TL Mafia XXX - Page 7

On August 09 2010 13:38 youngminii wrote:
God damnit I'm busy for like a day and there's 3948234 pages to read. Can someone post a summary of what's happened?

On August 09 2010 11:43 Foolishness wrote:

I didn't ask for your opinion. I said to pick the choice that was most likely.

Even if 2 DTs came out and said I was clean and a Tracker followed me and I didn't visit anyone and even if the GF was already dead I know you'd still accuse me of being mafia. Don't tell me things I already know.

On August 09 2010 14:09 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
unvote
##vote bill murray

I may be but an honest scribe, so I do recall you doing the following pattern day 1. To my knowledge this is not favourable given your response and lack of factual evidence.

On August 09 2010 14:26 Foolishness wrote:

Didn't you read his posts? I've used up my extra life so I got nothing else to live for. Forget about establishing town circles and the what not...I've lost my extra life. Therefore I am useless.

On August 09 2010 14:11 Foolishness wrote:

youngminii: already been said. I plan on doing an indepth analysis tomorrow (I really need to go sleep shortly >.<)

Infundibulum: He's less active than his normal style. His current posting reminds me of Incognito's 2 mafia family game (he was mafia). He hasn't contributed anything.

Chezinu: Fits the bill with youngminii (notice how youngminii is protective of Chezinu during day 1). Also I don't think you're mafia, Pyrry's not mafia, I'm not mafia, which leaves Chezinu as top candidate for balancing purposes. Infundibulum also fits for balancing since he's one of the most experienced players in this game as well.

Weeding through the inactives/lurkers is a tiring and troublesome process.

On August 09 2010 14:46 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:


Yeah, I'm changing it up this game. Last game I posted a lot and got dragged into arguments and lines of thinking that ultimately didn't help the town and ended up being frustrated with myself. Since I have less time right now anyway, i'm taking a more laid back approach to this game and trying to think more analytically than emotionally. I'm sure you're not the only one to have noticed.

That said I did some thinking and depending on what the tracker found, Xelin could be a confirmed innocent. Essentially, Xelin being framed to appear red doesn't matter - if Xelin is mafia and was tracked, the tracker will know that Xelin visited someone on today's kill list and ergo that he is mafia. If Xelin didn't visit anybody, then he's not mafia even if he was framed. So I don't think we need to worry about lynching Xelin.

Exceptions: Xelin is Principal or Ninja, in such cases my previous logic does not apply since those roles can't be tracked.

So basically this actually works out pretty well in that we have only 2 townies dead and 2 quasi-confirmed townies in Xelin and Foolishness.

On August 08 2010 12:14 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Lol.
Wow...Thread explosion.

On August 09 2010 15:13 ~OpZ~ wrote:
So then. We can assume Xelin is practically confirmed, yes yes? Foolishness, were you med protected or vet protected? Would be nice to know you and a med are in cahoots.

On August 09 2010 15:13 ~OpZ~ wrote:
So then. We can assume Xelin is practically confirmed, yes yes? Foolishness, were you med protected or vet protected? Would be nice to know you and a med are in cahoots.

On August 09 2010 15:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:

If a tracker speaks up, then we would all need to PM Xelin. Basically, tracker, whoever you tracked if they visited ANYONE and the person visited didn't die, you got us a confirmed townie. If they didn't visit anyone, you shouldn't pm them. GF, Ninja....Lil scary world out there.

But, Tracker, if you visited Xelin, and Xelin visited someone. And given the watcher watched Xelin....We should have one hell of a town circle. VARY NICE?!

So once Tracker posts that he followed Xelin...Should we mass claim to Xelin? We dont have the number of roles, BUT we can assume by balance....

On August 09 2010 15:21 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Lmao. My bad Pyrr. I take that back. -_-

I really gotta chill.

On August 09 2010 15:26 ~OpZ~ wrote:

Chez/Bumatlarge

I know who. There could be more than one, or chez could be lying. It IS Chez after all....

On August 09 2010 15:27 BrownBear wrote:
So reading through the thread, here's the major things I got out of this...

1: How the hell does BC factor into this game?
2: Chez continues to be amazing. And ridiculous.
3: Young continues to be young.
4: People are throwing way too much WIFOM around about Foolishness. I personally think he's telling the truth.
5: Image macros are stupid.

So, young, since you seem to be the most vocal against foolishness, and because you're trashing up the thread with hate again, AND because I want to see how you react, I'm voting for you. At the very least, lynching you gives us some information, while lynching a random inactive (bum wtf I've been more active than you >< ) gives us no information.

On August 10 2010 06:12 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
should it be Ninjii?

On August 10 2010 06:41 Foolishness wrote:

When are you going to be away from your computer? I need to post stuff about youngminii and I can't afford to have you spam it away.

On August 10 2010 06:41 Divinek wrote:


what do you mean see what happens?

what do we gain from lynching him? prove that he played like an idiot like the start of every other game?

On August 10 2010 06:50 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:


I defended BM, can I be the Principal too?