EPTHaunted Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
maybe im in the wrong forum, brb checking sc2 general | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
wait but then that would be obvious because if shmotz kills you at night then we would suspect shmotz wait but if scum kills you in order to frame shmotz we'd all think shmotz is scum and we'd end up lynching an innocent but what if shmotz knew that and actually decided to kill you anyway in the hopes that town would think scum is trying to frame shmotz this is confusing | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 11 2010 15:02 jodogohoo wrote: here are some profiles that might be shady =| + Show Spoiler + http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Iankill http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=annul http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Veldril http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=ShmotZ http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=kingjames01 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=HeavOnEarth http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=kenpachi http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Masq http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=jaminz http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=NB http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=kitaman27 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=d3_crescentia I'll update your list of profiles that might be shady + Show Spoiler + 1. deconduo 2. d3_crescentia 3. coagulation 4. jodogohoo 5. orgolove 6. pandain 7. southrawrea 8. CKSide 9. KtheZ 10. oddo123 11. bumatlarge 12. quickstriker 13. Therick 14. kitaman27 15. zerroth 16. NB 17. TheMunkey 18. YummyBlaBla 19. Kuja900 20. Lexpar 21. ~OpZ~ 22. SiNiquity 23. jaminz 24. Lucktar 25. AirbladeOrange 26. Masq 27. kenpachi 29. HeavOnEarth 30. kingjames01 31. Neos 32. goldfishs 33. Flicky 34. Zeraghul 35. chesshaha 36. KhrisKruel 37. spydR 38. Hyperbola 39. MetalFace 40. l0st_romantic 41. Aeres 42. ShmotZ 43. Hittegods 44. Veldril 45. grandmoose 46. LastArgument 47. jcarlsoniv 48. annul 49. Iankill 50. seRaPh 51. aztrorisk 52. Glasse 53. Bill Murray 54. LSB 55. Kpyolysis32 56. Nemesis 57. Yogy 58. Node 59. mptj 60. thegilaboy 61. CubEdIn | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
/night | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Town win condition: :At least 8 vampires and mafia are killed AND the town outnumbers the surviving members. Mafia win condition: All vampires are dead. Vampire win condition: All mafia are dead. Now, to all the newbies out there, it is not in our interests, at all, to prevent one of the other team's win condition. We are only focusing on our own win condition, whether or not another team achieves a win does not matter. It is entirely possibly that 2 teams (town/mafia, town/vampire) can achieve their win conditions. As such, later in the game, it might become plausible and beneficial for one of the scum teams to side with town. Obviously a town circle will emerge and using blue information, it may be in our favour to enlist the help of one of the scum teams. Do we have to do it? No. Will it be beneficial? Who knows. Will it be fun? Yes. Just putting it out there. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 11 2010 15:48 Bill Murray wrote: LOL. YOU JUST ADMITTED YOU'D BUDDY WHEN MAFIA, AND YOU'VE BEEN DOING IT WITH MASQ. I DON'T MEAN TO BE FUNNY WITH HALLOWEEN-REFERENCES, BUT THAT WAS REALLY THE NAIL IN YOUR COFFIN MR VAMPIRE LOL i thought spamming in caps was against tl rules | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 11 2010 15:56 DoctorHelvetica wrote: because i decided i dont like elections hitler 2.0 | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
point is, just 'cause something he's doing 'might' be something you would do as scum, it's also something many people would do as town ie. invalid argument | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Gee, how smart am I? | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 12 2010 07:50 aztrorisk wrote: I will switch to vendril if the vote is like 23 masq - 22 vendril at the end but not if it is 25 masq -21 vendril because my vote wouldn't do anything. This is what a lot of scum do. Let's say Masq is your teammate. You would vote to save his life (thereby risking yourself) only if your vote actually makes a difference (23-22). If it's 25-21 then your vote wouldn't affect anything and you'd be putting your identity on the line by trying to save scum without actually doing anything. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 12 2010 07:57 Pandain wrote: WTF WHY DID YOU DO THAT DONT YOU REALIZE THAT MASQ COULDNT HAVE BEEN THE JACK O LANTERN BECAUSE CLUES DONT RELATE TO THAT WHY THE FRICK DID YOU CLAIM IS THERE SOME I DONT SEE WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Summarizes how I felt when I read the roleclaim. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 12 2010 08:00 aztrorisk wrote: Actually, I thought of that, I was trying to make it apparent for the witch to curse me and the ghost to follow me. I was trying to give the ghost a easy decision of who to save. If my plan works out the following would occur to benefit the town: 1. Mafia wasted a kill point trying to save me 2. Mafia wasted a curse trying to curse me 3. Vampires wasted a Kill point trying to kill me as a result, the ghost haunt would be the most beneficial for the town this way. Here are the flaws in your plan. 1. Mafia is trying to kill Vampire, would be beneficial for town if Mafia killed a Vampire. 2. Mafia has no one better to curse, at best they probably would've cursed a random green but thanks to you they have a confirmed blue curse. 3. See #1. OH and you put the medic in a little bit of wifom. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 12 2010 08:01 Pandain wrote: or Vampire brute kills you and everyone who visited you that day. Well done. Well, I think we should keep his things hidden. I think he should only share with a select group so theres a chance the mafia/vampires won't know. I obviously nominate me. I'd like to congratulate aztro for bringing all that wifom to the town, you are a true hero, sir. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 12 2010 08:08 aztrorisk wrote: actually, the brute counts as a KP so I would be saved and the brute would also go to waste if the ghost decided to save me. Nono the ghost would die. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
... ... ... None of his shit makes sense, why are you surprised? | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
it's completely | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
fuck | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Stop confusing yourselves and focus on the only matter at hand: Veldril or Masq. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 12 2010 14:49 Bill Murray wrote: a few of my posts have been like 200 lines i am the most active member of the town i have to spotlight to maintain my position it is not fair to limit me this is inhibiting on my ability to properly play totally unfair stick it to the man, man | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
"People already think I'm mafia so no matter what I say/argue, people will think I'm saying that because I'm mafia". We are not idiots, there are people here that have been playing mafia for years. If you actually posted something of value as your defense, we may be swayed in our decision to lynch you. Instead, you act like you've already given up and that you have no defense. I'm sure everyone has a friend that never apologizes and instead says "well what do you want me to do, I can't do anything about it" instead of a simple "sorry". This is what you are doing and as such, I want everyone to vote for and lynch you. If you aren't scum then at least we've made an example of you as WHAT NOT TO DO. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 13 2010 08:03 bumatlarge wrote: RE-READ THREAD: MASQ SHOULD BE LYNCHED I must have misread somewhere on the veldril and masq debate, but going back, masq is the obvious lynch here. 1. He has clues pointing to him that seem a little obvious, but they are clear clues regarding something. 2. Veldril defended him, so we may have a lead if masq pops scum. 3. The vote lists will help us massively on fishing out opposing faction Masq is my vote, and if hes scum, then we can sift through the current list of masq people for his opposite faction. What if he isn't scum? Then we have absolutely no lead to go from. We'll be put off from voting Veldril and the vote lists mean squat. I don't want to rely on clues (might be because of my lack of experience in clue based games), I'd rather play this out from behaviour. Veldril is much more obvious than Masq in behaviour. Veldril defended him yet Masq voted for Veldril. What does this mean? I don't want to think about it. Call me naive but I really don't think Masq is scum. I mean if I was new to this game and I had such an important role, I'd be defending myself (using crap arguments since I'm new) to death. Masq is not doing this. On the other hand, Veldril is. (refer to my earlier post) I implore you to change your vote to Veldril, I don't care what these 'clues' say, if they're as obvious as the jack-o-lantern thing then all the other clues would be just as obvious. I'm pretty sure DoctorHelvetica isn't stupid enough to make one clue blindingly obvious and all the others vague as hell. And yes, I am defending Masq and accusing Veldril. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 13 2010 08:37 CubEdIn wrote: I'm one of the people who stood by my vote for Masq since the beginning, and I noticed something, which may be a coincidence. Everytime we zoned in on Masq, something happened to made ppl lose focus. First it was Veldril, then azo, and so on. All the while Masq is saying NOTHING, but voting. And it's easy to go and defend Masq when there's way you'll be lynched before the end of day. And I'm one of the people who stood by Masq from the beginning, maybe not as strong as you wanted him lynched but I never had my vote on him. When the Masq bandwagon started I didn't want to jump on because it happened out of nowhere and Masq didn't even make that many posts. Then the Veldril bandwagon started and I put my vote on him as a placeholder kind of thing. Then Veldril makes a series of posts that are very, very questionable. Now I'm strongly against Veldril and I'm supporting Masq on the basis of his posting behaviour, not some silly clues that are unreliable at best. And no, it isn't easy to defend Masq even though I won't be lynched today. What's going to happen if he IS scum? I'll be put under suspicion or targeted by the other scum team since I'll be seen as 'Masq's ally'. Am I willing to get lynched for him? No, but I'm willing to bet that I'm right on this. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
by the last sentence i meant that i'm sure veldril's a better lynch candidate than masq | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 13 2010 08:40 orgolove wrote: Oh really. Then next time I should register my smurf as well so that I have double the information power? What the !@#$? How the hell are smurfs allowed? It gives such an outrageous advantage. If you truly allow this, I give up. Fuck it. Shut the fuck up and get over yourself. They're avoiding people like you that rely on the metagame which some consider a game ruiner. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On October 13 2010 00:56 youngminii wrote: Your argument consists of the following: "People already think I'm mafia so no matter what I say/argue, people will think I'm saying that because I'm mafia". We are not idiots, there are people here that have been playing mafia for years. If you actually posted something of value as your defense, we may be swayed in our decision to lynch you. Instead, you act like you've already given up and that you have no defense. I'm sure everyone has a friend that never apologizes and instead says "well what do you want me to do, I can't do anything about it" instead of a simple "sorry". This is what you are doing and as such, I want everyone to vote for and lynch you. If you aren't scum then at least we've made an example of you as WHAT NOT TO DO. + Show Spoiler + On October 13 2010 08:32 youngminii wrote: What if he isn't scum? Then we have absolutely no lead to go from. We'll be put off from voting Veldril and the vote lists mean squat. I don't want to rely on clues (might be because of my lack of experience in clue based games), I'd rather play this out from behaviour. Veldril is much more obvious than Masq in behaviour. Veldril defended him yet Masq voted for Veldril. What does this mean? I don't want to think about it. Call me naive but I really don't think Masq is scum. I mean if I was new to this game and I had such an important role, I'd be defending myself (using crap arguments since I'm new) to death. Masq is not doing this. On the other hand, Veldril is. (refer to my earlier post) I implore you to change your vote to Veldril, I don't care what these 'clues' say, if they're as obvious as the jack-o-lantern thing then all the other clues would be just as obvious. I'm pretty sure DoctorHelvetica isn't stupid enough to make one clue blindingly obvious and all the others vague as hell. And yes, I am defending Masq and accusing Veldril. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
why do you think killing masq gives us info on veldril but killing veldril doesn't give us info on masq? | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Do not ever let someone take a public discussion/argument and turn it into a private one. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
i dont like posting with just one response so here Defending someone is much more revealing than the person whos getting defended. Aka, mafia could defend me, but I could be town and they're just trying to get pro town points. Or they could be accusing me for their own game. They could do either. However, a person who is GETTING defended is more revealing. If they are mafia, we know mafia wouldn't just continue the brigade on that(most likely, especially if they are a top contender) If they are town, then people who accused them should be looked at with suscipion and people who defended them(thus helping stop bandwagon) are good. Ci? Yum yum A person getting defended that doesn't defend the original defender (lolwut) doesn't give out any more information if lynched than the defender getting lynched. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Obvious scumlike behaviour, not pointing fingers yet. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 13 2010 09:53 Kpyolysis32 wrote: Posted without including this. If you really want what he said to be posted so bad, why not just post the PMs? I guess it's less reliable, because they could be forged, but I think that imitating Pandain's writing style would be kind of hard. I did. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
good job on the lynch though.. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 13 2010 13:26 Node wrote: Ah, finally got forum permission. Someone give me a quick rundown on what's going on at this point? Bill Murray is a grizzly old bear. Pandain is a cute baby panda. 1 + 1 = 2. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 13 2010 13:28 youngminii wrote: Bill Murray is a grizzly old bear. Pandain is a cute baby panda. 1 + 1 = 2. Along came a lion, protecting the panda and ravaging through the bear. Lion = DoctorHelvetica btw | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 13 2010 14:00 Bill Murray wrote: roleclaim to me in pm please i just died in mafia XXXI, and I asked for roleclaims there. I was a townie. I am a jack o lantern, and I really need ghost protection, but I don't want ALL OF YOU protecting me, so I need everyone who is a blue to pm me their role I need to live for a few day so I can place my bombs and be able to take out others later on after I am dead. If I have protection now later on I can sacrifice myself for a win. SO think of it as if I die now I can't get my bombs out. Ghost if I win, you win. Even if I am dead sacrificing myself for a win would be a honorable win for me and the town. Think about it, please. PM if you are willing to protect me and go for a win.- Bill Murray lol | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 13 2010 13:59 orgolove wrote: youngminii + Show Spoiler + He at first tried to appear as noob: On October 11 2010 10:07 youngminii wrote: what is mafia? On October 11 2010 13:04 youngminii wrote: whats a haunted zombie but then actively participated. He has a lot of posts that accuse many different people, and apparently doesn't care about who actually dies: On October 11 2010 15:04 youngminii wrote: sounds like a good plan lets do it /night On October 11 2010 15:39 youngminii wrote: don't forget to vote for aztrorisk because he is a loose cannon and has a picture of someone (presumably him in animated form) sleeping and being watched by a watcher. the watcher obv. suspects him of being scum so he's our best lead. Is this serious? Okay I guess I should defend myself. First two posts that you quoted are both from BEFORE THE GAME EVEN STARTED. The next two posts are clearly jokes, how can you not see that? Seriously, did you even read these posts before you quoted them? | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On October 29 2010 10:53 DoctorHelvetica wrote: lol i was ryry/chloechloe/ryannewman whatever youngminii is the jerk not me  Lol you think that's bad, read all the crap between me and quickstriker Anyway, very well played Annul. I would have loved to be alive past the first night  (screw you LSB) but great job on pulling us to victory. I'm going to have to fully read over this thread when I have the time  | ||
| ||
