[Patch 1.0.0.131: Ahri] General Discussion - Page 150

On December 23 2011 00:58 Hynda wrote:

But there is a hell of different situation when you have outlined rules that you can refer back to. Riot doesn't use that. A rioter is allowed to ban you cause he had a bad day and felt like punishing someone. I've never once stated that they can't do whatever the fuck they want to do. What started this was that I called Riots tribunal and banning staff a joke. Which is something I still hold firm to.

On December 23 2011 01:11 unichan wrote:

people don't want your criticism, deal with it
if you know what you did wrong and you don't want to be banned anymore then stop doing it
it's annoying as fuck when someone who thinks he's god at the game and believes he is clearly better than anyone else playing thinks he deserves to tell other people what they're doing wrong. contrary to popular belief, many players are actually aware of when they fucked up and they don't need you to rub it in their face.

On December 23 2011 01:13 Hynda wrote:

You seem to have missed the point entierly. I don't blame you for it but there isn't really anything I can respond to here, since it's not relevant.

On December 23 2011 01:15 unichan wrote:

cause i just skimmed through the last pages lol cause you wrote too much but i don't know why you're writing pages about why the system is flawed when you're clearly just mad you got banned

On December 23 2011 01:12 Alaric wrote:
Looks like a sustained dps mage to me. Probably not Swain or Ryze-level, as he has less damage spells and more burst in his ult, but I find him quite similar to them. Probably more suited to solotop than mid too, since the spotlight (I mean, not official SL, but that thing shown to IGN is obviously spotlight footage) showed that the shield return from his Q isn't instant, I can't see it being too useful to trade against other ranged champs. Not in lane harass at least, 600 range's pretty short too compared to most mid so he'd be hit before he's got his shield.

Also, low-CD protective single-target spell? Rylai please. Kiting Viktor with Rylai and Power Augment might be reminiscent of Vlad.

On December 23 2011 01:06 Hynda wrote:

So world of warcraft manages it
Starcraft manages it
CS manages it
Dota League manages it
Quake managed it
Broodwar managed it

but for League of Legends it's impossible to make proper non-vague outlines? What makes LoL unique.

And no I'm not taking his word untill i see every single of those replays, and yes I will do that. Bad work habit, but I know how to spot what needs to be spotted and then I will make up my mind about it. HOWEVER there should never ever be a need for anyone to feel like that, they should be told exactly what they got banned for.

On December 23 2011 01:16 Hynda wrote:
Yea I asumed so and that is fine. I don't expect people to put effort into reading something they are not interested in.
Lets ignore all the arguments and just say "lol u mad". I'm not taking your troll bait, however you are allowed to believe whatever you want.

On December 23 2011 01:28 Unentschieden wrote:
Hynda wants Riot to put up "clear" rules so he can "legally" yell at bad players. But that is exactly why the rules are vague, to give people like him no room to argue.

On December 23 2011 01:31 Hynda wrote:

trolololololololol

On December 23 2011 01:19 Requizen wrote:

Ooh, Rylai tanky-dps Viktor in top lane? Anyone without a dash gettin stunned. Rylai to slow, drop AoE, shoot lasers and laugh.

On December 23 2011 01:35 Unentschieden wrote:
Pendragon actually has a thread up right now where he promises to review Tribunal cases:

http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=18777530#18777530

I´m shure "trolololololololol" will be a strong argument, good luck.

On December 23 2011 01:29 unichan wrote:

yea this still doesn't explain why you believe you're allowed to be a jerk in game and not get banned just because the summoner's code is "vague"? or are you going to try to say that's not what you're saying at all

On December 23 2011 01:35 Unentschieden wrote:


Pendragon actually has a thread up right now where he promises to review Tribunal cases:

http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=18777530#18777530

I´m shure "trolololololololol" will be a strong argument, good luck.

On December 23 2011 01:38 Hynda wrote:
As for getting banned just for giving advice, was just an experiment just to show myself that the summoners code is way to vague and it's super easy to get banned even though you follow it word for word. That has nothing with my personal view of it, it has to do with my professional view of it. It's a joke from a professional standpoint.
From the experiment I concluded:

Player one following the code to a tee: Says A
Player two Breaks the code and tells that player to go fuck himself.
Player one gets banned, player two gets to plan on.
Why does player one get reported. Simply because people asume you're an asshole and only say stuff to be mean.


From a personal standpoint I have a much dimmer view. I hate that companies makes their players walk on eggshells around each other as if they can't take someone being ass, there is an ignore function. Use it. If people were allowed to be as much an absolute dick in chat as they wanted sure the ignore lists would be massive, but those that had valid things to say could communicate with eachother freely. Social Engineering.