EPTOn March 09 2011 01:22 Mogwai wrote:
dun worry guys, I have it from Grackis that Irelia is not OP.
dun worry guys, I have it from Grackis that Irelia is not OP.
Funny how all the people who dont go for an early Trifoce say she's not OP...
[Champion] Irelia - Page 12
| Forum Index > LoL Strategy |
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
Funny how all the people who dont go for an early Trifoce say she's not OP... | ||
|
necrosed
Brazil885 Posts
Merc Treads, Triforce, tank items, rape. | ||
|
ghen
United States1356 Posts
| ||
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Glacierz
United States1245 Posts
| ||
|
Kaniol
Poland5551 Posts
EU build of "max W first and go for attack speed items" (aka the "Irelia actually is not imba" build) and US build of "max W last and go for crazy e+q burst improved by triforce -> tank" (aka "MUST BAN IRELIA" build) | ||
|
Glacierz
United States1245 Posts
On March 10 2011 07:01 Kaniol wrote: From what i've seen there are (actually used to be 1+ month ago, back when noone banned her) 2 most popular Irelia builds: EU build of "max W first and go for attack speed items" (aka the "Irelia actually is not imba" build) and US build of "max W last and go for crazy e+q burst improved by triforce -> tank" (aka "MUST BAN IRELIA" build) Isn't that EU build the same as jungle build? | ||
|
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
On March 10 2011 07:04 Glacierz wrote: Isn't that EU build the same as jungle build? Yep. Wriggles -> wits end is the main thing in that build and it has good sustained dps but it's definitely not as good as trinity -> tank. | ||
|
gtrsrs
United States9109 Posts
trust me | ||
|
necrosed
Brazil885 Posts
On March 10 2011 07:04 Glacierz wrote: Isn't that EU build the same as jungle build? Maxing W first, then E is still quite the burst, specially by using W+Q. She just tears people apart. | ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
| ||
|
necrosed
Brazil885 Posts
And btw, rushing sheen on jungle isn't bad. | ||
|
Kaniol
Poland5551 Posts
Why delay her godmode? | ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
| ||
|
gtrsrs
United States9109 Posts
how do you feel about mana crystal + 2 pot open on her for superfast sheen + more mana to Q with? is teemo a viable counterpick to irelia? i feel like if teemo sits in his creeps and hits you twice + a Q every time you Q a creep, he'll win the lane. if you try to fight he blinds you and kites you. shrooms prevent you from comboing him at 6 or 7 and save him from ganks. what say you? | ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
like, Q -> E -> autoattack -> W will typically net you 2 sheen procs (1 off the Q, 1 off the W) if you just faceroll W -> Q -> E -> autoattack, you'll only get 1 sheen proc, but you will get 2 extra W procs (Q and autoattack). now that I'm looking at that though, W first probably makes sense as soon as you have 2 or 3 points in it, since a sheen proc really only grants you an extra 50-80ish damage (depending on level) which is affected by armor whereas a level 2 W getting 2 extra procs gives you an extra 60 true damage. So as soon as you have level 2 W, it's probably in your best interests to just faceroll W -> Q -> E even though it doesn't proc sheen as often. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On April 21 2011 03:23 zulu_nation8 wrote: Thoughts on maxing W before Q or E in lane? Or Q > W = E? Maxing W first is horrible. You need the better E duration, that's for sure. Bladesurge also is almost useless in any teambattle before it's rank 5 because of how the cd scaling works. That's why, although maxing W might seem tempting, you're going to have to max Q second and are left with a trashy E. Maxing W would be ok if you didn't need max Q and E as soon as possible. As is, they're too important. If you do max W, then for the love of god max Q second and leave E at rank 1. | ||
| ||
