Haunted Mafia

On October 11 2010 16:18 Bill Murray wrote:

in response to bolded, yes.
Masq defended Veldril, too. They defended each other. It is a mistake on their part.
Yes. Town are uninformed. Mafia know mafia. Vampires know vampires.
Honestly, I didn't even read the day posts. I focus more on scouring posts than beating my head into walls of clues.

On October 12 2010 00:43 Veldril wrote:
Oh well, I think I deserve to be suspected for protecting Masq. But let's be clear, I'm suspecting Masq too but I don't want to draw conclusion based solely on the story that the GM wrote. To quote what Dr.H written in the introduction:



That means the clue might hurt townie like us too.

Now let me response to Bill Murray's post:



I like your post here. Yes, I was absolutely did a bad post and deserve to be suspected. But after reading Ver's guide, do you think I would make a same mistake that Misder made in the past? I think not.



Could you please clarify how I admitted that I'm a mafia/vampire? Because I defended Masq? I guess your logic is something like this.

If someone is a mafia/vampire then that person would defend blame on his team mate.
If a person defend other person then those people are teammate.

Veldril defend Masq
Therefore,Veldril and Masq are team mate.
Therefore, Veldril and Masq are vampire.

If your logic is like above then I think you have made both formal fallacy and informal fallacy. With an experienced player like you, it is unlikely that you would make such fallacies, unless you ignore them to make an accusation on me with some agendas. Of course, I could be wrong but in that case, could you please clarify why do you think I team up with Masq please?

On October 12 2010 03:28 NB wrote:
WHO INVESTIGATE THE INVESTIGATORS?

I am considering between seRapH, jodogohoo and Veldril
If masq is truely the Jack-o-lantern, its "ok" to ignore him. Would not take risk only killing 1 blue since 1 blue life is SO MUCH worth compare to killing jack...

Reason i choose those 3 people:
seRapH: check my previous posts

jodogohoo: He changed his vote ALOT. The best way to explain this is that he likes to "agree" with people on lynching somebody. This means that he, in fact, does not value the "risk" that we have to take when lynching somebody or in another way to say: "He seem to know who to avoid killing". Most of his posts contain very "simple" logic and mostly "agreeing" with someone else on lynching people. If i have to change my vote right now, i would vote for him. I denied the possibility of him being a noob since his post counts is 2k...

Veldril: His biggest mistake was try to protect masq VERY early on. If that didnt cause enough attention toward this couple, Masq went a head and "agree" with Veldril's protection. => What this means is that instead of voting for masq, vote for Veldril is a MUCH safer option comparatively since Veldril has much more "power posts" than Masq. If both Masq and Veldril have equal chance of being mafia/vamp, why dont we remove the "harmful" one b4 the "harmless" one?

Now im off to do homework >.<... but i will replay if you have any questions toward my logic :-)

On October 11 2010 15:48 Bill Murray wrote:


I think I just found 2 vampires here guys

On October 13 2010 14:59 Glasse wrote:
I feel like you guys saying they will go for veldril are all wrong. Wouldnt it be smarter of them to keep the vamps with more kp while they know who one of them is? From what i understand they need to have the number of town ppl low as well so he will probably go unharmed, while we may have to vote him off or something like that.

On October 13 2010 15:16 NB wrote:

No! read my post!

I am quite sure that veldir will remain untouched. Reducing number of reds is so BAD for both M/V since town most likely will win. think about it, if M kill Veldir they also lose 1 "clear target" that they can save for later kill points.

If Veldir is safe night1, he will have 80% of my vote. If Veldir is safe night 1 + 1 vamp got killed => he got 100% of my vote. If he is dead => reset :<

On October 13 2010 15:20 NB wrote:
also i have to reconsider the fact why 2 townies wana let a Vamp live when they clearly know what he is....
Coagulation and YummyBlaBla, you 2 will be on my list.
If i happen to die tonight. please consider Coagulation and YummyBlaBla as the next target T_T

On October 14 2010 12:49 BrownBear wrote:
The day post isn't up yet. If you can link clues to each other, then you can fight all you want.

Until then, quit yer bitchin'

On October 17 2010 13:17 KhrisKruel wrote:
looks like pandain got hit by two people. So some overlap in kills.

so with that, I think there is still some fishy stuff going on with the KP. It also doesn't look like anyone got poisoned from night 1 but I'm not sure if it would tell us they died by poisoning.

On October 17 2010 13:29 Glasse wrote:
Well i'm going to sleep
ill watch this thread tomorow

(get it? lol)

also hammer clue is not my kirby STOP PICKING ON KIRBY