TL Mafia XV
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Anyone want to explicate that train wreck? I think it means that... when a non-sane DT is checked by a sane DT the role returned is a random one instead of DT? That seems wrong. Please explain. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 21 2009 03:23 Qatol wrote: What it means is if any form of insane DT checks a player who appears as "blue" to them, they get a random blue role back. However, when a sane DT checks a player with a blue role, they get the real role. Does a drugged DT get the correct blue role if they check a blue? If an insane DT checks the same person (that they perceive as blue) twice, is it possible they would get two different blue roles back or will they always see the same blue role attached to that person? | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 21 2009 12:43 Caller wrote: The only one you haven't overdone yet is killing Pyrrhuloxia everyday. >:-( | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Reasons to vote for me: 1. I won't lynch BC day one for no logical reason (already puts me above RebirthofLegend and Tricode). 2. I'm a Khan fan. Cheer me up with a sign of support before I have to go on suicide watch. Look at my picture up there. I'm about to drown my sorrows with either way too much absinthe or a shotgun unless my toss-playing bird bud kicks in into gear or you show me some lovin'. 3. I've got skillz; check my sig. winningstreak++ incoming. 4. ...ooʇ 'uʍop ǝpısdn ǝʇıɹʍ uɐɔ ı Plans: We choose the Day 2 Lynch on Day 1 (we can vote in this thread). The DTs will check that person Night 1 and get information from their death. I don't think the DTs should guess right after that (the flaw that Incognito found in his plan, I think), but it will narrow things down quite a bit for them. I don't think Qatol/Ver should have a problem with this. Day 1 Lynch will be the most inactive person. I feel this is necessary given the lack of clues. If everyone has posted, the most inactive person has to involve looking at quality of posts, not just number, because we don't want to reward spamming. As for the Medic/DT check list, I think they will naturally come together. The Medic list covers the players that would otherwise die soon if innocent (a.k.a. "good" players), who are also people the DTs are likely to check. At this point I'd say a list of 4 would be the best balance between too small and too large for a list. I'd name: Pyrrhuloxia (lol Modesty) L Ace BloodyC0bbler | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Essentially, it seems slightly contradictory to use DTs to keep people alive while saying DTs are supposed to check dead people. Granted, the medic list contains people who the mafia want dead (and I'd guess at least one mafia). | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 22 2009 12:39 BloodyC0bbler wrote: With this game we come to a stall, so let me stop this stride we are in before we all become a thrall. the dt plan is sound, but with an idea I may astound. with a little thinking in advance we can rid this trance. A vet we do claim, for if they do not we are put to shame. A clever plan in this is inlaid, a dt can check him and start a brigade, Chances of more than one are so small, as ver and qatol would like to keep things on the ball. So dear friends, let us wait for the phrase, so that with the vet we may all praise, to arms i say, now let us pray shit you've been saying relevant things in these poems? now i have to go back and read the rest of them lol. Let's not forget that there may not even be 1 veteran... | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 22 2009 12:56 HeavOnEarth wrote: so pyrr the least active person is obviously motbob, will you confirm you will lynch motbob when you are elected? Yeah, I just double checked and you are right about motbob. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 22 2009 14:22 Caller wrote: i'm still going to lynch pyrrhuloxia if elected i have my reasons as you can see i am consistent which is always a good trait in a politician reasons being? Being secretive is not a great trait of politicians in Liquiville. That only works in Chicago. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 22 2009 22:09 Caller wrote: i think that people who vote for pyrrhuloxia are awfully suspicious right now i seem to recall that whenever he takes a leadership position he's almost always mafia or dead I don't remember ever winning an election... of course my long term memory is crap. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
We do need to figure out, as a town and ASAP, who we will kill Day 2 so the DTs can check. Some people are saying it should be Tricode but I'm not on that bandwagon. I don't have a better suspect, though. Scamp is acting like he has as mafia in the past but I'm not sure he's super active when innocent (maybe he hasn't been innocent?). Caller wants to kill me for no given reason. I think it might be helpful to have an informal poll in this thread about where we stand if nothing changes between now and Day 2 so that the detectives can be helped out, what do you think? At this point, I think it is very likely that the GF will choose to be a vet. If there is no vet, the GF will likely wait around a bit and then claim to be the only vet. This means, if we go with the vet claim plan, the vet needs to claim super fast, without hesitation. Don't do it before Day 2 begins, though, we don't want to help the mafia choose their day 1 hits. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
I am not to enthused about killing motbob; the threat of killing the most inactive person seems to have made most of the town active already... I have made a promise, but I'm not sure the other ideas are any better. L wants to kill Scamp but I think Scamp could be just about anything at this point. BC wants me to kill Ace or Caller but I think Ace is making good arguments and Caller might be an okay move but not if it comes out of nowhere. Tricode I don't think I can kill if he ends up as pardoner. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Nowhere am I seeing a reason why I should pass the info on to Ace specifically, it seems any 2 people would give us the ability to keep the info alive. Of course if I pass on to even 1 mafia, I could be dead along with the other innocent so maybe I should pass it on? Let's put this in perspective: None of our plans require a protected office holder - the vet plan and DT plans are independent of Ace and I. Neither of us have claimed DT or medic or anything. So if both BGs are red and Ace and I get killed and the names of the BGs die we are just back to having the same two people dead and having to find reds based on behavior. So if we hold on to the info we just lose a potential gain, and just lose a good player + me. Which is bad but giving the info to a mafia helps them bluesnipe by taking two potential names off the list. Even if the mafia know the BGs would they really want to kill them? I dunno. One thing I saw: If Ace is red, he couldn't really kill me and stay alive cuz the odds of the third party being mafia are low although if the 3rd part was and both bgs were red and ace was green that could be a train wreck. Dunno where I'm going with that but the next paragraph is the one that will actually have a point to it. Passing the info on helps town only if both bgs are red. If one bg is green then passing it on only increases the risk the reds get the other name. If both bgs are green then we'd want no one knowing, not even me, because passing it on just increases the risk the mafia can zero in on blues easier or kill leaders to spread havoc or... there was one other thing they could do with it but it just fell out of my brain. Well another important point I need to say at some point is to remind you that town can kill ace or I at any time, the mafia are just deprived the strategic option of killing us unless they know the names of BGs so again there is only the potential benefit lost of having two red names and then losing them (but they would be unlikely to hand us those names in the first place, see next paragraph). Now here is why I think that the BGs are actually probably both (or maybe 1) green. I would say double red is the least likely. If the mafia had known my thinking they would probably would have gone double red to but I don't think they thought this deep (TL Mafia is usually made up of level 1/2 moves I don't see many crazy plans because they are too risky and usually blow up if they ever do get played). This is a brand new and weird mechanic. I think the mafia would look at it and not be sure what to do with it and decide to play a normal game rather than hand over a list of two people with two reds on it to an innocent player. Sorry if that was awfully jumbled the sleep deprivation is finally getting to me but hopefully I will be on adderall soon so I can focus on things again lol. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 25 2009 11:27 L wrote: not passing on the info at all was.. a poor decision. can you tell us more about the behavioral clues without giving us names? or would it be too obvious? You're the one that was arguing along with me against Ace to not pass it on. WTF. One BG wanted me to not pass it on and another wanted me to pass it on to one person. I guess maybe that's suspicious but whatever we aren't dead yet we can figure it out now. I'm definitely not really focused on this game but whatever too late now I'll do my best. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
We could have helped him determine his sanity with the Motbob plan but he's sure of Motbob's innocence for no reason. We won't be able to check his sanity now because we'll be too afraid to kill someone who might be the medic. Judge won't be able to help because he can't come forward and say Ace is a liar unless he is a blue role other than Medic. If he is medic, than I guess he could privately claim blue to Ace but then he would want to publicly claim green or we lose the fucking medic but if he claims green publicly when blue than Ace's story gets out of whack and we lose our trust in the DT. I think we have to be more on guard against a fake DT this game because we can kill a few innocents and not prove shit about whether the DT is fake or not. Fuck, if push comes to shove and a fake DT gets called out on a shit ton of contradictions he can always just say he guessed his state wrong and blame it on someone else. As for passing on the info, I'd love to do that to a confirmed townie but I don't think it is worth it for anything less than that. I also find it really unlikely that if the bgs were mafia they wouldn't have killed us night 1. We keep BG names secret in normal games. I fail to see how spreading the names outweighs the risk, especially at this point. Ace roleclaimed DT before the end of Night 1 for god sakes. If both BGs are red and Ace isn't and they didn't hit us both last night then the reds must be confident that even as a DT he is better alive than dead. If there is at least one innocent BG (I'd put this well over 50% chance at this point, probably over 90%), then keeping the BGs secret is the optimal play. I'm trying to think of a reason for the reds to slow play a two BG set up and all of the reasons suck. Confirmed innocents are likely to happen relatively rapidly. Ace could become one soon. I am starting to think we don't have a vet but I will pass on the info if I find someone I feel I can trust. So I guess maybe Ace thinks that if Judge is medic then the mafia won't kill him for fear of confirming a BG protected DT? Maybe, but if so I better keep the BG names well hidden to protect Ace and I can give him the BG names once he's confirmed. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 25 2009 18:29 Ace wrote: and for fucking sakes read the OP and the thread. As long as I always publicly post what roles I find it doesn't matter. They have a KP of TWO. It'll be pretty hard for them to just up and easily kill judge. duh? If medics can protect themselves then yes. On October 25 2009 18:29 Ace wrote: Do you get it now? If you give me the names, I can role check them Nights 2 and 3. Judge has already flipped blue for me. Once I check them WHATEVER COLOR THEY FLIP VIRTUALLY GUARANTEES MY SANITY. Do. You. Understand? 'Fraid not. Why would you check more than one of the BGs? And you'd still have 2 possible sanities left as far as I can tell since you still don't know what Judge really is. [QUOTE]On October 25 2009 18:29 Ace wrote: Judge has flipped blue - doesn't matter if he's a medic or not none of us know my sanity. Mafia can't fucking kill him because if I check the BGs also it confirms my sanity by Night 2. [Quote] It does matter somewhat because unless you or judge are mafia is is confirmed that if Judge is blue, he's a medic. So they at least now would know they don't have to worry about hitting a vet or a less valuable blue. [QUOTE]On October 25 2009 18:29 Ace wrote: Bodyguards are gauranteed blue. If I rolecheck them it doesn't matter what color they flip. I know what color they should be. This eliminates 4 of the 6 possible DT combinations. How hard is this to understand? It isn't and all this stalling your doing just keeps making the case against you stronger. [/QUOTE] You haven't managed to jedi mind trick me out of wondering whether or not you are a DT or not in the first place by completely ignoring the issue. I don't see why you need both either. Anyway we can discuss it further there's no reason to get pissed off when DTs can't check during the day anyway. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Mafia Bodyguards, with the exception of the Godfather, show up as Mafia to Rolechecks oh shit I didn't realize that part. yet another reason I doubt we have two mafia bgs at this point. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Let's say they appear "red" to me. Same thing. However let's also say I keep rolechecking people and I never see another "red". Ever. Or I rolechecked someone, who appeared "green" to me, they ended up dying and flipped a BLUE role. Both bodyguards are Mafia because if they were really BLUE they should have appeared "green" to me, not "red" because a legit BLUE just died and flipped "green" to me. Earlier on you said you would know your sanity if you just checked the two bgs. But now you admit the caveats that I was having earlier. So why were you calling me retarded? Stop being an ass and maybe you will get the trust you are seeking. There would still have to be people dying or additional checks to figure out your sanity. Motbob wasn't inactive, stop trying that shit. As for motbob, posting one post about how you can't post is being inactive. No one else has been that quiet. Anyway I think we have enough going on to lynch on something other than inactivity so let's drop the motbob brouhaha but don't BM anyone for calling him inactive. if I was really Mafia I'd be an idiot for letting you know about the BG switch AND putting myself up to the magnifying glass Finally, after about a million condescending posts you decide to see the game from someone else's point of view and start addressing my original concerns (namely, why should I believe you?) rather than just assert you are a DT, state a plan based on you being a DT, and then bitch at me for not following the plan. However, this isn't super convincing. I don't know what you mean by "letting you know about the BG switch". Please clarify. It might be what I'm looking for, it might be irrelevant, but please clarify. As for putting yourself up to the looking glass, that can be said about any time mafia fakes a role claim. Obviously, they'd be wanting to draw attention to themselves to cause chaos and do as much damage as possible before they get killed. It was common sense that at that point you could trust me with the BG names because if both BGs are legit and ended up dying the next night then obviously who's the only person that could be Mafia? Me. We've already explained that if the mafia got ahold of the BGs, they could use the BG list to avoid hitting BGs just as much as they could use it to hit them. If the pardoner was red, why would the mafia want to kill the BGs? They'd probably want to see how many pardons they could get away with using without drawing too much suspicion. Plus, they'd want their elected member to be the loud one drawing attention to himself and swaying the town while the other stay silent, maybe by faking DT. And faking DT in this game is easier and more profitable than in most as I explained earlier. And what role check would be easier to fake than the BGs, since the mafia are guaranteed to know the roles of the BGs since they get to decide them in this ruleset? You mean you should go re-read Mafia 8 to see how Ace deals with DTs that can't be confirmed or DTs that accuse people without the ability to be proven. Both of which have already been bypassed this game. Ding-Dong is anyone home over there? Roles were revealed on death in that game so this situation is no better than in Mafia VIII; in fact, this situation is worse because of how much easier it is to fake DT here (for reasons explained above + sanity mechanic, etc.). Why would he bring attention to the fact that bodyguards can be subbed in? If he was was Mafia he would have kept that aspect quiet, hoping no one believed it. Oh so this is the argument I didn't understand earlier. In other words, mafia will always assume that no one reads the rules. Not persuasive. He also wouldn't have run for a role and just killed 2 possible innocents in office on Night 1 A big name mafia wouldn't run for a role? Why not? Big names get unwelcome attention if they survive too long without BG protection. I don't get the second part about "just killed 2 possible innocents in office on Night 1". He roleclaims DT on Day 2. He said he had a plan on Day 1 and wanted some critical information. He also supported the Vet idea. Why? If he was Mafia surely he'd want to kill the bodyguards if Pyrr gave him the info... Actually you roleclaimed night 1 and survived, suggesting the Bgs are innocent but why would the mafia put bgs in if they had a pardoner that could browbeat pyrr into handing the names over (which you were asking for before elevating to the DT claim). however he publicly roleclaimed on Day 2 and posted the result of his check. Damn. No Mafia fake claiming a DT would ever do that because now he is accountable on multiple fronts. Telling us the alignments of the BGs doesn't prove dick because the mafia know those alignments. Hence my suggestion to kill judge because then you would actually gain some progress towards finding your sanity if you are really a DT and if you aren't you will actually be accountable. If you are a real DT then killing a few innocents won't matter for shit cuz once we have you as a confirmed and protected DT it'll be gg no re. Now if both BGs are red we could run into trouble but I think I'll be able to pass the info on soon. Also if Ace was Mafia why hasn't he tried to accuse anyone by now, or lead the town to lynch an innocent? Because that would be hella suspicious at that point. We don't know motbob's alignment, but if it was red you'd be too busy saving guilty people to lynch an innocent. Conclusion: Ace may or may not be a DT. He either has a hard time seeing from the town's point of view or is faking shit. I will take this opporunity to role claim as Psychologist and let you know that Ace is a confirmed Asshole. Why are you so mean? :'( We made a great team last game... | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 26 2009 11:36 Ace wrote: That idea was not chosen. The idea was Vet confirmation. RoL has been bitching because I won't allow Motbob to die. I checked Judge and reveal it and now all of a sudden it's well why didn't you say to kil Judge? DURR. How many times do I have to tell you - no one is dying for confirmations. None. Unless there's a good argument for why someone should be lynched I'll pardon them. The Mafia have a measly KP of 2 and you're all hell bent on rolling people just because. Not happening. We chose BOTH ideas. They are not mutually exclusive in any way. And if we had stuck to both, we would have been fine if no vet came forward. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 26 2009 13:14 Incognito wrote: In addition, proving your "alignment" doesn't prove that you're a DT, as Pyrr pointed out. I dunno if this fits anything I said. I've been working on the assumption that Ace is either DT or red but I guess he could be green faking DT to get people to listen more closely to his accusations later. We did have a lot of greens fake blue the last two games (foolishness saying he knew a vig in the speed game, RoL/infundi a few games ago [infundi was medic faking vig]). I guess it could be an ego thing since he is supposedly never wrong. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 26 2009 16:12 Tricode wrote: I don't recall Ace saying he wanted to really lynch you guys. But my memory is fuzzy on it...maybe ROL but i don't recall to much of Ace actually suggesting or saying we should lynch any of you. Only some suspicion or giving his opinion about your abilities. Yeah that's correct he doesn't seem to want to lynch anybody. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 26 2009 13:21 SugiuraMidori wrote: It would be neat if all the DT's could find each-other out Given the number of players and blue roles possible, I am guessing there is one DT in this game. Last game that Ver ran (speed game) there was one more red than blue (3 vs. 2). I think after mayor, pardoner, and BGs, there will be no more than 4 blues. 3 could be possible given the extra blue roles in this game and the low KP. Because of the new rules for DT and the reappearance of the mad hatter, I'd guess we have one of each of them. If we have 3 blues, there is probably no vig due to the mad hatter's similar role. And also no vet since no one has claimed. If we have 4 blues, I'd guess no vet just based off of no vet claiming. I really don't see a situation where we have two DTs. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 27 2009 05:50 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: i think all the walls of text and hostility are making people scared to post Yeah we've been to mean | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 27 2009 08:03 SugiuraMidori wrote: Okay.. seriously guys.. Ace WANTS to get ModKilled.. he already said it.. so don't waste the lynch on him and get Vivi already, Ace can just have himself be ModKilled... Also, anyone that abstains is probably mafia, they shall all perish in the fires of hell. Yeah, there are probably 8 mafia members. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 27 2009 08:03 SugiuraMidori wrote: Okay.. seriously guys.. Ace WANTS to get ModKilled.. he already said it.. so don't waste the lynch on him and get Vivi already, Ace can just have himself be ModKilled.... It's called bluffing. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 26 2009 09:08 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: -------. Hey, who called it? [EDITED DUE TO MOD REQUEST] Time to stop the flaming and be friends; flaming only helps the mafia. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Nah, he's a nice guy I apologize. Sorry it turned out this way friend let us be nice now. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 27 2009 10:28 Tricode wrote: Well, my mind is going crazy with many curse words from what i just witnessed. Brilliant play. We should have waited! BTW people who voted for Ace Amber[LighT] Vivi57 RebirthOfLegend (from motbob) Shikyo And as Pyrr said, looks like most of our plans are dead. We might still have a dt out there, but after seeing the way we made Ace feel how welcomed that role is, let's see if he will be ever feeling free to jump out and help us directly with out us wondering if he is mafia. I know some of these guys have been under suspicion and should still be looked at closely. As far as a brilliant idea, I don't have any really right now, all i can think about is a few people who should be carefully considered for the next lynch and possibly a double lynch after that. That is my weak suggestion. I dunno, Ace was pissing a lot of people off I wouldn't be surprised if most or all of the mafia were hiding in the abstainers waiting to push ace up if anyone else caught fire. Anytime we have 8 abstainers we're probably gonna get fucked although if Ace was red then trying to save him would have probably just made things worse for the maf. Whatever, it's clear we need to come out of our sleepwalking state and wake up as a town and get organized/unified. Motbob's back and I don't think there's a DT that checked him so we should be talking about behavior analysis now. Right now I'm most suspicious of Chezinu. I dunno what this IRSC thing is but it seems to be a lot of fluff that's not helping town, changes votes a lot for superfluous reasons, etc. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 27 2009 12:09 L wrote: How do people feel about this statement? I mean, its kinda jumping the gun, but if they knew he wasn't mafia, they probably knew his roleclaim was legit and wanted him offed. Does that mean they'd vote for him? From the voter list, most of the people who voted have been fingered for suspicion earlier, but I'm not entirely certain that ensures that at least one is mafia. Well they obviously wanted him offed. I suppose its tough to say. If the first few people to vote for Ace were innocent they wouldn't have had to vote for him because of all the abstainers. Or maybe they freaked out at the prospect of a BG protected DT and all voted on him first and argued against him. Hard to say. I think Ace did himself no favors so he was suspicious enough that all of his voters might have been innocent. I don't think we can draw conclusions from it. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 27 2009 13:59 BloodyC0bbler wrote: because my specialty was removed from the game, so instead im opting to be lame I however have given insight, in how to win this fight yes its all in rhyme, but its not like being annoyings a crime As mayor, I hereby decree that it IS a crime, ex post facto even. You are now under arrest and I'm printing wanted posters with Chezinu's mugshot. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 27 2009 18:28 motbob wrote: Also, last game I pushed the idea that Foolishness was the town MVP pretty hard in the secret mafia forum. For this reason I am positive that one of the following is mafia: Chezinu, Pyrr, RoL. Foolishness has not done anything special enough in this game to merit a night kill and the only reason that he would be killed would be because of a good reputation from previous games. I'm convinced that only those 3 people would have the feeling that Foolishness is dangerous to mafia. I was really impressed with how Foolishness helped me win the last two games. Oh wait, we weren't on the same team either game. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 28 2009 03:00 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: lol yeah Motbob, you were shouting about how great foolishness was and he WAS performing well for a day. But then he went to shit, got a bad lynch then we either killed him or the town lynched him. Can't remember. I dunno I just remember how I somehow got away with killing BC with his help. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 28 2009 12:26 Shikyo wrote: Umm... L roleclaimed Veteran. Or what do you mean? No riddles please, it's way too late Was talking to L, not you. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 28 2009 12:39 Shikyo wrote: Expecting hosts to take necessary actions. ruh roh | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 28 2009 13:11 SugiuraMidori wrote: Let me put this as clearly and succinctly as possible so that you guys can perhaps finally get it... IF YOU SUSPECT REDTOOTH YOU HAVE TO SUSPECT VIVI AND VICE VERSA Please kill these mafia already... I keep asking why you keep repeating this. Is it that they have been voting identically? | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 28 2009 22:20 Shikyo wrote: Right now, I don't really see how Chezinu is mafia, at least more than like Vivi. Care to explain? Also that PM. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 28 2009 22:51 motbob wrote: He's being blatantly useless in all his posts, which is what he did when he was mafia. Maybe he does that all the time. I guess the question is what is he doing in this brown forum thing. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On October 30 2009 11:00 Chezinu wrote: Why are you the way that you are. I hate so much of the things you choose to be... <3 Michael Scott! I love that quote! | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 02 2009 11:13 motbob wrote: ...I got the old team (you and Pyrr) to vote for Chez and you want to kill me? There are better lynch candidates. Hell, based on the fact that I pretty much singlehandedly got a mafia lynched I thought I was hovering around "confirmed town" levels. How did you get me to vote Chez? We never discussed that, or anything really. My vote for Chez was mostly based on his voting behavior which was pointed out to me by someone on IM. I don't remember who, it must have been BC or RoL since that's who I talk to on IM. The part that stuck out the most was how he said he wanted Tricode to be mayor but not pardoner, or vice-versa. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 02 2009 11:48 Tricode wrote: I think that was someone else who said that they wanted me to be mayor not pardoner. But meh, we got Chez lol, so always a good thing. "3. Sorry tricode but I don't want you to be pardoner" Is what he said. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 03 2009 13:09 Amber[LighT] wrote: Not to put a hole in your plan and I'm just saying this to speculate to the moron mafia team who didn't think of this awesome plan on Day 1 but wouldn't it have been a good idea for the mafia to originally make a member of their crew a bodyguard and give him the godfather rule, thus allowing him to pick the bodyguard role and forever stay hidden? It's what I would have done. I definitely hadn't thought about that. Way to shoot yourself in the foot! | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 04 2009 10:08 Scamp wrote: I had to check the PM I sent you. Re-reading it, I didn't really make it clear as to the intent of the PM. It was more so that someone had the info that Infun claimed medic and protected L the night he claimed he got hit and protected by a medic. I wasn't fully convinced, though, that Infun wasn't just using me to go after L. Oh sorry you're right. Since your PM I have found out that there was another medic protecting L that had sent his PM in at the very start of the day so that part of L's story checks out. Unless the person who claimed medic to me is lying. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Original post in spoiler, it's confusingly vague. + Show Spoiler + One votes, two votes, I don't give a shit I just don't get why it keeps changing. It's counts for 1 day 1, then 2 day 2, just figure out what your rules are and stick to it. I think it is true that in previous games the mayor has had votes doubled on double lynch days; however, this game, the rules state "You gain one extra vote for lynch voting. " It also says "This means everyone gets two votes to distribute between two different people. " Doesn't say "everyone but the mayor". Given that he's counted it as 1 all day it doesn't seem fair to double it at the last minute. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 04 2009 11:33 Ace wrote: ... honestly if everyone gets 2 votes why wouldn't your votes be doubled? v_v Because the rules don't say I do? | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Infundibulum protted L the night L claimed to have been saved by a medic. But Infundi didn't get a PM. But RoL also protted L that night and earlier so he blocked that hit: (5:24:29 PM)RoL: yoyoyo (5:24:37 PM) Pyrry: hey (5:24:47 PM)RoL: (5:24:51 PM)RoL: YOU CHOSE HER OVER ME? (5:25:05 PM) Pyrry: shes a girrrrrrl (5:25:14 PM)RoL: bros (5:25:16 PM)RoL: b4 hoez (5:25:18 PM) Pyrry: oh (5:25:23 PM) Pyrry: i thought it was hoez before bros (5:25:31 PM)RoL: u r ridic bro (5:25:35 PM)RoL: lawl (5:25:43 PM)RoL: actually they are all good candidates (5:25:45 PM)RoL: I juts figured (5:25:50 PM)RoL: give Shikyo one more day to prove hes a DT (5:25:53 PM)RoL: or off with his head (5:26:27 PM) Pyrry: 3 DTs? doubt it (5:27:24 PM) Pyrry: i thought it unlikely we had 2 (5:27:41 PM)RoL: I thought two (5:27:44 PM)RoL: three seemed a stretch (5:27:47 PM)RoL: especailly with two medics? (5:27:50 PM)RoL: like wtf? (5:27:53 PM)RoL: almost all blue roles (5:27:54 PM)RoL: what are you? (5:27:59 PM)RoL: twony? (5:28:13 PM) Pyrry: yea (5:31:35 PM)RoL: yay (5:31:41 PM)RoL: well I had that right :d (5:31:49 PM)RoL: what do you think of my list? (5:32:21 PM) Pyrry: yeah checkin amber is probably a good idea (5:33:56 PM) Pyrry: we know for sure we have 2 medics? (5:34:23 PM) Pyrry: did sugi get killed before or after infundi (5:37:19 PM)RoL: lol dude (5:37:22 PM)RoL: I am the second medic (5:37:25 PM)RoL: and I send in my protections (5:37:27 PM)RoL: immediately. (5:38:18 PM) Pyrry: what does the sending in protections immediately mean (5:38:21 PM) Pyrry: i mean like (5:38:25 PM) Pyrry: when has it came into play (5:42:19 PM)RoL: for SugDori (5:42:22 PM)RoL: as soon as it became night (5:42:27 PM)RoL: I read the post and already knew hours before (5:42:29 PM)RoL: I was protecting her (5:42:32 PM)RoL: because she claimed (5:42:35 PM)RoL: as soon as I saw the post (5:42:37 PM)RoL: I PMed Qatol (5:42:39 PM)RoL: or Ver (5:42:40 PM)RoL: or whoever (5:42:45 PM)RoL: title PROTECT (5:42:48 PM)RoL: content of PM (5:42:51 PM)RoL: Sugmidori (5:43:04 PM)RoL: probably minutes after the post every time (5:43:05 PM)RoL: I have my action in (5:43:08 PM)RoL: and I don't flipflop (5:43:30 PM) Pyrry: ya but like (5:43:38 PM) Pyrry: did you learn anything from it like (5:43:47 PM) Pyrry: I dunno (5:43:51 PM)RoL: I was the one who protected L (5:44:00 PM)RoL: So I checked the kills (5:44:02 PM)RoL: PMed him (5:44:06 PM)RoL: then realized exactly what happened (5:44:14 PM)RoL: and realized I couldn't trust him 100% (5:44:24 PM)RoL: because DF was the one that attacked him most likely (5:44:30 PM)RoL: so I made him go public (5:44:32 PM)RoL: and say I called to him (5:44:37 PM)RoL: which could be why I am still alive (5:44:45 PM)RoL: I think either him or shikyo are GF (5:44:48 PM)RoL: most likely shikyo now (5:44:59 PM)RoL: although his role is odd (5:45:04 PM) Pyrry: well we'll find out soon lol (5:45:06 PM)RoL: he would of had to choose DT (5:45:19 PM)RoL: which seems less likely (5:45:21 PM)RoL: then calling vet (5:45:23 PM) Pyrry: hmm well I kind of thought ace might have chosen DT earlier (5:45:29 PM)RoL: as GF? (5:45:38 PM) Pyrry: er faked it (5:45:44 PM) Pyrry: i mean (5:46:04 PM) Pyrry: a lot easier to fake this game (5:47:11 PM)RoL: yeah (5:47:14 PM)RoL: medic vet or DT (5:47:16 PM)RoL: are all viable now (5:47:20 PM) Pyrry: I'd lol if we had 3 and i don't doubt midori (5:47:20 PM)RoL: although the thing is (5:47:23 PM)RoL: it seems like Shikyo (5:47:26 PM)RoL: is trying to stay insane (5:47:30 PM)RoL: forgetting checks and stuff (5:47:37 PM) Pyrry: mmm (5:47:51 PM)RoL: midori was definitely hit (5:47:53 PM)RoL: the other night (5:47:54 PM) Pyrry: goin rogue as they say (5:48:02 PM)RoL: and I doubt mafia would hit themselves. (5:48:07 PM) Pyrry: mm yeah that would confirm her id think (5:48:18 PM) Pyrry: dont think a vig would have hit her (5:49:40 PM) Pyrry: Farfetch'd is so cuute | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Yalp. | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 07 2009 11:23 Vivi57 wrote: Whoever said that with the vet plan if no vet claimed, the gf could claim vet later just won a cookie. Should I PM you my address or are you gonna back pedal and say you were kidding? | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
| ||