|
On March 15 2010 17:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
swapping my vote off abenson, as people have given almost no reason why they are following my vote on him, let alone the fact my case wasn't strong. Moving to malongo with incog
wtf is this shyt. you get a bandwagon going on someone and then change your vote without calling for others to change their vote as well? when you're the reason many of them are voting that way?
we should be lynching you for being the most worthless mayor.
|
On March 15 2010 23:24 Abenson wrote:
Hello, I am back and have gotten caught up with the whole thing.
I have realized that I am to be lynched if this goes on, but I think this is wrong.
This is because:
a) I have shown no obvious signs of being mafia so far, other than inactivity. I am still in high school and it's currently march break, so I'm generally off somewhere or playing Starcraft with my friends.
b) I, as myself, would not like to be lynched.
c) As someone have said, nobody has come to defend me yet, this means that the mafia or anyone isn't trying hard to save me. Therefore I think this is sufficient proof that I have nobody working with me.
d) As for the "dt's post their results" is because I think that it is perfectly logical; And also I really have nothing better to post at the time and wanted to contribute.
Finally, I would like to say that lynching someone simply because of lack of candidate is generally a bad idea. It is wasting valuable lynches and plus I haven't really done anything that is suspicious.
the only time a DT should step forward is if they found a red. if they didn't, then there is no reason for them to put themselves in the limelight.
|
On March 16 2010 02:31 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Let's have a look how many people are attacking BC. Is he really that suspicious, or should we be taking a look at two people that have taken to trying to say he is worthless. That's bad for unity people.
who else said he's worthless? don't be grouping me up with anyone else, yo.
and fcuk unity, wth is this the special olympics? are we in a queen latifah video? you don't get points just for trying, this isn't high school phys ed. loser.
i think BC is playing shady, i think it's shady he was the last viable candidate in the pool for mayor and he somehow won with a convenient DT claim, and i think it's shady he still hasn't posted concrete info to prove he is in a fact a DT. all in all, there's quite a bit of trees in here, and i'm looking for the sunlight.
|
oh, and, i wasn't TRYING to say he was worthless. i said it. bada bing.
|
also abenson, he's the other major lynch candidate (besides yourself) so pointing a finger in his direction is good for you.
makes sense, just don't pretend that that's not a factor.
|
umm, i've already voted, asswipe.
|
On March 16 2010 06:37 L wrote:I wanted to see if you were around. Look at that. You are.
next time you want my attention, just lift your skirt up a bit. that always does the trick 
|
wait, L's a girl? that makes my joke not as much fun : (
|
On March 16 2010 08:18 Incognito wrote:
Back. So Versatile doesn't want to talk in pms, and she doesn't want to offer anything substantial in the thread too. Whats up? If you want to talk in thread here you have it. Its probably too late to talk about lynch candidates, so what do you think of BC? I am personally suspicious of his list he posted. Where most of the targets seem to lack any substantial reasoning. What do you think?
ah, good job. i wanted you to state publicly that you are suspicious of BC, instead of "trying to collect intel" behind the scenes. the more of the game that is in the open, the better for the town. hoarding information isn't useful, and it's important to keep everyone as involved in the game as possible, among the many other benefits.
my top suspect is BC, and that's who i think the town should lynch.
my reasoning being, he's playing horribly as not only a vet, but a vet who is also our mayor. no vet runs for mayor and is this inactive and this unhelpful if they're unless they've got some serious IRL things going on, and BC has said nothing of the sort yet.
in my book, being a retarded player is enough to get you lynched in most cases. being a retarded mayor is enough to get you lynched each and every time.
i also think that are seriously weak cases for every one of the people up for lynching this round. i wouldn't vote to lynch any of them, as i'm sure they're going to pop up green. i would rather not have a lynch than kill a townie.
|
On March 16 2010 08:34 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2010 04:08 citi.zen wrote:On March 16 2010 03:58 Versatile wrote:On March 16 2010 02:31 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Let's have a look how many people are attacking BC. Is he really that suspicious, or should we be taking a look at two people that have taken to trying to say he is worthless. That's bad for unity people.
who else said he's worthless? don't be grouping me up with anyone else, yo. and fcuk unity, wth is this the special olympics? are we in a queen latifah video? you don't get points just for trying, this isn't high school phys ed. loser. i think BC is playing shady, i think it's shady he was the last viable candidate in the pool for mayor and he somehow won with a convenient DT claim, and i think it's shady he still hasn't posted concrete info to prove he is in a fact a DT. all in all, there's quite a bit of trees in here, and i'm looking for the sunlight. Yeah, the ~Opz~ post was weird. "Unity" and too much shared information among unproven people is a bad thing. Everyone needs to play carefully until we get a breakthrough of some sort, either by catching a red or from the DT(s). When 4 people come a long and instantly pick shit with one person it just seems like they are trying to incite the mob of inactive townies to go after him. If Versatile and Foolishness equal mob, and go after BC by just saying he isn't doing anything, I think that's suspicious. Why not just pick some other random townie that ran for mayor to make a plan? Why put it on the guy that claimed dt? If he's truthful about dt it would make sense for the mob to want to attempt to get him distrusted. Kk? Get it now? Their are other suspicious people on here, let's look at them.
*looks up and sees "united states" besides opz*
learn the difference between they're, their, and there before you type my name again, please and thanks. you're a disgrace to the american school system.
|
On March 16 2010 09:01 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2010 08:39 Incognito wrote:On March 16 2010 08:34 ~OpZ~ wrote:On March 16 2010 04:08 citi.zen wrote:On March 16 2010 03:58 Versatile wrote:On March 16 2010 02:31 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Let's have a look how many people are attacking BC. Is he really that suspicious, or should we be taking a look at two people that have taken to trying to say he is worthless. That's bad for unity people.
who else said he's worthless? don't be grouping me up with anyone else, yo. and fcuk unity, wth is this the special olympics? are we in a queen latifah video? you don't get points just for trying, this isn't high school phys ed. loser. i think BC is playing shady, i think it's shady he was the last viable candidate in the pool for mayor and he somehow won with a convenient DT claim, and i think it's shady he still hasn't posted concrete info to prove he is in a fact a DT. all in all, there's quite a bit of trees in here, and i'm looking for the sunlight. Yeah, the ~Opz~ post was weird. "Unity" and too much shared information among unproven people is a bad thing. Everyone needs to play carefully until we get a breakthrough of some sort, either by catching a red or from the DT(s). When 4 people come a long and instantly pick shit with one person it just seems like they are trying to incite the mob of inactive townies to go after him. If Versatile and Foolishness equal mob, and go after BC by just saying he isn't doing anything, I think that's suspicious. Why not just pick some other random townie that ran for mayor to make a plan? Why put it on the guy that claimed dt? If he's truthful about dt it would make sense for the mob to want to attempt to get him distrusted. Kk? Get it now? Their are other suspicious people on here, let's look at them. So who exactly are these "suspicious people"? I've done said how I felt about BC getting assailed. While Zona is right, his first goal should be to find a red. He has a point. Cobbler doesn't need to build a town circle. He's the fucking mayor. And protected. He is his own mouth, so he should be checking and speaking, not the other way around. I just found that Versatile and Foolishness, attempting to incite doubt this early was suspicious. BC's own list was rather suspicious, as I was the only person on the list that he went all out on trying to pin as mafia. He's wrong, but I can't prove that myself. Well I suppose him trying to pin me as mafia would make since for him to check me then right? Lol. Why didn't he check me if he already thought I was the most suspicious looking person. Now that I'm thinking about it...If I was suspicious to you (which like I said, BC went all out trying to implicate me), and you are fully protected so you can post if you find a red yourself, why wouldn't you check me. I would never have been voted as GF. -_-...Anyway...No. I just found versatile and foolishness trying to start a riot that early into the day at Cobbler suspicious. Versatile's disappearance after the first day was another big thing to me. But she doesn't post much, right? Lol.
here's the thing, dumbass. i'm a pretty smart person. i don't think you know that, so i figured i'd tell you. anywho, even if i were half as smart as i really am, let's say, at the same intelligence level as you for example, i still would not doing ANYTHING in concert with a member of my mafioso family. dur.
and what is this disappearance thing you keep bringing up? i was gone for a little bit but i've been pretty damn active ever since, more active than you in fact. i'm making a genuine attempt to be here for the town. in any case, stop trying to misrepresent my posting style.
also, i've been attacked by 4-5 people already this game-- now, how likely is it 4-5 separate townies all decided to focus some of their energy on me? maybe 2-3, sure. but more than that is very unlikely.
lastly, i'm glad to see your finally questioning your allegiance to BC. i've already outlines why i think BC is shady, feel free to ask me some more about it if you like.
|
On March 16 2010 09:28 Zona wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2010 09:15 Versatile wrote:
my top suspect is BC, and that's who i think the town should lynch.
my reasoning being, he's playing horribly as not only a vet, but a vet who is also our mayor. no vet runs for mayor and is this inactive and this unhelpful if they're unless they've got some serious IRL things going on, and BC has said nothing of the sort yet.
in my book, being a retarded player is enough to get you lynched in most cases. being a retarded mayor is enough to get you lynched each and every time.
While I agree with you in part, you forgot to mention that he claimed DT: lynching a claimed DT this early in the game is a really bad idea, and I do not like that you suggested it. Show nested quote +On March 16 2010 09:15 Versatile wrote:
i also think that are seriously weak cases for every one of the people up for lynching this round. i wouldn't vote to lynch any of them, as i'm sure they're going to pop up green. i would rather not have a lynch than kill a townie. I do agree the cases right now are pretty weak, but this is day 2. But it's almost always better to have a lynch even if we lynch wrong, because lynching gains information with which the town can use to evaluate how people have accused and voted in the past. I also don't like when people say "I'm afraid we'll lynch a townie" because it's something mafia might say, as they know before the lynch whether or not it's a good one for the town. Of course newbie town members will often be unhappy/worry about lynching town members, but apparently you're a respected player here so perhaps more should be expected of you?
part 1: how do you feel about lynch a supposed DT mayor who has not been active? seriously, think about it. if you were DT and mayor, what would you be doing? he is not being active. he is not leading. he isn't doing anything DT mayor would do, at least not from what i've seen in thread. you're talking about expecting more from me, how about expecting more from the head of the town?
part 2: true we learn information, and that's useful, but imo, it's pretty clear we're not lynching a mafia member. there hasn't been any push to save anyone or change up votes. there hasn't been anything to even hint that the mafia is worried about losing a member, unless incog follows through on the pardon, which he should NOT. the town's decision should go through, no matter how much anyone may disagree with it. in any case, there will be a lynch and we'll get this information you want.
and i don't know about being a respected player, i mostly just make fun of people and call them politically incorrect names. but thanks ^_^
|
zona, you should hurry up and vote so you're not modkilled.
|
malongo has been pretty inactive, but i just assumed he was still dealing with things because of the earthquake. i think he was planning on being active, why else would he run for mayor?
oh well, post should be up soon-ish.
|
|
|
lmao. the relationship between L and BM is that of the drunkard and abused significant other. BM just won't stop going back for more.
ps: ace is not black, has never been to NYC, and can't even spell caribbean.
|
|
|
|
|
zona- do the math. if BC (plus town) doesn't find a mafia member by day 4, worse case scenario, where the medics don't prevent any hits and we lynch a town member every day, we're 11 v 5. that's 6 successful mafia hits in 3 nights, and 3 towny lynches. now imagine BC is mafia. a DT who hasn't found a red for 3 days, that's not completely impossible, right? that's 11 vs 7 votes, and since when has the town ever voted to together as one?
also, note that this doesn't take possible vigi hits into count, against town or mafia.
we need action way before day 4, and this next day is going to be an important one.
|
ummm, no @ BM.
i agree with whoever said malongo being red was luck. he wasn't even playing.
as for our next lynch target: town, if you don't recognize that someone between BC, L and incog is mafia, i will once again have to refer to the collective as a bunch of dingbats.
clearly, something is not adding up. at least one of them is mafia. and if we lynch one of them, we're guaranteed a red popping up.
my suggestion would be BC. and if incog threatens to pardon, we should kill incog first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
