[Patch 1.0.0.148: Kha'Zix] General Discussion - Page 131

On October 09 2012 08:15 petered wrote:


Except that it is willfully given by another person rather than won. So actually it is nothing like elo or win rates. Wait, what was your point again?

On October 09 2012 08:35 bmn wrote:


You're playing a computer game. It all boils down to numbers. It's all arguably useless, unless you're earning your salary by playing; there's nothing wrong with caring about it.

On October 09 2012 07:16 Dark_Chill wrote:


Mid does have a pretty big effect on the game though. They have easier access to the other lanes than the other members of the team, and usually pack a good amount of cc to help the team out.

On October 09 2012 08:56 GranDim wrote:


It kind of worked..

On October 09 2012 09:16 ticklishmusic wrote:


heh heh. well there's no real use getting in an argument over which role is really the most important in a team game everyone has their own preference and playstyle.

On October 09 2012 09:01 phyvo wrote:


Archimedes IIRC thought that numbers were reality. dan dun DUUUN!!!!

In any case it's really easy for people to blow something like little numbers out of proportion. I'm not upset by numbers, I'm merely sadly shaking my head since I know that people (including myself, hence the blurb) often fail to see the forest of being nice to people for the tree of self-righteous achievement manifested in a number.

On October 09 2012 09:25 Requizen wrote:
It's also generally the reason Riot doesn't like Supports doing too much damage or being solo laners, because stupid utility + damage is a strong combination.

On October 09 2012 09:01 phyvo wrote:


Archimedes IIRC thought that numbers were reality. dan dun DUUUN!!!!

On October 09 2012 09:35 kainzero wrote:

I still don't get this design philosophy, especially if they don't want to "endorse" the meta. (Which also seems silly too, as during Worlds they were clearly identifying each player as their position when those positions are just conceived through the meta as well.)

I think it's cool to have characters who can do multiple roles, and the current heroes who can both mid and support are still obviously biased towards one role.

On October 09 2012 09:35 kainzero wrote:

I still don't get this design philosophy, especially if they don't want to "endorse" the meta. (Which also seems silly too, as during Worlds they were clearly identifying each player as their position when those positions are just conceived through the meta as well.)

I think it's cool to have characters who can do multiple roles, and the current heroes who can both mid and support are still obviously biased towards one role.

On October 09 2012 09:00 Ferrose wrote:


Not if you're a dick and people troll honor you.

On October 09 2012 09:54 Parnage wrote:
Naut support is so underground he's submerged. He's just as good as Leona support and he's got an anchor which in my book makes him better.

On October 09 2012 10:02 Craton wrote:

You are smoking some really good stuff to think Naut support is as strong as Leona.

On October 09 2012 10:12 Parnage wrote:



Leona's and Naut's spells are essentially just as good as the others when you take two seconds to consider it.

Her gapcloser is his pull and gapcloser
Her shield is his shield and dot to mobs
Her stun is his passive root
The ults are essentially a matter of travel time targeted versus a planted dodgeble ult.

The only real reason you'd play Leona over Naut is her passive being a damage boon. Even then Naut get's damage off with his shield on with the dot