• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:34
CEST 05:34
KST 12:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection2Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview5[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)7
Community News
[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June0Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th150Weekly Cups (May 18-24): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League6
StarCraft 2
General
The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser Valorant Anti-Cheat: New Measures Against Unfair My starcraft 2 changes StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 528 Infection Detected Welcome to the External Content forum Mutation # 527 Hell Train
Brood War
General
FlaSh's ASL S21 Finals Review BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Tesagi Viewer - A new era of replay watching 14k games analyzed: Cross Spawn Nexus first good? VPN experiences
Tourneys
[ASL21] Grand Finals [BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How cold is too cold to be outdoors? Dating: How's your luck? Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esportsmanship: How to NOT B…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4634 users

TLO's thoughts: The LotV ultralisk

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
158 CommentsPost a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Liquid`TLO
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Germany767 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-24 14:52:53
June 23 2015 23:09 GMT
#1

Ultralisk in Review

by TLO




Hello everyone! In the light of the latest discussion about the new armor reducing ghost ability I'd like to share my opinion on the topic. In my opinion, Blizzard is trying to find a counter intuitive solution to a problem they unnecessarily created themselves. First I'd like to compare the old and new ultralisk with and without the armor reducing drone; I'll be using a maxed upgrade scenario for both the marine and the marauder


The Stats:


Marine vs Ultra:
HotS: 500hp / 3 damage = 167 hits
LotV: 500hp / 1 damage = 500 hits
Lotv + Drone 500hp / 4 damage = 125 hits
Not having a drone available will reduce the efficiency of a marine to 25%


Marauder vs Ultra:
HotS: 500hp / 20 damage = 25 hits
LotV: 500hp / 10 damage = 50 hits
Lotv + Drone: 500hp / 16 damage = 32 hits
Not having a drone available will the reduce efficiency of a marauder to 62.5%


Game Design:
It strikes me as poor design that whether a fight will be won or lost by Terran will mostly depend on having an armor reducing drone. The major deciding factors should be micro, positioning, and lastly composition. Composition however, shouldn't be all or nothing based on a single ability tailored towards a single unit. There's not any smart decisions to be made, it's just getting a ghost in time or not. It's incredibly frustrating and anti-fun having to deal with an almost indestructible unit because you missed your window. It's too severe a punishment that in my opinion feels like another chore added to the game that you need to take care off; instead of rewarding good play, you get punished for poor play.

Lastly, the scenario in which Terran does have the drone doesn't look very different from HotS. (Marine: 167 to 125/Marauder: 25 to 23). I suppose it adds another timing window, but that's not what StarCraft II needs in my opinion, especially not one that makes you feel completely helpless in case you miss it as Terran.

Narration:
The new ghost ability introduces a new but also unique concept into the game. Armor reduction doesn't exist yet and will most likely be limited to this niche scenario. The game is already happening at lightning speed and it's difficult for casters to tell viewers about all the details that decide a fight. The anti-armor drone adds another, unnecessary complexity to fights. Positioning and army control is usually far more obvious than an ability that changes one of the most ''hidden'' stats of a unit.

Counter suggestion:
I'm purely ball parking here but I want to show a rough idea of where I think the ultralisk should be going in LotV. I believe we're trying to achieve a more dynamic game that is trying to move away from deathball a-moving towards smaller skirmishes and multiple battlefields, so here's my idea:

      The 2/3 Ultralisk

  • HP: 500 -> 335

  • Attack: 35(+3) -> 25(+3)

  • Armor: 1+3+2 = 6

  • Minerals: 300 -> 200

  • Gas: 200 -> 125

  • Supply: 6 -> 4

  • Decrease size to 2/3

  • Reduce creep modifier from 1,3 -> 1,15

  • Improve off creep speed by 5% from 2,9531 to 3,1

  • New On creep speed from: 3,83903 -> 3,396065

  • Decrease damage point from 0.3332 to 0.167



Ultralisks tend to over-perform on creep and do poorly off creep, so I'd like to address this issue by making them slower on and faster off creep. Decreasing the damage point for ultralisks would also be beneficial to make them more reactive and micro friendly.

I don't believe the new LotV ultralisk is a very fun unit. So instead I'd like to see Blizzard try out a smaller version of the ultralisk. It's slightly faster off creep and slower on creep than before. This might allow Zerg to use ultralisks in several locations and in combination with zergling hit-squads to give late game harass some more punch while making ultralisks less frustrating to control. It could provide the ultralisk with the buff it deserves while not improving it in direct confrontation in which it excels already.


Sidenote:
As for the Ghost, just a random thought. How about instead the drone, give them a 100 or 125 energy blinding grenade that can temporarily disable a detector. Cause you know, we haven't seen enough Nukes since I switched to Zerg.
Thanks for reading!


Regards,

Dario

Writer: TLO
Editor: Jer99, The_Templar, Whitewing, SC2John, NovemberstOrm
Facebook Twitter Reddit
Team Liquidalea iacta est
Espers
Profile Joined August 2009
United Kingdom606 Posts
June 23 2015 23:12 GMT
#2
agreed. a cheaper, faster, less bulky ultralisk is the way to go.
Qwyn
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2779 Posts
June 23 2015 23:14 GMT
#3
I have long, long wanted an ultralisk with those stats.

Thanks for the writeup, TLO's assessment of the new ghost ability feels spot on. Just feels like a bandaid fix.
"Think of the hysteria following the realization that they consciously consume babies and raise the dead people from their graves" - N0
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9438 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-24 15:23:52
June 23 2015 23:16 GMT
#4
I agree with the analysis (as most others do), but I am not sure you really need that many other changes (like changing HP). I think all it needs is higher off creep movement speed and lower model size (from its HOTS state).
Athenau
Profile Joined March 2015
571 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-23 23:20:48
June 23 2015 23:19 GMT
#5
Hmm, where are those Marauder numbers coming from?

LotV Marauder with +3 upgrades = 2x(5+5+3 - 8) = 10 damage, not 16.

For what it's worth, I agree with the overall analysis.
banjoetheredskin
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
United States744 Posts
June 23 2015 23:38 GMT
#6
With the decreased size, I'm assuming that also means you want to get rid of the massive tag? Or leave it because it should still be able to crush force fields?
Writer#1 CJ fan | http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/508947-wcs-dreamhack-austin-interviews
Pontius Pirate
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
United States1557 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-23 23:42:00
June 23 2015 23:40 GMT
#7
It feels weird to disagree with TLO, but I'd much rather see the emphasis continue to be placed on making the Ultralisk an extremely beefy, yet somewhat unwieldy unit, and one that performs significantly better if you can engage in open terrain, rather than chokes. The Ghost ability is way too specific in this instance, yes. But it could be altered to become a positional tool in itself and add much to the game.

Change the effect from reducing armor by 3 to just giving a flat buff to all attacks hitting the targeted unit by 3, and it can gain use against units such as Hellbats, Archons, Queens, and Mutalisks, which are all units that could conceivably be involved in engagements before their armor reaches 3. Protoss units in general have a tendency of engaging during the Ghost phase of TvP before their shields have reached 3 armor. Increase the duration to about 30 seconds, and the drone would also need some more HP in order to survive long enough to make a difference in a long, back and forth fight. At this point in time, you've created something resembling an offensive PDD, in that it helps you DPS down high priority targets within a certain area. Yes, this slightly treads on the toes of the Liberator, but it's a bit quicker and used as part of a different sort of composition, one that requires additional units to make the most of the opportunities the drone provides.

Needless to say, it should not be out of the question to test out a 7 armor Ultralisk, since the 8 armor Ultralisk is proving to cause some extremely hard-counter oriented fights.
"I had to close the door so my parents wouldn't judge me." - ZombieGrub during the ShitfaceTradeTV stream
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16074 Posts
June 23 2015 23:42 GMT
#8
So he basically just said what everyone one else is also saying.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-23 23:47:57
June 23 2015 23:45 GMT
#9
I honestly dont like TLO idea and i disagree with him, mainly because the new ultra that has better micro would still be shut down by marauders and marines just like HotS. Ultras melt so fast.

Also why would anyone use this new Ultralisk with those stats instead of using Lurkers ?

I like the ghost ability its very good against Immortals and Ultras, also for once it forces the Terran to finally get a tier 3 bio unit instead of spamming MMM against Ultralisks.

Ultralisk/Corrupters/Ling/Bling vs Liberator/Ghost/Marine/Medivac is a fun balanced match.

If i were to give Ultralisk something its the tower ability, also fix his derpy pathing and increase its speed off creep and make it slower on creep.



"The Fractured but Whole"
TheWinks
Profile Joined July 2011
United States572 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-23 23:50:32
June 23 2015 23:50 GMT
#10
On June 24 2015 08:40 Pontius Pirate wrote:
It feels weird to disagree with TLO, but I'd much rather see the emphasis continue to be placed on making the Ultralisk an extremely beefy, yet somewhat unwieldy unit, and one that performs significantly better if you can engage in open terrain, rather than chokes.

This is already true of the HotS ultra. Why does it need to be stronger and beefier?
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16074 Posts
June 23 2015 23:52 GMT
#11
On June 24 2015 08:45 ZergLingShepherd1 wrote:
I honestly dont like TLO idea and i disagree with him, mainly because the new ultra that has better micro would still be shut down by marauders and marines just like HotS. Ultras melt so fast.

Also why would anyone use this new Ultralisk with those stats instead of using Lurkers ?

I like the ghost ability its very good against Immortals and Ultras, also for once it forces the Terran to finally get a tier 3 bio unit instead of spamming MMM against Ultralisks.

Ultralisk/Corrupters/Ling/Bling vs Liberator/Ghost/Marine/Medivac is a fun balanced match.

If i were to give Ultralisk something its the tower ability, also fix his derpy pathing and increase its speed off creep and make it slower on creep.


pls we both know this argument is bullshit.
In current tvz it's marine marauder medivac mine thor vs ling bane muta ultra (infestor). Please count how many tier 1, tier 2 and tier 3 units both races use and then speak again.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Pontius Pirate
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
United States1557 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-24 00:02:34
June 23 2015 23:54 GMT
#12
On June 24 2015 08:50 TheWinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2015 08:40 Pontius Pirate wrote:
It feels weird to disagree with TLO, but I'd much rather see the emphasis continue to be placed on making the Ultralisk an extremely beefy, yet somewhat unwieldy unit, and one that performs significantly better if you can engage in open terrain, rather than chokes.

This is already true of the HotS ultra. Why does it need to be stronger and beefier?

Because it doesn't function properly in said role with its HotS stats, particularly against Terran bio, because Marauders tear through them too fast. Whereas in LotV, Marauders do a more reasonable amount to them, but Marines do so little that they're almost worthless. I strongly agree with their philosophy behind the change, I just think that the current numbers and counterplay need more work.
"I had to close the door so my parents wouldn't judge me." - ZombieGrub during the ShitfaceTradeTV stream
TheWinks
Profile Joined July 2011
United States572 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-23 23:57:17
June 23 2015 23:57 GMT
#13
On June 24 2015 08:54 Pontius Pirate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2015 08:50 TheWinks wrote:
On June 24 2015 08:40 Pontius Pirate wrote:
It feels weird to disagree with TLO, but I'd much rather see the emphasis continue to be placed on making the Ultralisk an extremely beefy, yet somewhat unwieldy unit, and one that performs significantly better if you can engage in open terrain, rather than chokes.

This is already true of the HotS ultra. Why does it need to be stronger and beefier?

Because it doesn't function properly in said role with its HotS stats, particularly against Terran bio, because Marauders tear through them too fast. Whereas in LotV, Marauders do a more reasonable amount to them, but Marines do so little that they're almost worthless. I strong agree with their philosophy behind the change, I just think that the current numbers and counterplay need more work.

Do HotS ultras add to the power of the zerg army? I'd argue yes, it's a net power increase. That's why you see them built. I don't think buffing them for the sake of buffing them is a good idea unless you're going to restructure the lategame on both sides. With the nerfed marauder they were already significantly stronger in Legacy to the point where it might have been a balance problem with 6 armor instead of 8!
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16074 Posts
June 24 2015 00:00 GMT
#14
On June 24 2015 08:54 Pontius Pirate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2015 08:50 TheWinks wrote:
On June 24 2015 08:40 Pontius Pirate wrote:
It feels weird to disagree with TLO, but I'd much rather see the emphasis continue to be placed on making the Ultralisk an extremely beefy, yet somewhat unwieldy unit, and one that performs significantly better if you can engage in open terrain, rather than chokes.

This is already true of the HotS ultra. Why does it need to be stronger and beefier?

Because it doesn't function properly in said role with its HotS stats, particularly against Terran bio, because Marauders tear through them too fast. Whereas in LotV, Marauders do a more reasonable amount to them, but Marines do so little that they're almost worthless. I strong agree with their philosophy behind the change, I just think that the current numbers and counterplay need more work.

That's not true. ultras often look bad in tvz because they are such a huge investment that most players who tech to them to early can't afford much support for them and alone they die to marauders.
If a zerg manages to stabilize on hive and 3/3 with ultras and infestors + a big ling bane army it becomes extremely hard to win for terran. Buff ultras any more and zvt lategame will be a freewin.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
FrostedMiniWheats
Profile Joined August 2010
United States30730 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-24 00:05:09
June 24 2015 00:03 GMT
#15
Keep these coming, it's always nice to hear pro perspective on LotV. Thank you TLO.

I like the idea, but just about anything sounds better than lazily giving the ultralisk 8 armor. Personally, I'd like to see them revert the ultralisk to its HotS form but give it some sort of new passive ability to compensate rather than just adjust the stats.
NesTea | Mvp | MC | Leenock | Losira | Gumiho | DRG | Taeja | Jinro | Stephano | Thorzain | Sen | Idra |Polt | Bomber | Symbol | Squirtle | Fantasy | Jaedong | Maru | sOs | Seed | ByuN | ByuL | Neeb| Scarlett | Rogue | IM forever
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany16074 Posts
June 24 2015 00:05 GMT
#16
On June 24 2015 09:03 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
Keep these coming, it's always nice to hear pro perspective on LotV. Thank you TLO.

I like the idea, but just about anything sounds better than lazily giving the ultralisk 8 armor. Personally, I'd like to see them revert the ultralisk to its HotS form but give it some sort of new passive effect to compensate.

passive effect? why not an active ability? Maybe something like a spell you have to activate and then your ultras do 10% more damage for 5 seconds. I should work for blizzard!
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
June 24 2015 00:08 GMT
#17
Thanks for posting. I agree that the ghost ability feels forced and artificial. LIke, they made this change to the ultra for who knows what reasons, then they realise the change is too powerful, so they introduce a new ability that literally reverts the buff they gave the ultra. I mean... Just revert both changes at that point, and everyone will be happy? However, I don't quite see the point of your counter proposal either. :/

So the purpose of the 2/3 ultra is to make it smaller so that it will be easier to fit them in for harass? But at the same time they do less damage, so they won't do more damage per surface area. I don't understand how decreasing all values is supposed achieves less deathballs and more harass. Do you mean that it'll be easier for the ultra to reach the terran bases because they are smaller, but in larger numbers?

Be aware that decreasing the creep bonus reduced the defenders advantage for both sides (harder for zerg to defend with slower ultras on creep, harder to defend for terran with faster ultras off creep), making the matchup more volatile. I can see how faster off creep makes it easier to harass, but as a melee unit, it also makes it much stronger in a straight up fight.
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-24 00:09:38
June 24 2015 00:08 GMT
#18
On June 24 2015 08:52 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2015 08:45 ZergLingShepherd1 wrote:
I honestly dont like TLO idea and i disagree with him, mainly because the new ultra that has better micro would still be shut down by marauders and marines just like HotS. Ultras melt so fast.

Also why would anyone use this new Ultralisk with those stats instead of using Lurkers ?

I like the ghost ability its very good against Immortals and Ultras, also for once it forces the Terran to finally get a tier 3 bio unit instead of spamming MMM against Ultralisks.

Ultralisk/Corrupters/Ling/Bling vs Liberator/Ghost/Marine/Medivac is a fun balanced match.

If i were to give Ultralisk something its the tower ability, also fix his derpy pathing and increase its speed off creep and make it slower on creep.


pls we both know this argument is bullshit.
In current tvz it's marine marauder medivac mine thor vs ling bane muta ultra (infestor). Please count how many tier 1, tier 2 and tier 3 units both races use and then speak again.


Its not BS, not all matches are like that.

Ultralisk/Corrupters/Ling/Bling vs Liberator/Ghost/Marine/Medivac is a real thing, play more in the beta if you didnt got to see that or watch more tournaments.

Also most openers are medivacs/tanks and zerg forced into 2 base muta, and some people are still going turtle mech and then change into mass cyclone/hellions/vikings cuz its very hard to deal with that in late game.
"The Fractured but Whole"
Pontius Pirate
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
United States1557 Posts
June 24 2015 00:11 GMT
#19
On June 24 2015 09:03 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
Keep these coming, it's always nice to hear pro perspective on LotV. Thank you TLO.

I like the idea, but just about anything sounds better than lazily giving the ultralisk 8 armor. Personally, I'd like to see them revert the ultralisk to its HotS form but give it some sort of new passive ability to compensate rather than just adjust the stats.

What was the one that never went into a live build, but made them step over Zerglings and Banelings and block all splash damage to those units that they walked over? Was that "monarch plating"?
"I had to close the door so my parents wouldn't judge me." - ZombieGrub during the ShitfaceTradeTV stream
ZergLingShepherd1
Profile Joined June 2015
404 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-24 00:17:09
June 24 2015 00:13 GMT
#20
On June 24 2015 09:05 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 24 2015 09:03 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
Keep these coming, it's always nice to hear pro perspective on LotV. Thank you TLO.

I like the idea, but just about anything sounds better than lazily giving the ultralisk 8 armor. Personally, I'd like to see them revert the ultralisk to its HotS form but give it some sort of new passive effect to compensate.

passive effect? why not an active ability? Maybe something like a spell you have to activate and then your ultras do 10% more damage for 5 seconds. I should work for blizzard!


There was burrow charge, it was fun and good to use but Terran with Protoss complained and it got removed.
So yeah you guys dont like things no matter what mostly.
"The Fractured but Whole"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
WardiTV Mondays #83
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ROOTCatZ 215
RuFF_SC2 207
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 5174
Calm 1185
Leta 120
Noble 58
Bale 46
IntoTheRainbow 8
League of Legends
JimRising 805
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1105
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox550
Other Games
summit1g10518
C9.Mang0607
PiGStarcraft524
WinterStarcraft402
Hui .178
Maynarde141
ViBE57
kaitlyn25
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV294
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo564
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 27m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
11h 27m
Maestros of the Game
11h 57m
Clem vs Lambo
Zoun vs SKillous
Replay Cast
20h 27m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
Solar vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 11h
Grudge Match
1d 12h
FlaShFTW vs A.Alm
OSC
1d 17h
GSL
2 days
herO vs Rogue
Maru vs Cure
Patches Events
2 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KK 2v2 League Season 1
RSL Revival: Season 5
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
Maestros of the Game 2
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
2026 GSL S2
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026

Upcoming

BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Heroes Pulsing #3
Heroes Pulsing #2
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.