your thoughts or anything. lol.
www.cstarleague.com | Love is like playing the piano. First you must learn to play by the rules, then you must forget the rules and play from your heart.
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
November 24 2010 17:31 GMT
#116
On November 24 2010 22:40 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2010 17:15 Ver wrote:
On November 24 2010 16:12 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 24 2010 14:22 Ver wrote:
On November 23 2010 13:48 kingjames01 wrote:
On November 23 2010 12:50 Qatol wrote:
On November 23 2010 10:56 flamewheel wrote:
Hmm well we don't really want to restrict who can and can't no? That'd be elitist!

But for this first one probably let hosts (all people currently signed up to analyze currently are hosts) do this one just so you can have a basis in future games. Then I'd say it should be [reasonably] open to anybody.

Every player on the list has pretty much singlehandedly won at least one game as well. I realize I'm being a little elitist here, but I think it is worth it not to compromise. I would feel better with coaches who have consistently provided results.


Well, I don't quite qualify then. =)


The only special thing about the "analysts" is that they'll be in the OP of the bootcamp thread. You (and anyone else) can chime in their thoughts in the actual thread. Hopefully we can have some nice discussions and see various POV's.


Do you really want non-players/non-analysts to post during the game?

What format would you allow that will minimize the impact on the flow and not detract from the game itself?


There is the normal game thread, and then there will be the bootcamp analysis thread posted after the game. It's a separate thread with a specific purpose because the normal end of game talk is usually just whining and ego boosting; useful posts get lost fast in that.

So in the bootcamp thread the OP will have the "analysis" and then everyone, players and observers, can discuss the analysis/events of the game.


If we still want to sit on the sidelines and analyze the game without being noted as an analyst can we do that? I don't think my analysis would really benefit the players or you all anyway, but like I said previously I want to almost play the game without actually playing, if that makes sense.


Yeah that's half the point. There isn't good postgame discussion normally so the goal is that everyone will join in and there can be group emphasis on learning from games. Just post your thoughts anyways once its over even if you don't think it'll help anyone. It might stimulate some discussion or give people ideas.
Liquipedia
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
November 24 2010 17:35 GMT
#117
Ah that makes sense. =)
Okay, I look forward to the end of the game and learning what I can.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
November 25 2010 02:00 GMT
#118
Yeah, what ver said. Anyone can post analysis or constructive criticism. Just send it to us and we will add it into the OP in the next thread. I am probably going to do an analysis as well just because I am going to be reading the game anyway o_O. Depends how much time I have.
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
SiNiquity
Profile Joined April 2010
United States734 Posts
November 25 2010 03:06 GMT
#119
On November 13 2010 09:03 SiNiquity wrote:
Tentatively in ~ depends on when this thing actually starts (Thanksgiving & Christmas I won't be near any internet devices).

QQ
'i' before 'e' except after 'c' ~ it's scientifically proven.
DoctorHelvetica
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States15034 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-01 08:54:44
December 01 2010 08:52 GMT
#120
I'd be interested in analysing any games I'm not participating in. I'd prefer to host the next boot camp game rather than participate and while I'm not as good of a player as most of the vets, I think I have something to contribute.

I don't think I quite have the clout to be listed as an official analyst or anything, but I'll chime in with my thoughts. I need to work on my scumhunting for sure and my tendency to go for high risk/high reward plays runs pretty flagrantly against what a lot of people consider "good".

RIP Aaliyah
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Afreeca Starleague
10:00
Ro4 Match 2
Light vs Flash
Afreeca ASL 12938
StarCastTV_EN387
Liquipedia
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #103
CranKy Ducklings28
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech136
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 43036
Calm 6733
Sea 5978
Bisu 2424
Jaedong 1674
BeSt 1167
Horang2 507
EffOrt 458
Rush 453
Pusan 370
[ Show more ]
actioN 215
Larva 170
ToSsGirL 86
Killer 76
Hyun 72
Sharp 69
Liquid`Ret 58
HiyA 55
Mind 49
Sexy 37
Mong 32
JulyZerg 17
Bale 17
soO 16
Terrorterran 16
GoRush 16
NaDa 13
Noble 11
Hm[arnc] 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
[sc1f]eonzerg 8
SilentControl 7
scan(afreeca) 6
Dota 2
XcaliburYe123
League of Legends
JimRising 407
Counter-Strike
olofmeister3409
shoxiejesuss1242
x6flipin265
edward38
Other Games
singsing336
Happy234
monkeys_forever180
crisheroes111
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL45286
Other Games
gamesdonequick649
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 200
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 60
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP5
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3056
• Jankos748
• Stunt500
Other Games
• WagamamaTV306
Upcoming Events
INu's Battles
35m
ByuN vs herO
PiGosaur Cup
13h 35m
Replay Cast
22h 35m
Replay Cast
1d 13h
The PondCast
1d 23h
OSC
1d 23h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
OSC
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
BSL
4 days
GSL
4 days
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-05-11
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W7
YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.