EPT[Patch 1.0.0.148: Kha'Zix] General Discussion - Page 139
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
AsnSensation
Germany24009 Posts
| ||
|
Craton
United States17281 Posts
| ||
|
Zizoz
United States232 Posts
| ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
Forgive me if it's a stupid question, just trying to think about the game more. | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
On October 10 2012 08:14 AsnSensation wrote: wow salce #1 malphite ults one person and that person is the outragous support taric. Sounds like an iG play. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
Also Scarra says Sej' ult is one of the longest (it is, with Galio, Amumu and now Karthus), goes on to build sunfire and another belt but no cdr.  Also I'm getting an error message when I want to spectate the game spectated by a friend, "active game can't be found". Is it because, for example, he stays on the endscreen, thus still being "spectating" in the friendlist, while the game itself has ended? | ||
|
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
On October 10 2012 08:39 Node wrote: Something I've been wondering about lately: Why is it that when teams run 2v1 lanes, they send them top instead of mid? I think the essence of it is that it's a lot easier to deny top gold / xp than it is most AP mids -- but does that really outweigh the drawbacks of having your AD / support all the way out at top lane? I would think having them mid would bring more nifty benefits. (for instance, retaining the dragon control of having them bot, the map control of dropping mid tower quickly, easy ward placement at commonly used jungler routes, etc.) Forgive me if it's a stupid question, just trying to think about the game more. I've seen pro teams shift from 2v1 top to 2v1 mid after top tower goes down, but in earlier S2 games there were also a few 2v1 mids. I think the rationale for it top is that with the longer lane and against a melee character it's generally easier to push the tower, dive him under tower (or behind it), or just deny him farm. | ||
|
Craton
United States17281 Posts
| ||
|
kainzero
United States5211 Posts
| ||
|
Wetty
Australia419 Posts
| ||
|
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
But really, that picture doesn't do justice to oddone. ![[image loading]](http://www.originpc.com/Images/Landing/tsm/callouts-bwprofiles-nn4.png) Do young american team such as mme.ferus have solid sponsors ? | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
On October 10 2012 09:11 WhiteDog wrote: Solomid got another sponsor ("origin pc") it's raining money in their house. But really, that picture doesn't do justice to oddone. Do young american team such as mme.ferus have solid sponsors ? I'm not certain about any team's sponsors at the moment. With s3 coming up you'll see mid-tier NA teams who make into s3 get picked up by more known teams and/or pick up more sponsors. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On October 10 2012 07:18 Ryalnos wrote: Er, it seems like it'd be much better to choose a teamfight summoner (heal/exhaust) than smite... Most barons tend to come off a won teamfight anyway. The marginal security from a second smite on your team seems like a laughable reason to take it. I think that the extra smite in bot lane can be very valuable in securing dragon though. Seeing how passive most games are these days, that dragon gold can be pretty important. (plus, an extra 10 gp (plus minion) every minute is kind of significant to a support). But srsly, the only support I'd ever take smite on is Blitz. It synergizes with him so well. | ||
|
obesechicken13
United States10467 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On October 10 2012 09:26 obesechicken13 wrote: You guys think maybe riot matches you up with worse allies if you win a game? Like every time I play a coop vs AI vs intermediates on my smurf and lose as the only one on my team who's positive, the next game 2 of my allies do better than me. And yes shameful to lose to bots boo. Just random luck afaik.When I was leveling a smurf through ai games of get paired with level 30s one game and then level 10s the next.while other days I'd get straight low levels or straight 25+ | ||
Chexx
Korea (South)11232 Posts
its pretty sad how bad NA teams manage their pro life :< if its true what Scarra said. | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
Dgiese
United States2687 Posts
On October 10 2012 10:48 MooMooMugi wrote: Anyone else think DFG needs a nerf? Kinda ridic how a 60 sec cd item can do half your health instantly I know it's beyond stupid with eve. | ||
|
sob3k
United States7572 Posts
On October 10 2012 09:16 ticklishmusic wrote: I think that the extra smite in bot lane can be very valuable in securing dragon though. Seeing how passive most games are these days, that dragon gold can be pretty important. (plus, an extra 10 gp (plus minion) every minute is kind of significant to a support). But srsly, the only support I'd ever take smite on is Blitz. It synergizes with him so well. How often does dragon actually come down to a mid fight smite-off...like never, especially as people get better and learn to recognize when they can take and contest dragon, and when they need to gtfo. | ||
|
Craton
United States17281 Posts
| ||
| ||
