RESERVED FOR SOMETHING YEAHHHHH.
...Wait?
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
RESERVED FOR SOMETHING YEAHHHHH. ...Wait? | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
I don't know. Hey it's raining. Oh god Chez. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 03 2010 04:16 Korynne wrote: I don't get it. xD It was just us sticking out to the end with Foolishness. =P (Hopefully he'll play too? xP) Foolishness mafia. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 04 2010 12:39 DarthThienAn wrote: Show nested quote + On June 04 2010 11:44 Incognito wrote: On June 04 2010 07:40 Radfield wrote: On June 04 2010 06:59 flamewheel wrote: I just realized there was a Day Vigi :3 maybe... not necessarily... But I lets hope so. It's just so entertaining. I really hope I get Veteran, I promise to get some use out of it. Probably Night 1.... : ) How bout I make you a Veteran and I give mafia aligned dayvig to someone who has a grudge against you? or give mafia a night kill. stack kills, ezpz. lolol. flame's playing in this game. I want to play with cute flame :[. =[=[=[ >.> I can't say that I'm a good player. That would be a lie and we don't lie in this sub-forum! | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 05 2010 09:03 DarthThienAn wrote: Show nested quote + On June 05 2010 08:58 flamewheel wrote: On June 04 2010 12:39 DarthThienAn wrote: On June 04 2010 11:44 Incognito wrote: On June 04 2010 07:40 Radfield wrote: On June 04 2010 06:59 flamewheel wrote: I just realized there was a Day Vigi :3 maybe... not necessarily... But I lets hope so. It's just so entertaining. I really hope I get Veteran, I promise to get some use out of it. Probably Night 1.... : ) How bout I make you a Veteran and I give mafia aligned dayvig to someone who has a grudge against you? or give mafia a night kill. stack kills, ezpz. lolol. flame's playing in this game. I want to play with cute flame :[. =[=[=[ >.> I can't say that I'm a good player. That would be a lie and we don't lie in this sub-forum! It doesn't matter cuz ur so cute :3. That may be true... Or it may not be... | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
I've... graduated. Should have more time now. I think. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 08 2010 12:34 Incognito wrote: ^You can only play in one game at once. Anyway, I'm going to wait one more day till signups close. The game will start on Wednesday. Wait what with only 15? Dead players from my game can play right? | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
I got you another one :3 (Love me) | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 09 2010 12:12 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: Show nested quote + On June 09 2010 12:08 flamewheel wrote: Incognitooooooooooooo! I got you another one :3 (Love me) hey you asshole you better not have told mafia to kill me ! :D That would go against some vaguely defined ethical code :3 | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
I propose that Incognito keep a cute counter in this game as well! | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 09 2010 12:44 Foolishness wrote: So just to be clear, PMing is allowed in this game yeah? Edit: Can we also get an explanation of all the Detective/Medic variants and such? Normal: Saves as usual. Everybody's favourite paramedic. Weak: Dies if he/she protects anti-town player. Paranoid: Protects and roleblocks target. Naive: Protection is ineffective. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Also darn. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 10 2010 07:14 Radfield wrote: OK, lets talk balance for a sec. With 4 mafia vs 13 town aligned, and given that the mafia might have both a roleblocker and godfather, I would guess that we have a decent number of blue roles in the game. My guess at the moment would be at least 5 blue roles, plus possibly a town aligned day vig? I'm thinking 1 cop, 1 medic, 1 watcher/tracker, 1 vet and 1 vig/mad hatter. Also likely 1 Miller and the Day Vig. That leaves 6 townies(7 with the miller). Does this seems likely to other people? Thoughts? I'm putting out my thoughts on balance. Will compare in a second. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Semi-open setups are tricky, since we know what roles there can be but not the number. However, since there is a given number of mafia we should be able to roughly estimate what kind of blue powers (and/or extraneous mafia powers) there are in the game. 17 people and four mafia, so the mafia comprise 23.5% of the town's population. Normally in Incognito's games, the mafia comprise a flat 20% of the total population and blue roles are adjusted based on that, and given the fact that there are more varied roles than in these more 'standard' games, I'd assume we'd have some of those. Let's see... Incognito likes Mad Hatters. I can't remember if that is his or Qatol's (perhaps both?) favourite role, but most likely there will be one Hatter. Obviously, it'd be ludicrous to say that there isn't a medic, though the question is whether or not there's one medic or two. I'm split between the numbers, since either could work... A self-saving medic is way more powerful, and that would mean there would probably only be one medic. However, Incognito has ninja'ed in the fact that medics cannot save themselves, so two medics is probable. Between the Watcher/Stalker and DT there's more likely to be a DT. Watchers and Stalkers are cute roles, and I'd count them as half a blue role. There'll probably be one of either. There is a Veteran, most likely. Since it is a passive blue role, I'd count it as a half. Because you can't have too many blue roles without balancing Mafia powers as well... There will probably be a Mafia-aligned Day vigilante, and perhaps a town-aligned one. If there are two medics (or two of anything) I'd find it more likely that there'd be a roleblocker. Probably to throw off the DT, there will be one, at most but probably not, two Millers. Of course, this is all conjectural based on how I would potentially balance a game. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
I say a few hours, Incognito. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Also I'll just throw it out there that I'm all for lynching an inactive at the end of this 48-hour day, since it's very unlikely that a mafia member will slip up. Way more often (and by way more often I mean every case I've seen) a bandwagoned first lynch is just a townie that made a mistake and the mafia jumped him. Also if an inactive dies by first lynch, I request him to be struck by lightning Incognito. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Oh, just realized that Mafia KP was one (forgot about this, automatically assumed #/2 rounded up). Which means yeah, only one medic. I'm for roleclaiming since it's lulz. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 10 2010 09:55 meeple wrote: Show nested quote + On June 10 2010 09:45 Radfield wrote: On June 10 2010 08:14 Vivi57 wrote: This should be fun. Also, is lynching an inactive really best? We've done that since forever and people are so used to the strategy that I don't think it'll give us as much in the way of vote lists and voting patterns to analyze. I say that we make everyone talk then analyze behavior and if someone appears scummy, we shouldn't insta go for the inactive. I think I agree with this. Usually I'm a champion of inactive lynching, but theoretically in this set up there should not be anyone blatantly inactive. I mean, the invites were sent out solely based on activity. If we're having a problem with activity, by all means, but for now lets try to analyze. Face the facts, mafia who try to coast by are lame, mafia who play hardcore are sweet. Like Incognito in Mafia XXII; that was well done. Despite what I said earlier about being skeptical that people could be forced out of inactivity... we might be hard pressed to find a true inactive. In the short time that this game has been open, there's only 6 people that haven't posted. 6. Chezinu 7. citi.zen 8. Foolishness 10. RebirthOfLeGend 14. johnnyspazz 15. LuDwig- And of these, I expect that they will show up soon. If it continues like this, and we get tons of active people and lots of posts to analyze then it might very well be more advantageous to skip the inactive lynch. Being inactive doesn't just quantify people who don't post. There are people who will post nothing or go on generalities, and thus can still be considered non-contributers. Also if there are a ton of posts, a townsperson is just as likely (maybe more so) to slip up than a mafia member, though we'll see. Game's technically only 37 minutes old. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 10 2010 11:33 Foolishness wrote: ... Seriously though, did either of you even bother to think this through? Seems to me it's like, "lulz watz this weird role? no wai it can be good as DT otherwise we'd use it more AM I RIGHT?!?" Sure did! When did I say it was not as good as the DT? | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Reading thread now, in after internet outage + moderating my own game. + Show Spoiler + Love you Foolishness. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Hmm, MooCow and LuDwig-... So we have two people claiming Detective. This is going to take some thought, since we also have a Tracker claim--meaning that there'd be a very minimal chance of there being two DTs. So obviously, one of them is lying. ...To PM land we go! Oh also MooCow I'm not sure how you could have expected LuDwig- to "screw up" on Day 1 seeing as very little to mess up on. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 12 2010 03:01 LuDwig- wrote: [/blue]Show nested quote + On June 12 2010 01:06 MooCow wrote: I'm going to shake things up a bit. If there's one detective in this game it's ME! I'm the real Detective, not sure about sanity yet. I didn't role claim etc because I was waiting to see if LuDwig would screw up but he didn't really post that much. haahah quite easy to claim Detective when we are sending not claiming people to a corner .__. How to discover who is lying? The plan is quite easy! [blueTracker checks this night me or moocow. If one of us is lying tracker will knows that we have visited nobody during the night! So we will know for sure who is lying ![]() MooCow...i suppose you have not problem following this plan right? There are a lot of problems with having both "Detectives" visiting the same person, and having the Tracker following one of them. Will detail my messy thoughts below. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 12 2010 03:12 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: Btw we shouldn't lynch Ludwig or MooCow because as of now what they have both claimed is legal by L's plan. We should either go after someone who claimed townie or someone who didn't claim anything. Agreed. Inactives (I relegate people who don't claim to this section) suck. However, I don't think we'll be having any of the four unclaimed people be inactive by traditional standards. Foolishness is always around, MooCow has proven to be active (though I have a very small sample size to work with), Chezinu spams and PMs, and meeple is always around. I believe if any of these people want/ed to claim, they can do so at their leisure. Lynching a green sounds okay to me because of this. As for the "both DTs check one person and tracker watches one of the DTs" plan, I had a lot of "what if" thoughts typed up but I think I can list out a few of these points to make this plan ineffective: 1) We have two DTs? Mafia faking DT knows who town is, and so can always claim "sane" to get the right check since the OP states that checks come back Town or Mafia. A real DT won't be able to know his alignment after just one check, and he can be killed off before that (guess it's a medic-mafia cat-and-mouse game on that). 2) Incognito returns DT check results as soon as he gets to them. Forum mafia, as somebody has said above, is a linear game. How do we have the two DTs decide when to release results? Of course, this can easily be remedied by deciding on a set time to release the findings... still, look at 1. Inconclusive at best. 3) Ugh, I'm tired. While there are ways for which this plan can be made tenable, I'm sure, I haven't thought about it yet. Back to PM land... Also I will not be around at the deadline time. I'll try to make a vote before I leave based on where the thread is at that point (in about 3 hours). | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 12 2010 03:18 MooCow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 12 2010 03:13 johnnyspazz wrote: do you know if you're roleblocked or not? cause if the tracker follows the roleblocker and the person who is blocked knows he's roleblocked, then the roleblocker just revealed himself. Yea the person you roleblocked will be informed that they were roleblocked. I'm a bit fearful for my life now that i'm in the open like this so i'm going to ask if there are any kind medics around. No offence to you LuDwig but is anyone else reading LuDwig posts with a bit of an Italian accent with his grammar and wordings or is it just me? ![]() Might be just you... | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote: Show nested quote + On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote: On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote: damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote: Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/. Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks. Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. Okay back. Oops JSpazz? Radfield I vote for myself knowing the prevalence of bandwagons, thus didn't want to add to either JSpazz or meeple. Yeah L is right, especially in Incognito's case--he doesn't allow changes for DT checks, not sure about the other actions. DT checks are also returned as soon as possible, remember? Given that we have claims from 2 DTs, a watcher, and a tracker, how would it be to consolidate everything? Say like... MooCow and LuDwig- check meeple. meeple flips a coin to watch one of the two. tree.hugger flips a coin to track one of the two. Out of all this we should be able to get something, at least... (50% chance that watcher and tracker find the same target, so... Thoughts? Also: On June 12 2010 11:37 MooCow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote: On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote: On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote: On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote: damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote: Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/. Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks. Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? I'll wait for the town to decide whoever they want checked out. I just threw my idea out there because no one else had any. If I were mafia I wouldn't of risked myself by coming out and saying i'm the 2ND DT in the game with everyone believing that there is only 1 DT in the first place. I welcome any watcher/tracker. Well there's a 50% chance i'm completely useless in terms of checking people out and on top of that making people believe I am protown. WiFOM, don't use it. There are so many damn 'ifs'. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 13 2010 04:07 meeple wrote: Show nested quote + On June 13 2010 03:00 MooCow wrote: On June 13 2010 02:50 meeple wrote: On June 13 2010 02:46 MooCow wrote: On June 13 2010 02:25 meeple wrote: On June 12 2010 12:56 L wrote: On June 12 2010 11:51 meeple wrote: On June 12 2010 11:35 L wrote: On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote: Why exactly are you asking me instead of doing some thinking on your own?On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote: [quote] Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? lol well apparently you're the man with the plan... also I was asking the town. No need to get all defensive I'm not being defensive. I'm wondering why you're purposely not answering your own question. This post hasn't really answered the question either, so feel free to get to it whenever you feel like doing some work. It was a question to make people think and discuss... if they're both checking the same person (me?) then we can see which detective to trust and kinda follow their lead. I think we should check on someone that we want to lynch to help find out the sanity level of the DTs. So we should decide on someone soon because the night is almost over. ACTIVITY?! The problem with checking someone that we want to lynch... is that they might turn up red and while that would bag up some red it also wouldn't tell us anything about the sanity of the cops. Eh?! Getting a red like that is totally worth not knowing the sanity level of the DT's imo. Besides it only slows the us down by a bit if we don't know the DT sanity level but it's a huge gain getting a mafia. What do you guys think of Chez? If he is going to get mod killed from inactivity we can experiment on him. I hope not though because he seems like a fun mafia guy to play with. Yeah you're right... it was just something that occurred to me. I don't agree with lynching Chez on the grounds of inactivity though. If I have some time to go through posts I'll come up with more suspects. Oh he's not inactive. He'll be working behind the scenes, plus there isn't too much to analyze on the first cycle... | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 13 2010 10:40 citi.zen wrote: Show nested quote + On June 13 2010 10:02 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: On June 13 2010 08:18 citi.zen wrote: Hold on - a roleblocked townie is announced he got blocked? yes? I got a PM from incognito last "night" saying that I've been role blocked. This is not how it works in any other game. Can a mod chime in? Actually most games that I've seen recently with roleblockers involve the person being roleblocked getting told he is roleblocked, whether he has an action or not. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 13 2010 15:41 L wrote: Show nested quote + On June 13 2010 14:06 meeple wrote: Heh... well it does give some sticky situations since we can't actually rely that much on the detectives results... but it does give us some starting points. In my eyes, AFJ is slightly greener... not only because one of our "dts" seem to have confirmed what he claimed but also because of his lack of complaining under all this scrutiny. If he were red, I imagine he would be squirming a bit more... Of course, there's always the possibility that both MooCow and AFJ are mafia and coordinating this... which would explain both the result and the lack of complaining. I highly doubt that MooCow would suggest and check someone who is also mafia given that our current plan is to axe him in order to give DTs role information. Its possible that one is trying to set the other up, but both of them being mafia seems incredibly unlikely. You not checking AFJ kinda makes getting information our DTs harder, but if you've confirmed that there's a medic, that's awesome. The problem is that now our lynch choice is much harder. I personally don't think AFJ is mafia because he's acting pretty emotionally, but I haven't gone through his past games to see how he plays mafia. If that's the case, then its possible that up to 3 people visited AFJ yesterday. If i'm right and he's not mafia, then he isn't the medic either because he wouldn't lie about being roleblocked and meeple picked up a medic. Unless meeple is lying or if the hatter dropped a bomb on ludwig and thinks he and meeple are both mafia which seems very unlikely. So basically we're kinda at a null point in terms of the objective information. We can either kill AFJ to let our DTs narrow their potential sanities, or we can attempt to find someone else. Personally, I have tomorrow off and don't need to work all day, which means I'll have time to look into 2 people too. I think i'll pick flamewheel and foolishness because 1) flamewheel is cute and 2) foolishness is not posting which piques my interest. If I'm too busy to do a full post history on those 2, I'll do a gut feeling map of the people playing like I did last game. Love you, L. I'll try to do analysis on somebody tomorrow, if I wake up on time. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 13 2010 21:47 MooCow wrote: I'll do a bit of my thoughts and analysis on Flamewheel! Flamewheel *First post he revels he's actually the Godfather, lynch him. Posts in the actual start of the game : 18 #141 Gives some of his thoughts on the balance of the game. Nothing really solid. #151Wants to lynch an inactive which we did ( Jspazz ) #164He's up for roleclaiming which we all eventually do except for Chez. #242 A bit later he rc's townie, just in between the mass rc'ing of townies. #279 Gives his thoughts on 2 people rc'ing DT's ( MooCow and LuDwig) but imo doesn't really say anything useful. #326He votes for himself ( knowing that he won't be lynched but just as a placeholder because he won't be back in time for the voting ) He also gives a plan that's almost exactly the same thing I posted for the 2 DT's and watcher to do. Lasts few posts were just *one *liners not saying much. Conclusion He's actually not that active in this game imo. A lot of his posts end with something like he'll be back in a few hours or has to do something for a few hours, which is understandable, but may also be a mafia trying to cover up for his inactivity. He doesn't say much in any of his posts but he did say he will do an analysis. All of these things make me suspicious of him and I think he's mafia from my analysis so far. If I do my analysis will that help my case? \o/ Coming up shortly... | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
At this point, I’m willing to assume meeple is our Watcher indeed, and he found the Medic since it makes thinking about things a lot easier. On June 13 2010 13:49 meeple wrote: Ah... I'm back... yeah unfortunately I didn't watch AFJ but I did watch Ludwig... and have ascertained the identity of the medic ![]() What does this say about our power roles? If meeple is indeed our Watcher, then we had a Watcher/Tracker set. Since Detectives are weakened due to alignment issues, this is plausible. We also have a Medic—this is good? I can only assume the meeple-medic interaction happened in PM land. If it’s true and we have a Medic, this is good, since a 1KP medic can fully protect the town every night from Mafia hits given Scamp-like protecting abilities. So now we have two Detectives left. If the above mentioned blues are actually in this game, then in my opinion, there is a high probability that one of the Detectives is one of the lying blue roles (Veteran, Hatter… I still stand by the fact that Incognito likes Hatters) and the other one is of reversed or useless sanity. Why do I think we have a Hatter? At this point, I think it seems logical. I haven’t seen a standard game yet without some form of extraneous town KP, and the situation right now can boil down to Hatter or Veteran. Maybe there’s both and somebody claimed Townie? Entirely plausible. However, know that I requested Veteran before the game started—the plan was to cause a lot of ruckus to get the Mafia to try to slap me at night, though that request could not be entertained. So what does that mean? It means either somebody else more important got Veteran (though I don’t believe Incognito offered others a choice?) or that there are no Veterans due to balancing issue. The more I think about it, the less likely there is to be a Veteran. Mafia only have 1KP (plus a potential Day Vigi) so a Veteran is a huge deterrence, especially after the day comes about and actions are sorted out when the Veteran claims the hit. So plausible blue roles? It might boil down to one semi-useless to useless Detective in terms of alignment, a Watcher, a now-dead Tracker, a hidden Medic, and a Mad Hatter. The Medic is most likely hiding amongst the greens. One of our three other power roles is probably a Hatter. Can we tell which? Remember: AcrossFiveJulys said he was roleblocked, and meeple said he watched LuDwig-. Both LuDwig- and MooCow said they checked AcrossFiveJulys, and that he returned as town. Here are the possibilities: 1) Both of them are sane, and AcrossFiveJulys is, in actuality, green. Chances of this being the case with both a Watcher and Tracker in the game? Very low. That’s a ton of information right there. 2) One of the two is sane, the other Naïve or Insane and AFJ is Mafia. Perhaps we have one sane cop, this is plausible. Most likely, the other cop is Naïve, if that. 3) One of the two is a cop. The other is a Mad Hatter. I find this case very plausible. meeple watched LuDwig-, and though he hasn’t confirmed that LuDwig- visited AFJ, I assume that he would call LuDwig- out if LuDwig- had indeed not done so during the night. Of course, we’d have so much more information if meeple had just watched AFJ… Now, here’s an interesting part: AFJ claimed he was roleblocked almost immediately after the day post. Immediately before this point, we would have no indication that there was a roleblocker. meeple does not chime in that he watched LuDwig- instead of AFJ until later on. So in all probability, we can assume that AFJ was, indeed, roleblocked since saying so when it didn’t happen while under the risk of being watched would have been ludicrous and a gamble. Of course, I’m ignoring the elaborate conspiracy plots of meeple, LuDwig-, AFJ etc. all being Mafia… So AFJ was roleblocked. And supposedly MooCow and LuDwig- visited him during the night. meeple watched LuDwig-. Could LuDwig- be a roleblocker? It’s possible given the circumstances but this is LuDwig’s first game, and he roleclaimed early. Doubtless, if the Mafia were looking for something like this, it’d probably have taken them longer to have formulated a plan this crazy. So my (currently) final verdict on LuDwig-? Actually a Detective—sanity still unknown. MooCow… not sure. He returned with the same result as LuDwig-, though I highly doubt he’s a DT right now since that means for four information roles if everybody was legit… Though he did claim a lot later than LuDwig-, (under the premise of “I wanted to see if he would slip up”—which is slightly illogical in itself since it was the first day) so I think the chance of him being the Bomberman is quite high. Or perhaps I’ve been shenaniganed and he is a Veteran (Incognito, I would give you a pouty face if this were the case!)… or even a Vigilante. But seriously, Mad Hatter > Vigilante for Incognito and Qatol. Another kicker—we can’t be sure if meeple actually watched or not, since he did not announce results. But I want to assume he’s the Watcher. If he isn’t, I’m sure we can tie him down in the future. And this was a compilation of my loose thoughts. After the first night, there are still too many “ifs” for me to want to put myself in a certain, deadlocked, mindset. As for a lynch target, it’d be… okay… to lynch AFJ to ascertain partial sanity choices for our “Detectives.” Since it’s Day 2, I still don’t think there’d be too much scumtell appearing, though I think we can obviously see that Mafia are hiding amongst the green. Too much of a conspiracy if it were the blues. Who wants more? | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 14 2010 03:48 L wrote: MooCow, you kinda stole flamewheel from me, so I'll comment on your analysis. Flamewheel's actions don't look like he's me-tooing seeing as there have been some important decisions that he's been in on at a fairly early stage. Instead it looks like he's trying to keep his head down while still contributing a bit. Flamewheel might have modded a few games, but people don't expect him to singlehandedly drive games forward like radfield and I, so if he was mafia he'd probably have been safe doing exclusively stupid shit like getting people to call him cute. If I'd be able to guess, I'd say that he might be one of the blue roles that hasn't said anything yet. If he's green then maybe that's a tell that he suffers from a lack of motivation during his non-role games. Anyways, back to writing on foolishness. Oh L, remember Micro-Mafia II? | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 14 2010 06:41 Foolishness wrote: Show nested quote + On June 14 2010 04:37 flamewheel wrote: Why do I think we have a Hatter? At this point, I think it seems logical. I haven’t seen a standard game yet without some form of extraneous town KP, and the situation right now can boil down to Hatter or Veteran. Maybe there’s both and somebody claimed Townie? Entirely plausible. However, know that I requested Veteran before the game started—the plan was to cause a lot of ruckus to get the Mafia to try to slap me at night, though that request could not be entertained. So what does that mean? It means either somebody else more important got Veteran (though I don’t believe Incognito offered others a choice?) or that there are no Veterans due to balancing issue. The more I think about it, the less likely there is to be a Veteran. Mafia only have 1KP (plus a potential Day Vigi) so a Veteran is a huge deterrence, especially after the day comes about and actions are sorted out when the Veteran claims the hit. WHOA WHOA WHOA! So you requested Veteran and got denied. That's great and all. Hey for any non vets out there, did you know that you could request roles before the game starts? I sure didn't. Hey Incognito, why didn't you PM me and ask me if I wanted a certain role? Show nested quote + On June 14 2010 04:37 flamewheel wrote: It means either somebody else more important got Veteran At this point, everyone is more important than you. "waa waaaa I'm upset I didn't get the role I wanted waaa". Nobody needs to hear your QQ about not getting a "good" role. And now your assumption that "oh well I didn't get that role somebody else must have gotten it because I'm special" now just makes you sound like a pompous player. Thanks for your contribution there, it really opened my eyes on the current town situation and I feel like I have a better understanding of what's going on. Oh, can you PLEEEEAAAASSSEEE ask more questions in your posts? I honestly enjoy when someone feigns contribution by writing a bunch of rhetorical questions/possibilities that have already been discussed in the thread. NOBODY CARES. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 14 2010 07:15 L wrote: Show nested quote + On June 14 2010 07:12 Radfield wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 14 2010 06:41 Foolishness wrote: Show nested quote + On June 14 2010 04:37 flamewheel wrote: Why do I think we have a Hatter? At this point, I think it seems logical. I haven’t seen a standard game yet without some form of extraneous town KP, and the situation right now can boil down to Hatter or Veteran. Maybe there’s both and somebody claimed Townie? Entirely plausible. However, know that I requested Veteran before the game started—the plan was to cause a lot of ruckus to get the Mafia to try to slap me at night, though that request could not be entertained. So what does that mean? It means either somebody else more important got Veteran (though I don’t believe Incognito offered others a choice?) or that there are no Veterans due to balancing issue. The more I think about it, the less likely there is to be a Veteran. Mafia only have 1KP (plus a potential Day Vigi) so a Veteran is a huge deterrence, especially after the day comes about and actions are sorted out when the Veteran claims the hit. WHOA WHOA WHOA! So you requested Veteran and got denied. That's great and all. Hey for any non vets out there, did you know that you could request roles before the game starts? I sure didn't. Hey Incognito, why didn't you PM me and ask me if I wanted a certain role? Show nested quote + On June 14 2010 04:37 flamewheel wrote: It means either somebody else more important got Veteran At this point, everyone is more important than you. "waa waaaa I'm upset I didn't get the role I wanted waaa". Nobody needs to hear your QQ about not getting a "good" role. And now your assumption that "oh well I didn't get that role somebody else must have gotten it because I'm special" now just makes you sound like a pompous player. Thanks for your contribution there, it really opened my eyes on the current town situation and I feel like I have a better understanding of what's going on. Oh, can you PLEEEEAAAASSSEEE ask more questions in your posts? I honestly enjoy when someone feigns contribution by writing a bunch of rhetorical questions/possibilities that have already been discussed in the thread. I imagine that because flamewheel hosts so many games, he got a special bonus from a fellow host. Not a big deal. More importantly, after being mostly inactive since midway through the first day, why are you focusing on this and not more pressing matters? Because he wanted to make a post that appears to have content but doesn't. Does anyone know how to use TL's search to find all of someone's posts in a certain thread? Would make this much easier for me. Still waiting for your bit on the inactive Foolishness, L. I like how he won't be around for 48 hours but only steps up to attack my post without offering anything himself. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Chezinu's question is interesting though... | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
I have nothing new to add at this point. Will be back hopefully with a few hours before voting ends to mark some analysis and cast a vote... | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Well, inactivity lynch I believe. Foolishness, you're a bro. L, you're also a bro. AFJ is also a bro. Will be back before deadline, marking up my vote on a random inactive just in case. Vivi57 or RebirthOfLeGenD? Both are too damn inactive, just like in every other game. Lots to think about again. I haven't seen RoL, but Vivi promised us some pbpa. Until I see that, my inactivity vote goes there. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Foolishness, why would you want to kill me :< | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
![]() One of them I was lynched for "talking too much." The other one was XVI, where I just flailed around like a chicken with my head cut off. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Korynne hasn't been keeping up with this thread, heh. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 15 2010 10:01 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: Show nested quote + On June 15 2010 10:00 Foolishness wrote: On June 15 2010 09:59 meeple wrote: I'm so glad so many are around that we can swap like this... Yeah...I remember last time I tried to pull off a vote switch as mafia only half my team showed up for it... ##Slap foolishness We should really start having IRC games sometime. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 15 2010 10:23 Foolishness wrote: We need to pick someone for DTs to inspect. We also need to actually kill the person they inspect to try to figure out sanities, as this will also confirm AcrossFiveJulys for certain. From the remaining pool, I of course would like flamewheel inspected. Now I realize that some people may be against inspecting such a cute player, so I'd be cool with redtooth as well. Radfield has also been suspiciously absent as of late. I'll volunteer for inspection, and lynching as well if it will help uncover some truths, though your other two names do have merit. Depending on what I can reason about LuDwig- (to be posted tonight), it will be helpful to lynch whomever is inspected if we're deadlocked. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 15 2010 11:50 Foolishness wrote: Show nested quote + On June 15 2010 11:36 meeple wrote: mmm... on the other note... about who to dt check tonight... perhaps Chez is a better option. redtooth did make that post earlier questioning L... and his inactivity is a common theme in games I've played with him. Is there anyone who's averse to checking Chez? I'd rather check flamewheel. He wants to get checked himself and wants to die. He hasn't even posted anything beneficial to the town yet. Something to note about this: L early game kept making promises about doing analysis and never delivered until right before he died. He pushed for people to contribute to the town without doing so himself. This is awfully a lot like what flamewheel is doing as well. Both players are genuinely active, yet never contributing to the town....and both promise analysis but take days to deliver on it. On June 15 2010 11:59 Foolishness wrote: Show nested quote + On June 15 2010 11:54 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: I say stick with flamewheel too. Although his story adds up (he wants to die, says he sacrifices himself to be lynched since he'll be busy with TL article writing soon) it would also be a pretty good move for getting us not to lynch him since he appears townie. Also, I've been in PM contact with chez (as most people have I'd imagine?) and he's responded logically (albeit cryptically in his own way) to most of the things I've brought up via PM. I don't think chez is mafia, but I'm not completely sure obviously. Hey by the way that's usually a tell-tale mafia sign. Done now, hopefully OSL newspost readers will like it tomorrow. Go ahead, do the check and do the lynching--I don't mind. If I'm useless, you might as well get some use out of my carcass. And no, I'm not being sarcastic, nor is this a case of reverse psychology. We'll see the results um...about 70.5 hours from now ![]() | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 15 2010 13:33 Foolishness wrote: Show nested quote + On June 15 2010 12:34 flamewheel wrote: On June 15 2010 11:50 Foolishness wrote: On June 15 2010 11:36 meeple wrote: mmm... on the other note... about who to dt check tonight... perhaps Chez is a better option. redtooth did make that post earlier questioning L... and his inactivity is a common theme in games I've played with him. Is there anyone who's averse to checking Chez? I'd rather check flamewheel. He wants to get checked himself and wants to die. He hasn't even posted anything beneficial to the town yet. Something to note about this: L early game kept making promises about doing analysis and never delivered until right before he died. He pushed for people to contribute to the town without doing so himself. This is awfully a lot like what flamewheel is doing as well. Both players are genuinely active, yet never contributing to the town....and both promise analysis but take days to deliver on it. On June 15 2010 11:59 Foolishness wrote: On June 15 2010 11:54 AcrossFiveJulys wrote: I say stick with flamewheel too. Although his story adds up (he wants to die, says he sacrifices himself to be lynched since he'll be busy with TL article writing soon) it would also be a pretty good move for getting us not to lynch him since he appears townie. Also, I've been in PM contact with chez (as most people have I'd imagine?) and he's responded logically (albeit cryptically in his own way) to most of the things I've brought up via PM. I don't think chez is mafia, but I'm not completely sure obviously. Hey by the way that's usually a tell-tale mafia sign. Done now, hopefully OSL newspost readers will like it tomorrow. Go ahead, do the check and do the lynching--I don't mind. If I'm useless, you might as well get some use out of my carcass. And no, I'm not being sarcastic, nor is this a case of reverse psychology. We'll see the results um...about 70.5 hours from now ![]() Give us someone better to check then. Uh... How am I supposed to make it more clear? Check me. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
As for Detectives: you have the checks right? Choose a set time to release them (so there's no potential copying) and do so. Lynch me today if you want to check that. Of course, like I said I was roleblocked so the possibility of a Detective being a Mafia roleblocker still exists. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 17 2010 08:43 Foolishness wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2010 08:24 Qatol wrote: On June 16 2010 23:13 meeple wrote: On June 16 2010 21:16 Korynne wrote: Guys, you can vote for ending the day early. I have not decided how this will work yet and whether I will end the day early, but let me know your opinions so I can make a better decision later. Thank you. I would end it if there is a unanimous vote... which there is (other than ludwig...)... and I'm pretty sure the next vote will be unanimous as well... I would argue that as long as you have a majority of players agree to end it early and those players are also all voting for the same person to be lynched, then you can end the day early. I would also say for future use, that the person for whom the town is voting for must be given a chance to defend them self. As long as the person knows they are going to be lynched the day can end early. Well, still have to wait for everybody to vote in order to avoid modkills, no? So I'd still say that everybody has to have at least cast a vote. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
| ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 17 2010 10:21 MooCow wrote: Hmmm as I said before and did an analysis of Flamewheel I thought he was suspicious. in Flamewheel last post here he uses the word "concede" and Korynne also uses that word. This might be clutching at straws a bit but maybe Flamewheel pm'd her and she just wrote that pretty quickly without thinking. This might be a bit hard to understand due to my bad explaining but hopefully someone gets it. Uh, I've argued with her for two days now about whether or not the last person should concede to save us all time. I'm also fairly certain that the last few games in which the Mafia have given up somebody's "conceded." | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Also we don't know if it's redtooth or not still. 88 posts in the last week, barely any here. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Also too many information roles. ![]() On June 18 2010 10:27 MooCow wrote: VICTORY HORN!! ![]() =.= | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Rain Dota 2![]() Calm ![]() Jaedong ![]() Sea ![]() Bisu ![]() Horang2 ![]() BeSt ![]() Stork ![]() ZerO ![]() ToSsGirL ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends |
Kung Fu Cup
WardiTV Qualifier
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
GSL Code S
Cure vs sOs
Reynor vs Solar
OSC
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Maru vs TriGGeR
Rogue vs NightMare
The PondCast
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] OSC
Replay Cast
Online Event
CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
Chat StarLeague
PassionCraft
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Chat StarLeague
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Wardi Open
PiGosaur Monday
|
|