| Forum Index > Legacy of the Void |
|
Beliskner
111 Posts
Like the Ravager upgrades, I'd like to see some Disruptor upgrades in the Robo Bay that would be fun. Much like the Reaver which was Robo's mainstay had 2 upgrades. Not sure but maybe the ability to hit air/muta's? Robo feels like it needs something like that, although the new PO could suffice. Stasis ward hitting air would be pretty cool too. | ||
|
Quakecomm
United States344 Posts
| ||
|
TelecoM
United States10861 Posts
I have no idea. | ||
|
SmileZerg
United States543 Posts
On September 04 2015 09:19 Energizer wrote: What probably astounds me the most is the buff to carriers... like they need any help. It was a nerf, not a buff. Try reading more carefully next time before complaining that Blizzard doesn't know what they're doing. | ||
|
NyxNax
United States227 Posts
Second : The tank fire delay when dropping.... I mean are you serious.... Isnt the whole point in picking up a sieged tank so theres no fire delay?? MAKE THE DELAY WHEN PICKING THE TANK UP!? Seems a bit obvious but I donno.. Like a .5 to .75 delay in picking it up, just show a little animation of a cable(with a magnet) picking it up? Ok thats my first impression, seeing as I cant play it I'll make note I could be wrong.. Now that I think about it more though, when actually playing, having the tank fire delay makes it easier to micro, rather than having your medivac pause to pick up the sieged tank. So I suppose I'll amend this by saying I think the delay picking up the tank makes more sense(to me), but the tank fire delay will be easier. I suppose just even a slight .25-.50 delay pickin it up might be just enough pause to get a couple hits off on the tank and rinse/repeat - eventually push it back. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20344 Posts
Protoss Zealot Zealot Charge damage decreased from 30 to 8. Don't zealots already do like 6-8 damage when charging because of their regular attack? Is this just in addition to that? | ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On September 04 2015 09:54 Cyro wrote: Don't zealots already do like 6-8 damage when charging because of their regular attack? Is this just in addition to that? They have a regular attack when charging. So what this should do is make them do an overall of 24damage. Instead of what blizzard originally wanted (30) and what they accidently implemented (46). | ||
|
Pseudorandom
United States120 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20344 Posts
On September 04 2015 09:56 Big J wrote: They have a regular attack when charging. So what this should do is make them do an overall of 24damage. Instead of what blizzard originally had (30) and what they accidently implemented (46). Cool. That colossus buff isn't gonna be enough i feel. Seems like the extreme ranges and damage from liberator/ravager would make them worth a lot less even if the LOTV colossus didn't have hugely reduced damage and competed better with the Reaver. I'm ~55 games deep into legacy archon GM with a ~73% ratio and i have not seen a Colossus yet. Why would you build them? | ||
|
_Epi_
Germany158 Posts
| ||
|
HmmmCookies
Canada34 Posts
| ||
|
NKexquisite
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20344 Posts
I like this patch a lot. T and P have to give much more thinking into macromechanics. There is no Mule Hammer anymore, there is no easy way of photonovercharge anymore. In combination with new warpin rules this seems to be great! Chrono will help, but being a 1 click mechanic instead of something you throw out every 30-35 seconds per nexus is both easier and less entertaining IMO. Photon Overcharge hasn't really been a notable factor in many of my games recently, unlike HOTS | ||
|
_Epi_
Germany158 Posts
On September 04 2015 10:06 Cyro wrote: Chrono will help, but being a 1 click mechanic instead of something you throw out every 30-35 seconds per nexus is both easier and less entertaining IMO. Photon Overcharge hasn't really been a notable factor in many of my games recently, unlike HOTS You can kill a pylon much easier than a nexus, so you have to think more about pylonplacement and which pylon to overcharge to not lose the ability because of losing that pylon. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20344 Posts
On September 04 2015 10:07 _Epi_ wrote: You can kill a pylon much easier than a nexus, so you have to think more about pylonplacement and which pylon to overcharge to not lose the ability because of losing that pylon. We have like 3 pylons against the nexus anyway because they have to be close so they can warp in without it taking half a year. At 25 energy a cast you can probably drop 3 of them as well | ||
|
_Epi_
Germany158 Posts
On September 04 2015 10:09 Cyro wrote: We have like 3 pylons against the nexus anyway because they have to be close so they can warp in without it taking half a year. At 25 energy a cast you can probably drop 3 of them as well since the range decreased a lot you can walk around them if they are placed badly | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20344 Posts
On September 04 2015 10:11 _Epi_ wrote: since the range decreased a lot you can walk around them if they are placed badly Sure, you can walk around photon cannons too. Pretty much the same thing | ||
|
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
To me it doesn't sound like you'd ever really WANT an observer, as the invisibility doesn't seem to outway the resourcefulness of an oracle, and the overall sense of Stargate > Robo. This last part is coming from a zerg who mostly watches LotV rather than plays, so its possibly off the mark but its my initial observations. | ||
|
Cluster__
United States328 Posts
| ||
|
Feisty
Vatican City State35 Posts
Mule change is really interesting to me. I wonder if your natural is close enough on some maps that you could send your main mule to the natural to mine more efficiently or after your main mins mine out completely. I need to go ladder now. | ||
| ||
StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
|
EPT
