EPT[Patch 1.0.0.152: Preseason 3] General Discussion - Page 201
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
| ||
|
kongoline
6318 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:25 Slayer91 wrote: positive in the gay musical type of way though lmao | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
On December 14 2012 02:21 obesechicken13 wrote: I think it's a .4 ratio (soon to be .3) for Teemo's E You're not counting the DoT. Keep in mind we're talking about a situation where getting the AoE auto attack is inconsistent and therefore the DoT is important. In terms of how good Teemo is really IDK I haven't played him in a real game in ages. I just think that if anyone was going to be able to use runaan's in it's current state it would be Teemo first. Maybe I'm mistaken though. | ||
|
barbsq
United States5348 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:21 PrinceXizor wrote: One of my friends was banned for saying nothing but "gl hf" "gg" and ping missing ect ect. since you don't see what the report was for in tribunal it's all pointless anyway. tribunal doesn't work. it catches the people riot would have caught anyway, and a bunch of others. Eh? Isn't that the point of the system? To catch people that riot wouldn't otherwise catch? Given the current size of the player base, I kinda doubt that riot can actually handle the sheer volume of reports by themselves. In any case, reports are not always about what a player said. I can go into a game, say nothing but gl hf, and gg but still be massively annoying in other ways. It also highlights the importance of writing descriptions in the reports as well, as those ARE seen in the tribunal cases. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On December 14 2012 02:21 obesechicken13 wrote: I think it's a .4 ratio (soon to be .3) for Teemo's E Also someone said Kennen's W only counts on the primary target. The total damage is 0.8 including the DoT. 0.4 is simply the flat damage done each hit. The point being that with everyone moving around constantly you aren't likely to consistently hit people, but on Teemo that matters less because of the DoT damage. | ||
|
kongoline
6318 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:33 wei2coolman wrote: It still baffles me how people actually get banned >.> its easy to rage in 1-2 games in span of 100games if play a lot, some butthurt feeding kid who you called bad reports you then add fake reports which happen in almost every game, tribunal bots punishing everyone and here it is, u get banned | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:35 kongoline wrote: its easy to rage in 1-2 games in span of 100games if play a lot, add fake reports which happen in almost every game and tribunal bots punishing everyone and here it is, u get banned That's the thing; personally, I've definitely flamed my share people, and in quite a large portion of my games (not of recent, but especially my first 1000 games or so). Still haven't been banned. Which makes me find it hilarious that someone actually ends up being banned. I mean you'd have to be so fucking atrociously bad at the game, and completely toxic to actually get banned in this game; it's actually unfathomable how full retard or terrible you must be to get banned in this... And this is coming from a guy who's one of those dudes on the mic flaming people the entire time back in the days of cs 1.5 | ||
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:29 PrinceXizor wrote: I don't think leaving an entire community known for it's bad behavior and rage in charge of dealing with cases of rage is a good idea. trial by jury is far different than a mass anonymous vote. you screen jurors, you don't screen tribunal spammers. I would definitely think that 20-30% of bans from the tribunal are people who should not be banned. which is an unacceptable margin, hell anything above 2% should be unacceptable, one in fifty cases is already ridiculously bad, and it's definitely above that. Yeah... I get what you're saying. And I was over-simplifying like crazy. But I think I'd still prefer the community to not-the-community, even if they suck. I dunno. Maybe that's naive. | ||
|
Kickboxer
Slovenia1308 Posts
| ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:33 wei2coolman wrote: It still baffles me how people actually get banned >.> It's pretty random.I've reporting a certain guy for 3 weeks now who has flamed the entire game or just afk-ed and he still isn't banned.Meanwhile a friend I duoq with got banned yesterday and when I read the case all he did was call someone a retard or just generally tell people what to do.I've noticed a lot of bans for people being bossy.Which is what I think anyone who actually wants to win has to be so it's just a matter of time before you get smashed by the banhammer. Also I didn't think people at higher elo are just nicer to play with but I'm just sure of it after last few days.Either I am super lucky or just people just stopped spamming in chat and started screaming at their screen.Other than a rengar/zed who went a combined 0/12 by 9 minutes and didn't say a single word whole game(which we won rofl) all teammates have been decent >.>. | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
Kupon3ss
時の回廊10066 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:33 Seuss wrote: The total damage is 0.8 including the DoT. 0.4 is simply the flat damage done each hit. The point being that with everyone moving around constantly you aren't likely to consistently hit people, but on Teemo that matters less because of the DoT damage. It's decent on Teemo, but it'd almost have to come after liandry + cdr + void staff which means by the time u'd get it you're already on like 250 ap by which point you might as well just get a hat instead on normal kog it's pretty subpar, but on AP cog its quite amazing | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:51 onlywonderboy wrote: Trundle is getting the next visual update. Seems like an odd choice since no one really plays him. Popularity doesn't seem a particularly convincing argument against a visual rework. The real reason this is an odd choice is because Sivir has had the worst model in the game since forever. The Janna, Soraka, and Katarina models pre-rework were at least close to as bad, but there's seriously nothing else that's close. You can at least argue that maybe they want to make Karma more visually appealing (inc boob job), but I don't really understand what about Trundle's current model or look needs an update. Also, when they inevitably remake Nunu I'm totally gunning for Willump to just eat the kid and move on. Like, I totally don't even register he's there, the Yeti is the important part. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On December 14 2012 03:57 Seuss wrote: Also, when they inevitably remake Nunu I'm totally gunning for Willump to just eat the kid and move on. Like, I totally don't even register he's there, the Yeti is the important part. But the kid is the one that talks in the voice lines. Willump just grunts incoherently. | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On December 14 2012 04:01 TheYango wrote: Trundle doesn't need a visual upgrade, he just needs a new skin. But the kid is the one that talks in the voice lines. Willump just grunts incoherently. It works for Rammus. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On December 14 2012 04:01 TheYango wrote: Trundle doesn't need a visual upgrade, he just needs a new skin. But the kid is the one that talks in the voice lines. Willump just grunts incoherently. This, pretty much. Although his skills definitely need to be looked at; he's fallen waaayyyyy behind given the jungler power creep (and nerf to debuffs affecting jungle monsters). | ||
| ||
