|
Also, I'm all for killing vile human beings, but the only thing I've said repeatedly all game is "Hay guyz lets kill Yellow Turbans mmk?" Therefore, I really doubt you'd have any issue with that... unless, of course, you were Yellow Turban yourself.
Hahaha, I just realized, instead of calling Scum on people this game, we can simply call them yellow (In the cowardly sense, not the racist sense).
So, sir, unless you want to throw some hard evidence behind your claim that I am a vile human being, you might have just flagged yourself as the Yellow Turban Leader.
Also, I did not know about the RNG at the time of that ONE post. Thanks for clarifying that for me, though!
|
On May 19 2010 10:18 BrownBear wrote: Also, I'm all for killing vile human beings, but the only thing I've said repeatedly all game is "Hay guyz lets kill Yellow Turbans mmk?" Therefore, I really doubt you'd have any issue with that... unless, of course, you were Yellow Turban yourself.
Hahaha, I just realized, instead of calling Scum on people this game, we can simply call them yellow (In the cowardly sense, not the racist sense).
So, sir, unless you want to throw some hard evidence behind your claim that I am a vile human being, you might have just flagged yourself as the Yellow Turban Leader.
Also, I did not know about the RNG at the time of that ONE post. Thanks for clarifying that for me, though! It had already been stated multiple times within the thread that the roles were ordered via RNG....That one post was on page fifteen...while it was thoroughly talked about on page 13 and 14, by L & Comrade Caller, and BC. You sir, are obvious. Flagged myself as the yellow turban leader? Bring your worst!
|
Is it me or is everyone's argument blatant WIFOM?
|
So I skimmed the thread, what's your point? You seem to have decided that one little slip-up means I am Yellow Turban, which is pretty silly, honestly.
You really would rather kill an active player than one of the many people who have not posted or voted yet? And you would point at the one person in this thread who's been the most vocal about targeting the Yellow Turbans first? I question your gamesense.
|
On May 19 2010 10:25 Hesmyrr wrote: Is it me or is everyone's argument blatant WIFOM?
Meh, actually a little bit. I retract my earlier statement, that was in the heat of the moment. He's probably not the YT leader... but I still question his decision-making skills
|
On May 19 2010 10:26 BrownBear wrote: So I skimmed the thread, what's your point? You seem to have decided that one little slip-up means I am Yellow Turban, which is pretty silly, honestly.
You really would rather kill an active player than one of the many people who have not posted or voted yet? And you would point at the one person in this thread who's been the most vocal about targeting the Yellow Turbans first? I question your gamesense. Yes. And if it weren't for you meddling kids and that dog....
I honestly don't care, I told you I wanna kill someone, and you seem overly useful in a useless portion of the game. You being active can be argued because you have a role (like faction leader). I'd be happy to place my intuition vs you. Except I wanna die second, because I'm right of course.
|
We shall see. I mean, right now Radfield looks poised to be given control on day 1, and he's already said he's going to be gunning for inactives/useless players, so it will probably end up being pointless as is. I'm just not seeing how, unless you are absolutely 100% convinced I'm the yellow turban faction leader (which I am not, I'm not even a faction leader. I'm just a regular old dude like you), you would want to kill an active player versus an inactive or useless one. So, 'splain that one to me please.
|
On May 19 2010 09:48 Fishball wrote: Just a side note, I personally think it would be more interesting if the players would be forced to stick with their leaders who recruited them till the end. At least there is (false?)sense of loyalty there, as that would be the one and only faction you will be trying to help to win.
Kinda curious though, based on our current scenario. If a leader recruits a DT or Assassin, he/she doesn't know what he/she recruited. The DT/Assassin also doesn't know he/she has been recruited. Now lets say the DT uses their abilities on player X. Player X comes out as Zhao Yun. Ok great, you've found Zhao Yun, but what does that means to you? What should you do? Tell your leader? You don't even know who that person is. Tell the general public? For what? He might even be on your faction already. Same thing can be applied to the assassin. What is the purpose of using your ability? Unless you just want to randomly kill people, there really isn't any "purpose" in general.
Did I miss something here? How do we know that there are DTs and Assassins in this game? Was this all just hypothetical? If so, what's the point?
|
On May 19 2010 11:16 Scamp wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2010 09:48 Fishball wrote: Just a side note, I personally think it would be more interesting if the players would be forced to stick with their leaders who recruited them till the end. At least there is (false?)sense of loyalty there, as that would be the one and only faction you will be trying to help to win.
Kinda curious though, based on our current scenario. If a leader recruits a DT or Assassin, he/she doesn't know what he/she recruited. The DT/Assassin also doesn't know he/she has been recruited. Now lets say the DT uses their abilities on player X. Player X comes out as Zhao Yun. Ok great, you've found Zhao Yun, but what does that means to you? What should you do? Tell your leader? You don't even know who that person is. Tell the general public? For what? He might even be on your faction already. Same thing can be applied to the assassin. What is the purpose of using your ability? Unless you just want to randomly kill people, there really isn't any "purpose" in general. Did I miss something here? How do we know that there are DTs and Assassins in this game? Was this all just hypothetical? If so, what's the point? Wow, that is a very sneaky way to ask question. How would people answer your question without giving too much information about themselves. But by this, I am pretty sure that you are a major player (either Yellow Turban or a faction leader).
|
|
On May 19 2010 12:01 LunarDestiny wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2010 11:16 Scamp wrote:On May 19 2010 09:48 Fishball wrote: Just a side note, I personally think it would be more interesting if the players would be forced to stick with their leaders who recruited them till the end. At least there is (false?)sense of loyalty there, as that would be the one and only faction you will be trying to help to win.
Kinda curious though, based on our current scenario. If a leader recruits a DT or Assassin, he/she doesn't know what he/she recruited. The DT/Assassin also doesn't know he/she has been recruited. Now lets say the DT uses their abilities on player X. Player X comes out as Zhao Yun. Ok great, you've found Zhao Yun, but what does that means to you? What should you do? Tell your leader? You don't even know who that person is. Tell the general public? For what? He might even be on your faction already. Same thing can be applied to the assassin. What is the purpose of using your ability? Unless you just want to randomly kill people, there really isn't any "purpose" in general. Did I miss something here? How do we know that there are DTs and Assassins in this game? Was this all just hypothetical? If so, what's the point? Wow, that is a very sneaky way to ask question. How would people answer your question without giving too much information about themselves. But by this, I am pretty sure that you are a major player (either Yellow Turban or a faction leader). It's easy enough to assume that someone has a role. Did you all really assume there would be only faction leaders and plain townies? I almost always expect a dt/medic/vet role...But yeah....
|
|
Yeah but why expect roles like all the other mafia games when this one is clearly different?
Also I'm totally a major player in this game. My questions are simply way too sneaky.
|
On May 19 2010 12:55 Scamp wrote: Yeah but why expect roles like all the other mafia games when this one is clearly different?
Also I'm totally a major player in this game. My questions are simply way too sneaky. Then shouldn't you be staying low. A page back, people were talking about killing the big 4 and having a townee victory.
|
jeez im going to have to catch up on this later i have been getting pms, so as that is legal, feel free to pm me i will reply when i have more time and have refreshed up on my knowledge of the topics being discussed
|
posting ur role pm is a bad idea by which i mean its bannable
just so you know ^_^
|
On May 19 2010 14:30 Caller wrote: posting ur role pm is a bad idea by which i mean its bannable
just so you know ^_^
I GET IT ALREADY OK JEEZ
|
On May 19 2010 14:30 Caller wrote: posting ur role pm is a bad idea by which i mean its bannable
just so you know ^_^
oyay someone decided to ask before attempting to post.
Anyway, where is everyone?
|
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
|
+ Show Spoiler +On May 19 2010 05:16 Abenson wrote: Announcement: I don't care about anything right now. and so should you (not care)
Why? We are not really part of any clan/army right now, and therefore there is no point to us trying to do anything at all. Eliminating the Yellows sounds like a good plan, but it doesn't really benefit us. We, as regular townies, don't care about the politics right now Therefore I will simply un-vote and watch what happens (and occasionally spam) On May 19 2010 05:21 Tricode wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2010 06:08 Caller wrote:
Voting rules: 6. Voting is mandatory. You may NOT abstain. 7. Majority voting is not in effect. Inactivity If you sign up for this game you better be posting and voting at least once every day and night cycle. If you don’t I will annihilate your prefecture with some kind of natural disaster. And then ban you permanently from any of my games.
lol, owned
On May 19 2010 06:08 Hesmyrr wrote:Okay, guys. Show nested quote +On May 19 2010 04:50 Caller wrote: a) no, they don't even know that they are recruited. The only one that gets any confirmation is the leader. This is critical. The fact you don't even know which side you are working for - and I promise you nobody but YT will inform the "victim" of their target - is highly disadvantageous for us neutrals. Hell, you may be playing game as usual when BAM! faction leader being an idiot gets himself killed, and who suffers for it? Us! Do you want to suffer such ignominy? I tell you not! Eighteen other neutrals listening to my voice, ponder my speech. I will tell you of an way out. We will rebel against the injustice and wrestle control of the game out of these so-called leader's grasps. I propose... NEUTRAL REVOLUTIONTake note of the winning condition Caller has listed: Show nested quote +On May 11 2010 15:23 Caller wrote: i should probably specify that when i say outnumber all other groups, i mean that one group has more than 50% of the total player population. You know what this means? Even when there is one faction leader remaining, as long as he doesn't overwhelm us, he can't win. Let's pull a Battler and turn around the chessboard. What do you see? I see a four cult game, with us neutrals as Townies.Let me stress that. OUR PRIORITY AS NEUTRALS IS TO HUNT DOWN THE FOUR FACTION LEADERS, AND KILL THEM ALL. THEN IT WILL BE "TOWN" VICTORY, SINCE NEUTRALS (TOWN) IS THE ONLY FACTION REMAINING.This plan is beneficial for all of us, this is the plan that makes sense, and this is EXACTLY what we should be doing. Neutrals, we are no longer neutrals. We are now comrades fighting for mutual victory, struggling against the tyranny of the cults awaiting us. Hereby I dedicate myself into finding, and killing, all the leader in this game. Who agrees with me?!?!?
Very good post, Hes. I will be voting for you if I'm alive unless something changes.
On May 19 2010 06:32 BrownBear wrote: I see it as less of a four-cult game, and more of a two-stage game, since one cult is obviously much more powerful than the other three.
I completely agree with Brownbear here. We definitely would benefit from eliminating the yellow turbans early.
On May 19 2010 07:53 L wrote: Are people intentionally being idiots?
Does a bear shit in the woods?
I would like to stress that BloodyC0bbler is a great target to be the yellow turban leader.
|
|
|
|