|
On July 31 2012 04:37 vdale wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2012 04:34 l10f wrote:On July 31 2012 04:30 vdale wrote:On July 31 2012 04:23 Raelcun wrote:On July 31 2012 04:20 ExceeD_DreaM wrote: The german fencer should have just given up the bout... What was wrong with her anyway jumping up and down and handshaking a person who is obviously completely broken by a retarded call?
Edit: Mafe, of course... I am just talking about as in calls made. I am sure such things will never happen again! It's difficult to have an accurate sense of time when in such an intense moment like that, she had adrenaline pumping through her veins and probably thought she did it. Additionally to that the reason the Korean almost won was because she was given the advantage after a coin-flip. I don't think any fencer would give the win away in that situation. But to be fair she would have fought differently if she had to score to win rather than just not get hit. Yeah sure, but I mean it definitely didn't help the German fencer to feel like the Korean deserved to win. The Korean wasn't fencing just to 'not get hit' she was fencing to get the point as well. Getting points from counter attacks is just as legitimate as those from attacks.
|
On July 31 2012 12:32 OpTicalRH wrote:BBC, are you fucking kidding me? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/33RQ4.jpg) Messing with Park Tae Hwan with ridiculous DSQ affecting his mentality and performance. Then Korean judoka Cho Joon Ho wins JUDO 3:0 decision of 3 judgement and Japan audiences jeer and high officer calls them JAPAN WON! Now with this fencing issues where 1 second is magically lengthened due to clock error followed up with disrespecting Shin on twitter. This olympics is fucking disgusting for Koreans.
did that twitter post really happen? checking it now and it seems its gone. real shame.. Zzz
|
On July 31 2012 14:01 vasculaR wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2012 12:32 OpTicalRH wrote:BBC, are you fucking kidding me? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/33RQ4.jpg) Messing with Park Tae Hwan with ridiculous DSQ affecting his mentality and performance. Then Korean judoka Cho Joon Ho wins JUDO 3:0 decision of 3 judgement and Japan audiences jeer and high officer calls them JAPAN WON! Now with this fencing issues where 1 second is magically lengthened due to clock error followed up with disrespecting Shin on twitter. This olympics is fucking disgusting for Koreans. did that twitter post really happen? checking it now and it seems its gone. real shame.. Zzz
It's not the first time BBC deletes tweets.
|
United States1719 Posts
On July 31 2012 14:01 vasculaR wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2012 12:32 OpTicalRH wrote:+ Show Spoiler +BBC, are you fucking kidding me? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/33RQ4.jpg) Messing with Park Tae Hwan with ridiculous DSQ affecting his mentality and performance. Then Korean judoka Cho Joon Ho wins JUDO 3:0 decision of 3 judgement and Japan audiences jeer and high officer calls them JAPAN WON! Now with this fencing issues where 1 second is magically lengthened due to clock error followed up with disrespecting Shin on twitter. This olympics is fucking disgusting for Koreans. did that twitter post really happen? checking it now and it seems its gone. real shame.. Zzz it's still up there
|
On July 31 2012 14:09 Grettin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2012 14:01 vasculaR wrote:On July 31 2012 12:32 OpTicalRH wrote:BBC, are you fucking kidding me? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/33RQ4.jpg) Messing with Park Tae Hwan with ridiculous DSQ affecting his mentality and performance. Then Korean judoka Cho Joon Ho wins JUDO 3:0 decision of 3 judgement and Japan audiences jeer and high officer calls them JAPAN WON! Now with this fencing issues where 1 second is magically lengthened due to clock error followed up with disrespecting Shin on twitter. This olympics is fucking disgusting for Koreans. did that twitter post really happen? checking it now and it seems its gone. real shame.. Zzz It's not the first time BBC deletes tweets.
I know.. BBC getting to me now.. cannot stand some of the reporters. I wish they would be more sincere in congratulating the winner from other countries before rambling on about GB's chances yada yada yada. One that springs to my mind is the reporter who interviewed the A.Vino guy right after he won the road race.
|
i know nothing of fencing and its very hard to find an unbiased article on the web.
can someone explain to me what exactly happened? a clock malfunction?
|
On July 31 2012 14:01 vasculaR wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On July 31 2012 12:32 OpTicalRH wrote:BBC, are you fucking kidding me? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/33RQ4.jpg) Messing with Park Tae Hwan with ridiculous DSQ affecting his mentality and performance. Then Korean judoka Cho Joon Ho wins JUDO 3:0 decision of 3 judgement and Japan audiences jeer and high officer calls them JAPAN WON! Now with this fencing issues where 1 second is magically lengthened due to clock error followed up with disrespecting Shin on twitter. This olympics is fucking disgusting for Koreans. did that twitter post really happen? checking it now and it seems its gone. real shame.. Zzz
Yeah I guess it was deleted. the person responsible for the twitter seems to be a total idiot. Apparently the rules require you to stay inside till the conflict is resolved. On twitter he made it look like the player was creating problems by not leaving.
What happened(from a news article I read): Time was up, sk fencer was ahead, but the ding ding didnt go off because the ringer was stuck, and hence it rang a second later..but within that second the german fencer struck a blow that put her ahead,while technically the game was over.
|
On July 31 2012 13:26 lisward wrote: I disagree that priority is a coinflip. Anyone who's fenced for a priority bout know's that the winner of the outcome is hardly 'random'.
Priority is given before the 1 minute bout if fenced so that the fencers don't drag out the match forever. It doesn't matter if your opponent is given priority or not, because in the 1 minute you are fencing, both fencers have equal chances of scoring a point.
There is no 'defender's advantage' in Epee, the reason why you were seeing Shin and the Gold medalist fence with a lot of counter attacks is due in part to the nature of their fencing style, when you post with a French grip most of the time you have to fence a counter attack-ish style because you lose a lot of strength and precision in your blade work. At the highest level of fencing, there is no 'mental' advantage to priority as well, you can never count on bleeding one minute, it was entirely Britta's fault that she let the match go to the last 3 seconds and was force to fleche every second. It didn't matter did it? She won anyway.
This so much.
I think the problem right now with all the media attention is the fact that fencing's rules are complicated to begin with and the sport itself isn't "mainstream" at all. I think a lot of the media aren't even thinking properly about the situation.
I watched the priority fight over and over for a good half hour. IMO, although the decision to make the run an extra second is questionable, I don't find it ridiculous that one second "went forever." I've been in situations many times where I wasn't able to get past a certain time mark because of how quickly I was getting hit as soon as the clock started. I'm surprised a lot of people were surprised at the fact that the 1 second was lasting forever. I thought it was one of the most normal things in the world.
The bigger issue was the fact that the German was WAAAAAYYY to close during the last few seconds of the bout during En garde. And the fact that Shin didn't keep protesting the fact that the distance was way to close.
Priority isn't a coinflip. A good fencer will just fence regardless of priority. There are no defender's advantages. Can't be. Everything is equal, bar the priority. And really, that's just a mentality thing. The better fencer will come out on top regardless.
|
On July 31 2012 15:20 dartoo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2012 14:01 vasculaR wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On July 31 2012 12:32 OpTicalRH wrote:BBC, are you fucking kidding me? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/33RQ4.jpg) Messing with Park Tae Hwan with ridiculous DSQ affecting his mentality and performance. Then Korean judoka Cho Joon Ho wins JUDO 3:0 decision of 3 judgement and Japan audiences jeer and high officer calls them JAPAN WON! Now with this fencing issues where 1 second is magically lengthened due to clock error followed up with disrespecting Shin on twitter. This olympics is fucking disgusting for Koreans. did that twitter post really happen? checking it now and it seems its gone. real shame.. Zzz Yeah I guess it was deleted. the person responsible for the twitter seems to be a total idiot. Apparently the rules require you to stay inside till the conflict is resolved. On twitter he made it look like the player was creating problems by not leaving. She was forced to stay inside the competition area while she waited for the official complain to go through, however she was not forced to stay on the track. I let you interpret her decision the way you want.
|
On July 31 2012 15:51 nohbrows wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2012 13:26 lisward wrote: I disagree that priority is a coinflip. Anyone who's fenced for a priority bout know's that the winner of the outcome is hardly 'random'.
Priority is given before the 1 minute bout if fenced so that the fencers don't drag out the match forever. It doesn't matter if your opponent is given priority or not, because in the 1 minute you are fencing, both fencers have equal chances of scoring a point.
There is no 'defender's advantage' in Epee, the reason why you were seeing Shin and the Gold medalist fence with a lot of counter attacks is due in part to the nature of their fencing style, when you post with a French grip most of the time you have to fence a counter attack-ish style because you lose a lot of strength and precision in your blade work. At the highest level of fencing, there is no 'mental' advantage to priority as well, you can never count on bleeding one minute, it was entirely Britta's fault that she let the match go to the last 3 seconds and was force to fleche every second. It didn't matter did it? She won anyway.
This so much. I think the problem right now with all the media attention is the fact that fencing's rules are complicated to begin with and the sport itself isn't "mainstream" at all. I think a lot of the media aren't even thinking properly about the situation. I watched the priority fight over and over for a good half hour. IMO, although the decision to make the run an extra second is questionable, I don't find it ridiculous that one second "went forever." I've been in situations many times where I wasn't able to get past a certain time mark because of how quickly I was getting hit as soon as the clock started. I'm surprised a lot of people were surprised at the fact that the 1 second was lasting forever. I thought it was one of the most normal things in the world. The bigger issue was the fact that the German was WAAAAAYYY to close during the last few seconds of the bout during En garde. And the fact that Shin didn't keep protesting the fact that the distance was way to close. Priority isn't a coinflip. A good fencer will just fence regardless of priority. There are no defender's advantages. Can't be. Everything is equal, bar the priority. And really, that's just a mentality thing. The better fencer will come out on top regardless. I love how everyone is using the word coin flip like this is some screwed up Starcraft match up. Ask any professional fencer, no one complains about priority, it isn't a big deal, if the other guy get's priority, just win the fucking match.
|
On July 31 2012 13:40 ExceeD_DreaM wrote:http://sports.news.nate.com/view/20120731n08922?mid=s1315&cid=370312Look at this moron all excited and worked up.. I am just glad that there are thousands, (I've never seen more support on yahoo articles, like 5000 thumbs up for each comment) of people supporting Shin and agreeing how ridiculous it was, both the decision, and German fencer's reaction.
whatever the fencer's reaction was, it's no where as dumb as your post.
|
Hum, i'm wondering why it's "Epee" in english and not just "Sword"? Someone knows?
|
its not a sword :D its a very special kind of weapon, maybe rapier would work for a translation.
Also, this advantage thing is no biggie. Just look how even people who dont have the advantage are quite happy to let the referee cut like 3 minutes from their time by being idle.
|
|
But it was 5:5, I mean the Korean was given an advantage with the coin flip, right? Why is it fair that the German girl loses if its a draw? Koreans have a long history of 'everyone is against us/us against the system/we lost because of a Japanese conspiracy' mentality when sports are concerned. Hearing comments like 'Europeans helping Europeans' is bull, seriously, anyone that lives on this continent will laugh at you. Officials who have been with fencing for most of their lives came to a decision after 30 minutes of consulting and yet people who haven't held a sword in their lives have all of the sudden become leet-haxor fencing masters who 'know injustice when they see it'. It seems as though everything is within the rules of fencing except for the fact that the German was starting way too close. This used to be a nice family thread with two pages
|
On July 31 2012 20:53 LaNague wrote: its not a sword :D Epee literally means 'sword' in French, though it does imply the more triangular cross-section blade that is used for dueling/fencing.
|
Oota vs Cassara was really entertaining :D
|
On July 31 2012 22:47 ahappystar wrote:But it was 5:5, I mean the Korean was given an advantage with the coin flip, right? Why is it fair that the German girl loses if its a draw? Koreans have a long history of 'everyone is against us/us against the system/we lost because of a Japanese conspiracy' mentality when sports are concerned. Hearing comments like 'Europeans helping Europeans' is bull, seriously, anyone that lives on this continent will laugh at you. Officials who have been with fencing for most of their lives came to a decision after 30 minutes of consulting and yet people who haven't held a sword in their lives have all of the sudden become leet-haxor fencing masters who 'know injustice when they see it'. It seems as though everything is within the rules of fencing except for the fact that the German was starting way too close. This used to be a nice family thread with two pages  Because you're not supposed to let it go to a draw, this isn't some gymnastics sport, this is a combat sport, where someone has to win. The priority rule is supposed to punish fencers who refuse to fence.
|
On July 31 2012 22:47 ahappystar wrote:Officials who have been with fencing for most of their lives came to a decision after 30 minutes of consulting and yet people who haven't held a sword in their lives have all of the sudden become leet-haxor fencing masters who 'know injustice when they see it'. This used to be a nice family thread with two pages 
I was watching whole "30" minutes of "consulting" and the end was nowhere to be seen till some "boss" came and said basically - "Why should we care, it doesn't matter" and suddenly everything is decided.
|
This Korean Choi is quite exciting to watch ^^
|
|
|
|