General Discussion/Off-topic - Page 62
Forum Index > LoL General |
Vlanitak
Norway3045 Posts
| ||
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On November 26 2010 07:23 Psyonic_Reaver wrote: I've always run locket on Sona. How are people just NOW finding out it's a good item on her? Same. Without Locket, I run oom within 30 seconds during fights. With Locket I can go on for 5++ minutes without having to b for mana. Locket + Mercs and then whatever (AP, Defense, Auras, as well as ward spam of course). Also gives you sick survivability unless focused hard (which seems to happen to me more and more). | ||
Glasse
Canada1237 Posts
On November 26 2010 07:23 Psyonic_Reaver wrote: I've always run locket on Sona. How are people just NOW finding out it's a good item on her? people play sona without locket? wtf? the first time i played her i got a locket, can't live without it :3 its so perfect for her | ||
Brees
Marshall Islands3404 Posts
| ||
seppolevne
Canada1681 Posts
| ||
phyvo
United States5635 Posts
Zileas: "1200 in ranked corresponds to something like the top 25% of all players. Most people think they are a lot better than 1200, and 1300 might be like the top 10% of players... Players of course think that 1200 is 'average', and then are very surprised when they arent 1300, which they perceive as just 'a bit better than average" You heard it here guys. 1200 rating is top 25%. ... wow huh? | ||
TieN.nS)
United States2131 Posts
| ||
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
On November 26 2010 07:23 Psyonic_Reaver wrote: I've always run locket on Sona. How are people just NOW finding out it's a good item on her? LoL's + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + Too bad in the second vid my ult came up that second, and sona already died so used it on you just in case. Poor sona =( | ||
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
On November 26 2010 10:30 phyvo wrote: http://www.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?t=357933 You heard it here guys. 1200 rating is top 25%. ... wow huh? Lol at the 90% of the players who got a huge ego boost from this when they're still struggling to break out of 1300. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Lol at the 90% of the players who got a huge ego boost from this when they're still struggling to break out of 1300. ![]() This describes me perfectly. Except for the 1300 part. WE CAN'T ALL BE ON THE STARS TEAM , OKAY? | ||
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + I work when the game is happening. CAN'T SHOW OFF MY 1650+ BITCHESSSSSSSSS. | ||
Taurent
Canada401 Posts
is it standard to just stay all together after ~20mins and completly stop farming altogether ? | ||
gtrsrs
United States9109 Posts
On November 26 2010 10:30 phyvo wrote: http://www.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?t=357933 You heard it here guys. 1200 rating is top 25%. ... wow huh? it's so dumb to START someone at a ranking of top 25% though, like how does it make sense to have your initial ranking be so high? now with the being announced it's going to be even worse, because i remember at 1400 solo queue there were still tons of bads who had just gotten carried a few games in a row and thought they were hot shit. i'd later run into players at 900 who were like I'M STUCK IN ELO HELL FUUUUUU SO MANY FEEDERS I AM REALLY A 1400 PLAYER THIS SUCKS and i'd just be like wow well you're feeding at the 900 level soooo... and now they're gonna read this and be like I WAS 1400 I WAS TOP 5% OF PLAYERS THIS IS BULLSHIT I'M SO GOOD WAAAAAAH speaking of which, however, on my pursuit back up to 1500 i've stumbled upon the 1150-1300 crowd... holy shit now i remember why i tanked my elo in the first place. never have i ever seen so many wrong assumptions and decisions coupled with bad attitudes in a game. people think dumber shit at 1300 than they do at 900, i promise that. and the worse part is, since everyone at this level is ~1200+ they all THINK that they know how to play and so if you correct their bad decision ("rofl if you think ashe can't beat pantheon mid by opening long sword you're a noob" "lol i can tell you're bad at warwick because you think you need smite" "WHY ARE YOU FARMING TOP LANE TWITCH HELP THE TEAM JESUS STUPID WORTHLESS RAT") then they just flame you and turn the team against you, regardless of how you're doing. getting past 1400 might be harder than getting from 700 up to 1200 :| | ||
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
On November 26 2010 12:35 Taurent wrote: k i dont get it. im playing at lvl ~20, and in most games, about 20mins into the game my team is always all at mid, completely ignoring side lines/jungle, causing their team to also be all mid. so im usually out there farming, since theres no point in 5v5ing at a turret at lvl 10-12, but the abuse im getting is insane. is it standard to just stay all together after ~20mins and completly stop farming altogether ? [edit] Quote added to help clarify, sorry for the confusion, didn't expect a post to come inbetween the post above it and my response and I assumed you'd be able to figure it out anyway. My fault. [/edit] It really depends on what's going on in the game. If a tower is down and the opposing team is 5 manning your mid there's a good chance you should be there waiting for them to 5v5+tower you. There's nothing worse than your team getting aced because you're off farming and then losing towers mid because you can't stop the xv1 push. If it looks safe and there's just a lot of poking and threatening going on, ONE person should be running around to farm and threaten a turret to force them to disperse from mid. It's also somewhat acceptable to farm if you have a global ult like pantheon, TF or shen, but even then you should probably be near the mid. It is acceptable for your CARRY to go and farm while the other 4 hold the turret, but if they are 5 manning your mid tower you should try as hard as possible to have your 5 there to catch a mistake on their part. Really it's just getting a hang of when to stick together and when to go clear waves, and basically you want to be clearing the wave when there's no imminent danger of losing a tower or getting caught out of position for something like dragon or baron. It's also a lot safer to do if you have lots of wards. If I have a good initiator like Ashe/Morg/Gragas/Blitz/Amumu/Alistar on my team and the other team has only 4 and their mid tower, you better believe that I'm going to try and ace-1 them with my team by diving if I think I'll come out ahead or even (4 for 4 is fine because you're not there). | ||
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On November 26 2010 12:48 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote: It really depends on what's going on in the game. If a tower is down and the opposing team is 5 manning your mid there's a good chance you should be there waiting for them to 5v5+tower you. There's nothing worse than your team getting aced because you're off farming and then losing towers mid because you can't stop the xv1 push. If it looks safe and there's just a lot of poking and threatening going on, ONE person should be running around to farm and threaten a turret to force them to disperse from mid. It's also somewhat acceptable to farm if you have a global ult like pantheon, TF or shen, but even then you should probably be near the mid. It is acceptable for your CARRY to go and farm while the other 4 hold the turret, but if they are 5 manning your mid tower you should try as hard as possible to have your 5 there to catch a mistake on their part. Really it's just getting a hang of when to stick together and when to go clear waves, and basically you want to be clearing the wave when there's no imminent danger of losing a tower or getting caught out of position for something like dragon or baron. It's also a lot safer to do if you have lots of wards. If I have a good initiator like Ashe/Morg/Gragas/Blitz/Amumu/Alistar on my team and the other team has only 4 and their mid tower, you better believe that I'm going to try and ace-1 them with my team by diving if I think I'll come out ahead or even (4 for 4 is fine because you're not there). is this rant in response to the few words in the previous post concerning twitch? lol. Holy off topic batman | ||
Jupiter.sKy
United States50 Posts
On November 26 2010 13:18 UniversalSnip wrote: is this rant in response to the few words in the previous post concerning twitch? lol. Holy off topic batman He's talking about Taurent's post, lol | ||
crate
United States2474 Posts
On November 26 2010 12:48 gtrsrs wrote: it's so dumb to START someone at a ranking of top 25% though, like how does it make sense to have your initial ranking be so high? I think it's because only the top ~50% play ranked to begin with. So you start at the middle of the pack that's playing ranked. I think that's what Zileas is saying, but we don't really have any proof for this I suppose. | ||
Blitzkrieg0
United States13132 Posts
I just don't understand how people can get to level 30 and still not understand what last hitting is. If I had 10ELO for every time somebody decided they'd be the carry and ended up with less than 40 CS I'd be a 1600 player by now ^_^ | ||
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
On November 26 2010 14:30 Blitzkrieg0 wrote: I just don't understand how people can get to level 30 and still not understand what last hitting is. Ah, the beauty of the Elo system. | ||
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
Then carried another team 10/0/12 when did they change Kat's dagger to do magic damage? shiiiit that makes so many more viable AP kat builds possible nomnomnom. | ||
| ||